On Oct 28 21:58:22, bsdmas...@hushmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would you please consider uploading an iso image of your OpenBSD
> 4.8 to some public tracker such as thepiratebay.org?
>
> If you are unfamiliar with the process of making an iso-image out
> of a CD, or if you need help with the gene
> > What it offers:
> > selectable security level (-o sec=krb5/krb5i/krb5p),
Wow. So not only does it have "kerberos security",
it also allows me to select whether I want to be
krb5-secure, or krb5i-secure, or even krb5p-secure.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:58:22PM -0400, bsdmas...@hushmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would you please consider uploading an iso image of your OpenBSD
> 4.8 to some public tracker such as thepiratebay.org?
>
> If you are unfamiliar with the process of making an iso-image out
> of a CD, or if you n
Solo por llamarnos GANASTE para los proximos viernes y sabados
de noviembre y diciembre
BARRA Y CENA LIBRE PARA VOS
Queres hacer tu fiesta privada y No Pagar alquiler de salon ?
Cumpleanios-Despedidas-Casamientos-Lanzamientos de productos
Fiestas empresariales-Egresados-Graduados-Fiestas Univer
On 2010-10-28, James A. Peltier wrote:
> What it offers:
> Kerberos security, selectable security level (-o sec=krb5/krb5i/krb5p),
> firewall friendly
authentication != security
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:58:22PM -0400, bsdmas...@hushmail.com spoke thusly:
> Hello,
>
> Would you please consider uploading an iso image of your OpenBSD
> 4.8 to some public tracker such as thepiratebay.org?
>
> If you are unfamiliar with the process of making an iso-image out
> of a CD, or
On 29 October 2010 04:08, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> Would you please consider uploading an iso image of your OpenBSD
>> 4.8 to some public tracker such as thepiratebay.org?
>
> 4.8 is not yet released.
>
>> If you are unfamiliar with the process of making an iso-image out
>> of a CD, or if you need
On 28 October 2010 23:58, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would you please consider uploading an iso image of your OpenBSD
> 4.8 to some public tracker such as thepiratebay.org?
>
> If you are unfamiliar with the process of making an iso-image out
> of a CD, or if you need help with the generation and upload
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:23 +0200, "Henning Brauer"
wrote:
> * James A. Peltier [2010-10-28 20:23]:
> > What it offers:
> > Kerberos security,
>
> what again?
>
> > selectable security level (-o sec=krb5/krb5i/krb5p),
>
> ha ha ha ha
>
> > firewall friendly
>
> right
And this huge infras
On 2010-10-29 11.28, Eric Furman wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:23 +0200, "Henning Brauer"
* James A. Peltier [2010-10-28 20:23]:
What it offers:
Kerberos security,
what again?
selectable security level (-o sec=krb5/krb5i/krb5p),
ha ha ha ha
firewall friendly
right
And this huge infra
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:26:14 -0500
Denny White wrote:
> Here ya go, bunkie, pump up those brave little fingers and scroll a
> couple of lines. And while you're at it, spray some of this all over
> your sorry ass:
Please don't abuse the trolls, it's not their fault they have fat
fingers.
Benny LC6fgren wrote:
> Oh come on, surely you can't fail to realize that there are actually
> benefits to having all your data on one place, always? Especially if
> you
> have an environment where you might need to access it from several
> different platforms.
>
> Not only in terms of user
well, with Linux I have no problem ...
I have done all sorts of changes in controls, and no sound effect
'll find which way do I change the codec, thanks
--
Renato dos Santos
shazaum.wordpress.com
On 28 October 2010 19:37, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:07:14AM -0200, Shaza
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:08 +0200, "Benny Lvfgren"
wrote:
> On 2010-10-29 11.28, Eric Furman wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:23 +0200, "Henning Brauer"
> >> * James A. Peltier [2010-10-28 20:23]:
> >>> What it offers:
> >>> Kerberos security,
> >> what again?
> >>> selectable security level (-o s
- Original Message -
| On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:23 +0200, "Henning Brauer"
| wrote:
| > * James A. Peltier [2010-10-28 20:23]:
| > > What it offers:
| > > Kerberos security,
| >
| > what again?
| >
| > > selectable security level (-o sec=krb5/krb5i/krb5p),
| >
| > ha ha ha ha
| >
| > > fire
- Original Message -
| On 2010-10-28, James A. Peltier wrote:
| > What it offers:
| > Kerberos security, selectable security level (-o
| > sec=krb5/krb5i/krb5p), firewall friendly
|
| authentication != security
My apologies, you are correct and so I change "selectable security levels" to
- Original Message -
| On 2010-10-29 11.28, Eric Furman wrote:
| > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:23 +0200, "Henning Brauer"
| >> * James A. Peltier [2010-10-28 20:23]:
| >>> What it offers:
| >>> Kerberos security,
| >> what again?
| >>> selectable security level (-o sec=krb5/krb5i/krb5p),
| >> ha
On Oct 29 06:05:28, James A. Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:23 +0200, "Henning Brauer"
> | wrote:
> | > * James A. Peltier [2010-10-28 20:23]:
> | > > What it offers:
> | > > Kerberos security,
> | >
> | > what again?
> | >
> | > > selectable security lev
| > No I cannot just put and get. Moving hundreds of gigabytes of
| > medical imaging data around with FTP/SSH would be out of the
| > question.
|
| Yet moving hundreds of gigabytes of medical imaging data
| around with NFS is OK. More specifically yet, moving them
| around with NFSv4 is OK, but
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
"James A. Peltier" wrote:
> No I cannot just put and get. Moving hundreds of gigabytes of medical
> imaging data around with FTP/SSH would be out of the question.
Why?
I imagine you know but FTP/SSH != sftp
Do you think ssh is too slow and unreliable?
Interesting read(s)...
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2623.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3530.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1813.txt
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Oct 29 06:05:28, James A. Peltier wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > | On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:23 +02
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
"James A. Peltier" wrote:
> I was merely attempting to offer input as to why someone *might* require
> NFSv4.
Fair enough but you haven't convinced me, how about ipsec, nfsv3,
authpf etc, but I'd still investigate sftps applicability first.
- Original Message -
| On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
| "James A. Peltier" wrote:
|
| > No I cannot just put and get. Moving hundreds of gigabytes of
| > medical imaging data around with FTP/SSH would be out of the
| > question.
|
| Why?
|
| I imagine you know but FTP/SSH != s
James A. Peltier wrote:
> No, the NFS share is re-exported out via Samba as a native CIFS mount to
> Windows machines. It's a simple copy paste for them
CIFS? How do you encrypt that? That's all clear text (except the auth)
right?
Brad
- Original Message -
| On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
| "James A. Peltier" wrote:
|
| > I was merely attempting to offer input as to why someone *might*
| > require NFSv4.
|
| Fair enough but you haven't convinced me, how about ipsec, nfsv3,
| authpf etc, but I'd still invest
- Original Message -
| James A. Peltier wrote:
|
| > No, the NFS share is re-exported out via Samba as a native CIFS
| > mount to Windows machines. It's a simple copy paste for them
|
| CIFS? How do you encrypt that? That's all clear text (except the auth)
| right?
|
| Brad
Yes, you are
On Oct 29 07:22:22, James A. Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
> | "James A. Peltier" wrote:
> |
> | > No I cannot just put and get. Moving hundreds of gigabytes of
> | > medical imaging data around with FTP/SSH would be out of the
> | > qu
On Oct 29 06:54:07, James A. Peltier wrote:
>
> | > No I cannot just put and get. Moving hundreds of gigabytes of
> | > medical imaging data around with FTP/SSH would be out of the
> | > question.
> |
> | Yet moving hundreds of gigabytes of medical imaging data
> | around with NFS is OK. More spe
- Original Message -
| On Oct 29 07:22:22, James A. Peltier wrote:
| > - Original Message -
| > | On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
| > | "James A. Peltier" wrote:
| > |
| > | > No I cannot just put and get. Moving hundreds of gigabytes of
| > | > medical imaging data around
Niels Poppe [ni...@netbox.org] wrote:
>
> That is good to know, meaning, something else is broken:
>
> # bioctl -R sd0a sd2
> bioctl: Target sd0a: target not specified
>
> Would it be interesting to investigate what's on the devices
> or should I just re-create the whole thing from scratch?
I r
- Original Message -
| On Oct 29 06:54:07, James A. Peltier wrote:
| >
| > | > No I cannot just put and get. Moving hundreds of gigabytes of
| > | > medical imaging data around with FTP/SSH would be out of the
| > | > question.
| > |
| > | Yet moving hundreds of gigabytes of medical imagin
This discussion has deviated rather extensively from the O.P. question. As
such it would likely be advisable to start a new thread to continue the
discussion if people would like to continue. I, however, will likely no longer
be able to participate because I have other things to work on.
I wo
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
"James A. Peltier" wrote:
> That fact that I am choosing to use it is somewhat irrelevant to the thread
> but it exploded from the question of "why not to use NFSv4".
I thought the original thread was concluded quite quickly in that it
wasn't desired by
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> in that regard i disagree, but perhaps only in tone.
>
> With ipv6, they decided to create a bunch of new problems that
> people now find they care deeply about
>
>- they created a totally new problem by avoiding arp. the
> benefit
option KGDB
causes error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
In sys/kern/kgdb_stub.c
search for PC_REGS on line 353, 482, and 495
I am just re-starting in C so don't know much for now. Can somebody
fix it or more likely delete the file since its not being used much?
(got there from man
Hi,
Many things got me to want to write a quick thank you note to the devs
for a long time and as many things goes, times fly and sadly I keep
putting it off.
But, I guess some of the very disgraceful emails one misc@ lately
including some totally off topics f*cked up one about OpenBSD being
Sorry, I didn't need to tell anybody what to do. I just don't use the
file. My bad.
Thanks
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> option KGDB
>
> causes error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
> In sys/kern/kgdb_stub.c
> search for PC_REGS on line 353, 482, and 495
[IMAGE]
Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes
datos.
Empresa:
Nombre:
Telifono:
Email:
Nzmero de Interesados:
Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento.
O bien comunmquense a nuestros telifonos un ejecutivo con gusto le
atendera
Tels. (33) 885
All,
We're experiencing an issue with relayd, in that at random times it will
just fail to relay HTTP and HTTPS sessions (happens in spurts, web
browsers see nothing in "view source"), and then will resume as if
nothing abnormal had occurred. The traffic does not reach the intended
web hosts
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:22:12AM -0200, Shazaum wrote:
> well, with Linux I have no problem ...
linux support for realtek codecs alone is 5x as large as our
driver for all of azalia. likely they have some quirk for
your specific bios/codec combo.
> I have done all sorts of changes in controls,
right, sorry about the confusion
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Niels Poppe [ni...@netbox.org] wrote:
> >
> > That is good to know, meaning, something else is broken:
> >
> > # bioctl -R sd0a sd2
> > bioctl: Target sd0a: target not specified
> >
> > Would it
+1 Very well put Daniel
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many things got me to want to write a quick thank you note to the devs for
> a long time and as many things goes, times fly and sadly I keep putting it
> off.
>
> But, I guess some of the very disgraceful em
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a small, fanless computer that will accept a HD (perhaps
a 2.5" drive) that uses ECC RAM? Needless to say, it must run OpenBSD.
Being 64 bit, having accellerated crypto and/or supporting multiple drives
would be bonus points, but are not required.
-d
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Niels Poppe [ni...@netbox.org] wrote:
> >
> > # bioctl -R sd0a sd2
> > bioctl: Target sd0a: target not specified
> >
>
> I ran into this just the other day,
>
> bioctl -R sd0a sd2 didn't work,
>
> bioctl -R /dev/sd0a sd2 did...
Are the partition sizes on sd0a/sd1a (I assume the are mirrored) the same?
What does disklabel show for the RAIDed disks?
Niels Poppe [n...@xs4all.nl] wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Niels Poppe [ni...@netbox.org] wrote:
> > >
> > > # bioctl -R sd0a
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 05:39:27PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Are the partition sizes on sd0a/sd1a (I assume the are mirrored) the same?
> What does disklabel show for the RAIDed disks?
>
sd0 and sd2 are exactly identical
# disklabel sd0
# /dev/rsd0c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: USB
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 03:02:43AM +0200, Niels Poppe wrote:
>
> sd0 and sd2 are exactly identical
correction: sd0 and sd1
On 10/28/2010 06:42 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:30:25 +0200
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Claudio Jeker [2010-10-28 10:01]:
i have theorized in the past that the problem we face is
that an insufficient number of axe murderers are attending those kinds
of research meetings.
Wh
C I C L O D E E V E N T O S 2 0 1 0
ZLTIMOS CUPOS DISPONIBLES
Segunda edicisn, luego de quedar sin cupos el pasado 26 de octubre.
ESAG Sres/Sras de: misc@openbsd.org
Ticnicas de negociacisn e influencia
Desarrolle habilidades que potenciaran sus ventas, compras, relaciones
laborales y p
On 10/29/2010 09:24 PM, Corey wrote:
> I've put off learning anything really about IPv6 in hopes that after
> most organizations ignore it, it withers and dies (at least in its
> current form).
I like it. It works well with OpenBSD and you can get free tunnels from
Sixxs and others to use (if
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:24:43PM -0500, Corey wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 06:42 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> >On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:30:25 +0200
> >Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> >>* Claudio Jeker [2010-10-28 10:01]:
> >i have theorized in the past that the problem we face is
> >that an insuffic
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:41:52PM +0200, Jean-Francois wrote:
> > # bioctl -R sd0a sd2
>
> If I understand well the above command kicks off a rebuild on a replacement
> device. Few questions from my side ...
>
> Is it possible to rebuild with another device for example sd0b or sd1a
> instead
Really? that's odd. Did you try it a second time later by any chance?
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:22:45AM +0200, Niels Poppe wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:09:52PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > odd. does dmesg spit anything useful out?
>
> actually, no.
>
> for the usb stick pulling o
That should work just fine. Can you paste the entire dmesg after you
kick off the rebuild that fails?
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 03:02:43AM +0200, Niels Poppe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 05:39:27PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Are the partition sizes on sd0a/sd1a (I assume the are mirrored
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> option KGDB
>
> causes error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
> In sys/kern/kgdb_stub.c
> search for PC_REGS on line 353, 482, and 495
> I am just re-starting in C so don't know much for now. Can somebody
> fix it or more likely
From: Marco Peereboom
Date: 2010-10-30 2:49:53
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:24:43PM -0500, Corey wrote:
> > On 10/28/2010 06:42 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > >On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:30:25 +0200
> > >Henning Brauer wrote:
> > >
> > >>* Claudio Jeker [2010-10-28 10:01]:
> > >i have
Is there someone who can give me OpenBSD Administration course online
(practice using ssh) ? That will cover BSDP Objectives.
Thanks
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:53:32 +0400
OpenBSD Geek wrote:
> Is there someone who can give me OpenBSD Administration course online
> (practice using ssh) ? That will cover BSDP Objectives.
>
> Thanks
While this may not be the direct answer you were looking for, I hope it
will provide a better path
On Oct 29, 2010, at 7:43 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> As for SFTP or any other method that would duplicate data, I have already
discussed why it is not a possibility. SSHFS *was and still is* a possibility
but it was ruled out because of our HPC needs.
I run something that could be considered (a
59 matches
Mail list logo
