On 2022-05-06 10:28 -04, Sonic <sonicsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:18 AM Florian Obser <flor...@openbsd.org> wrote: >> Also, dhcpd(8) does not even hand out option 3 when option 121 is >> configured. > > That doesn't seem like correct behavior (the ISC version certainly > offers both). Both options should be sent if configured, it's up to > the client to properly handle this. > Clients that are rfc3442 compliant will install the option 121 routes, > clients that are not rfc3442 compliant will ignore option 121 and > install the gateway supplied by option 3. If dhcpd doesn't hand out > option 3 when option 121 is configured then clients that are not > rfc3442 compliant will not receive a gateway address.
> I fully agree, I was very surprised when I discovered this behaviour. But I haven't chased it down why this is. -- I'm not entirely sure you are real.
