On Mar 26 at 17:38, Simon White spoke: > > If you use L (default mapping) to reply to lists, you will always reply > just to the list address, as long as it is defined as a list in your > muttrc. > > The reply-to should then be redundant, because people /should/ just reply > to the list only. Mutt will send the correct headers if you use L.
You are assuming that /everybody/ is using Mutt with mailing lists. I do use Mutt and I do use L. But should I expect everybody to switch to Mutt? Some people still want to use Emacs, Pine, Elm or Netscape Mail... Not every mailclient supports Mail-Followup-To:. Are Mutters expected to boycott Nonmutters? -Hanspeter
