On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:12:29AM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Claudio Jeker
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:47:20PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
> >> Why do only certain wireless cards support host AP mode or IBSS mode?
> >> Is the 'modality' hardwired i
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:47:20PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
>> Why do only certain wireless cards support host AP mode or IBSS mode?
>> Is the 'modality' hardwired into the wifi hardware?
>>
>> For the archives (since I couldn't find anyth
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:47:20PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
> Why do only certain wireless cards support host AP mode or IBSS mode?
> Is the 'modality' hardwired into the wifi hardware?
>
> For the archives (since I couldn't find anything on this), the drivers
> that support being wireless rout
After installation of gconf-editor ekiga runs fine.So why isn't
gconf-editor as dependency for ekiga?
Dne 29. duben 2009 7:03 TomC!E! BodE>C!r napsal(a):
> I haven't gconf-editor installed so I tried it :
>
> Can't install gconf-editor-2.24.1p3: lib not found iconv.6.0
>
> I have snapshot from 23
Hi,
I saw many changes in CVS for that and even on the wanted list for
equipment compatibility testing as well.
So, I am not sure where this is and I am curious as to what stage it
might be?
No complaint here, just curious what might be the current stage of it.
Is it somewhat usable with a
> > root on cd0a swap on cd0b dump on cd0b
> > stopped at debugger+0x4,leave
> > Panic: cannot read disklabel, 0x600/0xf00, error 5
What official release CD did you generate this error on?
Chuck Robey wrote:
> (I sure hope I was clear in my description, go ahead
> and complain if I wasn't, I'll try again)
complain! :)
I'm going to end up nit-picking your language, but mostly because,
well, I'm confused. And no one else is responding, so I am going
to take a wild guess that I might
Apologies. By now of course I see *that*. But so it's just a software
issue then: that's the answer I was hoping for! It means there's
nothing inherently wrong with my hardware, I can make it work if I
just put the effort in (and find the time to learn).
Thanks
-Nick
On 28/04/2009, Theo de Raadt
> Why do only certain wireless cards support host AP mode or IBSS mode?
Because someone has to _want_ to do the work.
I understand not everyone can do the work, but why bother making lists.
It isn't going to encourage anyone to want to.
Why don't you all see that?
We are not your slaves.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Sebastian Rother <
sebastian.rot...@jpberlin.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:33:34 -0500
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
> > > Thos who take my but-reports to fix their own crappy code should be
> > > more quiet. Don't you think so too Marco? Or wait: You found eac
Why do only certain wireless cards support host AP mode or IBSS mode?
Is the 'modality' hardwired into the wifi hardware?
For the archives (since I couldn't find anything on this), the drivers
that support being wireless routers (Host AP mode) are:
acs(4), ath(4), pgt(4), ral(4), rtw(4), rum(4), u
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> depends how you plug the pins in when you get the adapter. if you do
> it this way, assuming the usual colour code for these, you can just
> use a normal ethernet cable.
>
> 2 black
> 3 yellow
> 4 brown
> 5 red+grn (ground; you /shou
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:15:02PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I can pick up these two cards very cheap. Nvidia FX5200 or MX4000.
> Will either work as dualhead?
Nobody sane picks up a nvidia card, not even for "very cheap". Get a
older radeon (eg. 9600). These work and you get decent 3D acceler
IBIZAFLOCK IS ONLINE NOW!
We want to invite you to take part in a brand new and free community:
IbizaFlock
Meet your Ibiza friends online, chat, post classifieds, share videos
and pictures and get informed about the latest events on world's
leading party island: IBIZA!
http://www.ibizaflock.com
I can pick up these two cards very cheap. Nvidia FX5200 or MX4000.
Will either work as dualhead?
Chris Bennett
--
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance
accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort
Well, it is up to you to chose complexity of the password and let the
john to work harder. :)
Choosing bash was a quick solution for executing the job after I'v
logged out, e.g. how else do you umount and vnconfig -u?
I'd like to use default ksh, but quick google-search gave me an answer
-
On 2009-04-28, Christopher Intemann wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for the hint, however, I'm in fact a bit more confused now:-)
> Couldn't I use such a thing:
> http://cgi.ebay.de/SERIAL-RS232-DB9-9-PIN-FEMALE-TO-RJ45-FEMALE-ADAPTOR_W0QQitemZ390041017767QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Computing_Networking_SM?hash=i
On 2009-04-27, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
>> > I've no idea what the name servers are supposed to be, so I
>> > just started a local one and pointed /etc/resolv.conf at it;
>>
>> not very nice, better find out what the actual nameservers are. I
>> believe ppp has some way to tell the client, see the p
Well, I would like to announce that the Spanish BSD User Group (its
Spanish acronym being "GUBE") is now official. Its mailing list is
kindly hosted on MetaBUG (http://www.metabug.org/).
--
Key ID: 493FB6AE
Key fingerprint: 3E96 7892 B56D AE27 02EF BBAA BAA6 6C78 493F B6AE
Keyserver:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Intemann wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for the hint, however, I'm in fact a bit more confused now:-)
> Couldn't I use such a thing:
> http://cgi.ebay.de/SERIAL-RS232-DB9-9-PIN-FEMALE-TO-RJ45-FEMALE-ADAPTOR_W0QQitemZ390041017767QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK
Jussi Peltola wrote:
Depends on the db9-rj45 adaptor, some need a rollover cable, some a
straight one. Try it.
http://www.ossmann.com/5-in-1.html
I just committed a diff that may help your machine (although perhaps
not with the wi(4)). Should be on your favourite anoncvs mirror in a
couple of hours, or in the snapshots in a couple of days.
I encrypted my $HOME with bioctl and just put the 'bioctl -c C -l
/dev/sd0g softraid0' line to my /etc/rc.
Simple and working solution although it needs a little bit
tweaking as currently I get dropped to single user mode if I
misstype my passphrase. This happens quite easily as I use dvorak
Christopher Intemann wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the hint, however, I'm in fact a bit more confused now:-)
Couldn't I use such a thing:
http://cgi.ebay.de/SERIAL-RS232-DB9-9-PIN-FEMALE-TO-RJ45-FEMALE-ADAPTOR_W0QQitemZ390041017767QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Computing_Networking_SM?hash=item390041017767&_trksi
Depends on the db9-rj45 adaptor, some need a rollover cable, some a
straight one. Try it.
Interesting. But if I steal your laptop and run jack the ripper on it
then I get your svnd password, don't I?
Using bash seems awkward. Does this work if you're using xdm?
Otherwise, this is very slick. The reason I haven't gotten around to
using encrypted homes is just that it's awkward to do it
The "apps" dir there is virtual. Gconf makes a virtual filesystem
where preference data is stored. Install gconf-editor to understand
really quickly. I found it confusing too.
So did you run that command?
On 27/04/2009, Toma Bod ar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I installed ekiga trough ports (pkg_add wa
On 2009-04-28, Tom wrote:
>
> Stuart: any luck with your ral* card in your Alix?
it still works fine with the up-to-date snap it's now running (before
it was running code from a month or two ago, also pretty much stable).
Hi,
thanks for the hint, however, I'm in fact a bit more confused now:-)
Couldn't I use such a thing:
http://cgi.ebay.de/SERIAL-RS232-DB9-9-PIN-FEMALE-TO-RJ45-FEMALE-ADAPTOR_W0QQitemZ390041017767QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Computing_Networking_SM?hash=item390041017767&_trksid=p3286.m63.l1177
In addition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
During install, I got an error, saying (this is hand-copying, here):
softraid0 at root
root on cd0a swap on cd0b dump on cd0b
stopped at debugger+0x4,leave
Panic: cannot read disklabel, 0x600/0xf00, error 5
So, I thought I would give a short summary
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:52:05 +0200
Sebastian Rother wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:33:34 -0500
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
> > > Thos who take my but-reports to fix their own crappy code should
> > > be more quiet. Don't you think so too Marco? Or wait: You found
> > > each bug yourself in soft
John Arnold wrote:
They all did 60+ MB/s, meaning I got at least 60% out of the gig links,
without resorting to jumbo frames, creative recv/sendspace sysctls or
anything, and also I did generate and sink the traffic on the end nodes,
so that also "adds" to the load for them.
Given that they c
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Sebastian Rother
wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:33:34 -0500
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
>> > Thos who take my but-reports to fix their own crappy code should be
>> > more quiet. Don't you think so too Marco? Or wait: You found each
>> > bug yourself in softraid.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:43:54PM +0100, Michal wrote:
> Seriously, shut up, the pair of you, it's going no where. You're both being
> immature twats about raid. Work on what your bitching about, or shut up, or
> at least keep the e-mails between your self. I don't fancy reading through a
> bitch
Sebastian,
You're really annoying for this planet.
Please, get a gun and shoot on your fucking head.
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:33:34 -0500
Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > Thos who take my but-reports to fix their own crappy code should be
> > more quiet. Don't you think so too Marco? Or wait: You found each
> > bug yourself in softraid. ;)
>
> I fucking wrote so yeah I am painfully aware of bugs in it.
> They all did 60+ MB/s, meaning I got at least 60% out of the gig links,
> without resorting to jumbo frames, creative recv/sendspace sysctls or
> anything, and also I did generate and sink the traffic on the end nodes,
> so that also "adds" to the load for them.
>
> Given that they costed som
On 28 April 2009 c. 19:21:15 Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:51:30 +
>
> rivo nurges wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have taken a bit different route.
> >
> > sudo btconfig ubt0 up
> > sudo sdpd
> > sudo bthcid
>
> ...
>
> Thanks for sharing. This reminds me that I also forgot to mentio
Seriously, shut up, the pair of you, it's going no where. You're both being
immature twats about raid. Work on what your bitching about, or shut up, or
at least keep the e-mails between your self. I don't fancy reading through a
bitch fest for 6 more hours. This isn't a celebrity paparazzi magazine
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Sebastian Rother
wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:19:27 -0500
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
>> Bwahahahahaha there really is no end to your stupidity. Thanks for the
>> morning laugh.
>>
>> <--- must be this tall to ride
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> <--- you
>>
> Thos who take my but-reports to fix their own crappy code should be
> more quiet. Don't you think so too Marco? Or wait: You found each
> bug yourself in softraid. ;)
I fucking wrote so yeah I am painfully aware of bugs in it. I haven't
seen any bug reports from you that weren't totally retarde
* Sebastian Rother [2009-04-28 17:02]:
> Thos who take my but-reports
butt-reports, indeed
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:51:30 +
rivo nurges wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have taken a bit different route.
>
> sudo btconfig ubt0 up
> sudo sdpd
> sudo bthcid
...
Thanks for sharing. This reminds me that I also forgot to mention
sdpd and bthcid *sigh* I should probably clean up my notes a bit
and pu
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:19:27 -0500
Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Bwahahahahaha there really is no end to your stupidity. Thanks for the
> morning laugh.
>
> <--- must be this tall to ride
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> <--- you
>
> You are beyond any help.
Thos who take my but-reports to fix their
... yet another vnd-hack including modified login_passwd, sudo
and .bash_logout:
http://en.roolz.org/Blog/Entries/2009/4/27_Auto_mount_umount_of_encrypted_%24HOME_on_OpenBSD.html
Read first-line warning carefully before usage/flame :).
//maxim
Hi,
I was kindly offered a v20z 1U server which lacks a home in a bay somewhere
close to Paris, FR, where it could be used to build and test code, very low
in/out traffic.
If you can help, please contact me off list, there will be beers :-)
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org/~gille
Bwahahahahaha there really is no end to your stupidity. Thanks for the
morning laugh.
<--- must be this tall to ride
|
|
|
|
|
<--- you
You are beyond any help.
On Apr 28, 2009, at 7:37, Sebastian Rother
wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:50:20 +0100
Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Tue,
Hello
I guess I kind of triggered this discussion since I asked Sebastian
yesterday if softraid crypto works only on whole disks or if it is
applicable on partitions too. I looked into some tutorials, the archive
and in the softraid manpages, but all examples used whole disks, so I've
got unc
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:37:53PM +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote:
> > >
> > > Please add the following to man softraid to enable others to get a clue
> > > how to encrypt a partition with sofraid.
> >
oh great, now you are cc'ing my private mail to misc. and insulting the
people who i work with.
Alexander Hall wrote:
I'll second this; from a gw of mine:
$ sudo crontab -l | grep ral0
# Down and up ral0 on failure
* * * * * ifconfig ral0 | grep -q OACTIVE && {
ifconfig \
ral0; echo "\n *\n"; ifconfig ral0 down; sleep 1; ifconfig ral0 up;
ifconfig \
ral
On Tuesday 28 April 2009 15.23.01 Pau wrote:
> Szia!
>
> have you done this on -current or 4.5?
>
This is on -current.
> 2009/4/28 LEVAI Daniel :
> > On Friday 24 April 2009 16.58.06 you wrote:
> >> login_fingerprint only supports login auth, not support
> >> challenge/response mode which is what
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:57:33 +1000 (EST)
Damien Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Sebastian Rother wrote:
>
> > > it is not a blanket thing - not all archs use it. the disklabel stuff
> > > well, we expect people to know how to use disklabel anyway. if they
> > > don;t, they can read the man
Markus Hennecke wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Tom wrote:
I took my RT2860 card (which likes to lock up the Soekris 5501 fairly
quickly), stuck it in an Openbsd 4.5-current (April 27 snap) and it
performed properly and didn't lock up. Mind you, the machine is amd64
and quite well powered. I transf
Szia!
have you done this on -current or 4.5?
thanks,
Pau
2009/4/28 LEVAI Daniel :
> On Friday 24 April 2009 16.58.06 you wrote:
>> login_fingerprint only supports login auth, not support challenge/response
>> mode which is what sudo (and other things) uses.
> Alright thanks! I've figured it is
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Sebastian Rother wrote:
> > it is not a blanket thing - not all archs use it. the disklabel stuff
> > well, we expect people to know how to use disklabel anyway. if they
> > don;t, they can read the man page.
>
> The method I descriped is NOT mentioned anywhere.
> People have
Hi,
Sebastian Rother wrote:
> If you like to encrypt multiple HDDs or partitions you might need
> to add additional softraid devices by
> modifying /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC and recompiling the kernel or
> you do nerve Marco who created that piece of code.
You can use multiple encrypted softraid
Hi,
On Mon, 27.04.2009 at 16:19:39 -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> That's what I remembered from the last time it happened, but I just
> double checked. It seems rsync only does this when -C cvs-exclude is
> passed. The problem is that it ignores directories, not just files.
that sounds broken, in
On Friday 24 April 2009 16.58.06 you wrote:
> login_fingerprint only supports login auth, not support challenge/response
> mode which is what sudo (and other things) uses.
Alright thanks! I've figured it is still useful because of the -a option of
sudo, and thanks to this I've discovered the [:auth
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:34:40 +0200 "Erwin van Maanen"
wrote:
> I've tried to do include the panic and trace with the screenshots i
> attached, i'm afraid i dont know another way to get the info across.
> I can appreciate the devs not being able to look at the/each
> virtualization issue, i was ju
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:50:20 +0100
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 01:34:25AM +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote:
> >
> > Please add the following to man softraid to enable others to get a clue
> > how to encrypt a partition with sofraid.
>
> ok, first off, please mail diffs in futur
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Tom wrote:
I took my RT2860 card (which likes to lock up the Soekris 5501 fairly
quickly), stuck it in an Openbsd 4.5-current (April 27 snap) and it
performed properly and didn't lock up. Mind you, the machine is amd64
and quite well powered. I transferred a lot of files wit
I took my RT2860 card (which likes to lock up the Soekris 5501 fairly
quickly), stuck it in an Openbsd 4.5-current (April 27 snap) and it
performed properly and didn't lock up. Mind you, the machine is amd64
and quite well powered. I transferred a lot of files with scp, got
about 1.2 MB/s on a sing
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
>
>
> Isn't this how humans learn? By making mistakes and learning
> from them? :)
>
Nah not really.
They watch their brother or sister get burned by a hot stove and
decide maybe better not to find out for themselves.
They watch one of their playmates drown or get r
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Did you ever check the security record of snort? It is at least as bad as
> wireshark's but it is sitting in the middle of your network passing
> packets. I couldn't sleep with such a system in my core.
> It is also a lot easier to bypass un
* Stuart Henderson [2009-04-28 12:08]:
> On 2009-04-28, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > Henning Brauer wrote:
> >> * Daniel Ouellet [2009-04-28 02:49]:
> >>> shut up! All are real and I even learn from Henning about the lost of
> >>> Queue here as well, witch I haven't thought of then. So, loose of
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-04-28, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouellet [2009-04-28 02:49]:
shut up! All are real and I even learn from Henning about the lost of
Queue here as well, witch I haven't thought of then. So, loose of queue,
mean also lost of AltQ too
On 2009-04-28, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>> * Daniel Ouellet [2009-04-28 02:49]:
>>> shut up! All are real and I even learn from Henning about the lost of
>>> Queue here as well, witch I haven't thought of then. So, loose of queue,
>>> mean also lost of AltQ too.
>>
>> no
Coert Waagmeester wrote:
I see your point. Thank you the above link was exactly what I was
looking for. I will remember to go digging around google first next
time.
If I may suggest, even before you go to Google.
If you start using OpenBSD, even before that. Just take a few hours and
read the
see tun(4) about the layer 2 tunnelling flag. but note well:
- dynamips from OpenBSD ports/packages does work with real
interfaces now (thanks Claudio!).
- dynamips only has JIT translators for i386 and amd64.
it will *totally* suck on anything else.
On 2009-04-28, Jaroslav Joska wrote:
> Hi a
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:56:57AM +0200, Jaroslav Joska wrote:
> Hi all!
> I installed OpenBSD on UltraSPARC IIIi machine (SunFire V440) successfully. I
> want to install dynamips and dynagen,
> but before this procedure I have to make bridge with one real interface and
> one virtual interface,
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 04:48 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> > Hallo all OpenBSDers.
> >
> > I want to setup two openBSD boxes at our office.
>
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html
>
> > They will each have 4 network interfaces, and they will do routing,
> > NATting (port
Jaroslav Joska wrote:
Hi all!
I installed OpenBSD on UltraSPARC IIIi machine (SunFire V440) successfully. I
want to install dynamips and dynagen,
but before this procedure I have to make bridge with one real interface and one
virtual interface, because dynagen doesn't
work with real interafces.
Hi all!
I installed OpenBSD on UltraSPARC IIIi machine (SunFire V440) successfully. I
want to install dynamips and dynagen,
but before this procedure I have to make bridge with one real interface and one
virtual interface, because dynagen doesn't
work with real interafces. I did the same things o
Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hallo all OpenBSDers.
I want to setup two openBSD boxes at our office.
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html
They will each have 4 network interfaces, and they will do routing,
NATting (port forwarding) and provide basic DNS services. And also
OpenVPN connectivity to the
Hallo all OpenBSDers.
I want to setup two openBSD boxes at our office.
They will each have 4 network interfaces, and they will do routing,
NATting (port forwarding) and provide basic DNS services. And also
OpenVPN connectivity to the 4 different networks.
They will be the same, config wise, but
Now it makes sense.
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> but it is sitting in the middle of your network passing
> packets. I couldn't sleep with such a system in my core.
> It is also a lot easier to bypass unnoticed a bridging FW/IDS
> then a box
> that does actual routing.
THAT's why it is called a TRANSP
76 matches
Mail list logo
