On Wednesday 08 October 2003 17.55, you wrote: > > Here is an updated patch: > > http://www.nada.kth.se/~hanke/files/lvs_1.diff > > To which version has that patch to be applied ? I make the patches always against the stock distribution version.
> > Would you aggree that I upload you last changes to the CVS, and you make > a diff than to the CVS again ? Would you mind using the new patch for updating CVS? > > As long there is no new version you can't damage anything. And the more > people test it, the more bugs are found. OK. My only problem is that I have a very slow internet connection at home (33 kbps). > > > I spent much time to understand the inner working. Moreover, I am not > > very sure if I am using LVS the way the authors thought. > > For me, LVS is mainly a tool the get nice files where I can make scripts > for the vides I encode. This is the way I do it. But I am only using the editing part. The other processing steps are done the usual unix way... > > For my point of view, LVS will be used for some time. > But thinking of converting/porting it to GTK2 and gstreamer will > increase the lifetime of LVS. The job LVS does now is done quite well. > > The 2 biggest problems are that Ronald and I have much to less time for > working on it. I see. It's my problem, too. BTW. Do you know of a (separate) tool like wavelab on MS for preparing a better sound channel? Yours, Michael ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
