On 2024-09-03 16:28 +02, Mike Fischer <fischer+o...@lavielle.com> wrote: > Note that I am not advocating for slaacd to directly execute arbitrary > scripts. But maybe an (optional) service that can be notified by > slaacd would allow slaacd to stay secure, stable and compact while > still providing proactive notification instead of polling might fit > the bill.
route -n monitor -inet6 | fgrep -A2 RTM_NEWADDR -- In my defence, I have been left unsupervised.
