On 2020-05-13, Vertigo Altair wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Sorry for late reply but I had a problem accessing this device.
>
> I’ve tried both OpenBSD 6.6 and 6.7 (amd64), nothing changed:
>
> I think you’re probably right; transceiver command is only available for
> ix(4) driver.
AFAIK the list is: ix, ix
c0: can't enable card
vscsi0 at root
scsibus2 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus3 at softraid0: 256 targets
root on sd0a (fead4daabfbd1a3a.a) swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
Tom Smyth , 12 May 2020 Sal, 23:02 tarihinde
şunu yazdı:
> Hi Vertigo,
> can you send on a dmesg,
wrote:
>
> Hi Misc,
>
> I have 2 questions about my dual port fiber optic ethernet card with Intel
> I210 chipset:
> 1. The ifconfig em0 media command output only shows that it supports
> multi-mode fiber (1G SX).
> Actually it worked when I tried single mode fiber. But I still
Hi Misc,
I have 2 questions about my dual port fiber optic ethernet card with Intel
I210 chipset:
1. The ifconfig em0 media command output only shows that it supports
multi-mode fiber (1G SX).
Actually it worked when I tried single mode fiber. But I still wanted to
report this to OpenBSD
hi
so restart with a blank paper ;)
i did an
rm -r /usr/src
then
cd /usr
cvs -qd anon...@ftp5.eu.openbsd.org:/cvs get -P src
cd /usr/src/sys/dev
patch -p1 < /home/glaess/EP80579_debug.diff
then i got some reject
i modify all rejected files by hand ( with the missing lines )
cd /usr/src/sy
gt; > > > > 2 int
> > > > > > > 23
> > > > > > > usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
> > > > > > > uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
> > > > > > > pcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel EP805
ntel EP80579 USB" rev 0x01:
>>>>>> apic 2 int
>>>>>> 23
>>>>>> ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel EP80579 USB" rev 0x01:
>>>>>> apic 2 int
>>>>>> 23
>>>>>> usb0 at ehci0: USB revis
t;>>>> fixed t10.ATA_TOSHIBA_MK6037GSX_676FTD3DT
>>>>> sd0: 57231MB, 512 bytes/sector, 117210240 sectors
>>>>> ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 "Intel EP80579 SMBus" rev 0x01: apic
2
>>>>> int 19
>>>>> iic0 at ichiic0
>&
| DS14145-RIPE| DS11-6BONE
193.178.161.0/24 | 3ffe:8010:7:2a::/64 | AS16288
---
A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in.
On 16 kwi 2015, at 21:55, Dariusz Swiderski
wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the noise, fixed in lates
a0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
>>> vscsi0 at root
>>> scsibus2 at vscsi0: 256 targets
>>> softraid0 at root
>>> scsibus3 at softraid0: 256 targets
>>> root on sd0a (f67e7646a5f64b3f.a) swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
>>>
t;> > Am 16.04.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Dariusz Swiderski:
>> >> hi
>> >
>> > yes i will do today , i et you know if done.
>> >
>> > holger
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> can you test the attahced diff?
>&g
j 'sfires' Swiderski
> >>> ---
> >>> SysAdm | SecOff | DS14145-RIPE| DS11-6BONE
> >>> 193.178.161.0/24 | 3ffe:8010:7:2a::/64 | AS16288
> >>> ---
ej 'sfires' Swiderski
>>>> ---
>>>> SysAdm | SecOff | DS14145-RIPE| DS11-6BONE
>>>> 193.178.161.0/24 | 3ffe:8010:7:2a::/64 | AS16288
>>>> --
> A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in.
>>>
>>>> On 16 kwi 2015, at 21:55, Dariusz Swiderski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the noise, fixed in latest builds. #784 works as expected
>
Hi,
Could you provide output of
pcidump -v
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 kwi 2015, at 18:59, Holger Glaess mailto:gla...@glaessixs.de>> wrote:
hi
can help someone ?
the 3 other intel ethernet card are also gigabit .
holger
# dmesg
OpenBSD 5.7-current (GENERIC) #759: Wed Apr 1 14:25:
:
> >>
> >>> Am 16.04.2015 um 20:21 schrieb Dariusz Swiderski:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Could you provide output of
> >>> pcidump -v
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>> On 16 kwi 2015,
gt;
>>> On 16 kwi 2015, at 18:59, Holger Glaess >> <mailto:gla...@glaessixs.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi
>>>>
>>>> can help someone ?
>>>> the 3 other intel ethernet card are also gigabit .
>>>>
>>>>
t of
>> pcidump -v
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 16 kwi 2015, at 18:59, Holger Glaess > <mailto:gla...@glaessixs.de>> wrote:
>>
>>> hi
>>>
>>> can help someone ?
>>> the 3 other intel ethernet card are also gi
Hi,
Could you provide output of
pcidump -v
Sent from my iPhone
> On 16 kwi 2015, at 18:59, Holger Glaess wrote:
>
> hi
>
> can help someone ?
> the 3 other intel ethernet card are also gigabit .
>
> holger
>
>
>
> # dmesg
> OpenBSD 5.7-current (GENE
rovide output of
>> pcidump -v
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 16 kwi 2015, at 18:59, Holger Glaess > <mailto:gla...@glaessixs.de>> wrote:
>>
>>> hi
>>>
>>> can help someone ?
>>> the 3 other intel ethernet card are als
Am 16.04.2015 um 20:21 schrieb Dariusz Swiderski:
> Hi,
>
> Could you provide output of
> pcidump -v
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 16 kwi 2015, at 18:59, Holger Glaess <mailto:gla...@glaessixs.de>> wrote:
>
>> hi
>>
>> can help someone
hi
can help someone ?
the 3 other intel ethernet card are also gigabit .
holger
# dmesg
OpenBSD 5.7-current (GENERIC) #759: Wed Apr 1 14:25:18 MDT 2015
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Genuine Intel(R) processor 1.20GHz ("GenuineIntel"
Hello,
I'd like to know some recommendations for a well supported gigabit
ethernet card
for openbsd 5.5 amd64
a single port
to use a PCI-E 2.0 x 1 slot
preferably quite compact, impacting very little on airflow within the
case.
- douglas
> > Also, I've heard that running X weakens
> > security, I'm going to OpenBSD because my FreBSD based Mac is,
> > apparently, where hackers go to relax. Can I strengthen the X component?
>
> Well that's got a never ending answer but the main points.
Forgot the real main point, don't run X on
previously on this list Jules Gilbert contributed:
> Also, I've heard that running X weakens
> security, I'm going to OpenBSD because my FreBSD based Mac is,
> apparently, where hackers go to relax. Can I strengthen the X component?
Well that's got a never ending answer but the main points.
Ope
On 08/13/14 19:18, Jules Gilbert wrote:
> When setting up 5.5, I get my ethernet card saying "active" and
> everything looks right, but pings to known outside addresses fail, eg.,
> I'm still not on the air. Also, I've heard that running X weakens
> security, I'
When setting up 5.5, I get my ethernet card saying "active" and
everything looks right, but pings to known outside addresses fail, eg.,
I'm still not on the air. Also, I've heard that running X weakens
security, I'm going to OpenBSD because my FreBSD based Mac is,
appare
On Aug 10, 2013, at 6:10, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> The i210/i211 chips aren't supported yet. The i217/pch_lpt found
> in the Lynx Point/Haswell PCH isn't either. I don't think any of
> the usual suspects have hardware yet.
Do those that need the hardware have it yet? If not, what's needed? The
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 02:53:41PM +0200, Peter Olsson wrote:
> Hello!
> Does OpenBSD support the recently released Intel I210 card?
> I have searched the net but have not come up with a satisfying answer to
> this.
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
The i210/i211 chips aren't supported yet. The i217/pch_lpt f
Hello!
Does OpenBSD support the recently released Intel I210 card?
I have searched the net but have not come up with a satisfying answer to
this.
Thanks,
Peter
Hi all,
perhaps my reply went astray, but let me repeat that this patch fixed my
problem and the ethernet cards get recognized correctly, works and is
stable with this patch.
Riccardo
Miod Vallat wrote:
Hi,
I inserted the card into a debian laptop which recongizes it. Here
some output.
dm
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
> I hope this patch can make its way in 5.3 in time.
5.3 is scheduled to be released in 10 days. There's no way for a
change now to make it to the CDs which are already pressed. It's a
couple months too late for that.
Philip Guenther
Hi Miod,
Sebastian was kind enough to compile a -current kernel for me wih this
patch and the ethernet card works!
I hope this patch can make its way in 5.3 in time.
Riccardo
On 04/16/13 22:28, Miod Vallat wrote:
Does the following diff help?
Index: if_ne_pcmcia.c
> Hi,
>
> I inserted the card into a debian laptop which recongizes it. Here
> some output.
>
> dmesg:
> [ 149.244112] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: pccard: PCMCIA card
> inserted into slot 1
> [ 149.244234] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: cs: memory probe
> 0xa000-0xa0ff: excluding 0xa00
Hi,
I inserted the card into a debian laptop which recongizes it. Here some
output.
dmesg:
[ 149.244112] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: pccard: PCMCIA card
inserted into slot 1
[ 149.244234] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: cs: memory probe
0xa000-0xa0ff: excluding 0xa000-0xa00
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 23:57 CEST, Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I bought a new PCMCIA card for my ol' Thinkpad since I managed to break
> the old one.
>
> This is what I see in dmesg when I insert it, but then no device shows
> up in ifconfig.
>
> ne4 at pcmcia0 function 0 "D-L
On 04/10/13 17:57, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi,
I bought a new PCMCIA card for my ol' Thinkpad since I managed to
break the old one.
This is what I see in dmesg when I insert it, but then no device shows
up in ifconfig.
ne4 at pcmcia0 function 0 "D-Link, DFE-670TXD, PC Card" port
0xa040/32
Hi,
I bought a new PCMCIA card for my ol' Thinkpad since I managed to break
the old one.
This is what I see in dmesg when I insert it, but then no device shows
up in ifconfig.
ne4 at pcmcia0 function 0 "D-Link, DFE-670TXD, PC Card" port 0xa040/32:
can't match ethernet vendor code
The car
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 05:40:10PM -0700, David Newman wrote:
> Any recommendations for an Ethernet card that fits into a PCI Express x8
> slot? I didn't see anything specific on the hardware page or in the
> archives.
>
> This is for a Dell CR100 OEM server. The spec shee
Any recommendations for an Ethernet card that fits into a PCI Express x8
slot? I didn't see anything specific on the hardware page or in the
archives.
This is for a Dell CR100 OEM server. The spec sheet mentions the usual
two Broadcom gigabit Ethernet interfaces, plus a "PCI Expr
try ebay for quad dc(4), znyx and others (they were used in netapp
filers). these should be fine if they'll fit your chassis (some are
full-length cards, which can be a problem).
you sometimes get quad fxp but not often, they're fine too.
afaik these two, dc and fxp, are the better performing of t
I need 100mb interfaces. I will probable go in a low end server class
machine.
> On 2008/02/01 12:21, Chris Bullock wrote:
> > I need a recommendation for a quad port nic to put in my
> router/firewall.
www.bgmicro.com has a quad AIC-6915 card for $38 their part COM1204
I use it in my fir
I need 100mb interfaces. I will probable go in a low end server class
machine.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2008/02/01 12:21, Chris Bullock wrote:
> > I need a recommendation for a quad port nic to put in my
> router/firewall.
> > What is the
On 2008/02/01 12:21, Chris Bullock wrote:
> I need a recommendation for a quad port nic to put in my router/firewall.
> What is the recommendation?
>
What speed?
What bus?
How much do you want to pay?
intel pro/1000 PT
_
Who's friends with who and co-starred in what?
http://www.searchgamesbox.com/celebrityseparation.shtml
I need a recommendation for a quad port nic to put in my router/firewall.
What is the recommendation?
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> int mitigation has always made quite some difference, but now it is even
> more, I agree.
>
I could never see a difference on Soekris boxes with a 400 us delay in if_sis
in earlier OpenBSD versions. But I never tried higher delays than that.
> nonth
* Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 21:17]:
> Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Sis(4) is plaing in the same league as rl(4). It works fine and I never
> > had porblems with it but I would never use it in a router with high
> > performance needs.
>
> No, the interface o
Hi,
Thanks for all the input, we have decided to go for a Dell PE860 with an
Intel quad pro/1000 GT adapter.
Best regards
Fredrik Carlsson
Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sis(4) is plaing in the same league as rl(4). It works fine and I never
> had porblems with it but I would never use it in a router with high
> performance needs.
No, the interface on sis is not as bad as the old rl chips. Also, the 83816
sis supports i
On 6/6/07, Ronnie Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henning Brauer a icrit :
> * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
>> I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
>> was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
>> (pf disabled) measured using
> Henning has something in saying that most of the tools aren't great,
> in the end all benchmarks are artificial in some measure. Replaying
> traffic is equally artificial as it's only indicative of the traffic
> you recorded - which is likely to be biased towards whatever was
> happening at the
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 17:52]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
> >> I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
> >> was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
> >> (pf disabled) measured using
Dave Harrison wrote:
> However I'm not aware of any tools that handle that kind of
> distributed benchmark.. anyone ?
>
httperf can be run in an array of clients (--client option), although
there is currently no way to automatically aggregate the results.
--
Theodore Bullock, <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
>> I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
>> was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
>> (pf disabled) measured using iperf.
>
> the single-stream tcp test iperf uses is pret
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
was unaware that moose farts were slow. you learn something new every day :)
i believe the speed of moose farts varies in relationship to the moose,
meese?, distance from Calgary.
Henning Brauer wrote:
single tcp session benches are completely meaningless and will not max
out any device faster than a moose fart
was unaware that moose farts were slow. you learn something new every day :)
* Dave Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 13:52]:
> If you're just looking for a big number, open a single TCP session and
> send alot of traffic through it so you don't have to continually start
> new sessions (sessions are comparatively expensive).
single tcp session benches are completely
Matt Rowley wrote:
>>> best "simulation" is recording your real-world traffic using tcpdump and
>>> then use tcpreplay. but that is tricky too.
>> Henning has something in saying that most of the tools aren't great,
>> in the end all benchmarks are artificial in some measure. Replaying
>> traffic
> > best "simulation" is recording your real-world traffic using tcpdump and
> > then use tcpreplay. but that is tricky too.
>
> Henning has something in saying that most of the tools aren't great,
> in the end all benchmarks are artificial in some measure. Replaying
> traffic is equally artific
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Ronnie Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 13:04]:
>> Henning Brauer a icrit :
>>> * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged m
* Ronnie Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-06 13:04]:
> Henning Brauer a icrit :
> >* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
> >>I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
> >>was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
> >>(pf disabled) measur
Henning Brauer a icrit :
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
(pf disabled) measured using iperf.
the single-stream tcp test iperf uses is pretty mean
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]:
> I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
> was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
> (pf disabled) measured using iperf.
the single-stream tcp test iperf uses is pretty meaningless
(unless.. well,
* Fredrik Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:04]:
> Jason Dixon wrote:
> >On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:26:19 +0200, Fredrik Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
> >>quad ethernet cards people recom
* Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/06/05 18:10, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
> >
> > > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> > > least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
> > > installed in a de
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:49:05PM -0500, Todd Alan Smith wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:10:08PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> >> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
> >>
> >> > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun
On 6/5/07, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:10:08PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
>
> > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> > least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and curren
On 2007/06/05 18:10, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
>
> > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> > least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
> > installed in a dell 1550 that works just fine. You can
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:10:08PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
>
> > Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> > least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
> > installed in a dell 1550 that work
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Robert Franklin wrote:
> Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
> least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
> installed in a dell 1550 that works just fine. You can find the Sun
> quad cards for really cheap off of eb
Why not a qfe card from Sun? I've used a quad port Sun PCI card for at
least a few years in both me Sun AXI servers, and currently I have one
installed in a dell 1550 that works just fine. You can find the Sun
quad cards for really cheap off of ebay. I think I picked mine up for
around $40 USD.
Daniel Polak wrote:
Original message from Fredrik Carlsson at 5-6-2007 18:26
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about
what quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well
supported by OpenBSD), but what quad ca
On Jun 5, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Fredrik Carlsson wrote:
A mix of all that ;)
It's in the startup phase so I can't provide that much info yet,
but there will be a lot of machines and we will be routing much
traffic internally and to Internet. The budget is quite important,
so if there is a c
Fredrik Carlsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
> quad ethernet cards people recommend?
> The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
> by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? what cards have good
> perfo
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Fredrik Carlsson wrote:
Hi,
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? what cards h
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:26:19 +0200, Fredrik Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
by Op
Fredrik Carlsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
> quad ethernet cards people recommend?
> The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
> by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? what cards have good
> perfo
Original message from Fredrik Carlsson at 5-6-2007 18:26
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about
what quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well
supported by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? wha
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:26:19 +0200, Fredrik Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
> quad ethernet cards people recommend?
> The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
> by OpenBSD), but w
Hi,
I'm planing to set up a new firewall and have a few questions about what
quad ethernet cards people recommend?
The server will probably be a Dell PE860 (they seem to be well supported
by OpenBSD), but what quad cards should i buy? what cards have good
performance?
Best regards
Fredrik Ca
Hi,
I'm building a firewall with 6 ethernet interfaces. It's a Tyan S2425
mobo with 2 onboard NICs and added quad port Routerboard 44 card on a
1U PCI riser card.
The problem is that vr0 does not work. It's detected with MAC address
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff and the PHY for vr0 is not detected.
vr1, vr2,
Anyone got any suggestions for getting this card started correctly? Seen
the question in older posts, but never an answer (running sparc64 generic).
kind regards
David
qec0 at sbus0 slot 0 offset 0x2 vector 4 ipl 2: 128K memory
qe0 at qec0 slot 0 offset 0x0 rev 1iomap insert error: 12 for va
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 10:44, you wrote:
> I see. Thanks a lot and sorry for the stupid question.
> By the way, is there any way, how to use the two NICs for load balancing?
>
> Karel
Yes there is.
trunk(4) will tell you how.
Regards
Johan M:son
@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Ethernet Card
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:08:39AM +0200, Karel Galu?ka wrote:
> Hi J.C.,
> Thank you for your answer.
> I have written that I want to use the computer as a router in a future.
I'm
> testing it in my lab as a simple non-router computer now. The firs
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:08:39AM +0200, Karel Galu?ka wrote:
> Hi J.C.,
> Thank you for your answer.
> I have written that I want to use the computer as a router in a future. I'm
> testing it in my lab as a simple non-router computer now. The first
> interface has ip 192.168.0.48 and the second
gs=141 mtu 33224
pfsync0: flags=0<> mtu 1460
enc0: flags=0<> mtu 1536
Karel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J.C. Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 2:47 AM
To: Karel Galu9ka
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Ethernet Card
On Tue, 16 May 2006 18:47:18 +0200, Karel Galuka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Problem is following: Only vr0 works. Vr1 is unreachable. Ping from console
>said Host is down. But when I disabled the first NIC in bios, the second NIC
>obtained vr0 and worked fine. So, I guess, HW is OK. I want the m
lags=0<> mtu 1536
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Karel Galu9ka
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:52 PM
To: 'Josh Grosse'
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Ethernet Card
Here it is Josh,
Computer is on my internal test network
16 byte fifo
biomask ff45 netmask ff45 ttymask ffc7
pctr: user-level cycle counter enabled
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
Karel
-Original Message-
From: Josh Grosse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:15 PM
This is all well and good... "I have a problem with my computer. Help me."
A dmesg would be a great place to start.
Tim Donahue
> Hi,
>
> I have been using the PD600 all over the place with 3.x, recently i had
> the exact same issue as Karel has when upgrading one of them to 3.9 - i
> assumed t
Hi,
I have been using the PD600 all over the place with 3.x, recently i had
the exact same issue as Karel has when upgrading one of them to 3.9 - i
assumed the port had died - fortunately i had a case able to take an extra
pci card, if anyone needs me to test any kernels to fix this please let me
Hi,
I'm new here and need your help.
I have computer based on VIA Epia PD-1 with two integrated VIA Rhine II
Ethernet Cards. (Latest bios v1.05). I have installed OpenBSD 3.9.
Cards are autodetected as vr0 and vr1. File hostname.vr0 contains:
inet 192.168.0.48 255.255.255.0 NONE
file
On 4/10/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006/04/10 15:48, Siju George wrote:
> > D-Link DFE-570TX Quad port
>
>Incidentally D-Link are in the doghouse at the moment for selling
>consumer routers configured to query a number of stratum-1 NTP
>timeservers intended for
On 2006/04/10 15:48, Siju George wrote:
> D-Link DFE-570TX Quad port
Incidentally D-Link are in the doghouse at the moment for selling
consumer routers configured to query a number of stratum-1 NTP
timeservers intended for restricted use: (not just phk's).
http://www.lightbluetouch
Hi,
Support for
D-Link DFE-570TX Quad port
ethernet adapter on OpenBSD 3.8 amd64 port is mentioned in
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html#hardware
Could some one please tell me if
D-Link DFE-580TX Quad Port
is supported too?
http://www.dlink.co.in/dlink/Products/Adapters/dfe580tx.htm
The "DF
96 matches
Mail list logo
