On 04-25-2002 at 23:55 EDT, VB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do my headers look ok? When I send messages to myself (I'm real lonely)
> it says "X-Authentication-Warning" and gives out some info that you don't
> need to know. I looked at google and it suggested adding "needmailhelo"
> under the p
Do my headers look ok? When I send messages to myself (I'm real lonely) it says
"X-Authentication-Warning" and gives out some info that you don't need to know. I
looked at google and it suggested adding "needmailhelo" under the privacy flag section
for sendmail.cf. But that did not work. Wh
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:57:54PM +0200, Nik Engel wrote:
> What kind of folder hooks are you using for Mailinglists.
Here are some examples of what I use. I only sort by threads those
folders that I use for mailing lists:
folder-hook . set sort=date-received
folder-hoo
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Rob 'Feztaa' Park spake thus:
> > which command do you use for your "search"?
>=20
> I'm doing it in a folder hook. The line looks like this:
>=20
> folder-
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
> > The reason I ask is that I've got some mboxes, and a few of them are
> > substrings of some others (ie, "foobar" is one mbox, an
Hi there!
Is there a way to perform a search on all mailboxes, without entering any in
specific? I use maildirs and Mutt 1.5.0i from the CVS. Thanks!
Cheers,
--
David Collantes - http://www.bus.ucf.edu/david/
College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida
"If you fear failu
Hi there!
Is there a way to perform a search on all mailboxes, without entering any in
specific? I use maildirs and Mutt 1.5.0i from the CVS. Thanks!
Cheers,
--
David Collantes - http://www.bus.ucf.edu/david/
College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida
"If you fear failu
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-26 01:18]:
> Is it possible to specify some kind of regex in mutt's search feature?
>
> The reason I ask is that I've got some mboxes, and a few of them are
> substrings of some others (ie, "foobar" is one mbox, and "foobarbaz" is
> another), and w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:20:09PM -0400, Laurent Pelecq wrote:
> > Mike Schiraldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > This is a permanent URL. The site will move soon.
> > >
> > > Which is it?
> >
> > Which is what? The URL was above I don't understand what you mean
--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is it possible to specify some kind of regex in mutt's search feature?
The reason I ask is that I've got some mboxes, and a few of them are
substrings of some ot
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 00:26:51 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> If you have no privileged access to a machine, you're probably
> the wrong person to install software systemwide. But every
> user may install a copy of mutt in $HOME. In this case, 'make
> install' is called without root permissions and
Hi,
* Vincent Lefevre [04/25/02 23:27:08 CEST] wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 23:12:58 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > It doesn't really matter, I think. The dotlock program is the
> > last which is to be installed. if chgrp fails, who cares since
> > (at that point) everything else is sucessfull
* John Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-25 14:19]:
> * On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Im Eunjea wrote:
>
> > * John Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-25 13:40]:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > >
> > > > I'm using this:
> > > >
> > > > macro index "\Cx" \
> > > > "~N*" \
> > > > "Mark all boring new msgs
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 23:12:58 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> It doesn't really matter, I think. The dotlock program is the
> last which is to be installed. if chgrp fails, who cares since
> (at that point) everything else is sucessfully where it should
> be. Just remove the binary.
But some users
* On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Im Eunjea wrote:
> * John Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-25 13:40]:
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > > I'm using this:
> > >
> > > macro index "\Cx" \
> > > "~N*" \
> > > "Mark all boring new msgs"
> >
> > This malfunctions if there are no N(ew) messages by incorrectly
> >
Hi,
* David T-G [04/25/02 19:14:01 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
> % too. :( I have to remove mutt_dotlock from my bin directory each
> % time I want to install a new version of Mutt.
> So which is easier, to remove a file or to tell configure to not put it
> there in the fi
* John Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-25 13:40]:
[...]
> >
> > I'm using this:
> >
> > macro index "\Cx" \
> > "~N*" \
> > "Mark all boring new msgs"
>
> This malfunctions if there are no N(ew) messages by incorrectly
> setting N on the highlighted message. Note that you therefore
> ca
* On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Im Eunjea wrote:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-21 04:35]:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > copy+paste from vim?
> >
> > anyway - this can be wrong if 'T' means
> > something else than .. :-(
> >
> > the following is a little longer - but should work
> > even when the
Vincent --
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
%
% On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:14:01 -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > So which is easier, to remove a file or to tell configure to not put it
% > there in the first place?
%
% The latter. :) I use a shell alias to configure mutt, because I need
Well, p
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:14:01 -0500, David T-G wrote:
> So which is easier, to remove a file or to tell configure to not put it
> there in the first place?
The latter. :) I use a shell alias to configure mutt, because I need
several other options (which may depend on the architecture). So, all
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:41:33AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> Matej Cepl wrote:
> [somewhat OT for this list, but...]
Sorry, for that, but do you any better list for isync?
> why are you so tied into using UW imapd? it's pretty much universally
> regarded as insecure and poorly written... you
begin Matej Cepl quotation:
>
> Does anybody have any better advice for me, please?
I don't think Mutt can do this for you, perhaps you should try the
mailing list for one of those other tools.
--
Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support:
http://www.eiv.com
Matej Cepl wrote:
[somewhat OT for this list, but...]
> * use patch for imapd for reading maildir boxen. I tried that
> (using patch for Pine 4.4* from
> http://hico.fphil.uniba.sk/pine-patches.html) but when I tried
> to connect to locally created maildir file, I have got just
> browsi
Hi,
I have here one linuxbox (RedHat 7.0 updated to current state of
updates.redhat.com) connected through to Internet through dial-up
and one (my wife's) notebook with M$-Windows (and Netscape
Messenger for reading emails) connected through the same dial-up
line (takes a lot of non-electronic co
Vincent --
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
%
% On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:59:29 -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > % This is quite annoying. A configure option to prevent it from being
% > % installed would be a good idea IMHO.
% >
% > While I agree that it isn't a bad idea, I don't know that it's
On Apr 25, David T-G wrote:
[snip]
>
> What does
>
> ls -dl `which mutt` `which mutt_dotlock` `dirname $MAIL`
>
> give you? If mutt_dotlock is owned by you instead of root, that's
> probably your problem. Fortunately it's easily fixed by getting rid of
> the mutt_dotlock you just installed
Hi!
On Don, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:13:54 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote
> I think you haven't understood. There is already a mutt_dotlock
> installed here (in /usr/...) with correct permissions. But I also
> want to install more recent versions of Mutt in my home directory,
> and "make install" install
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:59:29 -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % This is quite annoying. A configure option to prevent it from being
> % installed would be a good idea IMHO.
>
> While I agree that it isn't a bad idea, I don't know that it's a terribly
> good idea; you can already tell mutt to not use
Vincent, et al --
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 13:38:56 -0600, Brett H. Williams wrote:
% > Now I have a new problem, which is that my mailbox is considered
% > read-only. I am just using my spoolfile over NFS. Everything was
% > working great before the upgrad
Brett --
...and then Brett H. Williams said...
%
% Hi all,
Hello!
%
% I just started using Mutt last week, and have really loved it.
Yay for you, and welcome!
%
% I was using 1.2.5, but I wanted %E in index_format, so I grabbed 1.3.28i.
Good idea, especially since 1.2.5 has a security
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% >
% > ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
% > %
% > ...
% > % set alternates="egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)?"
% > % set alternates="ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org"
...
% >
% > set alternates="egargiulo@ing
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 13:38:56 -0600, Brett H. Williams wrote:
> Now I have a new problem, which is that my mailbox is considered
> read-only. I am just using my spoolfile over NFS. Everything was
> working great before the upgrade.
I have the same problem when I want to install Mutt. This is p
Hi all,
I just started using Mutt last week, and have really loved it.
I was using 1.2.5, but I wanted %E in index_format, so I grabbed 1.3.28i.
Now I have a new problem, which is that my mailbox is considered read-only. I
am just using my spoolfile over NFS. Everything was working great be
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eduardo --
>
> ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
> %
> ...
> % set alternates="egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)?"
> % set alternates="ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org"
>
> Unlike mailboxes or lists, alternates is a basic regexp, so your second
> setting will step
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
...
% set alternates="egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)?"
% set alternates="ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org"
Unlike mailboxes or lists, alternates is a basic regexp, so your second
setting will step on your first and no egargiulo addresses will be
recogniz
Christoph Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002-04-25 Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> > How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address
> > in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is
> > still there (CC).
>
> Did you set alternates correctly,
On 2002-04-25 Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address
> in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is
> still there (CC).
Did you set alternates correctly, so that mutt knows, who you are?
Regards,
Christoph
Hi all.
How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address
in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is
still there (CC).
TIA
--
Eduardo Gargiulo
^ejg(-.*)?@ar\.homelinux\.org$
msg27635/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Rahul Rekapalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-22 19:59]:
> I enabled PGP signing in mutt, when i view the mail, mutt shows the
> PGP signature inline, but a couple of friends of mine who use Pine,
> asked me why my PGP signature was attached rather than being inline.
> Is there something that I h
* Dave Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-23 08:20]:
> Our wonderful corporate IT department has added a virus scanner to
> the main MTA. .. this particular scanner communicates its result by
> adding an extra text/plain attachment to the top of the mail. AIUI,
> this violates the PGP/MIME RFC,
* Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-25 02:06]:
> I have a work account that I'd like to check now and then
> via imap, but the server is not always accessible as I must
> use an IPsec client to create the connection when I need it.
> What's the best way to configure Mutt to make it e
* Thomas Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-25 06:46]:
> The Mutt manual implies that "+" and "=" are
> simply two equivalent ways of designating the
> default location of mailboxes. No difference?
"spelling"
On Zsh command line the '=' is a meta sign
so I prefer using "mutt -f +folder".
Sven
Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Who controls the firewall? Depending on how the firewall is configured,
> you may not be able to access a POP server on the other side. I had
> mutt on my workstation working beautifully with my ISP's POP server
> until IT decided that allowing that serv
> > > set record=+sent-mail
> >
> > The Mutt manual implies that "+" and "=" are simply two
> > equivalent ways of designating the default location of
> > mailboxes. No difference?
>
> No - the + notation exists so that you don't have to type things like:
>
> set record==sent-mail
>
> Tha
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:59 pm, mikea wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 05:02:49PM -0500, Eric Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:19 pm, Eric Christopherson wrote:
> > > Hi. I'm having a bad problem with mutt: it tends to hang whenever it
> > > decides it says "Sorting ma
Hey people.
I have a work account that I'd like to check now and then via imap, but
the server is not always accessible as I must use an IPsec client to create
the connection when I need it.
What's the best way to configure Mutt to make it easy to check my work
imap folders? I don't
Previously, Nik Engel wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Joel Hammer wrote:
>
> > This seems to work for me in my .muttrc file.
> > fcc-hook . ~/Mail/sent-mail
> > Joel
> But unfortunaltly then mutt keeps me asking everytime if i want to save
> the mail..
> Even after setting:
> set copy=ask-no
>
Previously, Thomas Baker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:27:53PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > set record=+sent-mail
>
> The Mutt manual implies that "+" and "=" are simply two
> equivalent ways of designating the default location of
> mailboxes. No difference?
No - the + notation exists
Hi Joel!
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Joel Hammer wrote:
> This seems to work for me in my .muttrc file.
> fcc-hook . ~/Mail/sent-mail
> Joel
But unfortunaltly then mutt keeps me asking everytime if i want to save
the mail..
Even after setting:
set copy=ask-no
How can i prevent this ?
49 matches
Mail list logo
