Re: my wishlist items

2000-02-14 Thread Brian Kimball
Michael Elkins wrote... > On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 12:20:59PM -0800, Brian Kimball wrote: > > 3) option to show *all* subject lines when sorting by thread. > > See the documentation on $index_format. You can take out the sequence for > the thread tree if you want to. In 1.0.1? %s is giving me

Re: IMAP, Irix, 1.13i, random index listings and deletions.

2000-02-14 Thread Thomas Roessler
This may be a terminal problem. Try running mutt from an xterm. On 2000-02-14 15:23:57 -0500, Scott A. McIntyre wrote: > Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:23:57 -0500 > From: "Scott A. McIntyre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: WHOI > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: IMAP, Irix, 1.13i, random index l

Re: Reply-To more than one recipient

2000-02-14 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 03:39:30 +, rex wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 12:15:28AM +0100, Byrial Jensen wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 15:50:42 -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > > > I don't remember if it is legal to put more than one address in the > > > From: header. > > > > It is lega

Re: Reply-To more than one recipient

2000-02-14 Thread rex
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 12:15:28AM +0100, Byrial Jensen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 15:50:42 -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > > I don't remember if it is legal to put more than one address in the > > From: header. > > It is legal according to RFC 822 if and only if you also have a > Sender: h

new links on mutt.org

2000-02-14 Thread Jeremy Blosser
The following links have been added to/updated on www.mutt.org: http://roadrunner.swansea.linux.org.uk/~hobbit/cave.html telsa gwynn's .muttrc ftp://ftp.gigabell.net/pub/mutt/ download mirror http://www.igd.fhg.de/~zach/mutt/ .muttrc w/vim/slrn-bindings, mutt for sgi irix http://busy.dna.fi/~w

Re: trouble with -[yZ]

2000-02-14 Thread David DeSimone
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And yes, mutt -y shouldn't exit silently... mutt -Z will likely start > to work too once you get mutt -y working. Mutt might not be exiting "silently"; it might actually be crashing, and wants to dump core, but can't for some reason. -- David DeSim

Re: "subscribe" vs. "lists"

2000-02-14 Thread Michael Elkins
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 01:04:05AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > That's odd. If you have a .muttrc file from 1.0 (or 1.0.1) and move to > 1.1.x, then it should -- as far as I understand -- still recognise the > address as a valid list, and generate a MFT header. However, the > contents of the h

Re: Reply-To more than one recipient

2000-02-14 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 15:50:42 -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > I don't remember if it is legal to put more than one address in the > From: header. It is legal according to RFC 822 if and only if you also have a Sender: header which states who among the authors actually sent the message. -- Byr

Re: "subscribe" vs. "lists"

2000-02-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Feb 2000: > The documentation on this subject really needs to be cleaned up before 1.2. > It's not clear what the effect of setting these is. I missed the discussion > about this and only discovered the other day that I was not generating the >

Re: trouble with -[yZ]

2000-02-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Dave Lorand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Feb 2000: > When I issue a mutt -y or mutt -Z, mutt exits silently even when I > know there is new mail in a mailbox. mutt -y in particular shouldn't > ever just exit silently, if I understand the docs correctly. Can you see a list of your mailbox

Re: my wishlist items

2000-02-14 Thread Michael Elkins
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 12:20:59PM -0800, Brian Kimball wrote: > 3) option to show *all* subject lines when sorting by thread. See the documentation on $index_format. You can take out the sequence for the thread tree if you want to. me -- pgp key available from http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~me/elkins

Re: my wishlist items

2000-02-14 Thread Michael Elkins
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 12:20:59PM -0800, Brian Kimball wrote: > 1) stop printing extra \n on exit. I'm one of those anal types that > can't stand extra white space. You can't imagine how happy I was when > vim stopped doing this. This is fixed in the 1.1.x series. It annoyed me too, thats why

Re: "subscribe" vs. "lists"

2000-02-14 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 11:04:19AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > The change will be in version 1.2. 1.0.1 is a bug-fix release of > 1.0 with minimal changes, not containing any of the more interesting > changes done to the code in the meantime. The documentation on this subject really needs to

Re: Reply-To more than one recipient

2000-02-14 Thread David DeSimone
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My Mutt (1.1.3) behaves differently too. Pressing "r" and "y" will > reply to both addresses, "r" and "n" to just the iberia.es address. I think this behavior will make more sense if you instead look at it this way (and maybe you are, but it's not cl

IMAP, Irix, 1.13i, random index listings and deletions.

2000-02-14 Thread Scott A. McIntyre
Hi. I've been trying to convert to Mutt for my primary mail client and on a linux box this is working out just fine. However, on my SGI running irix 6.5.5, I've noticed disturbing behaviour, and don't know where to point. The symptom is that the index will display message information for messag

trouble with -[yZ]

2000-02-14 Thread Dave Lorand
Hi, I've been using and enjoying mutt for a couple of months now, but I can't get the -y, and -Z forms to work. My muttrc has a mailboxes line like this: mailboxes /var/mail/davel =alerts =logs =rootmail =src/site =src/tech except quite a bit longer (640 characters and 41 mailboxes total, in c

Newbie: color not working on debian stable

2000-02-14 Thread Alan
Howdy all, new mutt user, love it so far, but... Sadly the stable debian distro only has mutt 0.95, so I'm going from scratch. I am Compiling it on a debian stable box with slang 1.2.2 (runtime and dev files) and ncurses 4.2 (tuntime and dev) and it all compiles fine, but no color! The .deb has

Re: peculiar requirement (maybe)

2000-02-14 Thread Michael Tatge
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 06:56:41PM +0100, Frank Joerdens wrote: > Is it possible to configure mutt to not show the message DON'T DELETE > THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA which is generated by my IMAP/POP3 > server? I could have it appended to ~/mbox in which case I wouldn't see > it when loo

Re: peculiar requirement (maybe)

2000-02-14 Thread Mike Markowski
I use this: folder-hook . ;push 'l ! ~f "Mail System Internal Data"'\n and it seems to do the job. Maybe someone can explain why it doesn't work without that initial semicolon, though! :-) Thanks, Mike On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 06:56:41PM +0100, Frank Joerdens wrote: >

peculiar requirement (maybe)

2000-02-14 Thread Frank Joerdens
Is it possible to configure mutt to not show the message DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA which is generated by my IMAP/POP3 server? I could have it appended to ~/mbox in which case I wouldn't see it when looking at /var/spool/mail/frank but since I read my mail both via telnet a

Re: NFS lockd problem

2000-02-14 Thread Dan Lipofsky
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 09:44:21PM +0100, Martin Bertilsson Haagen wrote: > On my computers I have mounted my home directories with nfs. This because I > thinks this is a good thing to do. When I exiting mutt it askes me: > Move read messages to /home/haagen/Mail/old ([n]/y): > If i type "y

Re: Read-Markability by pattern

2000-02-14 Thread Randall J . Million
Perhaps you want the scoring function in mutt. It will not mark mail as read (automatically), but it will show the most important mails at the top so you can tell if one comes in. randy On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 03:14:50PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote: > Hi Telsa, > > thanks for your reply. > > In fa

Re: Read-Markability by pattern

2000-02-14 Thread Lukas Ruf
Hi Telsa, thanks for your reply. In fact I already make heavy use of procmail just to filter and archive incoming emails. The point what I wanted here: There is one source of emails where sometimes important mails arrive othertimes they are just silly, but in fact I want to keep them all and

Re: Read-Markability by pattern

2000-02-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Feb 2000: > is there a possibility to specify within Mutt a function, that filters > the incoming emails and marks them as read if the pattern matches ? Sure. Based on your situation, I'd also suggest a procmail/maildrop filtering solution, like Tel

Re: Read-Markability by pattern

2000-02-14 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 01:46:50PM +0100 or thereabouts, Lukas Ruf wrote: > Dear list, > > is there a possibility to specify within Mutt a function, that filters > the incoming emails and marks them as read if the pattern matches ? > > The problem: I receive lots of email -- some of them are imp

Read-Markability by pattern

2000-02-14 Thread Lukas Ruf
Dear list, is there a possibility to specify within Mutt a function, that filters the incoming emails and marks them as read if the pattern matches ? The problem: I receive lots of email -- some of them are important, others not. In fact, I want to keep all of them but I would like to be informe

Re: "subscribe" vs. "lists"

2000-02-14 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-02-14 01:10:40 -0500, Russell Hoover wrote: > I thought this change was going to take place in version 1.0.1, > but AFAKCT it hasn't. Is this change still in the works, or has > it been abandoned? The change will be in version 1.2. 1.0.1 is a bug-fix release of 1.0 with minimal changes

"subscribe" vs. "lists"

2000-02-14 Thread Russell Hoover
I could swear I read on this list not too long ago that the command "subscribe" would replace the "lists" command in the muttrc to define what mailing lists mutt should recognize the user as being subscribed to. I thought this change was going to take place in version 1.0.1, but AFAKCT it hasn't.