Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread John Buttery
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 14:05:45 -0700]: >Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: >> You can have it both ways; use Procmail to prepend "X-Nuke" at the >> beginning of all the "bad" lines, then ignore X-Nuke. > >That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X

Re: OT: canada sucks

2002-03-26 Thread John Buttery
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 21:59:56 +0100]: >* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 20:13]: >>Alas! tim lupfer spake thus: Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy" to me, which is a decidedly female name in Canada. I've never heard of a man named Jessy

Re: threading question -> sample mailbox?

2002-03-26 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
Yes, this is the intended behavior. It's because mutt displays the subject if the parent is not visible or missing, on the theory that who knows what the parent's subject is. -Daniel On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 11:05:07PM -0800, Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Ellement wrote: > >

Re: Scrolling the Index

2002-03-26 Thread Michael Elkins
A. Reinhold wrote: > When selecting messages with the cursor (bar) in the index to tag them or do >anything else, the index > scrolls one message line further if the end of the display is reached. Now > what i would like to have is that the index scrolls...uhhhm let's say 10 > lines further. I

Scrolling the Index

2002-03-26 Thread A. Reinhold
Hi, One question: When selecting messages with the cursor (bar) in the index to tag them or do anything else, the index scrolls one message line further if the end of the display is reached. Now what i would like to have is that the index scrolls...uhhhm let's say 10 lines further. Right now I

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05:PM + Simon White wrote: > Text based rules, Almost. I only need a 'console' tv application only playing the audio and radio... and then I agree that text based *completely* rules. ;-) > but in Solaris you are stuck with CDE anyway, it's not > worth shit

Re: tab complete-query with lbdbq

2002-03-26 Thread MuttER
* Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-26-02 23:15]: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:56:09PM -0500, MuttER wrote: > > I have the following entries in my .muttrc but am unable to tab > > complete a partial address (query) in the compose menu. > > > > set query_command="lbdbq '%s'" # calling lbdbq

Re: tab complete-query with lbdbq

2002-03-26 Thread Gary Johnson
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:56:09PM -0500, MuttER wrote: > I have the following entries in my .muttrc but am unable to tab > complete a partial address (query) in the compose menu. > > set query_command="lbdbq '%s'" # calling lbdbq > macro alias Q "!lbdbq .""lbdb query" > > Why am I un

tab complete-query with lbdbq

2002-03-26 Thread MuttER
I have the following entries in my .muttrc but am unable to tab complete a partial address (query) in the compose menu. set query_command="lbdbq '%s'" # calling lbdbq macro alias Q "!lbdbq .""lbdb query" Why am I unable to query a partial address in the compose menu? -- Pat Shanahan

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Markus Hubig
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > On Mar 26 at 17:34, Roman Neuhauser spoke: > > > > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:57:27 +0100 > > > Subject: substituing ~l in send-hook > > > > > > I'd like to create a generic send-hook which substitutes ~l, > > > something like: > > > > > > send

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Will Yardley said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:02:10PM -0800: > > /home/william/procps-2.0.7/ps > ladd% head COPYING > GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE You quoted it right there; it's not GPL, it's LGPL. I was yanking Rob's chain, because he's an evil bast

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Will Yardley spake thus: > Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > > I don't use ps. Or any replacements. >=20 > why ever not? Because I don't really know what it is, w

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Will Yardley
Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > > I don't use ps. Or any replacements. why ever not? what license does the version of 'ps' you're talking about use? for that matter, i'm almost certain there's a GNU version of ps for all you freakin' GNazis. ladd% apt-get source procps Reading Package Lists... Done

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: > begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:29:= 08PM -0700: > > I don't use ps. Or any replacements.

Re: reverse_name question

2002-03-26 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 26, Tim Kennedy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Sorry if this has been asked a lot. I've been looking through the 'net, > and various archives of various messages, for an answer to how I can get > mutt to reply to emails using the "To" address, as the "From" address. ... > set reverse_name =

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Michael Maibaum
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Alas! David T-G spake thus: > > % Lets see you work out an x-nuke solution and we'll see how many lines it > > % is... :P > > > > [0] This officially means that every single binary on my entire system > is GPL'd ;) SSH, openss

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:29:08PM -0700: > > I don't use ps. Or any replacements. Ok. Do you use vim? msg26224/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: > begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:= 37PM -0700: > > [0] This officially means that every

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0700: > > [0] This officially means that every single binary on my entire system > is GPL'd ;) You don't have ps? What are you using instead? msg26222/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

pgp_create_traditional in 1.5.0

2002-03-26 Thread Will Yardley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 for those not on the mutt dev list, pgp_create_traditional works again in 1.5.0 (cvs version - a patch from Armin Wolfermann), and the behavior has been changed so that application/pgp is no longer used (although there's an x-mutt-action=pgp-sign flag

Re: thread view

2002-03-26 Thread John P Verel
> ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said... > % How can i configure muttrc to collapse thread messages ? I use: folder-hook . 'push otV Sets sort order to thread, collapses all, puts you at top of the list. John - John P. Verel Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech!

FWD: Re: Using Mutt with a Local Spool *and* Multiple IMAP Servers: (rocky@umuc.edu)

2002-03-26 Thread Rocky Giannini
David, First -- Thanks very much for the quick response. When I saw your reply, I thought for sure that would work -- Unfortunately, I made the change, and I'm still seeing the same behavior. Here's what the default account-hook entry looks like now: account-hook . 'unset imap_user ; set folde

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! David T-G spake thus: > % Lets see you work out an x-nuke solution and we'll see how many lines it > % is... :P > > No, that's left as an exercise for the student. Really :-) This student is not interested in wasting time on procmail/formail silliness. I've just recompiled my kernel with

Re: beating the system from within

2002-03-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 23:23]: > > (5) Add a signature which points at > > all the sites which tell you > > about the problems with OE. (hey! :-) > > (6) s/signature/X-Message-Flag/g very good! and let's not forget about (7) pseudo-attachments! fun fun fun

behavior of abort (SigInt)

2002-03-26 Thread Tim
Somewhere between version 1.2.5i and 1.3.27i the behavior of SigInt changed. I am used to hitting ^C to get out of mutt (the main reason is that I have a script that looks through a number of folders and ^C has a different exit code than "q". "q" takes me to the next mailbox and ^C exits the scr

Re: beating the system from within

2002-03-26 Thread Will Yardley
Sven Guckes wrote: > (5) Add a signature which points at > all the sites which tell you > about the problems with OE. (hey! :-) (6) s/signature/X-Message-Flag/g :> -- Will Yardley input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >

Re: beating the system from within

2002-03-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 17:17]: > The point is that there're lots of people having to use [Outlook] > at work. Even if those people are familiar to the standards, > what shall they do if they're not abled to convince someone > with the power of decision not to use Outlook any

Re: Display Error

2002-03-26 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-03-26 23:04]: >* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 21:46 +0100]: >> After GPG is called to check a signature, Mutt's terminal gets >> corrupted. I can continue working by refreshing the display, but it's >> really annoying. >What is pgp_veri

Re: mutt+Outlook - calendar utility?

2002-03-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* David Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 19:34]: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:30:19AM -0500, Adam Shostack wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:15:47AM -0500, Mike Schiraldi wrote: > > ..it would be way cool to have an interface that downloaded > > your mail into mutt, and left your calendar

Re: Using Mutt with a Local Spool *and* Multiple IMAP Servers

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Rocky -- ...and then Rocky Giannini said... % % Hi Folks, Hello! % % I'm attempting to use mutt (V1.3.28i) to seamlessly read mail on a local % spool *and* two imap servers. Sounds easy enough. % ... % account-hook . 'unset imap_user' % account-hook imap://imap1.blah.com 'set folder=imap

Changing Groups in Mutt/NNTP

2002-03-26 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I cannot see any details howto change the current Group or even change back to the list of active groups when using Mutt/NNTP Sean - -- Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMA

Using Mutt with a Local Spool *and* Multiple IMAP Servers

2002-03-26 Thread Rocky Giannini
Hi Folks, I'm attempting to use mutt (V1.3.28i) to seamlessly read mail on a local spool *and* two imap servers. Here's what I want to be able to do: When I'm reading a message on the local spool, I would like to be able to =folder to save the message to a folder in the Mail directory on the lo

Re: Display Error

2002-03-26 Thread Phil Gregory
* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 21:46 +0100]: > After GPG is called to check a signature, Mutt's terminal gets > corrupted. I can continue working by refreshing the display, but it's > really annoying. What is pgp_verify_command set to? My guess is that you haven't turned off al

Re: reverse_name question - my_hdr overrides

2002-03-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Tim Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 17:34]: > I've been looking through the 'net, and various archives of > various messages, for an answer to how I can get mutt to reply > to emails using the "To" address, as the "From" address. > My understanding was that "reverse_name" could > overrid

Display Error

2002-03-26 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, I have asked about this a few weeks ago, but nothing changed, so I try it again. I have a display error: After GPG is called to check a signature, Mutt's terminal gets corrupted. I can continue working by refreshing the display, but it's really annoying. I use Mutt 1.3.24i (but also tried

Re: exchange Exchange!

2002-03-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Marco Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 17:32]: > Back to mail clients used on solaris: here (R&D), where > we have to use a Unix os to do real work, we have sparc, > but have only Netscape 4.7?? because "it's the only > ccompany certified client able to do IMAP, hence > to interface with

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Rocco -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % I send this to the user's list and not to developer's because I do not % want to 'spam' anybody. I think that -users is a good place for it. % % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few % dozen mai

Re: Patch: filter-message

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Dan -- ...and then Dan Boger said... % % On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:47:50PM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > Don't see why it would; can you clarify your hesitation? If the working % > folder is modified, say by a save or an edit-message or any such stuff, ... % > Or am I missing something? % % I t

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % David, it's wakie-wakie time! What? 42! The battle of the bulge! % % Alas! David T-G spake thus: % > % That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke % > % without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using the huge mess % >

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! David T-G spake thus: % > Just "working" isn't enough. It has to be elegant and clever with a dash % > of magic. *mutter* Kids these days... % % How is my solution not elegant? It's a simple 3 lines that trashes a % bunch of headers that I don't wa

Re: mailbox question

2002-03-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Matthias Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 19:11]: > What do I gain from this when I have 3 mailing list > on one and another 4 lists on the other account? "IMAP" > > > I'd like mutt to check whether a mail came from a mailing > > > list and display only those mail at ones that belong to >

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-26 Thread darren chamberlain
Quoting Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 26, 2002 14:55]: > The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to > send a few dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to > include the date and time in the file I specify by the 'record' > variable. Using `date`. But `date` is only exp

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--xHbokkKX1kTiQeDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! David T-G spake thus: > Just "working" isn't enough. It has to be elegant and clever with a dash > of magic. *mutter* Kids these days... How is my solut

Re: Patch: filter-message

2002-03-26 Thread Dan Boger
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:47:50PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Don't see why it would; can you clarify your hesitation? If the working > folder is modified, say by a save or an edit-message or any such stuff, > then mutt will utilize the close-hook command to bundle the temp folder > into the place

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--vJguvTgX93MxBIIe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David, it's wakie-wakie time! Alas! David T-G spake thus: > % That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke > % without ignoring the ot

Re: setting content type in email header with mutt

2002-03-26 Thread Gary Johnson
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:58:59AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote: > At 00:57 -0800 26 Mar 2002, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:10:14AM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote: > > > What about preparing everything to use the '-H' switch? Especially for > > > the case that you

Re: Problems going to INBOX using IMAP (Courier)

2002-03-26 Thread Bruno Postle
On Tue 26-Mar-2002 at 11:21:44AM -0800, jennyw wrote: > > I have something similar (with courier-imap), except both $spoolfile and > > $folder point to /INBOX > > Yeah, I've tried both -- they seem pretty much interchangeable? I think they probably are, imap-namespace is one of those ghastly thi

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 06:31:43:PM +0100 Marco Fioretti wrote: > Here where I work we use Ultra sparc machines, but have no root password > and only 100 MB of quota = can't compile and install stuff, and are forbidden > to do so: this situation is much more frequent than many Unix guru expec

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:38:10:PM + Simon White wrote: > If you use L (default mapping) to reply to lists, you will always reply > just to the list address, as long as it is defined as a list in your > muttrc. > The reply-to should then be redundant, because people /should/ just reply

Command expansion

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, I send this to the user's list and not to developer's because I do not want to 'spam' anybody. The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time in the file I specify by the 'record' variable. Using

Optimizations?

2002-03-26 Thread Jen Wu
I'm using mutt with an IMAP server (Courier). I notice that when I open a message with attachments, that mutt reads them in. Is there a way to just get the message body without attachments by default? Also, I notice that when I open up a folder, it gets all the headers before it displays them. I

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-26 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: > > A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I > > enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the > > message is. > > As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more > specific? ;-) What are you g

Re: reverse_name question

2002-03-26 Thread Ken Weingold
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002, darren chamberlain wrote: > Quoting Tim Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 26, 2002 12:33]: > > my local account name is sugarat. but I also get mail to > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". When people send email to > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", I want to automatically use > > "[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-26 Thread Will Yardley
jennyw wrote: [not sure about your second question] > Also, I notice that when I open up a folder, it gets all the headers > before it displays them. Is there a way to get it to a) cache > information) or b) read only some of the headers instead of all of > them? there's currently no caching f

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread David Rock
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:30:19AM -0500, Adam Shostack wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:15:47AM -0500, Mike Schiraldi wrote: > > Actually, in light of Ximian connector, it would be way cool to have > an interface that downloaded your mail into mutt, and left your > calendar in Evolution. > >

Re: reverse_name question

2002-03-26 Thread darren chamberlain
Quoting Tim Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 26, 2002 12:33]: > Sorry if this has been asked a lot. I've been looking through > the 'net, and various archives of various messages, for an > answer to how I can get mutt to reply to emails using the "To" > address, as the "From" address. > > my loca

Optimizations?

2002-03-26 Thread jennyw
I'm using mutt with an IMAP server (Courier). I notice that when I open a message with attachments, that mutt reads them in. Is there a way to just get the message body without attachments by default? Also, I notice that when I open up a folder, it gets all the headers before it displays them.

Re: Problems going to INBOX using IMAP (Courier)

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Jenny -- ...and then jennyw said... % % Tab completion is nice ... I'm not sure it's faster, though, when you % have nested folders, many with similar names ... Do you mean nested, as in down in subdirectories, or not nested, as in next to each other? You can also set a mask to limit your list

Re: mailbox question

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Matthias Weiss said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:26:43PM +0100: > What do I gain from this when I have 3 mailing list on one and another 4 lists > on the other account? The ability to use mailing lists to help you solve problems without committing ettiquette errors that cause th

Re: Problems going to INBOX using IMAP (Courier)

2002-03-26 Thread jennyw
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 10:53, Bruno Postle wrote: > I have something similar (with courier-imap), except both $spoolfile and > $folder point to /INBOX Yeah, I've tried both -- they seem pretty much interchangeable? > c ! will take you back to the index (! is an alias for > $spoolfile). That's g

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Ken Weingold
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002, Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Simon White said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05PM +: > > > > Text based rules, but in Solaris you are stuck with CDE anyway, it's not > > worth shit without CDE. > > I've had luck in the past with GNOME, and evidently Sun doe

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Mar 26 at 17:56, Simon White spoke: > 26-Mar-02 at 18:51, Hanspeter Roth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > You are assuming that /everybody/ is using Mutt with mailing lists. > > I do use Mutt and I do use L. > > But should I expect everybody to switch to Mutt? > > Some people still want to us

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Mar 26 at 17:38, Simon White spoke: > > If you use L (default mapping) to reply to lists, you will always reply > just to the list address, as long as it is defined as a list in your > muttrc. > > The reply-to should then be redundant, because people /should/ just reply > to the list only.

Re: mailbox question

2002-03-26 Thread Matthias Weiss
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:55:29AM +, Simon White wrote: > 25-Mar-02 at 22:26, Matthias Weiss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > I'm subscribed to several mailing lists which are sent > > to 2 mail accounts. I'm using fetchmail to retrieve the > > mails that are then stored in /var/spool/mail/mat

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX (Was:Re: mailers with scripting/setup language)

2002-03-26 Thread Ken Weingold
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002, Martin Karlsson wrote: > And now all Solaris-users can enjoy the MS Outlook > Express-experience ;-) > > http://www.microsoft.com/unix/ie/evaluation/outlookexp/default.asp And if it's anything like IE for Solaris, it sucks. Ever since 3.0, Netscape IMO has gotten more and

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.03.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Rocco Rutte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It thought Solaris users use text-based mail clients because workstation > installations of Solaris are not the fastest. Or do they just replace I thought we used text-based mail clients for the same re

Re: Problems going to INBOX using IMAP (Courier)

2002-03-26 Thread Bruno Postle
On Tue 26-Mar-2002 at 10:16:16AM -0800, jennyw wrote: > > set spoolfile=imap://jennyw@localhost/INBOX > set folder=imap://jennyw@localhost/ I have something similar (with courier-imap), except both $spoolfile and $folder point to /INBOX > What happens is that when I first run mutt, I see my inb

Re: Patch: filter-message

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Dan -- ...and then Dan Boger said... % % On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:19:14AM -0700, Steve Talley wrote: % > Quick description: ... % > separate invocation of the command. The stdout of the command will be % > appended to the current folder as a new message, and the original % > messa

Re: Problems going to INBOX using IMAP (Courier)

2002-03-26 Thread Simon White
26-Mar-02 at 10:16, jennyw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I've just started using the IMAP features of mutt (I'm pretty new to the > program in general, too). So far, things are working great -- except that > when I change folders. Relevant lines of my .muttrc: This is what I have in my .muttrc

Re: line drawings showing threads gone with REMOTE session!?!?!?

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Chris -- ...and then Christian Seberino said... % % Thanks for reply. I have ASCII characters remotely % now but want *lines* like locally Makes sense. % % Locally, thread emails are indented with lines joining % everything. These lines become asterisks remotely. Then it looks like yo

Re: Can I use mutt to notify a message to all PC users running MS Windows on the network? NOOOOO!

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
David, et al -- ...and then David Champion said... % ... % Yes, you can use mutt to send a message to a bunch of Windows users. % However, since mutt barters in e-mail, you need something else to broker ... % I'd suggest getting samba. Writing a small program that takes an e-mail % message on it

Re: Patch: filter-message

2002-03-26 Thread Dan Boger
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:19:14AM -0700, Steve Talley wrote: > Quick description: > > filter-message (default: &) > > Asks for an external shell command and filters the current or tagged > message(s) through it. Each tagged message will be filtered through a > separate invocati

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Simon White said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05PM +: > > Text based rules, but in Solaris you are stuck with CDE anyway, it's not > worth shit without CDE. I've had luck in the past with GNOME, and evidently Sun doesn't totally disagree, since they're moving to GNOME as

Problems going to INBOX using IMAP (Courier)

2002-03-26 Thread jennyw
I've just started using the IMAP features of mutt (I'm pretty new to the program in general, too). So far, things are working great -- except that when I change folders. Relevant lines of my .muttrc: set spoolfile=imap://jennyw@localhost/INBOX set folder=imap://jennyw@localhost/ What happens

Patch: filter-message

2002-03-26 Thread Steve Talley
Attached is a patch that implements the "filter-message" command discussed last week ("Replacing a message with its filtered output"). It combines parts of the "pipe-message" and "edit" commands, so that $editor doesn't have to be set/reset to filter a message through an external program. Quick d

content type question

2002-03-26 Thread Will Yardley
so this is kind of bizarre. we have an automated script that people send mail to and list what they've been doing. just to be silly, i've taken to using characters like 'ยค' as bullets in mine. the script that handles this sends out messages with a content type of us-ascii instead of iso-8859-1.

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:31:01PM +0100: > > The point is that there're lots of people having to use it at work. Even > if those people are familiar to the standards, what shall they do if > they're not abled to convince someone with the power of decission no

Re: mailbox question

2002-03-26 Thread Simon White
26-Mar-02 at 19:26, Matthias Weiss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > Since the mails go to separate accounts anyway, why not fetch the mail to > > two separate folders, and configure mutt to read both? > > What do I gain from this when I have 3 mailing list on one and another 4 lists > on the other

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Simon White
26-Mar-02 at 18:51, Hanspeter Roth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > You are assuming that /everybody/ is using Mutt with mailing lists. > I do use Mutt and I do use L. > But should I expect everybody to switch to Mutt? > Some people still want to use Emacs, Pine, Elm or Netscape Mail... > Not every m

Re: line drawings showing threads gone with REMOTE session!?!?!?

2002-03-26 Thread Christian Seberino
Sven Thanks for reply. I have ASCII characters remotely now but want *lines* like locally Locally, thread emails are indented with lines joining everything. These lines become asterisks remotely. Chris On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:22:21AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Christian Seberino <[

Re: Can I use mutt to notify a message to all PC users running MS Windows on the network? NOOOOO!

2002-03-26 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.03.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 21:22]: > > 25-Mar-02 at 02:00, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > > seriously - mutt sends email. that's it. > > > if your users don't read their ema

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Simon White
26-Mar-02 at 16:44, Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > It thought Solaris users use text-based mail clients because workstation > installations of Solaris are not the fastest. Or do they just replace > every workstation by a server to run Outlook? ;-) Text based rules, but in Solaris you a

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Simon White
26-Mar-02 at 17:35, Hanspeter Roth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > No I haven't received an answer. I think it's just not supported in > this context. > The workaround is to put a send-hook for each mailinglist. But not > very elegant... If you use L (default mapping) to reply to lists, you will al

reverse_name question

2002-03-26 Thread Tim Kennedy
Sorry if this has been asked a lot. I've been looking through the 'net, and various archives of various messages, for an answer to how I can get mutt to reply to emails using the "To" address, as the "From" address. my local account name is sugarat. but I also get mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Marco Fioretti
> > And now all Solaris-users can enjoy the MS Outlook > > Express-experience ;-) > > > http://www.microsoft.com/unix/ie/evaluation/outlookexp/default.asp > > It thought Solaris users use text-based mail clients because workstation > installations of Solaris are not the fastest. Or do they just re

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:56:57:PM +0100 Martin Karlsson wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 19.58 +0100]: > > ;-) It seems that Outlook users get along with one another so everything > > works as intended. > And now all Solaris-users can enjoy the MS Outlook > Express-ex

Re: mailbox question - mutt is *not* a filter!

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:40:23:PM +0100 Sven Guckes wrote: > * Matthias Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 06:50]: > > Then I have a question regarding address books - > > is there support for something alike in mutt?? > use "addressbook" I recommend using 'lbdb' ('little brother datab

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Mar 26 at 17:34, Roman Neuhauser spoke: > > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:57:27 +0100 > > Subject: substituing ~l in send-hook > > > > I'd like to create a generic send-hook which substitutes ~l, > > something like: > > > > send-hook ~l 'my_hdr Reply-To: ~l' > > > > The ~l won't be substi

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:25:21:AM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:04:14AM +0100: > > > > Just wondering why 1524 is so important to you... > You lost me. You lost me. We lost us. ;-) > To the best of my knowledge, I have never

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Roman Neuhauser
> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:57:27 +0100 > From: Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: substituing ~l in send-hook > > I'd like to create a generic send-hook which substitutes ~l, > something like: > > send-hook ~l 'my_hdr Reply-To: ~l' > > The ~l won't be sub

Re: mailbox question

2002-03-26 Thread Simon White
26-Mar-02 at 10:30, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > I didn't think this list could be posted to by non members. I am now > > going to have to find your address and copy-paste it up to the CC line. > > No, you don't "have" to. You choose to. Well, because I didn't read that line un

Re: Mail is not reaching destination

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:31:52PM +0100: > > like i said: "mutt is *not* for everyone" All users suck. mutt is for users who suck less. msg26149/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: mailbox question - mutt is *not* a filter!

2002-03-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Matthias Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 06:50]: > I'm subscribed to several mailing lists which are sent > to 2 mail accounts. I'm using fetchmail to retrieve the > mails that are then stored in /var/spool/mail/matthias. > I'd like mutt to check whether a mail came from a mailing > list a

Re: Mail is not reaching destination

2002-03-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Jerry Van Brimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 03:03]: > X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) > > 1. Is sendmail set up to allow messages to go to/from root? > I dont know? we can tell by the X-Mailer line - and by the way quote text. ;-) > > 2. I can't fin

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Adam Shostack
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:15:47AM -0500, Mike Schiraldi wrote: > > > % * Outlook Express is easy to set up and use, and provides you with > > > % secure, personalized, and complete features that make creating, > > > % sending, and reading your e-mail a more rich and dynamic > > > % experience. >

Re: mailbox question

2002-03-26 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Simon White said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:55:29AM +: > > I didn't think this list could be posted to by non members. I am now > going to have to find your address and copy-paste it up to the CC line. No, you don't "have" to. You choose to. Many people wouldn't. IMHO,

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX - that rich experience

2002-03-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Mike Schiraldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 15:16]: > > > % * Outlook Express is easy to set up and use, and > > > % provides you with secure, personalized, and complete > > > % features that make creating, sending, and reading > > > % your e-mail a more rich and dynamic experience. > > > >

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Mike Schiraldi
> > % * Outlook Express is easy to set up and use, and provides you with > > % secure, personalized, and complete features that make creating, > > % sending, and reading your e-mail a more rich and dynamic > > % experience. > > "experience" is another of those words, that in the context of > adve

Re: thread view

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Eduardo -- ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said... % % Hi all. Hello! % % How can i configure muttrc to collapse thread messages ? RTFM and then exec collapse-all somewhere in your muttrc. [You might optionally push instead.] % % ~ejg HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G

Re: thread view

2002-03-26 Thread darren chamberlain
Quoting Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 26, 2002 10:02]: > How can i configure muttrc to collapse thread messages ? collapse-thread, bound to \ev by default (I think). There's also collapse-all, bound to \eV. (darren) -- Fanaticism consists in redoubling your efforts when you have f

  1   2   >