On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:24:43PM -0500, Corey wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 06:42 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> >On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:30:25 +0200
> >Henning Brauer<lists-open...@bsws.de>  wrote:
> >
> >>* Claudio Jeker<cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com>  [2010-10-28 10:01]:
> >>>>>i have theorized in the past that the problem we face is
> >>>>>that an insufficient number of axe murderers are attending those kinds
> >>>>>of research meetings.
> >>>>Why not taking part of intl. engineering ? Thus you could act upon 
> >>>>worldwide
> >>>>decisions.
> >>>Taking part of intl. engineering brings you either into a lunatic asylum
> >>>or into prison. We're not that dumb to go down that road.
> >>we can't even. no way without being backed by a multinational
> >>corparate money sink.
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
> >>BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
> >>Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
> >>Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
> >>
> >It's exponential, I don't see why they didn't just add more dots. It
> >wasted most of a day of my life deciding I'll stick to ipv4, for as
> >long as possible. ipv6 has drawbacks and the only benefits I saw are
> >doable and with more choice on ipv4.
> >
> >I've always tried to steer clear of nfs,rpc, samba too. I did see some
> >software recently for windows that was supposed to enable sftp to act
> >like a windows share. I haven't had time or the need to see what sort
> >of filesystem integration exists for sftp on multiple platforms.
> >
> 
> I've put off learning anything really about IPv6 in hopes that after
> most organizations ignore it, it withers and dies (at least in its
> current form).  I may be deluding myself, what with the US
> government seemingly mandating it in the near future.  But as long
> as my ISP doesn't, and most others don't, I guess I'm OK.

The US government mandates it and then when it gets to the people who
support it they use V4.  It is a beautiful thing.  Go committee design!

Ask theo for his much smarter IPv5 idea.

> 
> Corey

Reply via email to