On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 12:17:35PM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
> On 990110, at 23:55:54, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> > I took over maintenance of [the lbdb] utility and you will find it at
> > http://luv.rhein.de/~roland/debian/#lbdb now (Source and Debian
> > binary). Actual version is 0.12.
What
[Sorry for breaking the thread - I'm replying via the web archives
as I've not received any mutt-users mail for 12 hours or so.]
Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Alisdair McDiarmid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990820 13:40]:
> > I use vim and mutt together (as it should be :) and I'm trying
> > to configure them t
At 03:07 PM 8/20/99 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:40:40 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
[snip]
>> Maybe a quick hack would be best here, like writing a script that
>> would first remove the Delivered-To header and then remail it
>> manually (eg. "grep -v ^Delivered-To:" pi
Lars --
...and then Lars Hecking said...
% David Thorburn-Gundlach writes:
% > Hi, folks --
% >
% > I'm trying ot build 0.97i on my Solaris 2.6 box. I found that I had
%
% I assume you mean 0.95.7?
Oh; oops, yep :-)
%
% > to go and get ncurses, so I did that. Now make reports a problem w
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 09:55:59AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
[...]
> I'm afraid I'm an old emacs user, and got to know vi, but have paid very
> very little attention to vim's extensions since it was introduced to linux.
>
> Could you do me a favour and digress about where the colours are actuall
On 990110, at 23:55:54, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> I took over maintenance of [the lbdb] utility and you will find it at
> http://luv.rhein.de/~roland/debian/#lbdb now (Source and Debian
> binary). Actual version is 0.12.
Has anyone built lbdb for HP-UX? I've been trying to build version
0.16, an
Hello all,
I did just notice that my mutt 0.95.7i won't speak to me in german.
I compiled it --with-included-gettext and without that option, but
it always speaks english.
strace says the following (all 6 result in "no such file or ..."):
open("/usr/share/locale/de_DE.ISO-8859-1/LC_MESSAGES/mes
I'm using the following:
mbox-hook .* =received
save-hook .* =received
Basically, I didn't understand till I just re-read it that this is
message-based, not folder based.
What I -want- is any time I quit or change folders, for it to save out the
mail to =received (I have that right there) U
All, my apologies if email to me was bouncing all over the place
yesterday. Someone where my domain name is hosted totally screwed up
my DNS record yesterday so it looked as if the domain didn't exist.
If anyone had any more input on my postponed menu, I didn't receive
it. Could you kindly res
On Aug/19/1999, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote:
> You can get around this by using:
>
> mailboxes `find ~/mail -type f -print`
Doesn't work here :-) Mutt only treats as mailbox the first item in
the list. So, if ~/mail had the folders "folder1", "folder2", "folder3", the
above command would
Yes, I'm replying again :-) I have realized just now, and the prior
message has already been sent. Consider this just a fix :-)
On Aug/19/1999, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote:
> You can get around this by using:
> mailboxes `find ~/mail -type f -print`
> (untested, but I use something simil
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 06:18:31AM -0700, Leiden, Soren spewed forth:
> VIM has some 150+ color syntax highlighting schemes-- attached is a fairly
> basic .vimrc file with syntax higlighting enabled...
Looked over that file...I see the syntax on line...but where are the
colours actually set
VIM has some 150+ color syntax highlighting schemes-- attached is a fairly
basic .vimrc file with syntax higlighting enabled...
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Well, the 7th day since I hooked up with mutt, and I tackled most of the
> manual tonight and set up a lot of things I hadn't yet.
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 10:29:57AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 12:33:37AM +0100, Alisdair McDiarmid wrote:
> > I use vim and mutt together (as it should be :) and I'm trying to
> > configure them to both have the same syntax colouring display.
> >
> > I like vim's standard c
In the manual, autoedit says it will skip the "send-menu" if set when
replying.
I tried setting it an noticed no difference UNLESS I also had edit_headers
set as well. The manual indicates there would be extra skipping of
questions if edit_headers was set as well, but autoedit by itself does
n
Well, the 7th day since I hooked up with mutt, and I tackled most of the
manual tonight and set up a lot of things I hadn't yet.
One of those was colours. I finally have a cool colour scheme that works
well. There's just one small part that bothers me: when I go to
reply/forward, vi (actually
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Question for ya first...how do you get vim's "standard colours for email
> mode" ...I guess how do you get vim's email mode? :)
The standard syntax highlight includes the email mode as well.
So all you need is to add the following to your /etc/vimrc:
" Vi
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 02:07:26PM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Atilla --
>
> ...and then Attila Csosz said...
> %
> % How could I see the To: field instead of From: field in my sent-items folder?
>
> See section 6.3.58 of the manualfor more details, but you probably
> want something
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 04:47:01PM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
> urlview was written by Michael Elkins. Are you suggesting I ask him to
> add the change I made to the URL display to warn about adding or removing
> a "/" in ftp URLSs?
>
> I would like to see urlview and url_handler in the c
19 matches
Mail list logo
