Re: [Mjpeg-users] writing multi threaded code

2011-09-21 Thread Michael Hanke
Mark, The easiest solution is most probably to use OpenMP if you have a serial program up and running. it consists "simply" of adding pragmas to the serial code. Any compiler should be able to handle this today. This avoids going to the basics like pthreads. It's a fast solution, but it's effic

[Mjpeg-users] performance problem of lavrec

2007-12-05 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, recently I observed a performance problem of lavrec after upgrading my computer. I am running SuSE Linux 10.1 (32 bit) on an Athlon 64 X2 3800+. I am capturing from a bt 878 with software encoding. I recompiled both mjpegtools 1.8.0 and the CVS version tuned to my hardware. I have always a

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Slightly off topic: Audio problem with lavplay...

2007-10-02 Thread Michael Hanke
I beg your pardon for answering slightly off topic. I have both on-board sound and an old SoundBlaster card. Recording with both works technically without any problem out of the box. BUT: The capture noise level for the on-board chip is around -35 dB, while that from the SoundBlaster is below -

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mjpeg-users] Another problem with very old VHS tapes

2006-11-09 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2006 00:51 schrieb stefan: > > You might try putting the data thru the new and improved deinterlacer > > and creating a progressive stream. Maybe that will 'blend' the two > > fields together into a more stable image. > > I fear that this will not help much,

[Mjpeg-users] Mjpeg-users] Another problem with very old VHS tapes

2006-11-08 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, I have another capturing problem with very old VHS tapes. I am using a Canopus ADVC-55 for capturing to PAL-DV. Even if my tapes are very old, I do not have any problem with lost frames, drops outs etc. My problem seems to be a synchronization issue of the individual scan lines. In some fra

Re: [Mjpeg-users] feeding mpeg2enc with many streams simultaneously

2006-08-15 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Dienstag, 15. August 2006 17:43 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Michael Hanke wrote: > [snip] > This has been talked about several times on the mailinglists in the > past. Unfortunately with 17000 messages in the archive it is hard > t

[Mjpeg-users] feeding mpeg2enc with many streams simultaneously

2006-08-15 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, The subject line is probably not very clear, but here is my problem: I have a project (a movie) consisting of many takes. Most of them need their own setting for preprocessing (denoiser, scaler etc) which are very different from take to take such that it is impossible to find a satisfact

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise Was: Video is "green" if i use yuvdeinterlace

2006-08-11 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 10:18 schrieb stefan: > stefan schrieb: > > Steven M. Schultz schrieb: > > > >> On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Michael Hanke wrote: > >> > >>> Hmmm... Please excuse my dumb question. Here are you puzzling me a little bit. [sni

[Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise Was: Video is "green" if i use yuvdeinterlace

2006-07-05 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juli 2006 00:03 schrieb stefan: > Steven M. Schultz schrieb: > > I'm on vacation at the moment and a lengthy discussion is not possible > > (about to wander out and do some sight seeing) but my suggestion > > is omit the deinterlace step > > > > clearly depends on what he trie

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Very long avi-file

2006-05-03 Thread Michael Hanke
Thanks a lot to all of you for your answers! I will try to build a new version of the tools because this seems to be the most elegant possibility. Michael Am Dienstag 02 Mai 2006 18.35 schrieb Martin Collins: > On Tue, 2 May 2006 09:51:19 +0200 > Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Very long avi-file

2006-05-02 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Dienstag 02 Mai 2006 17.56 schrieb Bernhard Praschinger: > Hallo > > > I got a very long MJPEG avi-file (ca 14 GB) which seems to use the OpenDML > > extension. Lavrec/glav seem to see the first 2 GB, only. How can I use this > > file (at least in lav2yuv/lav2wav)? > If you use the cve version

[Mjpeg-users] Very long avi-file

2006-05-02 Thread Michael Hanke
Hello, I got a very long MJPEG avi-file (ca 14 GB) which seems to use the OpenDML extension. Lavrec/glav seem to see the first 2 GB, only. How can I use this file (at least in lav2yuv/lav2wav)? Thank you. Michael --- Using Tomcat but need t

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Yuvtools

2006-03-08 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Mittwoch 08 März 2006 08.08 schrieb Florin Andrei: > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 14:09 -0500, Jerome Cornet wrote: > > > yuvmotionfps interpolates the motion of blocks withing the image rather > > than doing a simple temporal averaging of the entire frame. > > This allows a very smooth motion of the

[Mjpeg-users] Analog to DV capture

2006-02-27 Thread Michael Hanke
Hello, I am interested in capturing my analog material to dv. On this list, the Canopus ADVC-100 is very often recommended for that purpose. Here in Sweden it is very hard to get one, and it is extremely expensive (around 500 USD). Are there any other hard or software solutions for that purpose

Re: [Mjpeg-users] SVideo-In on graphics card

2006-01-30 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Montag 30 Januar 2006 19.02 schrieb Bernhard Praschinger: > Hallo > > > I apalogize if this is not the right list to ask... > > > > Recently, I got a new graphics card (NVidia 6600) which has SVideo and > > Composite *inputs*. Is there any possibility to capture video from these > > sources? I

[Mjpeg-users] SVideo-In on graphics card

2006-01-29 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, I apalogize if this is not the right list to ask... Recently, I got a new graphics card (NVidia 6600) which has SVideo and Composite *inputs*. Is there any possibility to capture video from these sources? If yes, does lavrec do the job? Thank you. Michael ---

[Mjpeg-users] LVS and mjpeg tools 1.8

2006-01-09 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, I tried to build LVS from CVS against mjpeg tools 1.8 but autogen failed. Having a look at configure.in I found the lines dnl mjpegtools AC_PATH_PROG(MJPEGTOOLS_CONFIG, mjpegtools-config, no) if test x$MJPEGTOOLS_CONFIG = xno; then AC_MSG_ERROR(mjpegtools-1.6 is required to run this ver

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler: Upsampling to widescreen

2005-12-06 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Dienstag 06 Dezember 2005 08.29 schrieb Stefan M. Fendt: > Steven M. Schultz schrieb: > > > I do NOT think it's a good idea. Upscaling ~20-30% (depending if you're > > > >in a NTSC or PAL area) degrades the quality so much I couldn't watch > >it (yes - I've done it and didn't like the results

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler: Upsampling to widescreen

2005-12-05 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Dienstag 06 Dezember 2005 04.34 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > > On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Michael Hanke wrote: > > > I have some material which is widescreen in letter box format. Since the > > quality is rather high (Digital Satellite --> SVHS-cable --> (re)digit

[Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler: Upsampling to widescreen

2005-12-05 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, I have some material which is widescreen in letter box format. Since the quality is rather high (Digital Satellite --> SVHS-cable --> (re)digitize) I am thinking of transforming the picture to DVD_WIDE (720x576 and 16:9). My question: is this a good idea or should I rely on the TV-set to

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Denoising old material

2005-11-21 Thread Michael Hanke
Thanks, Am Montag 21 November 2005 10.03 schrieb Dik Takken: > > for every take. This way I can produce many individual mpeg files which must > > be joined together. Is there a more elegant way such that I can chain the > > takes on the YUV4MPEG level before piping them into mpegenc? I am using

[Mjpeg-users] Denoising old material

2005-11-20 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, I am using mjpegtools for a rather long time for the restoration of very old VHS sources. But now I met a problem where I do not know how to proceed. The material which I have (already in MJPEG format) comes from 45+ years old 8mm material. Most of it is bw but some takes are colored. -

Linuxvideostudio Was:Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-14 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Mittwoch 14 September 2005 20.03 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: > > > I have just noticed a problem in the tracker with RC3, maybe you (or > > anybodey else) can take a look before releasing the new package: > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Opteron + mjpegtools

2005-02-21 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Dienstag 15 Februar 2005 18.52 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > > Did anyone try to use alternative compilers? > > Never got around to doing that. It was simpler (or so it seemed) > to get a faster system ;) > Since the issue was puzzling me, I tried to get the best out of my box. her

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Opteron + mjpegtools

2005-02-14 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Dienstag 15 Februar 2005 00.42 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Michael Hanke wrote: > > > I count y4mdenoise an excellent piece of software but I thought that I make > > something wrong: On my machine (1.2GHz Athlon) I obtain a denoising rate o

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Opteron + mjpegtools

2005-02-14 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, Am Samstag 12 Februar 2005 20.47 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > The final total elapsed time of the two encoding runs: > > dual G5: 34hrs 7min 1.3 frames/sec > dual Opteron: 15hrs 46 min 2.80 frames/sec > I count y4mdenoise an excellent piece of software but I thought that I

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplexing DTS streams, nearly

2005-01-20 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Donnerstag 20 Januar 2005 11.09 schrieb Dave Dodge: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:31:45PM -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > [...] > > Have you tried upgrading autoconf on an old system? It's nearly impossible. > > Well, yes and no. Installing updat

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplexing DTS streams, nearly

2005-01-19 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, Am Donnerstag 20 Januar 2005 04.31 schrieb Trent Piepho: > > > The minimum versions must be very bleeding edge, when redhat 9 and slackware > > > > No, not really. But their also not years old either (RH9 went end of > > life a some time back - they're up to fedora 3 or whateve

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Building from CVS

2004-12-16 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Dienstag 14 Dezember 2004 18.33 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Michael Hanke wrote: > > > I tried to build the mjpegtools from CVS. Unfortunately, I could not run > > autogen.sh successfully. The most important error: > > > > HAVE_

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Building from CVS

2004-12-15 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Mittwoch 15 Dezember 2004 08.33 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Michael Hanke wrote: > > > HAVE_PNG appears in configure.in. The stuff with HAVE_LIBPNG seems to be ok. > > The resulting configure script finds the png libraries... > > The

[Mjpeg-users] Building from CVS

2004-12-14 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, I tried to build the mjpegtools from CVS. Unfortunately, I could not run autogen.sh successfully. The most important error: HAVE_PNG not defined in AM_CONDITIONAL What is going wrong? I have installed libpng-devel. Thank you. Michael -

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Audio level meter for lavrec

2004-11-07 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Sonntag 07 November 2004 23.20 schrieb Steve Tell: > > This reminds me how badly we need graphical desktop-integrated > > video/audio capture applications under Linux. ;). LVS' capture tab is a > > good first step, but nowhere close to what's required... > > Agreed, although my wishlist for a g

Re: [Mjpeg-users] LVS and gdk error

2004-11-02 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, Your description is not quite clear to me. Are you changing the X-server in different runs of LVS? If this is the case, then the problem might be the configuration file of LVS. It saves automatically the last state including the Xv port number. Changing the Xserver gives rise to a differ

[Mjpeg-users] Re: [Kino-dev] audio and/or video

2004-09-19 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, Please excuse that I am posting to two lists, but it seems necessary... Am Sonntag 19 September 2004 19.03 schrieb Dan Dennedy: > We do not disagree. However, it takes time and effort to program the > functionality to do it. Kino2 will do what you want, but Kino 1.0 has > not even been rel

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Capture problem on SUSE-9.1

2004-09-02 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Freitag 03 September 2004 05.18 schrieb Derek Fountain: > I'm running the 1.6.2 version of the tools as found in SUSE-9.1 for IA32. I > have a self complied 2.6.7 kernel, but other than that it's all out of the > box SUSE. I've used the tools for years, on and off, but this is the first > tim

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Create a false ending - related questions

2004-08-19 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Donnerstag 19 August 2004 17.04 schrieb Anne Wilson: > [snip] > I've not done anything like this before, so I wonder if it is possible in, > say, audacity, to fade the music off at the end. I have a nice fade ending > on the video, and would like the audio to do something similar. Have you

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Create a false ending - related questions

2004-08-18 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo Anne, Am Mittwoch 18 August 2004 20.16 schrieb Anne Wilson: [snip] > With help from Steven to get the command and debugging verbosity right I found > that I could create transition avis. I went back to studio then, and opened > the first image avi then added the first transition avi and

Re: [Mjpeg-users] A new effect for Linux Video Studio

2004-08-16 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, Am Montag 26 Juli 2004 18.36 schrieben Sie: > Hallo > > I'm trying to include your patch to the current CVS version of LVS. > > I have found a some lines which does not seem correct to me: > lavedit_effects.c: > @@ -993,27 +1058,464 @@ > + /* Set preview aspect ratio */ > + i

Re: [Mjpeg-users] A new effect for Linux Video Studio

2004-06-29 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Dienstag 29 Juni 2004 12.34 schrieben Sie: > Hallo > > A short answer for you about the diff. > > > > > I did inlude a new effect into Linux Video Studio: Fade in/out to/from > > black > > > > or white. This includes a filter for the yuv stream and one for the sound > > > > stream. The patch

Re: [Mjpeg-users] A new effect for Linux Video Studio

2004-06-29 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Donnerstag 24 Juni 2004 19.59 schrieben Sie: > Hallo > > > I did inlude a new effect into Linux Video Studio: Fade in/out to/from black > > or white. This includes a filter for the yuv stream and one for the sound > > stream. The patch can be found at > > > > http://www.nada.kth.se/~hanke/fil

[Mjpeg-users] A new effect for Linux Video Studio

2004-06-24 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, I did inlude a new effect into Linux Video Studio: Fade in/out to/from black or white. This includes a filter for the yuv stream and one for the sound stream. The patch can be found at http://www.nada.kth.se/~hanke/files/lvs.patch.gz Remarks: - The patch is against LVS 0.1.7, *not* against

[Mjpeg-users] Offtopic: Software MJPEG De/Encoder

2004-05-17 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, Please excuse this post being a little bit off-topic. But I do not know where to ask otherwise. Maybe, I can get a hint where it is more suitable to ask. I am using the mjpeg tools heavily, but sometimes I need to use a Win98 box. For that, I need an mjpeg en/decoder. On the market I found

Re: [Mjpeg-users] picture artifacts in lavrec and matteblend

2004-05-06 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi Michael, > > On Mon, 3 May 2004, Michael Hanke wrote: > > - In my old OS setting (SuSE 7.2), I never observed these artifacts. > > Recently, I upgraded to SuSE 9.0. > > Can you try an old driver version (with a 2.4 kernel) and the new driver > version with both that

Re: [Mjpeg-users] picture artifacts in lavrec and matteblend

2004-05-04 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, On Monday 03 May 2004 16.22, you wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, 3 May 2004, Michael Hanke wrote: > > - In my old OS setting (SuSE 7.2), I never observed these artifacts. > > Recently, I upgraded to SuSE 9.0. > > Can you try an old driver version (with a 2.4

Re: [Mjpeg-users] picture artifacts in lavrec and matteblend

2004-05-02 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, this week I experimented a lot with different settings. probably I need to add that I do not know anything about PCI busses and brooktree chips. - When changing the latency timings I observed the the original delay (32) was a good compromise between the artifacts and inserted/deleted fra

Re: [Mjpeg-users] picture artifacts in lavrec and matteblend

2004-04-25 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, Thanks for your explanation. Deeply hidden on Hauppauges website I found a hint that the Soundblaster Live! could be the source of the problems. The suggested solution was to change the chipset settings 'PCI delayed transaction' to enabled. When I tried this, the number of these white li

[Mjpeg-users] picture artifacts in lavrec and matteblend

2004-04-13 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, Recently I observed some artifacts in the above mentioned programs. The first one is concerned with recording a video stream from a Hi8 source using a BT878 based card (that is, software encoding). From time to time (say in an interval of a few minutes), there appear horizontal lines in sin

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio

2004-03-17 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, some time ago I submitted a bug fix for lavtools/matteblend.flt.c. It seems to be lost because it did not make it into the CVS. Should I submit it once again? Thanks, Michael --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Fre

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio

2004-03-03 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, here follows my patch. Please excuse the long delay. The original code uses explicitly programmed loop unrolling. I did not do that because I assume that the compiler can do this much more efficiently. BTW: Has anyone tried to use Intel's compilers? This would give a boost in execution spe

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio

2004-02-18 Thread Michael Hanke
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 20.16, you wrote: > >> I found the problem. It is concerned with lavtools. I was > >> recording the fooprint using lavrec. Apparaently, it produced many > >> pixels (at least 10% per image) with YUV out of the spec > >> (16<=Y<=235, 16<= u,v <= 240). Since matteble

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio

2004-02-15 Thread Michael Hanke
What about mpeg2enc? On Friday 13 February 2004 23.53, Ronald wrote: > On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Michael Hanke wrote: > > Here is what I got in the edit tab: > > - With all the video extensions loaded into the xserver: Playing the > > video gives only colored lines. > > [..

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio

2004-02-09 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, I have now experimented a lot. The results were rather surprising for me. I am using the edit tab of LVS only because my hardware is much to slow for capturing in the GUI. Here is what I got in the edit tab: - With all the video extensions loaded into the xserver: Playing the video gives o

[Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio

2004-02-02 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, Recently I updated my old system to a recent SuSE 9.0. Unfortunately, Linux Video Studio does not work any longer. I was building the mjpeg tools 1.6.1.92 without any problems. They work as they should. I can record (lavrec) and play the material (lavplay, glav). When trying to edit the fo

Re: [Mjpeg-users] average higher than max

2003-12-02 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, On Tuesday 02 December 2003 07.14, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: > Hallo > > > > >INFO: [mplex] Average bit-rate : 9497200 bits/sec > > > >INFO: [mplex] Peak bit-rate: 9019200 bits/sec > > > > > > Basically it is 'peak' number thats wrong (it tends to underestimate a > > > little)

Re: Malloc failed, Was: Re: [Mjpeg-users] MPEG2 encoding performance

2003-11-26 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, On Monday 24 November 2003 18.16, you wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Michael Hanke wrote: > > Thanks a lot for all of your help. I had to upgrade libtool and autoconf. > > Then the build went smoothly. But when I tried yuvdenoise, I got an > > memory > In utils/cp

Fwd: Malloc failed, Was: Re: [Mjpeg-users] MPEG2 encoding performance

2003-11-24 Thread Michael Hanke
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Malloc failed, Was: Re: [Mjpeg-users] MPEG2 encoding performance Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:32:35 +0100 From: Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Tuesday 18 November 2003

Re: [Mjpeg-users] MPEG2 encoding performance

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Hanke
On Thursday 13 November 2003 08.23, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Michael Hanke wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 23.30, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > > "cvs update" is your friend > > > > Mmmh... That's what I tried to do.

Re: [Mjpeg-users] MPEG2 encoding performance

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Hanke
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 23.30, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > "cvs update" is your friend > Mmmh... That's what I tried to do. But autoconf/automake (invoked by autogen) failed with many undefined macros/errors etc. So I gave up. Michael

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Bt787

2003-11-10 Thread Michael Hanke
On Monday 10 November 2003 10.33, you wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 09:32, Michael Hanke wrote: > > - Can the Bt787 card be convinced to deliver a 'better' (whatever it > > means) stream? > > Before recording, run xawtv, right-click the window

[Mjpeg-users] Bt787

2003-11-10 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, I have another question where I do not know exactly where to ask it. Please forgive me if this is the wrong list. When capturing the same material under W98 (VirtualDub/huffyuv) and Linux (lavrec) with a Hauppauge Bt787-card I observed that the final result differs a lot: The colors wit

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Video/audio synchronization during capturing

2003-11-10 Thread Michael Hanke
Thank you very much for the hint - I will try it out. Regards, michael On Friday 07 November 2003 15.31, you wrote: > Michael Hanke írta: [...] > >My question is as follows: The granularity of the video is one frame (that > > is, 40 ms in PAL) while the audio granularity is o

[Mjpeg-users] Video/audio synchronization during capturing

2003-11-07 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, I have a question about synchronization issues while capturing. I own a bt878-based capture card and a emu10k-based sound card. When recording a video using lavrec, the program does its best to keep audio and video in sync. Since my VCR seems to be a little bit too slow, I get relatively

Re: [Mjpeg-users] DVD plus or minus?

2003-10-28 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, On Tuesday 28 October 2003 11.47, Maarten de Boer wrote: > hello michael, > > interesting post. > > > according to the DVD standard. My hardware player was kind enough to play > > the resulting mpeg2 stream burned as an SVCD. This is the picture quality > > I want to have! > > could you share

[Mjpeg-users] DVD plus or minus?

2003-10-28 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo! I have a question which is more related to DVD burning. So I apologize if this is the wrong place to ask. I hope that you can give some references where to obtain the informations I am interested in. The answers from dvdrhelp were not really satisfactory. I've prepared a number of VCD/S

Re: Fwd: Re: [Mjpeg-users] Fwd: lav2wav error

2003-10-15 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi On Wednesday 15 October 2003 18.11, you wrote: > > If I dream, I have more advanced ideas. The splitting of the sound is > > usually the last step before preparing the final movie. It is therefore > > this place where the final sound characteristics (sample rate etc.) are > > known depending on

Fwd: Re: [Mjpeg-users] Fwd: lav2wav error

2003-10-15 Thread Michael Hanke
and enhance the sound track, too. I am using external tools for it. The synchronization demands a lot of computing by hand (frame number <-> sound sample). Does somebody know about a tool for that? Thank you, Michael > auf hoffentlich bald, > > Berni the Chaos of Woodquarter -

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Fwd: lav2wav error

2003-10-13 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, tried it out this weekend. It worked perfeectly. Thank you very much. On Thursday 09 October 2003 18.15, you wrote: > Hallo > > > Some days ago, I was posting the following message to the list. > > Apparently, I did not receive any reply. Beg your pardon for my > > impatience. But can somebod

[Mjpeg-users] Fwd: lav2wav error

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Hanke
: Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I met a problem with lav2wav. After a long editing process I prepared a rather complex *.eli file containing references to a number of *.avi files. Some of the avi files do not contain any sound track (but most do). lav2wav gi

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio: Effects do not work with interlaced material

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Hanke
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 17.55, you wrote: > > Here is an updated patch: > > http://www.nada.kth.se/~hanke/files/lvs_1.diff > > To which version has that patch to be applied ? I make the patches always against the stock distribution version. > > Would you aggree that I upload you last changes

[Mjpeg-users] lav2wav error

2003-10-05 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, I met a problem with lav2wav. After a long editing process I prepared a rather complex *.eli file containing references to a number of *.avi files. Some of the avi files do not contain any sound track (but most do). lav2wav gives an error that there is now sound in the material. It would be

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio: Effects do not work with interlaced material

2003-10-05 Thread Michael Hanke
On Saturday 04 October 2003 14.34, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: > > http://www.nada.kth.se/~hanke/files/README > > Very fine too :) Updated, too. Font handling should now work. > > > Here is the patch: > > http://www.nada.kth.se/~hanke/files/lvs.diff > > Automatich patching worked. Here is an updat

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio: Effects do not work with interlaced material

2003-09-29 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, I am finally done with my first attempts to hack around in LVS. This is what I did: Everything is concerned with the effect 'text overlay'. - Works now correct for interlaced material. - Pipe command corrected. - Introduced correct font metrics. - removed some typos. - Introduced infrastruct

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio: Effects do not work with interlaced material

2003-09-10 Thread Michael Hanke
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 09.01, you wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 08:31, Michael Hanke wrote: > > I tried to write some code for mjpeg-tools. Unfortunately, I could not > > figure out completely the specification of the yuv data stream. > > Es

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio: Effects do not work with interlaced material

2003-09-09 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo: I tried to write some code for mjpeg-tools. Unfortunately, I could not figure out completely the specification of the yuv data stream. Especially, I do not know how interlaced material is handled. Where can I find the precise specification of the yuv data stream? Thank you, Michael

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio: Effects do not work with interlaced material

2003-09-02 Thread Michael Hanke
on all interlacing possibilities (p/t/b). Is this already fixed in the CVS-versions? I cannot see it because do not obtain access to cvs.sourceforge.net. Yours, Michael On Monday 01 September 2003 10.12, Michael Hanke wrote: > Greetings, > > I am using Linux Video Studio 0.1.7 in ord

[Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio: Effects do not work with interlaced material

2003-09-01 Thread Michael Hanke
Greetings, I am using Linux Video Studio 0.1.7 in order to cut my Video8 material. When trying to make the titles using the effects provided (image/text overlay) I experienced the following behavior: 1. With noninterlaced PAL material (352x288), everything worked out fine. 2. Now I am using top

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: [SUMMARY] Re: mpeg2enc performance numbers for older hardware?

2003-06-18 Thread Michael Hanke
Hallo, after having read all the references, I am a little bit confused concerning the interlace/progressive question. I intend to burn PAL-SVCD. Since progressive input seems to be much faster encoded than interlaced, I wonder if the SVCD standard allows for progressive material? What does SVC

Re: [Mjpeg-users] linux video studio

2003-06-10 Thread Michael Hanke
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 17.57, you wrote: > Hey, > > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 07:41, Michael Hanke wrote: > > > If you did want to use the "Playback Video" page. I fear it cannot > > > work. Because that is a feature only for the zoran based cards. > > >

Re: [Mjpeg-users] linux video studio

2003-06-04 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi On Tuesday 03 June 2003 19.23, you wrote: [snip] > > Having said this I am trying now to make the whole stuff more > > comfortable. Therefore I tried to use linux video studio - and failed > > miserably. > > Which version do you use ? linuxvideostudio-0.1.7 > [snip] > > Which page did you use

[Mjpeg-users] linux video studio

2003-06-02 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, after all the hints which I got from the list I am now very proud to have my first VCD ready with a result comparable to the source quality (bad Video8). Having said this I am trying now to make the whole stuff more comfortable. Therefore I tried to use linux video studio - and failed miser