[Sorry for the slow reply. It took me a while to find time to create
the FAQ on this.]
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 03:21:29PM -0400, Michael Sanders wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:02:25PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > But does this work with Mozilla (the current version is now 0.9.3)?
>
>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:17:07AM +0100, Redak, Dorian wrote:
> Thanks for the hint.
> I'm using qmail's sendmail wrapper. The sendmail binary is executable and
> all qmail processes are running.
Do you have dsn_notify or dsn_return enabled? If so, don't. qmail
doesn't support DSN.
Brian
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 07:07:28PM -0500, Steve Bankowitz wrote:
> Brian D. Winters [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 03:19:30PM -0500, Steve Bankowitz wrote:
> > > (pretty standard stuff.) But every once and a while I would like to
> > > jump back
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 03:19:30PM -0500, Steve Bankowitz wrote:
> (pretty standard stuff.) But every once and a while I would like to
> jump back to Mutt to check a message. Since I'm running screen I
> thought, ``Oh, I'll just spawn vim off in another screen and then jump
> back to mutt if nee
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 05:19:00PM +, Nollaig MacKenzie wrote:
> Actually, mutt is cute about this. If I'm reading
> =Lists/mutt-users [aka /home/nollaig/mail/Lists/mutt-users]
> and do
>
> :set folder=~/tmp
>
> mutt continues to show me =Lists/mutt-users, and typing
I would guess that mutt
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 12:37:20AM +1000, Darrin Mison wrote:
> Why doesn't this work?
> save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
I could be wrong, I believe you want (untested):
save-hook '~s fm-news' =freshmeat_list
> It insists on saving mesages to =noreply in stead of =freshmeat_list
>
> <>To
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 04:04:13PM -0700, Peter Jaques wrote:
> has anyone gotten muttzilla working on freebsd? when i click a mailto link
> now, nothing at all happens, not even console complaints from netscape.
First off, muttzilla now has its own mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secondly, ye
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:34:36AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:37:31AM -0500, Pete Robie wrote:
>
> > Hello, I am kind of new to the list and was looking for information on
> > blocking a domain (user level, not admin) within Mutt. We are running
> > Qmail (as I know t
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 11:56:08AM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> Hi, I'm running debian 2.2 woody and I just did apt-get install
> muttzilla and sure enough there was a debian muttzilla package, which
One of these days I should check out the various muttzilla packages I
keep hearing about. Among o
FYI: It looks like I may finally have the time to work on muttzilla
again. I'm setting up muttzilla with sourceforge. -users and
-announce mailing lists are up, but the CVS repository hasn't been
populated yet. Hopefully there will be a slightly more user-friendly
version available soon.
Anyw
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 01:48:26PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Brian D. Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000:
> > 2) Add an "auto_add_maildir_lines" option.
>
...
> I don't think this even needs to be an option, or is there some bad
> pe
(I checked the archives, and although this has been asked before, no
one had a good answer. Hopefully someone will have a better idea this
time around, or I missed the answer in the archives.)
I use maildirs, but I prefer to see lines rather than sizes in the
message index. I've been using the
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:27:56PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> |preline -f /usr/bin/procmail
I'm not sure about the -f. I don't use it in my .qmail, but based on
the description in the man page I don't see why it would cause
procmail to fail either. My guess would be that you are having
procm
> I am currently looking how to achieve procmail filtering via Qmail, but
Have you tried:
|preline procmail
in your .qmail file? (I believe that this is in the qmail
documentation somewhere.)
> in the mean time, why is there a (0) byte indication in the index of
> every message that comes in?
> And etiquette requires that if you are fairly newbile
> you send your question to CoolSoftwareNewbies and wait
> a reasonable time before construing the absence of
> answer as an indication that you should send it to
> CoolSoftwareUsers?
Wouldn't they have to read the docs for the lists to get
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 07:46:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 05:49:47PM -0700, Brian D. Winters wrote:
> >
> > Never, never, never filter a mailing list like mutt-users based on
> > To:, Cc:, From:, Subject:, Reply-To: or Mail-Followup-To: if
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> I'm trying to get procmail working on my rh 6.2 system, after reading the
> manual and banging my head on the keyboard for several hours, I'm
> thoroughly confused--a comfortable state, for me and linux.. my question
...
> What I want
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 01:21:21AM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
...
> :0:
> * ^From:.*mutt\..*
> mutt
You will probably have better luck with something like this:
:0
* ^Sender: owner-mutt
$FOLDERS/mutt/
If your folders are mbox instead of maildir, change the :0 to :0: to
enable locking and remove
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 10:38:16PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> Has anyone successfully integrated Slrn and Mutt together in use with
> netscape? Or just so these programs can be used hand in hand...
Check out http://www3.telus.net/brian_winters/mutt/ .
Brian
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:23:30PM -0500, Corey G. wrote:
> I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
> It only states addresses as alternates. I really do not want to debate
> what the definition of an "alternate" is but it's the same as
> an "alternative" or not the
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:30:23PM -0500, Corey G. wrote:
> By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am
> curious.
The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFCs, this is
rather long, and som
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 09:52:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> I have a maildir which has mail delivered to it directly (i.e. it has
> cur, new and tmp directories in it) but it also has other maildir
> folders in it. Mutt doesn't seem to be able to cope with this at all,
> am I missing something
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 02:59:01AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Corey G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 04 May 2000:
> > Would changing your umask work?
>
> Probably not, my umask is 022 and Mutt still creates new folders and
> saved files with mode 600. I think it's a security precaution a
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 10:03:30PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I would like to be able to press just when I am in the compose
bind compose send-message
Brian
On Sat, Apr 15, 2000 at 02:17:24AM -0500, Jason Helfman wrote:
> has anyone successfully gotten muttzilla to work for both news and mail
> in netscape..
Yes, although I've been told that I (and at least half a dozen web
site maintainers) need to read an RFC before news support will be 100%
co
cyrus@localhost)
by paulbm.demon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA22019;
Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:29:35 +0100
Whatever happened, please don't let it happen again.
Thanks,
Brian
On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 07:29:35PM +0100, Brian D. Winters wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 10
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 10:45:15AM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
> > I'd just like to have better control over when gpg tries to
> > download keys, I wish it (or mutt) would ask "hey, do you want
> > me to try and fetch this key from $keyserver?".
>=20
> Have you tried hitting ^C if the fetch is ta
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 10:45:15AM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
> I'd just like to have better control over when gpg tries to
> download keys, I wish it (or mutt) would ask "hey, do you want
> me to try and fetch this key from $keyserver?".
Have you tried hitting ^C if the fetch is taking too long?
[OT apology, disclaimer, etc.: Muttzilla isn't really affiliated with
mutt, I just happen to use mutt. I'm not sure mutt-users is a good
place for this, especially since I always get dropped from all of the
mutt lists three days after I subscribe anymore. But anyway...]
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 02:37:21PM +1000, Bek Oberin wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > Bek Oberin [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > I want to create a macro to let my jump straight to mailbox 'foo',
> > > whichever's currently displayed.
> > When you just hit 'c', the box offered up first /should/
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 10:28:21AM +0400, Alex Kapranoff wrote:
> I don't use emacs and have those files in /tmp too. They look like
> mutt-kapran-{pid-of-mutt}-15.
~/.saves-* files are from emacs. /tmp/mutt-* files are from mutt.
Brian
> Also, does anybody know what `Content-Type: text/plain, charset="utf-7"'
> mean? I do know UTF-8, but I can only guess what UTF-7 is. AFAIK both
> Netscape and Internet Explorer support it. I recently received a couple
> of mails in this encoding (mailer: MS Outlook Express 5.00) and the only
I don't quite agree with what you proposed, but you gave me some good
food for thought. Here goes...
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 10:48:49PM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Wednesday, 01 September 1999 at 14:18, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> > I like the idea of having two different actions (view
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 10:37:45AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> Now now.
Sorry, shouldn't write e-mail when I'm tired and grumpy...
> This actually isn't a big deal if you are using a GUI client with a mailbox
> window separate from the message index window and one of those nifty
> tree-view wi
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 03:22:42PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> I wonder, though, if our original poster, who used a setting like
> folder="{imapserver}INBOX." was attempting to get Mutt to translate
> "+folder" into "{imapserver}INBOX.folder", which means a folder
> literally named "INBOX.folde
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 05:46:46PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> Brian D. Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > set spoolfile='{imapserver}inbox'
> > set folder='{imapserver}INBOX'
>
[lots of explanation from David as to why this doesn&#
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 01:47:48PM -0400, Thomas Shay wrote:
> I've recently switched to using a Cyrus IMAP server for mail, and can't
> figure out how to specify the path to mail folders on the server. With
> pine, the format seems to be {imapserver}INBOX.[] (this points at what
I ran across one
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:13:31PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> You should all check out Brian Winters version, which is reportedly rather
> stable and was written from scratch.
IMNSHO you should follow Jeremey's advice. ;) I can tell you from
experience that hacking on their elm.c example unt
> Mutt 0.95.6i (1999-06-03)
> gpg (GnuPG) 0.9.9a-snap1999-07-28
I think that version of mutt still expects gpgm, the features of which
got rolled into gpg itself somewhere in the 0.9 sequence. Try making
gpgm a symlink to gpg.
Brian
> color body brightgreen black " [;=:]-*[)>(<|//\/]]" # :-) etc...
>^^
I think that the added right square bracket probably needs to be
escaped. Try this (untested):
color body brightgreen black " [;=:]-*[)>(<|//\/\]]" # :-) etc...
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 03:10:54PM +0700, m4v3r1ck wrote:
> I was hoping that the new procmail can direct mails to $HOME/Maildir
> (actually the file end up in $HOME/Maildir/new right?) in maildir format
> and re-direct all other mails specified by the procmail rules I've set up
> to $HOME/mail in
On Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 11:08:28PM -0400, Chris Grossmann wrote:
> Unless there's a predefined "Subject" line in the link..
> Like before, I get a "Bus error".
I missed an instance of the previously posted bug, except this time
instead of not having a "subject" keeping you from passing a "to",
ha
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
> Althought most messages to the list have [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the To
> header, there are a number that don't. These messages appear to have
> nothing in any header to identify that they belong to this list. Of
> course the subject ma
On Sun, Apr 18, 1999 at 02:34:42PM -0700, Todd Strilchuk wrote:
> i have a related question about using mutt with netscape. currently i
> have a pc environment setup at work (windows nt) and have access to
> our unix box via exceed. is there any way to configure netscape (on
> my pc) to run a un
A while back I posted a question about whether it was possible to get
mutt to decode utf-7 (rfc2152) encoded messages automatically for me.
Not suprisingly, I didn't hear back from anyone. (Out of all the
people I get mail from, I've only seen utf-7 from one of them, so it
isn't exactly a common
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 03:04:37PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> Would you be able to provide an adapted version for mutt?
I've packaged up my modifications to Netscape's files and posted(*)
them on my web page:
http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~brianw/email/
Check the READMEs. You ma
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 10:00:35PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> I don't suppose you can supply a URL.. their web site is so poorly set up,
> I actually searched for a long time without even getting close..
I had the same problem. After a lot of searching I finally got lucky
and found it at:
htt
I'm getting e-mail from a friend encoded in character set UTF-7. (He
is using Outlook Express.) I was able to find support for UTF-8 on my
system (Linux/glibc), but nothing about UTF-7. I checked around some,
and found where UTF-7 is defined by rfc2152, but haven't found
anything about it as fa
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 06:32:39AM -0500, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Oh, wait a second... I guess I take that back; I tried to set
> "pgp_default_version" to "gpg" and when I selected "sign (a)s" from
> the pgp menu I got
>
> sh: gpg043m: command not found Can't open your secret key
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:43:31PM -0600, Dan Lipofsky wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:20:13PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> > I think it would be annoying if Mutt moved my cursor around while I'm
> > trying to find a message, just because some new mail happened to arrive.
>
> Well, it could
50 matches
Mail list logo
