Re: What's going on? (copies of messages...)

1999-09-09 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
Here is a script to use formail to remove dups: rm id-cache formail -q- -D 12000 id-cache mutt-lx ls -l mutt-l mutt-lx Just remember to copy the user id/gid before: mv mutt-lx mutt-l -- Later ... Rich Roth --- On-the-Net Direct: Box 927, Northampton,

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-18 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 05:06:02PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I also think we could expand this base a lot if pre-compiled DOS and/or > > W32 binaries were easily available. > > I think people using binaries aren't very likely to contribute. Maybe in raw percent, but the actual use wou

Re: A mutt problem or a samba problem?

1999-07-18 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 02:41:17PM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > I have played with a Win'95 server program that could be address from a Mutt > > mailcap, called 'doc server'. It's on one of the mutt resource pages - I > I was intending to play with this further too, but I was under the i

Re: A mutt problem or a samba problem?

1999-07-16 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
I can't directly answer your Q, but have a suggestion I use of a simplier way to address the problem. I setup a second pop mail box and configure my netscape browser to pick up email from that mailbox only SO if I want to handle html email or load a local attachement, I just bounce it from my m

Re: additional flags

1999-07-06 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
You might check out my slang language extensions, which allows adding an arbitrty headers and doing whatever you want with them (display, sort, tag, etc). I built a whole project/tag manager with them. It's all at: http://www.katn.com/opensw/#mutt The last version I did was 0.95

Re: smart spell checking and MIME magic

1999-06-30 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
You might check out aspell - much better spell checking logic, very BAD interface -- but it might be a solution and they keep improving the interface: http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/aspell -- Later ... Rich Roth --- On-the-Net Direct: Box 927, Northampton, MA 01061, Voice: 413-

Re: timezone calculations don't take new year into account

1999-06-14 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 10:52:51PM -0600, Tkil wrote: > | Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 21:10:28 +875400 > | X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e Thanks BUT VERY old news - this was (heavily) discussed (and fixed) right after the first (of Jan, 1999). -- Later ... Rich Roth --- On-the-Net Direct: Box 927, Northa

Re: Unfriendly terminal behaviour

1999-06-07 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 02:50:47PM -0400, rfi from Rich Roth wrote: > release see www.slang.org and the new release in: Sorry - that's http://www.s-lang.org -- Later ... Rich Roth --- On-the-Net Direct: Box 927, Northampton, MA 01061, Voice: 413-586-9668 Email: [EMAIL P

Re: Unfriendly terminal behaviour

1999-06-07 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
I think John answered it a few weeks ago - there is also a new development release see www.slang.org and the new release in: >From John (Jun-06-1999) Yesterday, I released version 1.3.7 of the slang library (and version 0.99-6 of jed). The library is available from: ftp://space.m

Re: Netscape question, related to URLview.

1999-06-07 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 12:23:27PM -0400, Jailbait wrote: > I run my instance of Netscape locally. > > I'd like to pass urls to the local NS from the remote urlview. > Has anyone done this? You can even get fancier with a small remote program provided by Netscape at: http://home.netscap

Re: archiving and tagging

1999-06-02 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 07:24:41AM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote: > I have a large mailbox of work mail, and I often move old messages out > to a corresponding compressed mailbox. There ought to be an easy way I have a similiar setup and solve it by rolling all my large mailboxes, inbox

Re: empty headers

1999-06-02 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 08:33:11PM +0800, Duncan Sargeant wrote: > solution. I was after builtin support, and the dummy letter will mean > I have to strip the headers manually if I don't want to use them. > > What I should have asked is: is there any reason why my_hdr doesn't > accept empty he

Re: empty headers

1999-06-02 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 11:13:07AM +0800, Duncan Sargeant wrote: > I'm looking for a way to put empty headers in an email messages so that > when I compose a new message, the header fields are there for me. ... > So that I can just fill in the header field when I edit my messages. As I recall, b

Re: MS Outlook Conversion

1999-06-01 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 11:45:33PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > from OE) to netscape mailbox, which I presume is mbox. I haven't tried > > it myself. > > Unfortunately netscape mailbox is nowhere near mbox :( Sure looks like it to me, the first line is a bit weird though, no host name >Fro

Re: S-MIME question

1999-05-13 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 11:06:47AM -0400, Jos Purvis wrote: > Hiya. I'm a rabid user of Mutt (ha, ha), and have been using it Ouch > signing features (the encryption would be used occasionally but not > exclusively). I don't know much about S-MIME, so forgive a silly > question, but do

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-11 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 10:28:22AM -0500, Kenny Elliott wrote: > My /usr/include/unistd.h simply does an "#include " and my > /usr/include/asm/unistd.h which is a link to > /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386/unistd.h has no mention of R_OK. Mine is a full file with the version comment of:

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-11 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 06:44:12PM -0500, Kenny Elliott wrote: > > > Thanks! I had to and and include for fcntl.h in compose.c, init.c, hook.c, ... > > This sounds like a config problem with your linux sources - normally fctnl.h > > is really in: > > > > /usr/include/ > > asm -> /usr/sr

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-10 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:59:04AM -0500, Kenny Elliott wrote: > > Not enough information. Which version of Linux? On my Linux systems, > > R_OK is defined in . > > You actually supplied enough information above for me to fix the problem. > Thanks! I had to and and include for fcntl.h in compo

Re: MS attachments

1999-05-04 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, May 03, 1999 at 07:52:45AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: > problem Let's say there's an incoming message with that has spaces > in the filename (yeah, I know...but some people seem to think it's a > good thing). In other words, something like this: > >begin 600 99 Travel Expense Rep

Re: S/mime

1999-04-27 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 01:11:35PM +0200, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote: > Is here a support for: > S/MIME Cryptographic Signature [applica/x-pkcs7-si, base64, 3.3K] Not at the moment - the supporting libraries have just been released in a format that can be used in Mutt and there has b

Re: Xterm cut-n-paste with mutt

1999-04-20 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 10:27:06AM +0300, Petri Kaukasoina wrote: > I have mutt with slang-1.2.2 in rxvt-2.19 and don't get any extra spaces > even when I copy and paste several lines at the same time. In xterm (from > XFree86 3.3.3.1) I do get the extra spaces. I forwarded this to the author of

Re: Xterm cut-n-paste with mutt

1999-04-19 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 10:48:51AM -0400, David Shaw wrote: > I am using mutt with s-lang, and I have noticed that if I do an xterm cut > and paste, I get the spaces at the end of each line. Normally, with an I have mutt/s-lang in rxvt (TERM=xterm) and do NOT get that effect - at least if I sta

FAQ/Web site maintance (Was: using $index_format in folder-hooks)

1999-04-13 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 01:58:04PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote: > P.S.: this is becoming an faq, do we have an active faq maintainer ? Which brings up the question of what happened to the expected web site enhancements ?? (www.mutt.org is still listing 0.95.1) -- Later ... Rich Roth ---

Re: How to deal with attached S/MIME?

1999-04-08 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 03:38:15PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > > My understanding is that you'd have to start from scratch - the tool > > kit is US/Gov developed and blocked from export. > > Thomas doesn't need to do so, because someone else did: That's what I was hoping - I have a probabl

Re: How to deal with attached S/MIME?

1999-04-08 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 12:34:47PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 1999-04-06 16:54:36 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > If I use `v' I can only see garbage there ... how can I deal with > > these signatures? is there anyway they can be checked as pgp/mime > > sigs are? > > Not yet. I'm

Re: pop support

1999-04-05 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 07:45:37AM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote: > Sure, I just wondered if the mail that is fetched from the pop host wanders > through sendmail or is directly put into some folder. Ah, very different Q - it's put directly in the main mail folder. -- Later ... Rich Roth ---

Re: pop support

1999-04-03 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 03:36:35PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: > Actually, there is some sort of POP magic that can be used to send mail > via the POP daemon. I don't know how widely supported it is. I suppose Never heard of it - Sounds like some nifty idea the spec writer threw in that no one ha

Re: pop support

1999-03-30 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:48:02PM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote: > does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via port 25? I think you have a mis-understanding of POP - pop has nothing to do with forwarding or, for that matter, sending email - and Mutt, does use a MTA (like

Re: preferred editor?...

1999-03-25 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 10:22:43PM -0500, Rocky Giannini wrote: > > Check out Jed - it has what you are talking about including the ability to > > program special handling you like using a builtin C-like language. > > Does anyone know if there is a way to make jed spell-check an entire message >

Re: redundant file formats2txt

1999-03-12 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 11:37:11AM -0800, Brandon Long wrote: > > text/enriched; /home/binde/bin/rtfreader %s; copiousoutput ... > rtfreader program I know about actually reads application/ms-rtf or the Do you have a location for this program ?? -- Later ... Rich Roth --- On-the-Net D

Re: saving uuencoded files with "spaces" in the name

1999-03-10 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 08:29:58AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 1999-03-09 21:12:55 -0600, Josh Hildebrand wrote: > > > The times when I get just the first word of the filename saved is > > when I do a '| uudecode' (without -o and the filename). > > This is obviously a problem with the ver

Re: saving uuencoded files with "spaces" in the name

1999-03-09 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 12:54:50AM -0600, Josh Hildebrand wrote: > Certainly there is either a way to tell mutt to handle the spaces properly, > or to create a macro that grabs the file name with > > | head -1 | cut -d ' ' -f 3- > > and then runs uudecode -o on it.. I'm not sure how to do that

Re: ANNOUNCE: aladalcurm.py (was: Re: Switching to mutt)

1999-03-08 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 07:49:31PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > The script is called aladalcurm.py. > [ALl ADresses ALiassed with CURses Menu] > It is written using Python (http://www.python.org) and curses. Personally it's way to clever for me to remember - how about 'take-email.py'

Re: preferred editor?...

1999-03-08 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 10:58:52AM -0500, Randall Hopper wrote: > On that thread, which support WYSIWYG text/enriched composition with Mutt? I think that is on the table for someone to write. -- Later ... Rich Roth --- On-the-Net Direct: Box 927, Northampton, MA 01061, Voice: 413-586-9668

Re: preferred editor?...

1999-03-08 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 12:01:29PM +, John Poltorak wrote: > Which editor do mutt users generally recommend for creating emails? > > I would prefer something which works fairly intuitively using a PC > keyboard - ie uses cursor keys, PgUp, PgDn, Home, End etc..., > and use of colour would b

Re: 0.95.3: How to use äöüßÄÖÜßâêîôûàèìòùáéíóúÂÊÎÔÛÀÈÌÒÙÁÉÍÓÚ

1999-03-03 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 10:57:01AM +0100, Dirk Foersterling wrote: > You already know me ;-} I'm upgrading from 0.79... > > I have problems with the following characters (and probably more that I > didn't try): > > äöüßÄÖÜâêîôûàèìòùáéíóúÂÊÎÔÛÀÈÌÒÙÁÉÍÓÚ > > (Two lines if you can't display them

Re: PGP unknown

1999-03-01 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 12:31:19PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Once that's out of the way, try again; if that fails, we'll dig in to > > your .muttrc settings. > > This may not be a muttrc problem. Perhaps Mutt was built with no PGP >

Re: extracting encoded prtion from mail messages - offtopic

1999-02-23 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 09:45:02AM +0200, Eric Smith wrote: > I am trying to extract binary attachments (say a .doc file or whatever) > from a mail folder. This process must be automated in a script. Now my Check out 'Metamail' - it's the package used by most unix email clients to do a lot of

Re: Trying Mutt (fwd)

1999-02-22 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 02:48:32PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote: > I am currently a Pine user and would like to tryout mutt. > Question > Can I use my existing /home/rjpp/mail/file/folder setup.? If yes what has > to be set in .muttrc, so far I can only get mutt to see the empty file > rjpp in

Re: Bold and underline using backspace.

1999-02-18 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 03:04:57PM -0800, Brandon Long wrote: > You can also use text/enriched messages instead of text/plain. To each > their own. With text/enriched, at least, most modern mailers have a > chance of handling it. Are you saying that Mutt will display text/enriched with colo

Re: mailing list madness

1999-02-12 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 11:25:56PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: > This whole mailing list situation is really silly. When Michael Elkins > ran the lists at Harvey Mudd College, they were open, and there was > practically no spam. The new maintainer has admitted that the reason The world is no

Re: Duplicate mails - recovering

1999-02-03 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
Just a note: If you didn't have formail -D in your .procmailrc file To clear the dups try: ls -l mutt-l formail -q- -D 8192 id-cache mutt-fixed mv mutt-fixed mutt-l # make sure to set the owners right cho

Re: Mail mode for Jed

1999-02-01 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 02:33:30PM +, Patrick Colbeck wrote: > I used to have a bit of slang code that would give highlighting of headers > etc in Jed when using it as an editor called from Mutt. Unfortunately I > forgot to archive it before I reinstalled my PC and can't find it on the Net >

Re: Problems with mutt and editor in Terminal

1999-01-28 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
Personally I just use jed and it works fine run from a rxvt window or directly. -- Later ... Rich Roth --- On-the-Net Direct: Box 927, Northampton, MA 01061, Voice: 413-586-9668 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Url: http://www.on-the-net.com ~~~ www.i-depth.com lets you Add