On 2022 sam 06 aoû - 09:51, Zack Newman wrote: > Correction. Apparently even though it is not explicitly stated, > Section 2.4 merely allocates fe80::/10 for link-local addresses while > Section 2.5.6 defines what range, fe80::/64, from that allocation is > currently valid, so it is not a contradiction; just poorly worded. > > Source: > https://community.cisco.com/t5/ipv6/ipv6-link-local-address-space/td-p/3411919 >
As a follow up, I was able to get my ISP to change the link local address of their cisco and now everything works. I realize I've be a bit vague in this thread as I was debbugging the issue. And I am very grateful that regardeless you were able to guide me to the solution. Best regards -- Nicolas Goy Engineer & Developer https://www.kuon.ch https://www.goyman.com
