On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 06:31:24PM -0800, ariel a wrote:
Please repoprt bugs on bugs@ instead of on misc@, not all developers
read misc@
-Otto
eration not permitted)
> Check that you have set 'machdep.allowaperture=1'
> in /etc/sysctl.conf and reboot your machine
> refer to xf86(4) for details
> [ 21.456] linear framebuffer access unavailable
> [ 21.467] (--) Using wscons driver on /dev/ttyC4
> [ 21.563]
> X.Org
ysctl.conf and reboot your machine
refer to xf86(4) for details
[21.456] linear framebuffer access unavailable
[21.467] (--) Using wscons driver on /dev/ttyC4
[ 21.563]
X.Org X Server 1.20.13
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[21.563] Build Operating System: OpenBSD 7.0 amd64
[21.56
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, Steve Litt wrote:
It's one thing to support an alternative: Quite another to call
for the death of the original.
Unfortunately it is not an alternative as I wrote before.
X11 is among other things a standard. If wayland imposes itself,
we will have soon programs for X an
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 06:01:52PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
[...]
> I use Openbox with program instantiation via dmenu. Now here's the
> thing: dmenu is written in pure X: No qt, no gtk, no xforms. Dmenu
> does its job perfectly, so quickly that instantiation from hotkey is
> imperceptable, as is m
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 23:26:18 +0200
Tomasz Rola wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:18:18PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Frankly, there is not much point in non-developers discussing
> > whether additions to base are acceptable. Feel free to suggest
>
> Well, whatever developers
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:18:18PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
[...]
>
> Frankly, there is not much point in non-developers discussing
> whether additions to base are acceptable. Feel free to suggest
Well, whatever developers come up to, I hope I will be able to
continue using FVWM, on top or in
Tue, 2 Jul 2019 10:31:21 -0700 John Brahy
> Thanks for the Wikipedia link. I never researched sentence spacing before.
Of course, and to reward the patience of reading to the end of the noise:
Template: X Window System https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:XWinSys
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:3
Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:09:01 +0300 cho...@jtan.com
> li...@wrant.com writes:
> > Worthless thread, worthless comments, annoying Matthew.. STOP spamming.
>
> Well you're not wrong so there's no need to keep the public involved.
It's best discussed in public or not discussed at all, so list include
Tue, 02 Jul 2019 11:19:17 +0300 cho...@jtan.com
>
> Matthew
Worthless thread, worthless comments, worthless Matthew. STOP spamming.
li...@wrant.com writes:
> Tue, 02 Jul 2019 08:40:35 +0300 cho...@jtan.com
> >
> > Also I don't need to fix your email system's inability to classify spam.
>
> YOUR mail server reputation is negative, fix your setup.. STOP spamming.
IWFM
Matthew
ps. Two dots *and* two spaces? Try harder.
Tue, 02 Jul 2019 08:40:35 +0300 cho...@jtan.com
>
> Also I don't need to fix your email system's inability to classify spam.
YOUR mail server reputation is negative, fix your setup.. STOP spamming.
> Matthew
>
li...@wrant.com writes:
> You're misreading something, or talking to yourself, making corrections.
> Your emails ended up in the spam twice so far, do something about that..
Two dots again? We've been over this.
> Your emails came in as spam twice so far, maybe do something about that?
Get it to
I just love reading the drama that's always on this list. I've been using
OpenBSD since 2.0 and the decisions of the team never failed me even when
gobbles did his thing.
If X11 wasn't secure enough for OpenBSD then Theo and his crew would write
OpenX. They've fixed NetBSD, SSH, and generally avai
I will reply you to clarify some things but I agree with Ingo and we
should let the thread die.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:11:37PM +, Roderick wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
>
> > Can you show me what missing Wayland part is bigger than DRM+Mesa+LLVM?.
Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:52:56 -0700 Michael Forney
> On 2019-07-01, Roderick wrote:
> > Namely, the only free implementation of EGL is Mesa 3D. And EGL is
> > needed by Wayland.
>
> I'm not an OpenBSD user, just an interested bystander, but I want to
> point out that the second part of this stateme
On 2019-07-01, Roderick wrote:
> Namely, the only free implementation of EGL is Mesa 3D. And EGL is
> needed by Wayland.
I'm not an OpenBSD user, just an interested bystander, but I want to
point out that the second part of this statement is false. Wayland
also supports shared memory buffers. In
Mon, 01 Jul 2019 20:52:24 +0300 cho...@jtan.com
> li...@wrant.com writes:
> > Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:09:41 +0300 cho...@jtan.com
> > >
> > > I don't think I'll be relying on software from such confused individuals
> > > any time soo
> > n.
> >
> > Since when? Make a note: your long lines will n
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
Can you show me what missing Wayland part is bigger than DRM+Mesa+LLVM?.
What do you want to say with the question?
As far as I understand, neither DRM nor Mesa are parts of (original)
X11. Further, you read in Wikipedia:
--
li...@wrant.com writes:
> Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:09:41 +0300 cho...@jtan.com
> >
> > I don't think I'll be relying on software from such confused individuals
> > any time soo
> n.
>
> Since when? Make a note: your long lines will never fit on a punch card.
I haven't used a punch card since ... wel
Ingo Schwarze writes:
> the voice of reason.
Listen to it.
Matthew
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 06:39:01PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > Mon, 1 Jul 2019 17:13:44 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 05:20:20PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > > > Mon, 1 Jul 2019 00:46:33 +0200 Juan Francis
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado writes:
> Can you show me what missing Wayland part is bigger than DRM+Mesa+LLVM?.
Probably, but that's not my problem.
> After the personal attack, I was hoping a more elaborated answer.
There was no personal attack. That you feel there was reveals little
more tha
> The only thing we miss for Wayland in base is libxml and it's not
> as bloated as shit called DRM, Mesa and X.org, so it's perfectly
> acceptable,
Frankly, there is not much point in non-developers discussing
whether additions to base are acceptable. Feel free to suggest
ncing. Try again later..
> > > Juan, I still can not find one single piece of text where you were right.
> > >
> >
> > Can you show me what missing Wayland part is bigger than DRM+Mesa+LLVM?.
> >
> > After the personal attack, I was hoping a more ela
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 05:20:20PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Mon, 1 Jul 2019 00:46:33 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
>
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 09:09:08PM +, Roderick wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2019, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nope, you misund
Mon, 1 Jul 2019 17:56:18 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 06:39:01PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > Mon, 1 Jul 2019 17:13:44 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 05:20:20PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > > > Mon, 1 Jul 2019
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 06:39:01PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Mon, 1 Jul 2019 17:13:44 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
>
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 05:20:20PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > > Mon, 1 Jul 2019 00:46:33 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 3
Mon, 1 Jul 2019 17:13:44 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 05:20:20PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > Mon, 1 Jul 2019 00:46:33 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> >
> > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 09:09:08PM +, Roderick wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 30 Ju
Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:09:41 +0300 cho...@jtan.com
>
> I don't think I'll be relying on software from such confused individuals any
> time soon.
Since when? Make a note: your long lines will never fit on a punch card.
> Matthew
>
li...@wrant.com writes:
> You can't do without YOU understanding basics of X11, do something else..
> Juan, I don't trust your lack of any qualification for even feature bait.
Two dots? This thing should never have more than one dot.
How about:
> You can't do without YOUR understanding X11 basic
Mon, 1 Jul 2019 02:22:02 +0300 Leonid Bobrov
> I make a mistake by writting this mail, but:
>
> X Window System is just a shit windowing system while Wayland is a simple,
> fast and secure display server protocol.
> (Well, almost simple, this XML dependance is overkill.)
>
> You people protectin
Mon, 1 Jul 2019 00:46:33 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 09:09:08PM +, Roderick wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2019, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> >
> > > Nope, you misunderstood the text.
> >
> > No. It is *you* that do not understand what X11 is
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
Xorg is the most insecure software in base.
Why? Because it has bugs? Or because, in oppossite to wayland,
it can listen to outside connections if configured so (by default
it does not)?
If you only care about the remote apps, with
Roderick writes:
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2019, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
>
> > You can run (local or remote) X11 applications inside of a Wayland
> > compositor.
>
> The following contradicts your above assertion:
>
> https://wayland.freedesktop.org/faq.html#heading_toc_j_8
Wayland. The
quot;This doesn't mean that remote rendering won't be possible with Wayland,
> > it just means that you will have to put a remote rendering server on top
> > of Wayland. One such server could be the X.org server".
>
> You quote the text and are unable to get the conclusi
nt it death.
> A very destructive attitude.
>
No, it's your attitude is destructive.
> > "This doesn't mean that remote rendering won't be possible with Wayland,
> > it just means that you will have to put a remote rendering server on top
> > of Wayland. On
means that you will have to put a remote rendering server on top
of Wayland. One such server could be the X.org server".
You quote the text and are unable to get the conclusion: having
wayland, if you need X11, then you must implement an X11 server.
Is it not clear from the text that for upgr
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 03:59:55PM +, Roderick wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, gwes wrote:
>
> > I regularly run programs on one machine connected to a display
> > on another machine. AFAIK, the current state of Wayland makes
> > that difficult. I confess to not following it closely.
>
>
ur above assertion:
>
> https://wayland.freedesktop.org/faq.html#heading_toc_j_8
Nope, you misunderstood the text.
"This doesn't mean that remote rendering won't be possible with Wayland,
it just means that you will have to put a remote rendering server on top
of Wayland. One such server coul
On Sun, 30 Jun 2019, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
You can run (local or remote) X11 applications inside of a Wayland
compositor.
The following contradicts your above assertion:
https://wayland.freedesktop.org/faq.html#heading_toc_j_8
Rod.
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, gwes wrote:
I regularly run programs on one machine connected to a display
on another machine. AFAIK, the current state of Wayland makes
that difficult. I confess to not following it closely.
I also do it, and I also have no much idea of what is wayland.
But I have the
t; Sounds like something that belongs in the ports tree
>
Not really, we accepted worse crap than XML: DRM code from Linux,
especially AMDGPU; X.org; LLVM. So libxml in base won't be that harmful
to us, so maybe even radically removing X.org and having a sane Wayland
compositor in base will
Leonid Bobrov [mazoc...@disroot.org] wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 01:56:43PM -0400, Christopher Turkel wrote:
>
> First, I'd like to blame Xenocara for this pain porting Wayland to
> OpenBSD (because building Mesa from ports would be an opportunity),
> right now to build Mesa with Wayland supp
400, gwes wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 6/28/19 1:56 PM, Christopher Turkel wrote:
> > > Probably someday. X won’t be going away anytime soon.
> > >
> > > On Friday, June 28, 2019, Nathan Hartman
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Came across t
his:
> > >
> > > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=X.Org-
> > > Maintenance-Mode-Quickly
> > >
> > > Long story short, Red Hat hopes to switch from X.Org to Wayland and
> > > expects X.Org to go into "hard maintenance mode&
On 6/28/19 1:56 PM, Christopher Turkel wrote:
Probably someday. X won’t be going away anytime soon.
On Friday, June 28, 2019, Nathan Hartman wrote:
Came across this:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=X.Org-
Maintenance-Mode-Quickly
Long story short, Red Hat hope
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 01:56:43PM -0400, Christopher Turkel wrote:
> Probably someday. X won’t be going away anytime soon.
>
> On Friday, June 28, 2019, Nathan Hartman wrote:
>
> > Came across this:
> >
> > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=X
Probably someday. X won’t be going away anytime soon.
On Friday, June 28, 2019, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> Came across this:
>
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=X.Org-
> Maintenance-Mode-Quickly
>
> Long story short, Red Hat hopes to switch from X.Org to
Came across this:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=X.Org-Maintenance-Mode-Quickly
Long story short, Red Hat hopes to switch from X.Org to Wayland and
expects X.Org to go into "hard maintenance mode" after that.
Relevant to OpenBSD?
On 2019-03-01, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> If you have a checkout of /usr/xenocara ...
>
> I have the cvsweb. I got the .core file with those instructions, run
> gdb with my current X. I am not sure if snapshots X is compiled with
> or without debug symbols.
> Looking at some functions headers, I thin
> If you have a checkout of /usr/xenocara ...
I have the cvsweb. I got the .core file with those instructions, run
gdb with my current X. I am not sure if snapshots X is compiled with
or without debug symbols.
Looking at some functions headers, I think I should mention that in
firefox the web page
On 2019-02-28, dmitry.sensei wrote:
> The community for some reason does not like problems with X and DRM :)
>
> ср, 27 февр. 2019 г. в 20:06, Mihai Popescu :
>
>> I tried again this link with a recent snapshot and the result is the
>> same, X got a segfault.
>>
>> Is there a special debug run for
The community for some reason does not like problems with X and DRM :)
ср, 27 февр. 2019 г. в 20:06, Mihai Popescu :
> I tried again this link with a recent snapshot and the result is the
> same, X got a segfault.
>
> Is there a special debug run for X to be able to get some detailed
> informatio
I tried again this link with a recent snapshot and the result is the
same, X got a segfault.
Is there a special debug run for X to be able to get some detailed
information, please?
Does it worth to pursue this debug?
Thanks.
Check your /etc/hosts
пт, 15 февр. 2019 г., 14:54 Mihai Popescu mih...@gmail.com:
> I installed firefox too, there is no problem with that page, I mean
> X.org is not doing segmentation fault. It looks like chromium is
> trying to do something nasty against X.org's stuff.
>
>
I installed firefox too, there is no problem with that page, I mean
X.org is not doing segmentation fault. It looks like chromium is
trying to do something nasty against X.org's stuff.
Got some details about this: X.org crashes only when I move the mouse
pointer inside the big picture presented on the web page, the product
itself. I captured the chomium output too:
[49853:80110072:0215/111903.592670:ERROR:process_metrics_openbsd.cc(126)]
Not implemented reached in bool
base
Hello,
I'm sending it here, since I am not an expert to analyze it and send
it to bugs@. By chance, my X.org is doing segmentation fault whenever
I visit a web page with chromium. Again, it segfaults every time I go
there, may or may be not interesting. Here is the action and log
files.
I
On 2019-02-13, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Did anyone managed to run fine X.org on the integrated video Intel HD
> P4600 from Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 or another Intel Xeon E3 with the
> same integrated video.
>
> Models with P do not appear in man intel and am not sure if
Hello,
Did anyone managed to run fine X.org on the integrated video Intel HD
P4600 from Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 or another Intel Xeon E3 with the
same integrated video.
Models with P do not appear in man intel and am not sure if they are
supported by this driver or something else. (dmesg will be
> Increase the limits in login.conf for the relevant login class;
> you'll need to logout and back in for them to take effect.
> You've hit both datasize and openfiles limits.
How much to increase them ? The login.conf is the one put by the
install. This error will fire even with one tab open in x
Increase the limits in login.conf for the relevant login class;
you'll need to logout and back in for them to take effect.
You've hit both datasize and openfiles limits.
On 2012-02-04, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> I've run xxxterm from xterm on openbox this time, under some load
> stress pages (many b
I've run xxxterm from xterm on openbox this time, under some load
stress pages (many big pictures slideshow style, waiting with patience
for the pages to load).
There it pops an error after each set of aprox. 100 pages:
$ xxxterm
xxxterm: config_parse: cannot open /home/uhmewrk/.xxxterm.conf: No
s
tomas.bod...@gmail.com (Tomas Bodzar), 2012.02.03 (Fri) 20:34 (CET):
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > I've run in some "able to repeat issue" using X.org doing some
> > software try. The result is a complete X.org server shut down. I'
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've run in some "able to repeat issue" using X.org doing some
> software try. The result is a complete X.org server shut down. I'm not
> good in reporting things, but this is very interesting b
On Feb 1, 2012 3:09 PM, "Mihai Popescu" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've run in some "able to repeat issue" using X.org doing some
> software try. The result is a complete X.org server shut down. I'm not
> good in reporting things, but this is very inte
Hello,
I've run in some "able to repeat issue" using X.org doing some
software try. The result is a complete X.org server shut down. I'm not
good in reporting things, but this is very interesting because it
repeats every time. See the details down there, I'm curious if
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:32:30 +0100
David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Brett wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Locking the screen with xlock, then pressing ctrl+alt+numeric* unlocks the
> > screen as described at:
> >
> > http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/X-org-server-allows-anyone
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Brett wrote:
> Hi,
> Locking the screen with xlock, then pressing ctrl+alt+numeric* unlocks the
> screen as described at:
>
> http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/X-org-server-allows-anyone-to-unlock-computer-1417864.html
>
> This happens on amd64 week-old-
Hi,
Locking the screen with xlock, then pressing ctrl+alt+numeric* unlocks the
screen as described at:
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/X-org-server-allows-anyone-to-unlock-computer-1417864.html
This happens on amd64 week-old-current, tried with both fvwm (from base) and
with jwm win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After changing the resolution to 640x480 in Mac OS 9.2.2 and
rebooting into OpenBSD, X.org was broken and the system required a
hard reboot. However, after changing the resolution back to
1024x768 from Mac OS 9.2.2, X.org was able to work again. Thus
le to run X.org
and a console at the same time. However, I do not always want
X.org. Often, I'd much rather have a console. Unfortunately, X.org
doesn't work quite right if started from the console; the keyboard
is all screwed up. This script allows me to pick at boot time
whether I want to
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Aaron Mason wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm referring to what was said by alanc in #opensolaris at 04:02:34 at
> http://echelog.matzon.dk/logs/browse/opensolaris/1254434400 - anybody
> know anything about this, and how it will affect OpenBSD'
Hi all,
I'm referring to what was said by alanc in #opensolaris at 04:02:34 at
http://echelog.matzon.dk/logs/browse/opensolaris/1254434400 - anybody
know anything about this, and how it will affect OpenBSD's X.org
implementation?
Thanks
--
Aaron Mason - Programmer, open source addict
On Feb 14, 2008 5:40 AM, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is work being done on this for openBSD:
>
> http://www.x.org/wiki/PciReworkProposal
>
> I ask because I do not see openBSD listed.
>
We're working on it for the future. That wiki page is not up-to-date.
Is work being done on this for openBSD:
http://www.x.org/wiki/PciReworkProposal
I ask because I do not see openBSD listed.
Thanks,
Brian
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobi
On 6/18/07, Alexey Suslikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As seen in http://wiki.x.org/wiki/IntelGraphicsDriver, xf86-video-i810
is no more and there is xf86-video-intel driver instead.
New driver supports more chipsets including i965 and i945 (aka
GMA 950 which is frequent
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As seen in http://wiki.x.org/wiki/IntelGraphicsDriver, xf86-video-i810
is no more and there is xf86-video-intel driver instead.
New driver supports more chipsets including i965 and i945 (aka
GMA 950 which is frequently used in laptops).
Is such i810 -> intel update for X
In last week I checked OpenBSD 4.1 from snapshot ane when I run xterm
xterm -ls -fn -*-fixed-medium-*-*-*-*-130-*-*-*-*-iso8859-2
I have in .profile
LANG=pl_PL.ISO8859-2
export=LANG
LC_ALL=pl_PL.ISO8859-2
export LC_ALL
xterm tell me
Locale not supported by Xlib
[2006-11-24 17:51] Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a better way... :)
>
> Christian Ruediger Bahls wrote:
> > wsdisplay1 at creator0: console (std, sun emulation), using wskbd0
> ^^
[...]
> > Section "Device"
> > Identifier "Wsdisplay0"
[...]
> > Opt
Christian Ruediger Bahls wrote:
> i post this to the list so it shows up in the web
> should somebody have the some problem
> (if you see any mistake please do not hesitate to contact me)
>
> i hat problems setting up X.org for an Ultra 10
> (i normally use that machine r
i post this to the list so it shows up in the web
should somebody have the some problem
(if you see any mistake please do not hesitate to contact me)
i hat problems setting up X.org for an Ultra 10
(i normally use that machine remote so X is less important)
this machine has a Creator3D
Just for information:
I noticed the same behaviour on my FreeBSD laptop.
It appears from time to time, and when I have it on a tty, I'll have it
until next reboot.
Oddly enough, when I launch xinit or X on the tty which has the problem,
it works normally. I checked the logs, well... nothing to say.
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange problem which appeared in 3.8 and appears in 3.9. When I type
startx it does nothing. After waiting for half a minute i press cancel and
only then it begins to do something but fails to start. When I open another
tty and type there startx it s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange problem which appeared in 3.8 and appears in 3.9. When I type
startx it does nothing. After waiting for half a minute i press cancel and
only then it begins to do something but fails to start. When I open another
tty and type there startx it starts normally. The s
Strange problem which appeared in 3.8 and appears in 3.9. When I type
startx it does nothing. After waiting for half a minute i press cancel and
only then it begins to do something but fails to start. When I open another
tty and type there startx it starts normally. The strangest thing is that I
do
On 6/7/06, Fred Crowson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cagdas Tulek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed OpenBSD 3.9 on Toshiba Satellite 1410 laptop,
> yesterday. Everything is fine except the problem I face on X which
> does not happed at console. When I press a key, it sometimes prints
> double-letter
Cagdas Tulek wrote:
Hi,
I've installed OpenBSD 3.9 on Toshiba Satellite 1410 laptop,
yesterday. Everything is fine except the problem I face on X which
does not happed at console. When I press a key, it sometimes prints
double-letters.
I am asking for help.
I'm sending the dmesg output as an
Sorry,
I've forgotten that attachments are stripped...
Here is the dmesg output:
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.20GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-clas
Hi,
I've installed OpenBSD 3.9 on Toshiba Satellite 1410 laptop,
yesterday. Everything is fine except the problem I face on X which
does not happed at console. When I press a key, it sometimes prints
double-letters.
I am asking for help.
I'm sending the dmesg output as an attachment.
Thanks...
tgz? If not, see section 4.10 of the FAQ.
Btw, there should be snapshots coming up now which already include the
945 patches for both the kernel and X.org, so maybe it's easier to try
one of those.
Cheers,
Dimitry
Hey all,
I'm having trouble configuring X on my iMac G5. I'm wondering if
anyone has a working xorg.conf for a 17" iMac G5?
If so, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks,
RJ
--
em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aim: dbhsibgeek
www: http://www.bellsouthpwp.net/r/j/rjnowling/
Poster: "I am a Windows System
On Wed, 17 May 2006 23:28:15 +0900, vladas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Stop in /usr/Xbld (line 63 of Makefile).
>*** Error code 1
>
>Stop in /usr/Xbld (line 82 of Makefile).
>#
>
>
>Of course its me making the mistake. Only do not understand where.
>Would be grateful if someone could enlighten me,
everywhere.
However, at least one person I've asked to test this patch found out
that X.org does not support the 945GM (the mobile version) yet. That
is what the second patch is for, so if you want to test this, and have
a laptop with 945GM, you need to rebuild both your kernel and X.org.
If you
On 5/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand this piece of code:
if (getuid() == 0 || geteuid() != 0)
Why check if the geteuid() != 0 if we are only wanting to root to run the
block inside the if statement?
getuid returns the real user id, geteuid returns th
Hi,
I don't understand this piece of code:
if (getuid() == 0 || geteuid() != 0)
Why check if the geteuid() != 0 if we are only wanting to root to run the
block inside the if statement?
My reasoning is that if geteuid != 0 then the statement evaluates to true
and the code block gets run just lik
/usr/Xbld || \
+ (mkdir -p /usr/Xbld && cd /usr/Xbld && lndir ../XF4)
+ cd /usr/Xbld
make build
Index: xc/programs/Xserver/render/mitri.c
--8<CUT-8<--
--- Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The vulnerability in X.Org 6.9 presented in this recent advisory:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2006-March/013992.html>
partially applies to OpenBSD-current.
The impact of the vulnerability is limited on OpenBSD thanks to the
privilege separation code in the X
Nick Holmes wrote:
Dear Misc@,
I am looking to build a new OpenBSD workstation for home and would
like to have a dual-headed setup using DVI. I have seen some recent
previous dicussion on this matter (Matrox P650 series not supported
because of Parhelia chipset)
Hm, few weeks ago I bought
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
