On 990308, at 18:50:28, The Beast from the East wrote:
> Did you set the "record" variable? This variable has no default
> so you may have to set it.
I've confirmed that this is a problem with my environment and not with
mutt. Another user on my system does not experience the problem. I do
hav
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Tony Rose wrote:
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:14:56 -0500 (EST)
> From: Tony Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pine Discussion Forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Pine Alternatives ???
>
>[...]
>
> Is there a GUI program that will authenticate at the login that would
> repla
Did you set the "record" variable? This variable has no default
so you may have to set it.
On Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 07:55:26AM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
> Until recently, mutt would recognize '<' as a short cut for the record
> folder. It seems it no longer recognizes it on the command line (
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 05:39:40PM -0500, rfi from Rich Roth wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 10:58:52AM -0500, Randall Hopper wrote:
>
> > On that thread, which support WYSIWYG text/enriched composition with Mutt?
>
> I think that is on the table for someone to write.
Emacs has a WYSIWYG text-
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 07:49:31PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> The script is called aladalcurm.py.
> [ALl ADresses ALiassed with CURses Menu]
> It is written using Python (http://www.python.org) and curses.
Personally it's way to clever for me to remember - how about 'take-email.py'
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 10:58:52AM -0500, Randall Hopper wrote:
> On that thread, which support WYSIWYG text/enriched composition with Mutt?
I think that is on the table for someone to write.
--
Later ...
Rich Roth --- On-the-Net
Direct: Box 927, Northampton, MA 01061, Voice: 413-586-9668
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 11:54:41AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Majorly annoying problem; very simple solution.
We call that a 'cockpit' error
--
Later ...
Rich Roth --- On-the-Net
Direct: Box 927, Northampton, MA 01061, Voice: 413-586-9668
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Url
On Thu Feb 18 09:49 1999 -0500, felix k sheng wrote:
> I switched to mutt for precisely it's ability to do this (version 91i),
> but found w/out modifying the source suddenly the above didn't work for
> me. That is, when I have just:
>
> send-hook . 'my_hdr From: felix k sheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 09:41:11AM -0500, Petr Hlustik wrote:
SNIP
>
> There is also a perl script to convert Pine's .addressbook to mutt
> format. I have to admit, I still miss in Mutt the ability of Pine to "take"
> addresses from the body of the e-mails (it can do the From: field).
I was als
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999, Dan Resler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| Sorry, this does not work "as advertised" nor as you state it
| above. If I type "mutt -y" I get a listing of the incoming mailboxes
| that I have defined. If I enter one of these, then hit c for
| change-folder, then press , I get the
> > This should be in the FAQ. from the change-folder prompt, you can hit
> > tab to complete (or ?) and tab again gets you the mail folder list.
> Sorry, this does not work "as advertised" nor as you state it
> above. If I type "mutt -y" I get a listing of the incoming mailboxes
> that I have de
On 03/08/99 Dan Resler uttered the following other thing:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 07:15:52PM -0800, Brandon Long wrote:
> > On 03/07/99 James FitzGibbon uttered the following other thing:
> > > I'm a new mutt user, recently converted from Pine. I'm trying to
> > > emulate the "l" command in Pin
On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 07:15:52PM -0800, Brandon Long wrote:
> On 03/07/99 James FitzGibbon uttered the following other thing:
> > I'm a new mutt user, recently converted from Pine. I'm trying to emulate
> > the "l" command in Pine, which would bring up a list of folders that you
> > have define
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This did the trick. It seems that the problem was that I had my
> editor (vim) start at the first blank line after the headers (right
> below Reply-To). When going into insert mode with "i" it incorporated
> Reply-To into the body. If I go into insert
>On Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 04:56:52PM -0500 Rob Reid wrote:
> rxvt. It even takes less memory than xterm. There are a lot of
> variants of rxvt out there, but rxvt is a good place to start, and you
> probably already have it.
Can anyone give me a pointer to where I can pick up a version for SunOS
This did the trick. It seems that the problem was that I had my
editor (vim) start at the first blank line after the headers (right below
Reply-To). When going into insert mode with "i" it incorporated
Reply-To into the body. If I go into insert mode with "o" (skipping a
line after Reply-To) it
rfi from Rich Roth:
|On Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 12:01:29PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
|
|> Which editor do mutt users generally recommend for creating emails?
|>
|> I would prefer something which works fairly intuitively using a PC
|> keyboard - ie uses cursor keys, PgUp, PgDn, Home, End etc
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 08:51:44AM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 10:38:59PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote:
> >
> > Currently using Pine 4.x. Can I use my existing ~/HOME/mail
> > structure, or should it be rebuilt. If this is a rtfm ask, which doco and
> > where?
On Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 12:01:29PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
> Which editor do mutt users generally recommend for creating emails?
>
> I would prefer something which works fairly intuitively using a PC
> keyboard - ie uses cursor keys, PgUp, PgDn, Home, End etc...,
> and use of colour would b
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 04:27:15PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Oddly, if I reply to a message the Reply-To stays in the header. The problem
> only manifests itself when I compose a new message.
Try removing the extra blank line and see if it gets added again -- if not,
it's in the original setup
Hu
Ship's Log, Lt. Peter van Dijk, Stardate 080399.0056:
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 12:44:37AM +0100, Alexander N. Benner wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Mutt: =mutt [Msgs:13 New:1 Inc:4
> > It means that you have new mail in one mailbox.
> 4 mailboxes, actually :)
oops .. well ... I was already in bed
On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 10:38:59PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote:
>
> Currently using Pine 4.x. Can I use my existing ~/HOME/mail
> structure, or should it be rebuilt. If this is a rtfm ask, which doco and
> where?
Sure you can, just put all folders in a 'mailboxes' line in your .
On 990305, at 18:31:53, Scott McDermott wrote:
> --- configure.in Thu Mar 4 18:21:48 1999
> +++ configure.in.new Fri Mar 5 06:38:19 1999
> @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
> ;;
> esac
>
> -AC_PATH_PROG(SENDMAIL, sendmail, no, $PATH:/usr/sbin:/usr/lib)
> +ac_aux_path_sendmail=":/usr/sbin:/usr/lib
On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 10:05:30PM -0500, James FitzGibbon wrote:
> I use Maildir for all my mail, including lists and fcc folders. Under Pine,
> I organized these folders like so:
>
> ~/mail/
> /inbox/
> /lists/
> /mutt-users/
> ...
> /saved/
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
