On 8 October 2015 at 07:13, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> mcmer-open...@tor.at (Marcus MERIGHI), 2015.10.08 (Thu) 12:26 (CEST):
>> kwesterb...@gmail.com (Kenneth Westerback), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 17:09 (CET):
>> > Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment.
>&
The OpenBSD Foundation is pleased to announce that we have been
accepted as a mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code 2015.
As such if you are a student who qualifies to apply for GSOC, you will
be able to find us in Google's Summer of Code Application process.For
details on the applicatio
On 28 June 2014 13:55, frank ernest wrote:
> Hello, I'm ballsystemlord from the Opensuse forums and I've been reading
> a lot about how systemd is unportable, even for use with some linux
> programs and the systemd devs are not concerned about it. I, as a single
> person, can't possibly hope to ma
On 24 June 2014 11:10, ML mail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The new OpenBSD auto_install with PXE works like a charm and just have 2
> questions regarding the install.conf file I did not manage to find out yet:
>
> 1) how can I install the bsd.mp instead of the standard bsd image?
bsd.mp should be copied an
On 23 June 2014 06:24, Avi Cohen wrote:
> Hello
> In my application (it is a router in the access) I'm initially running
> dhclient daemon without any interface specified for dhcp.
> Then - on user request - we add interfaces to dhclient.conf on run-time
>
> I have 3 questions - that I'll
On 17 June 2014 07:37, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 06/17/14 02:40, Jiri B wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:47:03PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
>>> [diff to easily allow different keys]
>>>
>>> I think focus has been lost.
>>>
>>> What's the point of signing releases? To say "This came from the
>>
On May 26, 2014 9:53 AM, "Walter Souza" wrote:
>
> Why OpenBSD has no interest in using journal file system?
>
OpenBSD has great interest in using journal filesystem. Nobody has sent us
the diffs that would add one.
Ken
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > > I h
On 24 May 2014 09:59, Stan Gammons wrote:
>
> On 05/24/2014 08:51 AM, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>>
>> On 24 May 2014 09:31, Stan Gammons wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought I understood the different flavors of OpenBSD but apparently
>>> not since I keep getting
On 24 May 2014 09:31, Stan Gammons wrote:
> I thought I understood the different flavors of OpenBSD but apparently not
> since I keep getting version errors when I try to add packages to sparc64
> snapshots. The packages I'm trying are from the /snapshot/packages/sparc64
> folder on the same mi
On 21 May 2014 07:20, bodie wrote:
> On 21.05.2014 12:50, bodie wrote:
>>
>> On 21.05.2014 11:18, bodie wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> testing http://marc.info/?t=14002453903&r=1&w=2 further and now I
>>> hit issue with corporate WIFI. I can connect perfectly fine to 2 of
>>> them provided with WP
On 18 May 2014 15:19, Norman Golisz wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> On Sun May 18 2014 13:45, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>> can you share your configuration file ?
>>
>> i'm unable to reproduce no matter what i try :-/
>
> I'm also able to reproduce this crash:
>
> $ echo test | mail norman && sudo smtpd -dv
>
On 18 May 2014 07:52, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 07:37:26AM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>> On 18 May 2014 05:37, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:40:13PM -0400, Allan Streib wrote:
>> >> On Sat, May 17, 2014, a
On 18 May 2014 05:37, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:40:13PM -0400, Allan Streib wrote:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2014, at 05:30 PM, Allan Streib wrote:
>>
>> > Just upgraded to -current from my local mirror. Was previously working
>> > with a recent-ish -current (late April or early
On 14 May 2014 11:26, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/05/14 11:21, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >>> $ \time -l signify -C -p /etc/signify/openbsd-55-pkg.pub -x SHA256.sig
>> > moo-1.3p1.tgz
>> >>> Signature Verified
>> >>> moo-1.3p1.tgz: FAIL
>>
On 8 May 2014 05:33, Xavier Claude wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use autoinstall with OpenBSD 5.5 but the Server line in
> the configuration file is not read set according to the install.conf
> and instead is used for the ntp server.
>
> Here is my install.conf file:
> System hostname = testbs
On 4 May 2014 14:47, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> On 05/03/14 20:22, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>>
>> On 3 May 2014 10:13, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/03/14 15:01, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3 May 20
On 3 May 2014 10:13, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> On 05/03/14 15:01, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>>
>> On 3 May 2014 08:49, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/03/14 14:10, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3 May 20
On 3 May 2014 08:49, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> On 05/03/14 14:10, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>>
>> On 3 May 2014 06:27, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So marking a partition as 'Active/Bootable', (the 00 -> 80 change)
>>>>
On 3 May 2014 06:27, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
>> So marking a partition as 'Active/Bootable', (the 00 -> 80 change)
>> causes your system to hang. Apparently Linux does this when you
>> 'Label' it. The OpenBSD installer does it for you when you
>> select 'Whole disk'. Nothing obviously to do with
On 1 May 2014 14:59, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
>> Can you provide a hex dump of the MBR Linux produces? The evidence would
>> seem to point at the boot code stored in the MBR. To which I made a
>> recent minor tweak. So you might also try a 5.4 install to see if it
>> works.
>
> Below are the hexdu
On 30 Apr 2014 03:28, "Martijn Rijkeboer" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've got a weird disklabel related problem (or so it seems). When I
> partition my harddisk with fdisk and add an OpenBSD (A6) primary
> partition the system can still boot, but once I place a disklabel
> on the partition (disklabel -
On 30 Apr 2014 15:57, "Kenneth Westerback" wrote:
>
>
> On 30 Apr 2014 15:39, "Martijn Rijkeboer" wrote:
> >
> > > Please post at least a dmesg with the disk attached but no disklabel
> > > plus fdisk and disklabel output after se
On 30 Apr 2014 15:39, "Martijn Rijkeboer" wrote:
>
> > Please post at least a dmesg with the disk attached but no disklabel
> > plus fdisk and disklabel output after setting the label but before the
> > (failing) reboot.
>
> Below you will find the dmesg and output from fdisk and disklabel before
I'm pretty sure that Linux does not manufacture disklabels that are
compatible with OpenBSD. And visa versa! And if you're
creating/mounting filesystems you are *not* an unprivileged user and
you *definitely* can crash systems if you're not careful. :-)
That said, if you can provide details on the
On 16 April 2014 19:20, Liviu Daia wrote:
> On 15 April 2014, ohh, whyyy wrote:
>> Hey, Thanks! yes, it looks like the sys.tar.gz was missing.. I created a
>> small howto for it (for patching 5.4):
>> cd /root && ftp http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/`uname -r`/src.tar.gz &&
> [...]
>
> Nit
On 11 April 2014 11:15, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Apr 11 11:46:12, openbsd.as.a.desk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> -
>> 1)
>> If I search for "openbsdfoundation" on:
>>
>> - Facebook
>> - Twitter
>> - Youtube
>> - Instagram
>> - Flickr
>> - Slideshare
>> - etc..
>>
>
On 9 April 2014 12:24, Fil Di Noto wrote:
> Is there any hope of OpenBSD running on IBM Power hardware (System P,
> LPAR) in the future?
>
> I've recently been working with this hardware and it's pretty amazing.
> I can't speak to its future market share but there seems to be a lot
> of propaganda
On 3 April 2014 22:04, Martin Braun wrote:
> As we all know on the front page of OpenBSD it says "Only two remote holes
> in the default install, in a heck of a long time".
>
> I don't understand why this is "such a big deal".
>
> A part from the base system in xBSD, OpenBSD - so far - also contai
On 27 March 2014 11:30, Boris Goldberg wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
> Thursday, March 27, 2014, 9:14:00 AM, Jiri wrote:
>
> JB> Could you please elaborate why not sftp for sets (and/or
> JB> for pkg_add)?
>
> I'll rephrase: can someone besides Theo elaborate? It was an obvious
> mistake to reply to hi
http://www.openbsd.org/report.html
On 26 March 2014 16:59, Charlie Farinella
wrote:
> I'm trying to install OpenBSD 5.4 on a Dell Vostro 400, it's several years
> old but not ancient. 4GB RAM, 250GB Seagate ST3250310AS hard drive. The
> installation goes normally until it tries to find the ha
On 26 March 2014 13:46, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:41, Marc Espie wrote:
>> One other reason is that our ftp *client* is a pile of crud.
>>
>> Almost anyone who approaches it runs away screaming (or becomes berserk,
>> grabs an axe, and starts cutting madly at the rest of the
5.2 to 5.5 is a big jump. Can you try 5.3 and/or 5.4 to narrow down
when the problem began? Bisecting the tree would be the next step. :-)
Ken
On 20 March 2014 20:34, Daniel Melameth wrote:
> With OpenBSD 5.2, I had no issue doing suspend and hibernate: when I
> closed the lid, it suspende
On 19 March 2014 18:09, Chris Smith wrote:
> Great to see Unbound in base, thanks.
>
> But what about ldns? I still have that installed as a package -
> removed the unbound package as per the -current instructions, but
> shouldn't the ldns package package be removed as well as I believe
> unbound
Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment.
Ken
On Mar 19, 2014 11:36 AM, "Marcus MERIGHI" wrote:
> Reference:
> ``Softraid 3TB Problems''
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=136225193931620
>
> Difference:
> My HDDs show up as 4096 bytes/sector in dmesg.
>
> Short:
On 6 March 2014 13:59, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Kenneth Westerback said:
>> delete the partition 'i'. You don't need it, as it will be
>> automatically created when necessary.
Something would have been added. Again, the output of
'disklabel -d sd0'
On 6 March 2014 13:23, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Ted Unangst said:
>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 18:49, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > I have a strange problem. Recently I added following to my /etc/fstab:
>> >
>> > /dev/sd0i /mnt/arch ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
>> >
>>
On 6 March 2014 12:49, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a strange problem. Recently I added following to my /etc/fstab:
>
> /dev/sd0i /mnt/arch ext2fs rw,nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
>
> I can't mount this partition using "mount -a":
>
> $ sudo mount -a
> mount: /dev/sd0i: fstab typ
On 24 February 2014 07:56, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
> On 2014-02-24 "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
> Date: 2014-02-24 10:49:03
>
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014, at 03:45 PM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
>> > Took a while to submit this, but for the past ~ six weeks of
>> > snapshots sysmerge fails thus:
>> >
>
On 18 February 2014 02:57, Philippe Meunier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have problems mounting Windows 7 DVD ISO images on OpenBSD 5.4
> stable. For example, you can download X17-59463.iso from
> http://www.mydigitallife.info/official-windows-7-sp1-iso-from-digital-river/
>
> # ls -l X17-59463.iso
> -r
On 10 February 2014 13:11, RD Thrush wrote:
> With a somewhat recent i7 desktop, using startx, X seems to run ok; however,
> at 1024x768 rather than the expected 1920x1200 resolution. ctl-alt-keypad+ or
> - have no effect on resolution. ctl-alt-backspace correctly reverts to text
> mode. I t
On 9 February 2014 16:58, d...@genunix.com wrote:
> warning: really long post with some questions and thinking.
>
> Hello dear OpenBSD types.
>
> I have been using UNIX in various forms and flavours for a long time now
> and could even go so far as to say a "very" long time. Therefore it just
> se
rc.conf(8) says "create and edit a rc.conf.local". Not copy rc.conf.
I'm not sure what the FAQ says but I'd think it would be similar
advice.
Ken
On 9 February 2014 13:28, VaZub wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There is a small nuisance I've stumbled upon during my first
> experiments with OpenBSD.
>
>
On 6 February 2014 12:40, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> L. V. Lammert [l...@omnitec.net] wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, davy wrote:
>>
>> > Can I do a 4.1 -> 5.4 in one shot?
>> >
>> Nope. One version at a time, .. though the better solution would be to do
>> a fresh install and copy data.
>>
>
> What I
On 6 February 2014 12:40, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> L. V. Lammert [l...@omnitec.net] wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, davy wrote:
>>
>> > Can I do a 4.1 -> 5.4 in one shot?
>> >
>> Nope. One version at a time, .. though the better solution would be to do
>> a fresh install and copy data.
>>
>
> What I
On 6 February 2014 12:31, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>
>> Well, that would imply waiting for May 1 or whenever the physical CD's
>> are available.
>>
> 5.4 is available now, ..
>
>> Starting now with a -current
On 6 February 2014 11:44, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>
>> Shudder. NO! :-)
>>
>> Aside from the very valid hardware concerns Nick mentioned, there are
>> too many flag days of various kinds strewn along that path. Skip t
Shudder. NO! :-)
Aside from the very valid hardware concerns Nick mentioned, there are
too many flag days of various kinds strewn along that path. Skip them
all, start fresh with a -current
snapshot.
Ken
On 6 February 2014 05:49, davy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently was asked to take over t
On 5 February 2014 06:35, Holger Glaess wrote:
> Am 03.02.2014 17:54, schrieb Kenneth Westerback:
>
>> Reactivating the dhclient-script is not going to happen.
>>
>> I am interested in what you would see syntax in dhclient.conf looking
>> like.
>>
>> Wou
On 4 February 2014 11:25, Marc Espie wrote:
> 2014-02-04 Kim Twain :
>> Does pkg_add automatically check these signatures, or, as of now, I'd need
>> to manually download the packages, verify them with signify and then install
>> them locally with pkg_add?
>
> In -current, if you don't use any fla
Reactivating the dhclient-script is not going to happen.
I am interested in what you would see syntax in dhclient.conf looking like.
Would multi-path routing modifications to all routes be needed? How should this
be combined with supersede/default/append commands for the relevant
options? Would i
i386-donatetoopenbsdfoundationtoday-openbsd5.4?
. Ken
On 2 February 2014 12:10, Adam Jensen wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 16:17:08 + (UTC)
> na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
>
>> At least it's consistent. FreeBSD's collection of
>> -undermydesk- (gcc)
>> -marcel- (gd
Neither field is required. 'Free Space' in fsinfo can be -1 or just wrong,
and 'Next Free Cluster' is a hint only. Hence in either case you can fix
them up, or ignore their incorrectness and the filesystem is still
considered ok.
And since they are not required I guess newfs never bothered to fil
http://open-zfs.org/wiki/About_OpenZFS
Under 'Other' at the bottom:
"ZFS source code is copyright various contributors, and available under the
CDDL open-source license."
The second paragraph is amusing:
"OpenZFS is not associated with openzfs.org. Don't forget the dash in our
URS: open-zfs.org
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 7:50 AM, ropers wrote:
> 2009/12/18 Daniel Zhelev :
>> after log in I sow that the root file system
>> is over 100%.
>
> *Over* 100%? How is that even possible?
>
>
Because this is Unix? Not a sarcastic reply, pointing out that this is
a well known feature of ffs. Although
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Aaron Mason
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Kenneth Westerback
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Marco Peereboom
wrote:
>>> yes
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:30:46AM +0100, Robert wrote:
&g
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> yes
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:30:46AM +0100, Robert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just read [1,2] that Western Digital (and probably others) will start
>> to sell disks with an internal block size of 4KB instead of 512 byte.
>>
>> The article
56 matches
Mail list logo
