* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 14:05:45 -0700]: >Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: >> You can have it both ways; use Procmail to prepend "X-Nuke" at the >> beginning of all the "bad" lines, then ignore X-Nuke. > >That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke >without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using the huge mess >david posted). > >I know I'd be breaking some RFC, but if I prepended just 'Nuke' then it >would get hidden, and the real X- headers that I want would be >displayed. > >It's still easier to just rip the headers right out. > >-- >Rob 'Feztaa' Park >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >-- >This life is a test. It is only a test. Had this been an actual life, you >would have received further instructions as to what to do and where to go.
I must be missing something, but wouldn't you just add: ignore X-Nuke ...which is actually, in practice, more like "ignore X-Nuke*"? Still, if you have a system that does what you want, go with it. Philosophically I agree with whoever it was that said deleting content from an email was to be avoided at all costs, but it's your mail. I just know it would bug me more to know I was deleting headers than to look at the cruft. :) -- ridiculously long signature snipped, I know I go over 72x4 regularly but this one was just silly. :)
msg26240/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
