On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 01:29:42PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I have just spent some time compiling and installing ncurses. After
> doing so I went into mutt and got:-
> S-Lang Error
> Malloc Error
> SLcurses_initscr: init failed
> As you see my mutt was compiled with Slang.
> I then found
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 01:40:52PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> Has anyone ever got cursesmodule to compile under AIX 3.2.5 and if so
> could they give me a blow by blow account of how to get it compiled
> and used with mail2muttalias.py?
I think you would have much more success if you asked
In my efforts to improve my use of mutt, I got round to trying
mail2muttalias.py. It is interesting that in avoiding bloat in
mutt itself by using other programs you introduce bloat elsewhere
in your file system! OK, I had installed python as I want to learn
to write some CGI stuff in python rath
I have just spent some time compiling and installing ncurses. After
doing so I went into mutt and got:-
S-Lang Error
Malloc Error
SLcurses_initscr: init failed
As you see my mutt was compiled with Slang.
I then found that most (also uses Slang) gave:-
Unable to create keymaps.
I then realised
Manoj Kasichainula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:16:15PM -0400, G . Sumner Hayes wrote:
> > 1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
> > filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
> > I'm using IMAP mail, which
On 13/Sep/1999, McKisson, Shawn wrote:
> Would you say that mutt is probably the best mail client for handling mailing
> lists? Are there any other reasonable alternatives?
If it were not, I wouldn't be using it :-)
But I think you won't get a different answer in this list :-D
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:16:15PM -0400, G . Sumner Hayes wrote:
> 1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
> filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
> I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there any
> way to ge
(Mutt 1.0pre2, pgp 5 on what's basically Red Hat Linux 6.0 with some
security updates)
1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
[I'm CCing this to HJ to see if he can send me the other patches he
mentioned]
I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[I read via IMAP from multiple machines, so no fetchmail/procmail combo works]
> The rest of the office is using Outlook with PGP
> support, but that sends old-style PGP bodies and sets the
Hello,
If I compile mutt-1.0pre2 with ncurses, the following line in my muttrc
does not work correctly:
color status black cyan
Instead I get brightblack on cyan while in the index and normal black on
cyan in the pager. Actually, regardless of the specified color, I
always get bright v
Keith Harbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 11 Sep 1999:
> Can (some of) the various expandos in, for instance, index_format,
> especially %s and %F, be used in the print_command string variable?
> I tried it with %s, but mutt just passed it through without expansion.
I'm not that knowledgea
Hi Mutters!
Now, I've been using mutt for years, but I don't understand this:
I switch from tcsh to zsh as my login shell and all of a sudden I
only get coredumps. :-(
Who can tell me what is wrong, please?
eule:~>gdb /usr/bin/mutt
GNU gdb 4.17.0.11 with Linux support
Copyright 1998 Free Softwa
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will handle
> this quite nicely.
Fetchmail will pull the mail from the IMAP server and, presumably, store
it locally on your workstation. That's pretty much what it's for,
anyway.
When using a
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will
> handle this quite nicely.
I read mail on more than one machine. I can have fetchmail leave the
mail on the server, but then it doesn't get deleted from the server when
I delete it.
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 02:36:12PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>McKisson, Shawn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>> Would you say that mutt is probably the best mail client for handling
>> mailing lists?
>
>Yes. List-reply, threading (not just viewing, but deleting/etc. as well),
>intelligent handling
Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will
handle this quite nicely.
Josh
> G . Sumner Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Now I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
> > any way to get mutt to automatically verify old-style signatures
G . Sumner Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
> any way to get mutt to automatically verify old-style signatures on
> this mail?
I guess I'm kinda lucky, in that I have login access on the server where
my mail gets stored, so
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 02:25:11PM +0200, Stasinos Konstantopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, is there a way to use mutt on the command line to
> extract an attachment from an email? What I'm trying to do is have a
> script that will save to a predefined directory all attachments
> include
Hi,
I was wondering, is there a way to use mutt on the command line to
extract an attachment from an email? What I'm trying to do is have a
script that will save to a predefined directory all attachments
included in a mail piped through it.
Any other tool that will do this for me maybe? For exam
"R. Marc" wrote:
>
> > In my opinion, wmmail is useless until you have a permanent connexion.
>
> I'm sure you have reason for this opinion, but if you use fetchmail
> wmmail is simply grand, permanent connection or no, IMHO.
>
> [snip]
> > and most of the time people are trying to minimise the
20 matches
Mail list logo
