Hi,

This posting is more about the source code. Please excuse me if this is the 
wrong list.

Since the list responds usually very fast and cooperative, I assume that 
nobody else has met the problem before. Therefore, I had a look at the source 
code under ddd...

I aplogize if I am completely wrong, I am only an amateur.

The reson for the described behavior seems to be near line 1920 in 
lavedit_effects.c. In order to obtain the movie settings, a jpeg snapshot is 
taken. In interlaced material, the snapshot consists of two halfframes one 
after the other. If the video image is loaded afterwards, only the first 
halfframe is read thus giving rise to the indicated behavior. I guess that 
the correct movie information must be fetched from the YUV4MPEG stream 
similarly as it is done in play_image_overlay around line 1327. The image 
preparation will become a little bit messy depending on all interlacing 
possibilities (p/t/b).

Is this already fixed in the CVS-versions? I cannot see it because do not 
obtain access to cvs.sourceforge.net.

Yours,
Michael


On Monday 01 September 2003 10.12, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am using Linux Video Studio 0.1.7 in order to cut my Video8 material.
> When trying to make the titles using the effects provided (image/text
> overlay) I experienced the following behavior:
>
> 1. With noninterlaced PAL material (352x288), everything worked out fine.
> 2. Now I am using top-first interlaced PAL material (704x576). When I try
> to add a text overlay, lavpipe complains about height mismatch in the input
> streams. Indeed, having a look at the effects.pli file I found out that the
> stills use only half of the resolution (one subframe).
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Michael
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to