Why do I get this warning as part of the PGP output of every single
signed message on this list (except my own)?
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
What have I set wrong?
--
On Wed 09/20/00 at 08:40 PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My efforts in this direction however lead me to the following
> reflections. The L-mix e-mail list has virtually no traffic. The various
> newsgroups that could possibly have people interested in this topic have
> l
Jens Askengren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000:
> Yes, I'm suggesting that mutt needs a GUI.
Not to nitpick, but no. mutt does not need a GUI. It'd probably be more
accurate to say that you -want- a GUI for mutt. To this day, mutt is easily
the most powerful, configurable, fast
Well, a GUI does have some advantages:
- One can read HTML-mail... OK, people should not be sending html, but
really a lot of (Microsoft)-users, do. It would be quite nice to view
the layout they intended with fonts inline images.
- The resolution is usally much more, so you can have more text on
On 2000.09.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jens Askengren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A GUI-mutt could be implemented by separating mutt into a backend and
> several frontends (curses, X11, etc). The frontend could be selected at
> compiletime, or loaded as a plugin/dll/.so-lib at runtim
Hi,
At 6:24 AM EDT on September 23 Jens Askengren sent off:
>
> While I was replying to Peter Jaques question about a catchup command,
> another reply was already posted to the list. I couldn't possibly know
> that, because it's impossible to browse the mailboxes and compose at the
> same time
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 10:19:17AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> ... and my fear is that, once such a change were made, the text-only
> mutt would suffer if not go away entirely. That would really suck
> for me, for instance, since I do my mail over an ssh vt100
> connection (and pround of it! :-)
Jens Askengren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000:
> > Last time I asked about this, I was told to check out "Balsa".
> > (Which I haven't yet done, though it's on my list of things to do
> > any decade now...)
>
> There are a lot of GUI clients out there for X11. But unfortunately, mo
Jens --
...and then Jens Askengren said...
%
% Yes, I'm suggesting that mutt needs a GUI. I know that some of you might
Gaack! *sputter* *wheeze* cough cough
'scuse me
% want to edit your .procmailrc after reading this post. Please do so, but
% read this first =)
Hey, if this is any indi
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:02:44PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Jens Askengren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000:
> > Yes, I'm suggesting that mutt needs a GUI.
>
> Last time I asked about this, I was told to check out "Balsa".
> (Which I haven't yet done, though it's on my list of
Jens Askengren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000:
> Yes, I'm suggesting that mutt needs a GUI.
Last time I asked about this, I was told to check out "Balsa".
(Which I haven't yet done, though it's on my list of things to do
any decade now...)
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, ak
While I was replying to Peter Jaques question about a catchup command,
another reply was already posted to the list. I couldn't possibly know
that, because it's impossible to browse the mailboxes and compose at the
same time. This is quite annoying, and a good reasons to code a GUI for
mutt.
thanks y'all!
peter
--
Peter Jaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://cs.oberlin.edu/~pjaques
klezmer&balkan&turkish clarinet; free food&shelter; peace pilgrim
PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 01:33:36AM -0700, Peter Jaques wrote:
> i'm looking for some command that will mark all messages in a current
> mailbox as being read, without having to actually read them.
You might want a macro like this:
macro index m "~A\
N\
~A"
Repl
On 2000.09.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Byrial Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tag all messages, mark the tagged messages read, and finally untag
> them. Can be bound to macro if you like, for example:
>
> macro index R "T~A;WN;t" "Mark all messages read"
This is correct, of cour
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 01:33:36 -0700, Peter Jaques wrote:
> i'm looking for some command that will mark all messages in a current
> mailbox as being read, without having to actually read them. sort of like
> ^R but for an entire mailbox (& not dependent on threading). is there a
> such?
Tag all
On 2000.09.23, in <2923013336.A18320@sol>,
"Peter Jaques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm looking for some command that will mark all messages in a current
> mailbox as being read, without having to actually read them. sort of like
> ^R but for an entire mailbox (& not dependent on th
i'm looking for some command that will mark all messages in a current
mailbox as being read, without having to actually read them. sort of like
^R but for an entire mailbox (& not dependent on threading). is there a
such?
thanks
peter
PGP signature
18 matches
Mail list logo
