On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 08:30:40AM +, Richard Bostrom wrote:
> I have a static ip using this configuration in my hostname.interface
> inet 192.168.1.240 255.255.255.0
>
> It wont allow for internet access. I have an openbsd book but I cannot find
> the right syntax.
The
I have a static ip using this configuration in my hostname.interface
inet 192.168.1.240 255.255.255.0
It wont allow for internet access. I have an openbsd book but I cannot find the
right syntax.
Hello.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:37 AM Richard Bostrom
wrote:
> I have a static ip using this configuration in my hostname.interface
> inet 192.168.1.240 255.255.255.0
>
> It wont allow for internet access. I have an openbsd book but I cannot
> find the right syntax.
> Hello.
>
Which interface are you trying to bring up? In order for people to help
you have you ever posted a dmesg to this mailing list?
Also, man mygate.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:37 AM Richard Bostrom
wrote:
> I have a static ip using this configuration in my hostname.interface
> inet 192.168
Am 14.10.2024 um 17:47 schrieb Chris Ross:
On 2024-09-10 19:20:13, Thomas Bohl wrote:
I used https://aloof.de/f/IPv6Aliases-en.sh for many years.
HTH
Apologies that I missed this earlier, Thomas. I took a look at this now,
and it does do very much what I want. I have been trying to find s
> On Oct 14, 2024, at 00:39, Mike Fischer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Obviously, polling is an option, but I’d rather be notified by the kernel
>> when I need to.
>
> I think the suggestion made by Florian Obser earlier in this thread makes a
> lot of sense.
>
> And if you want to get away from scrip
> On 2024-09-10 19:20:13, Thomas Bohl wrote:
> I used https://aloof.de/f/IPv6Aliases-en.sh for many years.
> HTH
Apologies that I missed this earlier, Thomas. I took a look at this now,
and it does do very much what I want. I have been trying to find something
event-based, rather than pollin
> Am 14.10.2024 um 04:58 schrieb Chris Ross :
>
>
>
>> On Sep 3, 2024, at 16:48, Chris Ross wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 3, 2024, at 10:28, Mike Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>> There are two parts to this:
>>> - The IPv6 prefix.
>>> - The IID.
>>>
>>> The changes of the IPv6 prefix are generally tri
> On Sep 3, 2024, at 16:48, Chris Ross wrote:
>> On Sep 3, 2024, at 10:28, Mike Fischer wrote:
>>
>> There are two parts to this:
>> - The IPv6 prefix.
>> - The IID.
>>
>> The changes of the IPv6 prefix are generally triggered from the outside
>> (Internet provider). So here some mechanism t
On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 04:59:56PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Does it improve code performance declaring function variables static ?
It depends on many factors if it will speedup things, it might even
cause slowdowns. It can also introduce bugs because your function is
https:/google.com/search?q=Does+it+improve+code+performance+declaring+function+variables+static+%3F
On 10/6/24 9:59 PM, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Does it improve code performance declaring function variables static ?
Hi folks!
Does it improve code performance declaring function variables static ?
Thanks.
--
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolves do not perform
in the circus
Am 02.09.2024 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Ross:
I’m trying to move from a static IPv6 network to a dynamic allocation from an
ISP. The hard part is that some of my hosts have secondary addresses for
specific services to use. I need to find a way to listen to router adverts
but then manually add an
> Am 03.09.2024 um 17:45 schrieb Florian Obser :
>
> route -n monitor -inet6 | fgrep -A2 RTM_NEWADDR
Very interesting! Thank you!
I looked at the output of `route -n monitor -inet6` as there seems to be no
documentation for what that looks like. And my Internet provider obliged me
with a sho
olling might fit the bill.
>
> The IID is controlled by the host. Currently the only combination of
> automatic prefix + static IID seems to be EUI64 IIDs. Additional syntax to
> allow manually set static IIDs might be nice. Something like: `ifconfig $if
> inet6 autoconf -iid :b
On 2024-09-03 16:28 +02, Mike Fischer wrote:
> Note that I am not advocating for slaacd to directly execute arbitrary
> scripts. But maybe an (optional) service that can be notified by
> slaacd would allow slaacd to stay secure, stable and compact while
> still providing proactive notification ins
> Am 03.09.2024 um 16:28 schrieb Mike Fischer :
>
> Just complicate things even more, how do you handle routing? If your host
> gets multiple public/routable prefixes, your default route will still point
> to only one of the routers. So might need to deal with incoming packets from
> router A
vice that can be notified by slaacd would allow
slaacd to stay secure, stable and compact while still providing proactive
notification instead of polling might fit the bill.
The IID is controlled by the host. Currently the only combination of automatic
prefix + static IID seems to be EUI64 IIDs. Add
On 2024-09-02, Chris Ross wrote:
> I’m trying to move from a static IPv6 network to a dynamic allocation from an
> ISP. The hard part is that some of my hosts have secondary addresses for
> specific services to use. I need to find a way to listen to router adverts
> but then man
On 2024-09-02 22:51 -04, Chris Ross wrote:
> Yeah. I see rtsold has a couple scripts it knows how to run, so that is a
> place. But having a hook in slaacd(8) (or somewhere else?) would be nice.
Not going to happen.
engine.c: if (pledge("stdio", NULL) == -1)
frontend.c:
that, one from the router I’m building which is getting
its IPv6 from a different location than the prior/current gateway.
I have the “new” network from that advertisement last night, with a
lifetime of 0. With some effort, I could write something to parse
slaacctl output with more thought. But,
On 9/2/24 16:21, Chris Ross wrote:
I’m trying to move from a static IPv6 network to a dynamic allocation from an
ISP. The hard part is that some of my hosts have secondary addresses for
specific services to use. I need to find a way to listen to router adverts
but then manually add an alias
> Am 02.09.2024 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Ross :
>
> I’m trying to move from a static IPv6 network to a dynamic allocation from an
> ISP. The hard part is that some of my hosts have secondary addresses for
> specific services to use. I need to find a way to listen to router adv
I’m trying to move from a static IPv6 network to a dynamic allocation from an
ISP. The hard part is that some of my hosts have secondary addresses for
specific services to use. I need to find a way to listen to router adverts
but then manually add an alias with a static lower 64 bits. Looking
append ".gz" to path and check existence */
ret = snprintf(gzpath, sizeof(gzpath), "%s.gz", path);
goto abort;
Jim
On Thursday, November 9th, 2023 at 07:37, Paul Pace wrote:
> I have gzip-static set in a server block in httpd.conf.
>
> If I make
I have gzip-static set in a server block in httpd.conf.
If I make the following request:
curl -I -H 'Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate' http://example.com
the response has no Content-Encoding header and the Content-Length
matches /var/www/htdocs/index.html.
If I make the followi
On 3/28/23 17:27, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
Anyway, what I am trying to figure out is how to NAT the rdomain's?
At the moment from what I understand one has to put "rtable (n)" at the
end of the NAT rule...
That is for _changing_ rtable; if the interfaces inv
On 3/28/23 17:27, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
Anyway, what I am trying to figure out is how to NAT the rdomain's?
At the moment from what I understand one has to put "rtable (n)" at the
end of the NAT rule...
That is for _changing_ rtable; if the interfaces inv
On 3/28/23 17:27, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
Anyway, what I am trying to figure out is how to NAT the rdomain's?
At the moment from what I understand one has to put "rtable (n)" at the
end of the NAT rule...
That is for _changing_ rtable; if the interfaces inv
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
> Anyway, what I am trying to figure out is how to NAT the rdomain's?
>
>
> At the moment from what I understand one has to put "rtable (n)" at the
> end of the NAT rule...
That is for _changing_ rtable; if the interfaces involved (the $vpn_net1
interface and $
Thanks Stuart!
On 3/28/23 16:19, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
On my WAN vlan for what I am going to call ISP-B, as ISP-A is existing
for a long time. What I'm trying to do right now is set this as a
default gateway for a particular subnet.
There's no such thing as
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
> On my WAN vlan for what I am going to call ISP-B, as ISP-A is existing
> for a long time. What I'm trying to do right now is set this as a
> default gateway for a particular subnet.
There's no such thing as "default gateway for a subnet".
One way to do what y
Hi again,
so my shiny new fiber has been installed yesterday and currently I can
ping the gateway IP address but not much more.
It was interesting as they gave me this whole subnet and told me I get a
gateway address. What they should have said to eliminate my confusion
was that there is a
On 3/23/23 21:22, Jared Harper wrote:
On my server (7.2 amd64) I have gzip-static set in the server block as
documented, and it appears to work as expected. I am sorry that it
probably doesn't help your situation, but maybe the differences in
configuration can help point you in the
Le 23/03/2023 à 22:22, Jared Harper a écrit :
On Thursday, March 23rd, 2023 at 2:15 PM, Jordan Geoghegan
wrote:
On 3/9/23 17:31, Joel Carnat wrote:
Hi,
I just tried applying gzip compression on a simple test web site using
httpd and the gzip-static option ; using OpenBSD 7.2/amd64.
As I
On Thursday, March 23rd, 2023 at 2:15 PM, Jordan Geoghegan
wrote:
>
> On 3/9/23 17:31, Joel Carnat wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just tried applying gzip compression on a simple test web site using
> > httpd and the gzip-static option ; using OpenBSD 7.2/amd64.
On 3/9/23 17:31, Joel Carnat wrote:
Hi,
I just tried applying gzip compression on a simple test web site using
httpd and the gzip-static option ; using OpenBSD 7.2/amd64.
As I understood the man page, gzip-static is supposed to be used
inside the server block ; like listen, errdocs or
j...@carnat.net (Joel Carnat), 2023.03.10 (Fri) 17:41 (CET):
> Le 10/03/2023 à 16:41, Marcus MERIGHI a écrit :
> > j...@carnat.net (Joel Carnat), 2023.03.10 (Fri) 02:31 (CET):
> > > I just tried applying gzip compression on a simple test web site using
> > > httpd
>
Le 10/03/2023 à 16:41, Marcus MERIGHI a écrit :
Hello,
j...@carnat.net (Joel Carnat), 2023.03.10 (Fri) 02:31 (CET):
I just tried applying gzip compression on a simple test web site using httpd
and the gzip-static option ; using OpenBSD 7.2/amd64.
As I understood the man page, gzip-static is
Hello,
j...@carnat.net (Joel Carnat), 2023.03.10 (Fri) 02:31 (CET):
> I just tried applying gzip compression on a simple test web site using httpd
> and the gzip-static option ; using OpenBSD 7.2/amd64.
>
> As I understood the man page, gzip-static is supposed to be used inside
Hi,
I just tried applying gzip compression on a simple test web site using
httpd and the gzip-static option ; using OpenBSD 7.2/amd64.
As I understood the man page, gzip-static is supposed to be used inside
the server block ; like listen, errdocs or tls. But doing so does not
seem to enable
> Indeed, I see, portability is an hard to obtain status also in pf, when the
> if change.
>
> Do you have a more effective as *portable* tip in respect to this subject and
> pf?
In respect, the following should be also an other good one:
set state-policy if-bound
-- Daniele Bonini
Crystal Kolipe :
> If you change the hardware completely, then of course you are likely to have
> to make changes to the networking configuration. That's almost unavoidable
My meaning was this one. In case you want to enforce mac comparison
it is better working in pf.conf on the interface with
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 14:35:18 +0100, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> To be honest I never had the need to store static arp entries. So for
> me the best place is /dev/null.
Not op, but I have such a need: I own an wifi AP which tends to not
being able to let arp pass, in one direction. All the r
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 05:33:09PM +0100, Daniele B. wrote:
>
> > The /etc/hostname.if files can take a MAC address as the if part now, so
> > that
> > is not necessarily an issue.
>
> Interesting though, how to specify the mac?
>
> However this doesnt change much in portability coordinates, if
> The /etc/hostname.if files can take a MAC address as the if part now, so that
> is not necessarily an issue.
Interesting though, how to specify the mac?
However this doesnt change much in portability coordinates, if you litterally
switch you bsd
from an hardware system to an other one luckly
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Daniele B. wrote:
> At this point it is better to enforce mac constraints in pf.conf than
> loosing on portability (changing hardware, etc) enforcing mac in hostname.if,
> my opinion.
The /etc/hostname.if files can take a MAC address as the if part now, s
>
>> Please exuse me if this is a stupid counter question,
>> but isn't this what ethers(5) is for?
>
> Not really - you could use it as input to a handrolled script if you
> wanted, but the main purpose of that file is to lookup addresses/names
> for ether_ntohost()/ether_hostton().
>
> Like
you
>> > could suggest if there is a dedicated place or recommended
>> > place for OpenBSD where static arp entries should be stored.
>> > I found many answers over the internet, in some books it is
>> > mentioning /etc/netstart.
>> > Also on very old threa
r recommended
> > place for OpenBSD where static arp entries should be stored.
> > I found many answers over the internet, in some books it is
> > mentioning /etc/netstart.
> > Also on very old thread fro OpenBSD I see it was discussed at
> > some point a possible idea l
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 03:30:18PM +0200, Cristian Danila wrote:
> Dear Misc,
>
> I would really appreciate if more experienced members of you
> could suggest if there is a dedicated place or recommended
> place for OpenBSD where static arp entries should be stored.
> I found
Dear Misc,
I would really appreciate if more experienced members of you
could suggest if there is a dedicated place or recommended
place for OpenBSD where static arp entries should be stored.
I found many answers over the internet, in some books it is
mentioning /etc/netstart.
Also on very old
I have a basic web server set up
server "example.com" {
listen on * port 80
gzip-static
directory {
index index.html
no auto index
}
}
When opening the root webpage (http://example.com), the server does not
respond with "Content-Encoding: gzip&qu
Hi all,
Sorry for the noise. I found out that it was pf.
When I tested with pf disabled I always only did this with pf disabled on one
side. Once I disabled on both sides it worked.
So I need to figure out now, what exactly is the issue.
Thanks
Markus
> On 26. Nov 2022, at 11:19, Markus Wipp w
Hi all,
I hope that someone here on the list could give me some hints on how I can make
my setup working.
I have the following setup:
"Virtual server 1" is connected to "Virtual server 2" via egre over ipsec on
both sides I’m using a bridge and a vether interface.
Both virtual servers are loca
On 2022 sam 06 aoû - 09:51, Zack Newman wrote:
> Correction. Apparently even though it is not explicitly stated,
> Section 2.4 merely allocates fe80::/10 for link-local addresses while
> Section 2.5.6 defines what range, fe80::/64, from that allocation is
> currently valid, so it is not a contradic
On 2022 ven 29 jui - 14:08, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-07-28, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I think I found the issue.
> >
> > The cisco is useing the address fe80:b2b:11fe:161::2 but for some
> > reason, openbsd doesn't link this.
> >
> > I cannot ping fe80:b2b:11fe:161::2%vport0
> >
>
On 2022-07-28, Nicolas Goy wrote:
>
> Ok, I think I found the issue.
>
> The cisco is useing the address fe80:b2b:11fe:161::2 but for some
> reason, openbsd doesn't link this.
>
> I cannot ping fe80:b2b:11fe:161::2%vport0
>
> The system is adding fe80::%vport0/64 to the routing table.
>
> I am n
On 2022 jeu 28 jui - 12:20, Kevin Wallace wrote:
> On 2022-07-28 11:32 AM, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> > I found something weird that might be a bug.
>
> > ping6 fe80:b2b:11fe:161::2%vport0
>
> The KAME IPv6 code uses the second word of link-local addresses for
> internal bookkeeping, and clears it befo
I found something weird that might be a bug.
If I do
doas ifconfig vport0 inet6 fe80::2/10
Then
ping6 fe80:b2b:11fe:161::2%vport0
On the tcpdump output, I see a different address
20:31:15.816576 fe80::fce1:baff:fed1:b34 > ff02::1:ff00:2: icmp6: neighbor sol:
who has fe80:0:11fe:161::2
-
Ok, I think I found the issue.
The cisco is useing the address fe80:b2b:11fe:161::2 but for some
reason, openbsd doesn't link this.
I cannot ping fe80:b2b:11fe:161::2%vport0
The system is adding fe80::%vport0/64 to the routing table.
I am not sure, but I think that's the cause.
I tried to
I added this as my first line in pf.conf
pass quick log on vport0 proto icmp6
When I do tcpdump -i vport0 I do see the packets
19:21:09.846069 fe80:b2b:11fe:161::2 > ff02::1:ff01:1: icmp6: neighbor sol: who
has [class 0xe0]
But there is nothing on tcpdump -i pflog0
It seems those pack
As additional info, here are my sysctl
net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
net.inet6.ip6.redirect=1
net.inet6.ip6.hlim=64
net.inet6.ip6.mrtproto=0
net.inet6.ip6.maxfragpackets=200
net.inet6.ip6.log_interval=5
net.inet6.ip6.hdrnestlimit=10
net.inet6.ip6.dad_count=1
net.inet6.ip6.auto_flowlabel=1
net.inet6
Ok, actually the ISP router is also trying the multicast after failing
the unicast:
Here are two packets, the first one works, the router responds (openbsd
box), but the second one is ignored.
first one (works is responded to):
[+] Frame 12012: 86 bytes on wire (688 bits), 86 bytes captured (688
On 2022 jeu 28 jui - 16:14, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> On 2022 jeu 28 jui - 15:52, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> > On 2022 jeu 28 jui - 13:18, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> > >
> > > - I can ping internet from my router, but it cuts every 10 seconds or
> > > so. If I inspect the traffic, I see that the ISP router is se
On 2022 jeu 28 jui - 15:52, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> On 2022 jeu 28 jui - 13:18, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> >
> > - I can ping internet from my router, but it cuts every 10 seconds or
> > so. If I inspect the traffic, I see that the ISP router is sending
> > neighbor discovery with my router address, an
On 2022 jeu 28 jui - 13:18, Nicolas Goy wrote:
>
> - I can ping internet from my router, but it cuts every 10 seconds or
> so. If I inspect the traffic, I see that the ISP router is sending
> neighbor discovery with my router address, and that my router does not
> respond.
>
This seems to
Hello,
My ISP gave me a /56 and told me it was statically routed (no
DHCPv6-PD).
Let's say this prefix 2a02:aa08::YY00::/56 is now x00::/56
What I want to do, is to split this prefix into /64 and use the /64 for
my vlans.
So what I did is on my interfaces I have the following ips:
wan x00:
lls the option
3 route if a default route is not provided by option 121.
According to this paragraph of RFC3442: "If the DHCP server returns
both a Classless Static Routes option and a Router option, the DHCP
client MUST ignore the Router option." I'm not even sure Debian
strictly f
On 2022-05-06, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2022-05-04, nacelle ...:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=162652200109398&w=2 I disagree.
> while its technically correct with the rfc, in practice, not many OSes
> rigidly enforces not using the router option when 121 is present that
> I've used.
It
Dealing with broken clients can be handled with separate groups or
even "deny booting;" instead of breaking the dhcp server.
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:03 AM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2022-05-09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> ...so the correct configuration is clear: list both a 0.0.0.0/0
> classless route and "option routers", and it should work for all
> cases.
Yes. The server sends both, the clients that handle opti
On 2022-05-09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>>
>>> That doesn't seem like correct behavior (the ISC version certainly
>>> offers both). Both options should be sent if configured, it's up to
>>> the client to properly handle this.
>>> Clients that are rfc3442 compliant will install the option 121 route
On 2022-05-06, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2022-05-06 10:28 -04, Sonic wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:18 AM Florian Obser wrote:
>>> Also, dhcpd(8) does not even hand out option 3 when option 121 is
>>> configured.
>>
>> That doesn't seem like correct behavior (the ISC version certainly
>> off
On 2022-05-06 10:28 -04, Sonic wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:18 AM Florian Obser wrote:
>> Also, dhcpd(8) does not even hand out option 3 when option 121 is
>> configured.
>
> That doesn't seem like correct behavior (the ISC version certainly
> offers both). Both options should be sent if con
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:18 AM Florian Obser wrote:
> Also, dhcpd(8) does not even hand out option 3 when option 121 is
> configured.
That doesn't seem like correct behavior (the ISC version certainly
offers both). Both options should be sent if configured, it's up to
the client to properly handl
On 2022-05-06 08:26 UTC, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-05-04, nace...@narwhals.org wrote:
>> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=162652200109398&w=2 I disagree.
>> while its technically correct with the rfc, in practice, not many OSes
>> rigidly enforces not using the router option when 121
On 2022-05-04, nace...@narwhals.org wrote:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=162652200109398&w=2 I disagree.
> while its technically correct with the rfc, in practice, not many OSes
> rigidly enforces not using the router option when 121 is present that
> I've used.
It's not just technicall
022 09:58:04 -
@@ -1106,14 +1106,6 @@ parse_dhcp(struct dhcpleased_iface *ifac
intprefixlen, compressed_prefixlen;
csr = 1;
-if (routers) {
-/*
- * Ignore routers option if classless static
-
Ok, ignore my previous mail. The solution is to use -soii:
# ifconfig em0 autoconf eui64 -soii lladdr f2:b6:71:e6:11:7e
This makes the non temporary public and ULA addresses use the EUI-64 IID based
on the lladdr.
Thanks!
Mike
> Am 29.12.2021 um 19:37 schrieb Mike Fischer :
>
> On Tue, Dec 2
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021, at 21:05, Mike Fischer wrote:
>> Am 28.12.2021 um 13:09 schrieb Paul de Weerd :
>> Seems like the simplest way, especially using the lladdr option.
> Yes, I’ll give that a try.
Ok, I have tried the following:
Remove my current IPv6 configuration from em0:
# ifconfig em0 -ine
Hi Thomas!
Am 28.12.2021 um 16:24 schrieb Thomas Bohl :
>
> Hello,
>
>> My Internet connection is using dynamic IPv6 prefixes. I want to configure a
>> local (OpenBSD) machine so its public IPv6 address adjusts to changes in the
>> network prefix but keeps a stati
Hi Diana!
> Am 28.12.2021 um 15:58 schrieb deich...@placebonol.com:
>
> I'm still interested in why you are concerned about "leaking" the MAC address?
Well, knowing the vendor of an interface might lead an attacker to exploit
known security issues relevant to that vendor. While I deem the risk
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021, at 21:05, Mike Fischer wrote:
>> Am 28.12.2021 um 13:09 schrieb Paul de Weerd :
>> Seems like the simplest way, especially using the lladdr option.
> Yes, I’ll give that a try.
That’s how I “solved” that problem too, though I’m not too worried
about leaking anything, so I jus
I'm still interested in why you are concerned about "leaking" the MAC address?
Changing the MAC with laddr will still leak the MAC but now it will be the one
you created.
If you do decide to change the MAC to a long defunct NIC manufacturer. That is
what I do for fun. Some of my 10G interfac
resting! I hadn’t thought of that.
> | My options for running an OpenBSD server using IPv6 thus seem to be:
> | - Find a provider with static public IPv6 addresses (prefixes)
>
> That would work, but means you have to change providers - is that
> really what you want? Could be a goo
On 2021-12-28, Mike Fischer wrote:
> Thanks Stuart!
>
>> Am 28.12.2021 um 10:01 schrieb Stuart Henderson :
>>
>> On 2021-12-27, Mike Fischer wrote:
>>> After reading man pages for slaacd(8), hostname.if(5) and ifconfig(8) the
>>> only way to combine a
(but note that it's not really different from
"leaking" your IPv6 address in that case).
| My options for running an OpenBSD server using IPv6 thus seem to be:
| - Find a provider with static public IPv6 addresses (prefixes)
That would work, but means you have to change providers
Thanks Stuart!
> Am 28.12.2021 um 10:01 schrieb Stuart Henderson :
>
> On 2021-12-27, Mike Fischer wrote:
>> After reading man pages for slaacd(8), hostname.if(5) and ifconfig(8) the
>> only way to combine a static IID with a dynamic prefix seems to be the eui64
>>
On 2021-12-27, Mike Fischer wrote:
> After reading man pages for slaacd(8), hostname.if(5) and ifconfig(8) the
> only way to combine a static IID with a dynamic prefix seems to be the eui64
> option:
> inet6 autoconf eui64
>
> However this limits the IID to a fixed valu
) machine so its public IPv6 address adjusts to changes in the
network prefix but keeps a static Interface Identifier (IID). I’d also like to
be able to configure the IID manually.
Essentially this would be a server running on the LAN but with a public IPv6
address, reachable from the Internet
Hi,
My bad... I finally read more man pages about ip6, route, trying to understand
their network topology...
New config for ovh ipv6 with a prefixlen 64.
Example /etc/hosname.if :
inet6 2607:5300:60:62ac:: 64
!route add -inet6 -net 2607:5300:60:62ff::/64 -cloning -link -iface ix0
!route add -
Forgot this. 1 hour later It sucks again
. What a fucking network :(
-Message initial-
> De: Eric JACQUOT
> Envoyé: lundi 12 avril 2021 0:13
> À: Piotr Isajew ; misc@openbsd.org
> Sujet: RE: static IPv6 config on OVH dedicated server
>
> Hi Piotr,
>
> -Mes
Hi Piotr,
-Message initial-
> De: Piotr Isajew
> Envoyé: vendredi 9 avril 2021 22:59
> À: misc@openbsd.org
> Sujet: static IPv6 config on OVH dedicated server
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm struggling to configure IPv6 for my fresh OpenBSD 6.8
> installation running o
Piotr,
On 9/4/21 17:28, Piotr Isajew wrote:
The default gateway for your IPv6 block (IPv6_GATEWAY) is always
...xxFF:FF:FF:FF:FF.
For example:
The IPv6 address of the server is 2607:5300:60:62ac::/64. The
IPv6_GATEWAY will therefore be 2607:5300:60:62FF:FF:FF:FF:FF.
Th
À : misc@openbsd.org
Objet : static IPv6 config on OVH dedicated server
Hi,
I'm struggling to configure IPv6 for my fresh OpenBSD 6.8
installation running on OVH (soyoustart.com) dedicated server.
What I get from the ISP is the /64 address pool.
OVH requires static configuration with ga
Too fast
You will never reach an outside gateway.
--
Eric JACQUOT
De : Eric JACQUOT
Envoyé : vendredi 9 avril 2021 23:55
À : Piotr Isajew; misc@openbsd.org
Objet : Re: static IPv6 config on OVH dedicated server
Hi Piotr,
You have to configure your if with
The basic question is per the subject line, filling in the details here
I have wireguard working with each peer having ipv4 and ipv6 addresses
and all of them are able to ping each other and also to the WAN through
the central peer.
The central peer is a vultr VPS and has a /64 prefix
.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
ry$ cat mytls.c
__thread int a; int b; int main() { return a = b; }
ry$ egcc -o mytls -static mytls.c
ry$ ./mytls
Segmentation fault (core dumped
class 0xc0]
So it works like in the past, that a lot off packages goes lost first, than it
works for a time and than it goes off again.
Kind regards,
Kay-Uwe
> The best option I know of is to add a static, permanent NDP entry
> with ndp(8) entry before bringing up the interface. This
1 - 100 of 497 matches
Mail list logo