Hi, * David T-G [04/25/02 19:14:01 CEST] wrote: > ...and then Vincent Lefevre said... > % too. :( I have to remove mutt_dotlock from my bin directory each > % time I want to install a new version of Mutt.
> So which is easier, to remove a file or to tell configure to not put it > there in the first place? And which is easier, to do nothing or to > modify the configure and make rules? That doesn't seem to be as easy as you write. I was almost going to insert a coin into my floppy drive to make the build procedure do what I wanted. I simply wanted to built without the mutt_dotlock included. And because I wasn't abled to make it work, it added a line to my autobuilder just using sed to overwrite a #define directive in config.h. Done. > % > I think, however, that it might be well worth adding some magic in the > ... > % Yes, I want exactly that. > Now we need someone to write it... It doesn't really matter, I think. The dotlock program is the last which is to be installed. if chgrp fails, who cares since (at that point) everything else is sucessfully where it should be. Just remove the binary. Cheers, Rocco.
msg27657/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
