On Mar 26 at 17:56, Simon White spoke: > 26-Mar-02 at 18:51, Hanspeter Roth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > You are assuming that /everybody/ is using Mutt with mailing lists. > > I do use Mutt and I do use L. > > But should I expect everybody to switch to Mutt? > > Some people still want to use Emacs, Pine, Elm or Netscape Mail... > > Not every mailclient supports Mail-Followup-To:. > > Are Mutters expected to boycott Nonmutters? > > Woah! Not at all! > > I was responding to someone who wanted a send-hook within mutt to change > the Reply-To header, not a non Mutt user. > > A lot of people can't switch to Mutt, won't switch to Mutt, don't need to > switch to it, etc. But I said nothing against any other MUA. I was > speaking /purely/ from a Mutt context.
OK. But I'd like also those using MUAs which don't support Mail-Followup-To: replying to the mailing list. That's why I also insert a Reply-To:. Otherwise they reply also to my From: address which I don't want. -Hanspeter
