Sam, I use mutt at work to read mail from an IMAP store.
While I love mutts functionality, I must say that the its speed in processing IMAP stores strikes me as slow. I think this is because mutt doesn't seem to have any caching mechanism. As a result, each tim you open an imap subfolder you have to wait for it to spool th count. If you have a folder with lots of messages this can be a substantial wait time. If you archived locally and just kept y our inbox for initial reception it might not be too bad... On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:37:55PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote: > I'm considering switching to IMAP. How good is Mutt as an IMAP > client? I'm currently just accessing local mbox files directly, > but I'd like to be able to access my mail from other machines. > > Thanks, > Sam
msg23527/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
