Re: IMAP folder path

1999-08-31 Thread Brian D. Winters
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 03:22:42PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > I wonder, though, if our original poster, who used a setting like > folder="{imapserver}INBOX." was attempting to get Mutt to translate > "+folder" into "{imapserver}INBOX.folder", which means a folder > literally named "INBOX.folde

Re: newbie : lot of problems with mutt

1999-08-31 Thread David DeSimone
Raju K. V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 3047603 Aug 28 19:01 mutt* > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail54665 Aug 28 19:01 mutt_dotlock* This looks correct. > -rwxrwxr-x 1 root mail 2694 Aug 28 19:04 /var/mail/root That's fine, except that your

Re: IMAP folder path

1999-08-31 Thread David DeSimone
Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should mutt append the delimiter except against the root namespace > {imapserver}, or should you just have to say 'set > folder="{imapserver}Mail/" (mutt will never append the slash to imap > folders)? it's probably not useful for Mutt to append the de

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread David DeSimone
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > set pgp_autosign > send-hook email@somewhere "unset pgp_autosign; etc..." No, that won't work, because once you send some mail to , pgp_autosign will be unset, and remain unset. > > send-hook ~A set pgp_autosign > > send-hook ~[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Rob Reid
At 6:23 PM EDT on August 31 Joshua Weage sent off: > If that is the case, then anything that was changed with > a send-hook applies to all further messages that you send > until another send-hook is encountered? IMO, that is a bad > idea, and isn't mentioned in the manual. What is the > a

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Joshua Weage [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 09:15:16PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > That's not sufficient. Remeber that variables set from within hooks > > are persistant. > > > > If that is the case, then anything that was changed with a send-hook > applie

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Joshua Weage
If that is the case, then anything that was changed with a send-hook applies to all further messages that you send until another send-hook is encountered? IMO, that is a bad idea, and isn't mentioned in the manual. What is the appropriate send-hook to use to switch back to "normal" opera

Re: color-support is gone

1999-08-31 Thread Oliver Immich
Thanks a lot for your hints! I uninstalled the rpm and configured the tarball properly ( -> slang-0.99.38-8 is part of the 5.2 distro, you wouldn´t guess that, would you). Now, I´m having wonderful colors making my life easier. Sorry for posting twice. First time seem to be gone lost... Oliver

Re: color-high not working

1999-08-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Oliver Immich [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > since 0.95.6i Mutt lacks color-support in my terminals. > I am very sure about my rc - files being correct, everything > else is working properly, too. If somebody on this list have > a clue: Please tell me! > > ---> I installed mutt-1.0pre1i-2.cfp.rhl

Re: BUG: 0.95.7i and possibly later.

1999-08-31 Thread Fairlight
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 09:09:32PM +0200, Thomas Roessler cogitated: > On 1999-08-31 14:32:44 -0400, Fairlight wrote: > > > 6) Mutt then re-read the mailbox and presented every message twice. > > I assumed that it had rewritten/appended all the messages to > > received. The index DEFINITELY had e

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
That's not sufficient. Remeber that variables set from within hooks are persistant. On 1999-08-31 15:13:26 -0400, Joshua Weage wrote: > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 15:13:26 -0400 > From: Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: pgp autosign > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PR

Re: BUG: 0.95.7i and possibly later.

1999-08-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-08-31 14:32:44 -0400, Fairlight wrote: > 6) Mutt then re-read the mailbox and presented every message twice. > I assumed that it had rewritten/appended all the messages to > received. The index DEFINITELY had every message twice...count on > status line was doubled. Funny. What kind of

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Joshua Weage
That should work, although the following will also: set pgp_autosign send-hook email@somewhere "unset pgp_autosign; etc..." Josh > > go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can this be done, if it can be done at > > all? > > You can do this (I believe) with send-hook, something like: > send-

BUG: 0.95.7i and possibly later.

1999-08-31 Thread Fairlight
I ran into an indexing bug that I think may need fixing... Let me explain the circumstances: 1) My folder variable is set to ~/Mail 2) save-hook and mbox-hook both point to =received 3) I had a folder-hook > 'set move=no' 4) I called mutt -f Mail/received (from $HOME) 5) I went to change folders

Re: color-support is gone

1999-08-31 Thread Mark Luntzel
well, was it configured with --with-slang or --with-curses=DIR sounds like it wasnt, or your slang/ncurses paths are nonexistent/wack. On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 10:51:25AM -0700, esoR ocsirF wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:39:02AM +0200, Oliver Immich wrote: > > > > > > Hello ´Mutters´,

Re: color-support is gone

1999-08-31 Thread Fairlight
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 10:51:25AM -0700, esoR ocsirF cogitated: > On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:39:02AM +0200, Oliver Immich wrote: > > > > > > Hello ´Mutters´, > > > > a few days ago I started using mutt and I am very very happy with it. > > Everything I need or I have discovered so far is worki

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Michael Elkins
[please send all questsion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 04:10:15PM +0200, Bo?tjan Muller [NEONATUS] wrote: > I would like to enable mutt to autosign all my outgoing mails except ones that > go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can this be done, if it can be done at > all? You can do this

Re: color-support is gone

1999-08-31 Thread esoR ocsirF
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:39:02AM +0200, Oliver Immich wrote: > > > Hello ´Mutters´, > > a few days ago I started using mutt and I am very very happy with it. > Everything I need or I have discovered so far is working well - except of > color-support which makes mutt even easier to use. I had

Re: message width in vim?

1999-08-31 Thread Shao Zhang
Pete Toscano [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > hmmm, this is interesting and helpful, but i have a further question. > how do you get vim (or is it even possible?) to "soft wrap" while > editing and then insert characters when you exit or write? this > would be nice in that, if you're editing a file

Mutt + Vim Q's -Antwort

1999-08-31 Thread TE-Labor Diplomant
Hi, >i'm using vim as my e-mail editor I guess this is a good choice. Yup. >notice it has margins on the right and left leaving space on both sides. it >is also 'full' justified to those margins. I'ld use something like: :imap ,ip :se tw=40gqapk>ap and then just type ,ip in the paragraph yo

How Do I Make (Only Some) Mail Appear in Russian?

1999-08-31 Thread Irving_Wolfe
I have some mail come in occasionally that is, for example, in Russian, dos code page 1251, I think it is. Most of the characters look blank, but they are really there. I guess they have a high bit set and are not coming out visible for me. I try changing my console font to all the different ch

color-support is gone

1999-08-31 Thread Oliver Immich
Hello ´Mutters´, a few days ago I started using mutt and I am very very happy with it. Everything I need or I have discovered so far is working well - except of color-support which makes mutt even easier to use. I had colors with 0.95.4us, but since then they´re gone. I installed the 1.0pre1i

color-high not working

1999-08-31 Thread Oliver Immich
Hello mutters, since 0.95.6i Mutt lacks color-support in my terminals. I am very sure about my rc - files being correct, everything else is working properly, too. If somebody on this list have a clue: Please tell me! ---> I installed mutt-1.0pre1i-2.cfp.rhl5.i386.rpm on my RH5.2 (not real

Re: zsh command completion for mutt

1999-08-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-08-31 12:43:58 +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote: > I don't know if it's better, but I use the following completion: Nice. However, the recursive path searching seems to be a bit slow...

Re: converting pine aliases to mutt

1999-08-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-08-31 16:00:11 +0530, Raju K V wrote: > I have a whole lot of pine aliases (in .addressbook). I need to convert > them to mutt. Can you suggest a simple method or point to an existing > script for doing the same? Under ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/mutt/contrib/, there is a script named addrbook

Re: zsh command completion for mutt

1999-08-31 Thread Jimmy Mäkelä
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 07:49:17PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > I'm tinkering around a bit with zsh. > > Does anyone have something better than this for mutt command > completion? (I don't like that sub-directories hack too much, but > it seems to be the only thing I get working.) > I don't

converting pine aliases to mutt

1999-08-31 Thread Raju K V
hi all, I have a whole lot of pine aliases (in .addressbook). I need to convert them to mutt. Can you suggest a simple method or point to an existing script for doing the same? Thanks in advance, Raju