Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-04-28, Daniel Ouellet <dan...@presscom.net> wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouellet <dan...@presscom.net> [2009-04-28 02:49]:
shut up! All are real and I even learn from Henning about the lost of
Queue here as well, witch I haven't thought of then. So, loose of queue,
mean also lost of AltQ too.
no, this is not related to altq at all.
Thanks for the correction here Henning. I was wrong.
I assume AltQ was working with the queue, so, no queue would mean
loosing altq capability. Hmmm. Looks like something I miss understood
and I will go back looking at it.
Thanks for the tip.
this is the other queue; sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq
I thought PF would use it in pf_check_congestion() as a hint, but I can't
work out how this happens for ethernet interfaces, only these..
./net/if_ppp.c: if_congestion(inq);
./net/if_sl.c: if_congestion(&ipintrq);
./net/if_spppsubr.c.orig: if_congestion(inq);
./net/if_spppsubr.c: if_congestion(inq);
./net/if_strip.c: if_congestion(&ipintrq);
./net/if_tun.c: if_congestion(ifq);
Thanks Stuart!
I really and totally miss that and confuse the two. Shame on me.
Nice to get it somewhat cleared up however. (;>
Some more reading.
Best,
Daniel
