Hi all,
I need to allow X11 services over ssh for my developers on one openbsd box.
Rule for ssh service works ok, but when I try to start a X11 app (like xterm for
example on destination host) doesn't works.
On openbsd side nothing is dropped. Somebody knows how can I debug this?? Do I
ne
I have OpenBSD 4.0 on a HP laptop and I need to
install Skype because is for the comunication in my
job and I have the freedom for install my lovely
OpenBSD.
This what I have done:
1. I installed the redhat_base-8.0p8.tgz for the
emulation.
2. Download the skype-0_90_0_1.rpm and installed it
with
On a firewall that is not mine but where the admins run to me for help
8-) somebody noticed that name resolution was not working.
rc.conf.local says:
named_flags=""
named.conf is the default (caching with recursion only for local
clients)
uname says:
OpenBSD fw.example.com.au 3.9 GENERIC#617 i386
/
On 3/23/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trust me, you really do need to carefully read INSTALL.zaurus, and you
> really don't want to use the whole disk for openbsd - that'll set you
> up for a world of hurt. The linux environment that ships with the
> zaurus is quite brittle and d
> Trust me, you really do need to carefully read INSTALL.zaurus, and you
> really don't want to use the whole disk for openbsd - that'll set you
> up for a world of hurt. The linux environment that ships with the
> zaurus is quite brittle and depends on some of the stuff on the disk.
I really don'
On 3/22/07, Kyle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Nick ! wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> think long and hard before you trash the partition table. hint: you
>> don't want to use the whole disk for openbsd.
>
> I don't? I mean, I know to sav
On 3/23/07, Kyle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Nick ! wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> think long and hard before you trash the partition table. hint: you
>> don't want to use the whole disk for openbsd.
>
> I don't? I mean, I know to sav
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:40:48AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Sounds similar to debian which also has to reboot a new kernel. Do you
> run the rebuild niced?
I don't. I want it to be done as soon as possible.
> However, is it correct that when a new release comes out every six
> months,
> However, is it correct that when a new release comes out every six
> months, you have to reboot into that? How long does an upgrade from one
> release to the next take?
Minutes on a fast machine. I have seen a HPPA B180 take like 25 minutes
but that is the exception and not the norm.
>
> Th
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Nick ! wrote:
On 3/22/07, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
think long and hard before you trash the partition table. hint: you
don't want to use the whole disk for openbsd.
I don't? I mean, I know to save the first few sectors for the
partition table, but isn't th
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:00:01PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:30:06PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> > I'm considering moving my 486 from Debian to OpenBSD. I haven't the
> > money to spend on a new e.g. UNIX System Administration. 4.4 BSD System
> > Mana
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:30:45 -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
>RW wrote:
>> I have a simple setup.
>> Sydney to Melbourne and the ipsec.conf is one of the nice easy ones
>> whilst I learn to do more complex setups. It has been working for
>> months.
>>
>> Today doing "ipsecctl -s all" at either end
On 3/22/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -How do you people with zaurii trade data from them with other
> computers? Purely over the network? With SD cards? USB hubs +
> thumbdrives?
We sync our repositories and commit over wireless we find in the bars
where we drink, of course.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:30:06PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm considering moving my 486 from Debian to OpenBSD. I haven't the
> money to spend on a new e.g. UNIX System Administration. 4.4 BSD System
> Manager's Manual is out of print. I haven't been able to google
> any
On 3/22/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I figure that if I get an old BSD book and combine it with the
OpenBSD FAQ plus man pages, I'll be off to a good start.
If you know your way around Linux just start with the FAQ and
manpages. That's what I started with and the FAQ is
Window to the world for waterfront real estate
Advertise free of charge your property for sell or rent
VERSION FRANGAISE PLUS BAS
Owner of a waterfront property for rent or sale ?
Did you know that there is now a specialized site to sell or rent
properties on a waterfront site.
Targeting only p
Hello,
I'm considering moving my 486 from Debian to OpenBSD. I haven't the
money to spend on a new e.g. UNIX System Administration. 4.4 BSD System
Manager's Manual is out of print. I haven't been able to google
anything freely available on the internet. My local library has had
their only UNIX
On 3/22/07, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:28:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Their challenge is that they need to provide choice so they
> have what they call reasonable defaults.
No, they don't need to provide choice. At least not that many. They deci
I'm not too knowledgeable in the security arena so this question may
prompt flogging.
My server has three hard drives, one contains the OpenBSD system and the
other two are blank and will be a raid mirror of the /var/www directory.
Is it wise to give over the entire drive for the mount point /
> Symantec have been trying to demonise OS X for a long while.
And it is going to work soon.
Because OS X has no Propolice-like compiler stack protection, nor
anything like W^X which makes parts of the address space
non-executable, nor anything like address space randomization which
makes certain
On 23/03/2007, at 3:19 AM, Lars D. Noodin wrote:
Symantic makes its living selling paper bailing cups in a leaky boat.
;-)
The media actively participates in obfuscating the issues, the
causes and
the solutions by publicizing such crap from Symantic and MS.
Yes. Symantec make their money f
On 3/22/07, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
man zkbd
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=zkbd&arch=zaurus
Thanks for the tip, but that only talks about when the zaurus is on.
I'd turned it completely off. I'm hoping it was just a fluke though.
> -I don't have a CF Wifi card
On 3/22/07, Nick ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-I've discovered that the power button is really a standby button,
like on Palms. However, I did `shutdown -h now` from the shell and
afterwards it wouldn't turn back on. In order to make it come back I
had to take off the battery cover, press the res
at the boot prompt type boot -c
then type enable acpi then type quit
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 3/22/07, Jay Jesus Amorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
good day!
can anyone here help me on how i can enable acpi on my laptop?
my laptop is running openbsd 4.1-current.
thanks for your help
long live o
> -I've discovered that the power button is really a standby button,
> like on Palms. However, I did `shutdown -h now` from the shell and
> afterwards it wouldn't turn back on. In order to make it come back I
> had to take off the battery cover, press the reset button, take out
> the battery, and p
Hello guys,
We are looking to buy an HP ProLiant DL320s server with about 5-8
terabyte of storage and Smart Array P400 or P800 for a backup purposes.
According to www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ciss&arch=i386&sektion=4
it should be supported in -current, but "the current code
So I picked up my shiny 6gig zaurus from the post office today (glee!)
and I'm preparing to blow away the terribly primitive UI that comes
with it and make it an awesome OpenBSD-in-my-pocket; but I have a few
questions. This isn't entirely on-topic, but google hasn't helped.
Please, feel free to d
Hi,
We're running carp on two Openbsd 4.0 routers on vlan interfaces and
we're observing a state change from backup to master to backup on the
host that should stay as the backup. This happens periodically and
adjusting the advbase and advskew seems to have no effect apart from
adjusting the perio
good day!
can anyone here help me on how i can enable acpi on my laptop?
my laptop is running openbsd 4.1-current.
thanks for your help
long live openbsd.
--jay--
On 3/22/07, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
from a vegetarian at that.
The fallacy that is this clause undermines your broader argument.
Promise yourself not to spread such falsity again, and you will be
well served.
-Todd
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:42:57PM -0500, David Terrell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:29:33PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On 3/22/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Or is it that strip -s removes all symbols and it was only intended to
> > >remove the debug symbols. Th
Do your firewalls forward ip 4?
sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
Jack Bates wrote:
If you can help, please feel free to CC: me directly:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My partner-in-crime and I are having some trouble getting a LAN-to-LAN VPN
working with OpenBSD-4.0-stable isakmpd. Both firewalls have a
First, I am an absolute newbie. I purchased the OpenBSD 4.0 cd's and got it
loaded and running and succesfully added the Samba and KDE packages.
Installing OpenOffice and getting mail working are my next two projects with
it. I am running an i386 machine with a 1.2 GHz AMD Athlon processor.
To lo
If you can help, please feel free to CC: me directly:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My partner-in-crime and I are having some trouble getting a LAN-to-LAN VPN
working with OpenBSD-4.0-stable isakmpd. Both firewalls have a relatively
unaltered install. Both firewalls still have pf, ipsec and isakmpd_flags
"u
Miod Vallat wrote:
[...]
> I am not aware of anyone working on running OpenBSD on the NSLU2, but if
> you want a nice pet project to spend time on, NetBSD runs on it and
> porting their code should be relatively easy to do. Of course this won't
> help with the fact that the NSLU2 is horribly slow (
On 3/22/07, Jeff Rollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/03/07, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:28:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > Their challenge is that they need to provide choice so they
> > have what they call reasonable defaults.
>
> No, they do
On 22/03/07, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:28:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Their challenge is that they need to provide choice so they
> have what they call reasonable defaults.
No, they don't need to provide choice. At least not that many. They dec
I expect it's old, old news to those with more shell scripting scars: but
the results of the [ -e ] test are at variance with my allegedly reasonable
reading of the documentation.
For all three of sh, ksh, and the /bin/test manpages, the description of the
-e test reads "file exists", unlike the
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:29:33PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Or is it that strip -s removes all symbols and it was only intended to
> >remove the debug symbols. The libs won't work?
>
> yes, libs without symbols aren't especially use
On 3/22/07, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:28:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Their challenge is that they need to provide choice so they
> have what they call reasonable defaults.
No, they don't need to provide choice. At least not that many. They deci
On Thursday 22 March 2007 08:09, Thierry Lacoste wrote:
> After a default 4.0 install I installed www/mod_auth_bsd
> but all users are rejected.
> I have the following line in my /var/www/logs/error_log:
> httpd: invalid script: /usr/libexec/auth/login_passwd
>
> Same results wether apache is chroo
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:40:57PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:28:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > Their challenge is that they need to provide choice so they
> > have what they call reasonable defaults.
>
> No, they don't need to provide choice. At least not t
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:28:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Their challenge is that they need to provide choice so they
> have what they call reasonable defaults.
No, they don't need to provide choice. At least not that many. They decide
to do so. That's most of what's wrong with OS
list,
i am looking for a video streaming program and noticed ffmpeg did it
over http. installing ffmpeg from packages gave the following...
4.0 GENERIC i386, no X11
> sudo pkg_add -v ${PKG_PATH}ffmpeg-20060312p1.tgz
Password:
parsing ffmpeg-20060312p1
Dependencies for ffmpeg-20060312p1 resolv
On 3/22/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or is it that strip -s removes all symbols and it was only intended to
remove the debug symbols. The libs won't work?
yes, libs without symbols aren't especially useful for future development.
Hello list,
I bought a TEW-424UB usb wireless adapter to use with my landisk
(Plextor EH40L). I recommend that you go out and get one of these. In
Canada, TigerDirect.ca has the 400GB model for $315CDN after rebate.
The supported hardware list indicates that the TEW-424UB is supported
but
for testing proposes i installed a current snapshoot. i saw
the announcement of the netbean pkg thus i complied jdk 1.5
and installed netbeans.
when i build/run a project the output in the output/console
of netbeans is mostly not readable. it prints targets like
init:
deps-jar:
but the ou
On 2007/03/22 13:01, Bruce Bauer wrote:
> Yes, it shows that for a nat rule but doesn't mention anything about pass on
> a binat rule. I only discovered that binat accepts pass from the grammer
> section of pf.conf(5).
"Packets that match a translation rule are only automatically passed
if the pa
Yes, it shows that for a nat rule but doesn't mention anything about pass on
a binat rule. I only discovered that binat accepts pass from the grammer
section of pf.conf(5).
I can't find any authority that states that "binat pass..." causes a bypass
of all filtering as it does with "nat pass..."
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:09:04PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> How can you call it a low water mark art? I wasn't speechless,
> I laughed my ass off. I needed the humor this morning, I'm hung
> over and spent the morning in a stupid meeting. That message made
> my day.
Because what was `early
> It won't be serving very much; I'm looking to replace my existing NSLU2
> running Debian, which is doing thttpd, postfix, samba, nfsd, spamprobe, spey,
> dovecot, and dnsmasq. (I'd actually quite like to continue using the NSLU2
> but
> it doesn't turn on automatically --- which is a pain in the
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:41:08AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> Linux distros do the first to market and damn the
> consequences game just as well as Microsoft ever has.
>
> "Third party software" - in linux? fuck in Linux distributions
> everything in userland is third party software. Linux
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:09:04PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> * Artur Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-22 10:32]:
> > Kamil Monticolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > # ls -lhS /usr/lib/libcrypto*a
> > > -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.7M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto_pic.a
> > > -r--r--r--
Woodchuck wrote:
[...]
> I sent a longer ramble offlist
Indeed. Ta.
> , but onlist, the bottom line is this:
> you'll save some memory, a few megabytes, but if they are the tipping
> point between usefulness and non-usefulness of the machine, spend
> your time and money on Ebay, finding more memo
Very good point, Jeremy.
OpenBSD-current is *not* the way to start off. This is the only
op system I've ever used which has generally been stable
enough to use on a production machine, but that does not
mean that newcommers should use it.
Start with the stock release, and then get some extra pei
Perhaps the better thing to say is that it takes know-how to run
current *correctly and well*.
If you're just dipping your toes into OpenBSD. Running -current might
not be for you.
On 3/22/07, STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:01:23 Nick ! wrote:
> On 3/22/07,
On 3/22/07, STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:01:23 Nick ! wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Jay Jesus Amorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > how do i know if im using openbsd current?
>
> If you have to ask you aren't.
>
> Current is installed by installing snapshots and com
* Artur Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-22 10:32]:
> Kamil Monticolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > # ls -lhS /usr/lib/libcrypto*a
> > -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.7M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto_pic.a
> > -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.6M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto_p.a
> > -r--r--r-
Currently im using the following email address: / Moj nowy adres email:
http://toya.net.pl/~pirama/email.jpg
regards,
TTR
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, David Given wrote:
> I have a machine with 48MB of RAM that I want to use as a server.
>
> The OpenBSD kernel is a bit over 5MB. I assume that gets loaded into memory
> and is not swappable, giving me 43MB left, which isn't a lot.
I sent a longer ramble offlist, but onlist,
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:01:23 Nick ! wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Jay Jesus Amorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > how do i know if im using openbsd current?
>
> If you have to ask you aren't.
>
> Current is installed by installing snapshots and compiling from CVS.
> The learning curve is very steep.
>
A quick read of the faq shows the "pass" keyword causes a bypass all
filtering ...so don't use it if you want your filters to be applied .
Bruce Bauer wrote:
Using OpenBSD 4.0
Using binat for the first time in the real world
Questions:
binat pass on fxp0 from $server_int to any -> $server_ext
On 3/22/07, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yes a big chunk of the problem is the knuckle
dragging mouth breather in front of the keyboard - thank god that's
not OpenBSD's targeted userbase,
Damn, I wonder how I stumbled onto OpenBSD then.
Greg
On 3/22/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You mean OpenBSD has encrypted swap out-of-the-box? That's fantastic.
It took a while to set up on my debian etch box.
That is why we call it ``secure by default''
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:12:23AM -0700, Ben Calvert wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:58:31 +0530, "Siju George"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
>
> >From the article:
>
> Microsoft is doing better overall than its leadin
> Siju George wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
> >
> >Just for some entertainment, no troll :-)
> >
> >--Siju
> >
>
> IMHO it's not a fair comparison, most linux distributions ship with alot
> more software than microsoft windows does, and most bugrepo
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:11 +, David Given wrote:
> I have a machine with 48MB of RAM that I want to use as a server.
>
> The OpenBSD kernel is a bit over 5MB. I assume that gets loaded into memory
> and is not swappable, giving me 43MB left, which isn't a lot.
>
> Is it worth recompiling the
Using OpenBSD 4.0
Using binat for the first time in the real world
Questions:
binat pass on fxp0 from $server_int to any -> $server_ext
does this bypass all other pf filter rules?
binat on fxp0 from $server_int to any -> $server_ext
does this form allow filtering?
Googleing comes up with many diff
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Kamil Monticolo wrote:
> > The OpenBSD kernel is a bit over 5MB. I assume that gets loaded into memory
> > and is not swappable, giving me 43MB left, which isn't a lot.
>
> You can turn off ipv6, altq if not needed, and of course lots of hardware
> that you don't need also.
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, RedShift wrote:
> Siju George wrote:
>> http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
>> Just for some entertainment, no troll :-)
>
> IMHO it's not a fair comparison, most linux distributions ship with alot
more
> software than microsoft windows does, and most bugre
On 3/22/07, Neil Joseph Schelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 11:29 am, RedShift wrote:
> Siju George wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
> >
> > Just for some entertainment, no troll :-)
> >
> > --Siju
>
> IMHO it's not a fair co
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> RedShift
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 10:30 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Microsoft gets the Most Secure Operating Systems award
>
>
> Siju George wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > http://www.inte
Kamil Monticolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # ls -lhS /usr/lib/libcrypto*a
> -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.7M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto_pic.a
> -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.6M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto_p.a
> -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.5M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto.a
> # strip -s /
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Siju George
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:29 AM
> To: OpenBSD Misc
> Subject: Microsoft gets the Most Secure Operating Systems award
>
>
> Hi,
>
> http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php
On Thursday 22 March 2007 11:29 am, RedShift wrote:
> Siju George wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
> >
> > Just for some entertainment, no troll :-)
> >
> > --Siju
>
> IMHO it's not a fair comparison, most linux distributions ship with alot
> more soft
On 3/22/07, Ben Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Microsoft is doing better overall than its leading commercial competitors.
^^
No wonder. they stacked the deck before doing the comparison
doesn't this mean that they now h
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
Just for some entertainment, no troll :-)
--Siju
IMHO it's not a fair comparison, most linux distributions ship with alot
more software than microsoft windows does, and most bugreports indicate
an issue with
Hello!
Joachim. I think that the problem you had with your Thinkpad happened
to the son of a friend I have at Illinois too (on a slightly different
variant). On his laptop (a T20) the display CCF lamp did not turn on.
Indeed, buying at least two similar laptops is a smart idea. That is
the rea
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:58:31 +0530, "Siju George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
>From the article:
Microsoft is doing better overall than its leading commercial competitors.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:16:24PM -0500, Travers Buda wrote:
> * Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 22:37:01]:
>
> > I've got a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram, ISA bus, with two drives: 840 MB
> > and 1280 MB IDE. Currently running Debian GNU/Linux Sarge.
> >
> *snip*
> >
> > Is th
David Given wrote:
I have a machine with 48MB of RAM that I want to use as a server.
The OpenBSD kernel is a bit over 5MB. I assume that gets loaded into memory
and is not swappable, giving me 43MB left, which isn't a lot.
Is it worth recompiling the kernel to remove support for features I'm no
Nice, let's all now switch our servers to Windows!!!
Oh but it doesn't run on ultrasparc...
Nevermind...
:D
2007/3/23, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
Just for some entertainment, no troll :-)
--Siju
--
Please avoid sending
After a default 4.0 install I installed www/mod_auth_bsd
but all users are rejected.
I have the following line in my /var/www/logs/error_log:
httpd: invalid script: /usr/libexec/auth/login_passwd
Same results wether apache is chrooted or not.
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Thierry.
On 3/22/07, Jay Jesus Amorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how do i know if im using openbsd current?
If you have to ask you aren't.
Current is installed by installing snapshots and compiling from CVS.
The learning curve is very steep.
-Nick
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:11:22AM +, David Given wrote:
> And if it is worth recompiling the kernel, can anyone recommend any
> particularly big features it would be worth taking out?
I wouldn't bother, unless you find yourself actually running low on
memory. Not running GENERIC means any pr
Hi,
http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
Just for some entertainment, no troll :-)
--Siju
On 2007/03/22 13:54, Kamil Monticolo wrote:
> > The OpenBSD kernel is a bit over 5MB. I assume that gets loaded into memory
> > and is not swappable, giving me 43MB left, which isn't a lot.
If you're going to do things like this, you have extra steps when you
find a problem, because you need to te
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:47:11PM +0100, RedShift wrote:
> >You may also stripe nearly all of your libraries, for example:
> >
> ># ls -lhS /usr/lib/libcrypto*a
> >-r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.7M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto_pic.a
> >-r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.6M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto
Thanks!!
2007/3/22, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Use systat and read the systat(1) manual.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> On 22/03/07, Tang Tse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Maybe it is an stupid question, but since 1 week ago i got my HDD led
> > allways powered on. Is it p
Kamil Monticolo wrote:
The OpenBSD kernel is a bit over 5MB. I assume that gets loaded into memory
and is not swappable, giving me 43MB left, which isn't a lot.
You can turn off ipv6, altq if not needed, and of course lots of hardware that
you don't need also. For example I have a 2 x smaller
Use systat and read the systat(1) manual.
Regards,
Andreas
On 22/03/07, Tang Tse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Maybe it is an stupid question, but since 1 week ago i got my HDD led
allways powered on. Is it possible with something like top to see hdd % load
o something like?
Thanks.
Hello,
Maybe it is an stupid question, but since 1 week ago i got my HDD led
allways powered on. Is it possible with something like top to see hdd % load
o something like?
Thanks.
> The OpenBSD kernel is a bit over 5MB. I assume that gets loaded into memory
> and is not swappable, giving me 43MB left, which isn't a lot.
You can turn off ipv6, altq if not needed, and of course lots of hardware that
you don't need also. For example I have a 2 x smaller kernel that GENERIC on
RW wrote:
> I have a simple setup.
> Sydney to Melbourne and the ipsec.conf is one of the nice easy ones
> whilst I learn to do more complex setups. It has been working for
> months.
>
> Today doing "ipsecctl -s all" at either end generates the expected
> output. Each is a mirror of the other.
>
>
I have a machine with 48MB of RAM that I want to use as a server.
The OpenBSD kernel is a bit over 5MB. I assume that gets loaded into memory
and is not swappable, giving me 43MB left, which isn't a lot.
Is it worth recompiling the kernel to remove support for features I'm not
using --- IPv6, say
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> This is a known bug and not fixable until we change the statfs
> structure.
>
> http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yes&numbers=5169
Awesome. I wish other software had such a high quality of support.
Thanks Otto.
--
Stephan A. Rickauer
-
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> Our Soekris (4.0-stable) NFS mounts a remote share:
>
> # df -h /projects
> FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> linsrv01:/projects410G2.0T 417G 498% /projects
>
> # grep projects /etc/fstab
> linsrv01
On 21 March 2007, Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 22:37:01]:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've got a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram, ISA bus, with two drives: 840 MB
> > and 1280 MB IDE. Currently running Debian GNU/Linux Sarge.
> >
> *snip*
>
Our Soekris (4.0-stable) NFS mounts a remote share:
# df -h /projects
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
linsrv01:/projects410G2.0T 417G 498% /projects
# grep projects /etc/fstab
linsrv01:/projects /projects nfs rw,auto 0 0
where linsrv01 is a SLES10
99 matches
Mail list logo
