* Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> [2009-04-28 12:08]: > On 2009-04-28, Daniel Ouellet <dan...@presscom.net> wrote: > > Henning Brauer wrote: > >> * Daniel Ouellet <dan...@presscom.net> [2009-04-28 02:49]: > >>> shut up! All are real and I even learn from Henning about the lost of > >>> Queue here as well, witch I haven't thought of then. So, loose of queue, > >>> mean also lost of AltQ too. > >> > >> no, this is not related to altq at all. > > > > Thanks for the correction here Henning. I was wrong. > > > > I assume AltQ was working with the queue, so, no queue would mean > > loosing altq capability. Hmmm. Looks like something I miss understood > > and I will go back looking at it. > > > > Thanks for the tip. > > this is the other queue; sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq > > I thought PF would use it in pf_check_congestion() as a hint, but I can't > work out how this happens for ethernet interfaces, only these..
it does. IF_INPUT_ENQUEUE in sys/net/if.h -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
