clever!
On 15 Oct 00, 8:23PM, Ulf Erikson wrote:
> There is a nice (or at least fun) fix for this at
> http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~neil/mutt/
> The idea is to use a small script, which returns immediately, as editor;
> this script will spawn a new instance of mutt, running in a term of its own
why not just sync the mailbox before starting the draft? then if you start
another mutt which modifies the flags, it doesn't matter.
peter
On 15 Oct 00, 12:16PM, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:51:12PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> > I don't think this would work. mutt sits waiting f
there's a tricky thing here, though. if a message exists on the desktop
machine, & not on the laptop, there are two possibilities. 1) you
downloaded it to the laptop & deleted it, or 2) it's new mail you've never
downloaded to laptop. this could be dealt with by keeping a record of when
syncs happ
use this command:
netscape -remote openURL(%s, new-window)
this comes from http://home.netscape.com/newsref/std/x-remote.html as
referenced by the netscape binary. the document covers remote control
of netscape; pretty spiffy.
--
Ben Roberts, Class of 2001 (1st of millenium), founding membe
my urlview conf (the default) opens urls in the most recent netscape window.
# command to invoke for selected URL
COMMAND netscape -remote 'openURL(%s)'
Can this be changed so that it opens a new netscape window for it?
--
Darrin Mison
--
Lazlo's Chinese Relativity Axiom:
No matter ho
Claus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 15 Oct 2000:
> Right now I see scripts as my only chance; if someone has experience
> with a good setup please let me know.
Well, one alternative you may consider looking into is AFS (Andrew File
System). I've never used it myself, but IIRC it supp
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 06:34:55PM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
: On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:15:04PM -0700, joel wittenberg wrote:
: > I read email from both my laptop and desktop machines (which are
: > each in different email domains, ISPs, etc), and I do this fairly simply
: > since my email ser
Marco --
...and then Marco Ahrendt said...
% On 15 Oct 00, at 13:40, David T-G wrote:
%
% > you anything else because I don't want to further contribute to your
% > delinquency ;-)
%
% i forgot to say that i already tested this setting. this is not what i want:)
Ah. Well, I don't feel so bad,
Suresh --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
%
% > Suresh & Mrinal & co, this *definitely* needs to go into the mutt-newbie
% > FAQ. This seems to come up at least once a week. Is it just me, or are
% > we getting *more* questions for this *s
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:15:04PM -0700, joel wittenberg wrote:
> I read email from both my laptop and desktop machines (which are
> each in different email domains, ISPs, etc), and I do this fairly simply
> since my email server uses POP3 (I believe that something similar is
> possible usi
Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 15 Oct 2000:
> mutt -s < $1
It might be easier to just use "mutt -H tempfile", and then use /dev/null
as the input.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.fre
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 05:11:47PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Dan Boger thought:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:51:12PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> > I don't think this would work. mutt sits waiting for the editor to
> return
> > before sending the mail. If you use gvim which detaches
Uncle!!!
Ok I'm a newbie as far as mutt goes but I'm willing to pay my pound of flesh cause I
know it'll be worth it.
I'm running mutt-1.2.5i-1 that I installed as an RPM on RH 6.2. It seems to be
working more of less with my IMAP server. I am trying to get it working with PGP
6.5.8. I've
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 10:20:06AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Bob Bell proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Just open another mutt session. Unlike many mail editors, you can
> > have multiple instances of mutt running at the same time.
>
> However, mailbox flags get modified when
* Juergen Salk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001015 14:31]:
> >
> > The problem is, when there are no mails which are 1 week old, mutt
> > everytime askes "Append messages to foo? ([yes]/no)". Is it possible to
> > disable this question completely?
>
> T
* Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001015 14:31]:
>
> The problem is, when there are no mails which are 1 week old, mutt
> everytime askes "Append messages to foo? ([yes]/no)". Is it possible to
> disable this question completely?
Try adding "unset confirmappend" to your $HOME/.muttrc fi
Claus -
I read email from both my laptop and desktop machines (which are
each in different email domains, ISPs, etc), and I do this fairly simply
since my email server uses POP3 (I believe that something similar is
possible using IMAP, but I don't know exactly how to do it since I don't
h
Claus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 13 Oct 2000:
> 1. I'm thinking of using rsync for the mail folders. I'd have to use
>an mbox since rsync doesn't know about mail spool locking.
How about you use Maildir instead? It's file-per-message, so rsync
presumably would work better with
On 15 Oct 00, at 13:40, David T-G wrote:
> Marco, check out pgp_create_traditional in the manual. I won't tell
> you anything else because I don't want to further contribute to your
> delinquency ;-)
i forgot to say that i already tested this setting. this is not what i want:)
mutt then sends t
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 06:41:47PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Dan Boger thought:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 02:35:24PM +, Conor Daly wrote:
> > cat ~/mbox | /usr/bin/formail -D 8192 msgid.cache > laptop:~/mbox
> > cat laptop:~/mbox | /usr/bin/formail -D 8192 msgid.cache > ~/mbox
>
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 05:48:38AM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
David T-G thought:
> Conor --
>
> ...and then Conor Daly said...
> % On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:00:05AM +0800 or thereabouts, Bevan Broun
> wrote:
> % > on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:39:46PM -0400, Peter Solodov
> <[EMAIL PRO
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 08:44:28PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Dan Boger thought:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 08:44:58PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> > > another way to go at it, and this also works only if there's only one
> > > machine
> > > that is getting the mail, is just put the mail
I'm having a problem with swedish characters in mutt.
Inside mutt I just can't seem to read or write them.
The charset in mutt (iso-8859-1) is correct so I can't
see any reason for why it shouldn't work.
Hmm, I can say that I've got the swedish characters working
in almost every other program inc
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 10:13:00PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Charles Curley proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Which is rather useless because then mutt just sits there with its tongue
> > hanging out saying "Waiting for Emacs..." until the editor completes. That
> > phrase is pro
Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 15 Oct 2000:
> I don't have a solution for this though - need some way for mutt to just go
> on, not waiting for the process, and not deleteing the tmpfile... then, somehow,
> when the editor is done, something needs to send that mail...
Well, the answe
Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 15 Oct 2000:
> Now, this works nicely most of the time but I find that about 50% of
> postings from mutt-users are coming directly from the authors rather than
> from the list. I suspect that this is to do with how long the list takes
> to turn around
Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Shane Wegner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > I seem to be able to set how Mutt handles the `From:'
> > header but not the `From' header. Is setting this
>
> set envelope_from
or
set
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Marco, check out pgp_create_traditional in the manual. I won't tell
> you anything else because I don't want to further contribute to your
> delinquency ;-)
> Suresh & Mrinal & co, this *definitely* needs to go into the mutt-newbie
> FAQ. This seems
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Marco, check out pgp_create_traditional in the manual. I won't tell
> you anything else because I don't want to further contribute to your
> delinquency ;-)
> Suresh & Mrinal & co, this *definitely* needs to go into the mutt-newbie
> FAQ. This seems
Marco --
Before I forget, you should know that the proper address for mutt-users
is as above; gbnet hosts the mailing list and web site, and their address
sometimes leaks through accidentally. That said, ...
...and then Marco Ahrendt said...
% hi all,
%
% i have running mutt1.2.5i and gpg 1.0.
Charles Curley proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Which is rather useless because then mutt just sits there with its tongue
> hanging out saying "Waiting for Emacs..." until the editor completes. That
> phrase is probably an artifact of emaclient rather than mutt, but it does
> reneder mutt rather
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:51:12PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> I don't think this would work. mutt sits waiting for the editor to return
> before sending the mail. If you use gvim which detaches itself from mutt,
> mutt decides that you've abandoned the message and aborts the send. To
> make mut
Interesting one here...
I've spent the last couple of days puzzling over why about 50% of the
posts I'm receiving from the mutt-users list seem to be addressed directly
to me rather than coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] It finally occurred to
me that it might be the "Nuke Duplicate messages" rule i
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 10:20:06AM +0530 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Suresh Ramasubramanian thought:
> Bob Bell proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Just open another mutt session. Unlike many mail editors, you can
> > have multiple instances of mutt running at the same time.
>
> Howev
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 10:20:06AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered:
> Bob Bell proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Just open another mutt session. Unlike many mail editors, you can
> > have multiple instances of mutt running at the same time.
>
> However, mailbox flags get modified w
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 08:57:30PM -0200 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Rod Pike thought:
> Greetings,
>
> Newbie question
>
> When I start ( and quit ) mutt there are sometimes error messages a the
> bottom of the screen that flash up and then are gone. Is there a log
> that I can look at t
hi all,
i have running mutt1.2.5i and gpg 1.0.1. when i encrypt and sign a message
mutt is exporting the mail like this:
Content-Type: multipart/encrypted; protocol="application/pgp-encrypted";
boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
Content-Disposition: inline
this is a problem for users with pega
Hi,
at the moment I move 1 week old mails automatically in ~/Mail/archiv/mbox
with the following line in my .muttrc:
folder-hook =mutt-users$'push T~r>1w!~F\n\;s+archiv/mutt-users.gz\n'
The problem is, when there are no mails which are 1 week old, mutt
everytime askes "Append mes
Shane Wegner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I seem to be able to set how Mutt handles the `From:'
> header but not the `From' header. Is setting this
set envelope_from
in older mutts, set sendmail=/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -oem -f [EMAIL PRO
39 matches
Mail list logo
