Please take this up on lists where it is more relevant.
OpenBSD is not going to participate in a campaign that calls non-free
things free.
We don't tell lies like the other BSD's do.
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:04:12PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Hi Pawel,
> >
> > Pawel Jakub Dawidek schrie
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:04:12PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Pawel,
>
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek schrieb am Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:02:47PM +0100:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:38:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> >> So isn't it rather hypocritical to have a anti-Blob campaign, backed
> >> by
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:55:04PM -0400, Paul D. Ouderkirk wrote:
> > And because I love to reply to myself, if I compile it with -O3, I can
> > reproduce your results:
>
> -O3 enables -fstrict-aliasing, which this program violates. The man
> pag
Hello
My name is Lara Thynne and I am a PhD candidate at Deakin University
Australia. I am currently researching the boundary between work and
leisure activities directly related to the open source community and
open source program development.
As part of this I am running a survey at the follo
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:43:19PM +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> in the sense of freedom, FreeBSD (among others) is a ultra-cheap whore,
> as this fat pengiun is.
Hehe:) As Borat use to say "very nice":)
The problem is that in world's history the worst and the biggest source
of evilness ever is f
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> /*
> * You assume that the in memory representation of an
> * unsigned [2] looks exactly like unsigned long long and you
> * expect to access the valid initialized memory of x by
> * dereferencing p.
> *
> * These assumptions are all wrong.
>
I understand that the Nokia IP1x0 stores the MAC addresses for the fxp
(4) interfaces in a strange ROM location and so you have to manually
key them in after the OpenBSD install. Is this still the case and is
it the case for the IP130 also? I found a document called IP130FAQ
that states that
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:44:05AM +0100, Han Boetes wrote:
> I just had two cronjobs which were set on the same time and the
> first match was executed and the second was ignored.
Does /var/cron/log say anything?
> Of course this is not entirely enexpected but is this considered a
> bug or somet
On 3/18/07, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/18/07, Maurice Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, March 16, 2007 at 19:34:59 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> >Running "A.B-RELEASE+Patches" is very similar to "A.B-STABLE" since the
> >user applied patches (available on the erra
Hi all,
Sorry for the size of this email, but this issue drives me nuts.
This discussion is for the most part not going anywhere and looks like
dirty laundry between various party.
Campaign for no BLOB start by refusing BLOB period. No one will do
goodwill if not force to do so. That's human
On Mar 19, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Timothy A. Napthali wrote:
The only problem I can foresee is that I remember reading somewhere
that
some MTAs use NOOP as a kind of keep-alive at times.
You will also find the command sequence RSET+NOOP used to delimit
transactions when an SMTP client reuses an
* Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-20 03:44:05]:
> Hi,
>
> I just had two cronjobs which were set on the same time and the
> first match was executed and the second was ignored.
>
> Of course this is not entirely enexpected but is this considered a
> bug or something which would be nice t
Le Lundi 19 Mars 2007 05:09, Joachim Schipper a icrit :
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 05:56:04PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> > * Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-18 16:16]:
> > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 08:57:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2007/03/18 16:35, Peter wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:12:24PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
> variable value change every time i run it. What would it be my mistake
> on the source? Did i forget some thing?
>
> #include
>
> int
> main(int argc, char **argv)
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:55:04PM -0400, Paul D. Ouderkirk wrote:
> And because I love to reply to myself, if I compile it with -O3, I can
> reproduce your results:
-O3 enables -fstrict-aliasing, which this program violates. The man
page explains in more detail.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 04:40:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Compile it with -O3. Then enjoy.
Sure. Then I'll light my hair on fire and put it out with a ballpeen
hammer.
--
Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.u
Wim Vandeputte wrote:
Did you contact http://www.genesis.com.hk/ in Hong Kong?
Or should we remove them from the list of resellers?
Probably, I don't think they've been alive for a good many years. I seem
to recall this being the case even back in 3.x days.
---
Lars Hansson
Lars D. Nooden wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Dave Anderson wrote:
> > You've left out the extremely important fact that many vendors
> > interpret acceptance of blobs by any "free" OS as validating their
> > position of not releasing adequate documentation -- so accepting blobs
> > (even when "th
"Gustavo Rios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
> variable value change every time i run it. What would it be my mistake
> on the source? Did i forget some thing?
Bleh, what a depressing thread. Gustavo, why didn't you bother to
prov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:17:46PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:12:24PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
> > variable value change every time i run it. What would it be my mistake
> > on the source? Did i
RStachowiak wrote:
> On 18/03/07, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> The question was not about normal upgrade procedure (which I'm perfectly
> aware of ) but about internal working of system during upgrade phase to
> let me understand it better and comprehend all corner cases.
The f
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
So isn't it rather hypocritical to claim GPL license is bad and BSD
license is good and ship operating system with GPLed code?
No.
How do you feel about having pro-GPL operating system?
I don't know, I run OpenBSD.
---
Lars Hansson
The only problem I can foresee is that I remember reading somewhere that
some MTAs use NOOP as a kind of keep-alive at times. This may be an
issue depending on how those MTAs deal with not getting the 250 response
from SPAMD they were expecting.
Tim.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:12:24PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
> variable value change every time i run it. What would it be my mistake
> on the source? Did i forget some thing?
>
> #include
>
> int
> main(int argc, char **argv)
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:35:28AM +0100, Frank Denis wrote:
> Le Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:12:24PM -0300, Gustavo Rios ecrivait :
> >I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
> >variable value change every time i run it.
> >int
> >main(int argc, char **argv)
> >{
> > u
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 08:02:10PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
> Wait, how is * defined on two voids? That shouldn't even compile
> (unless it's autocasting to int?).
``unsigned'' is short for ``unsigned int''. The ``(void *)'' cast is
a red herring.
On 3/19/07, Paul D. Ouderkirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/19/07, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No!
>
> p sizeof is 4 bytes, p is the frst byt of &x, and p + 1 is the 4th
> byte. Casting is only on attribution of &x to p.
>
> Realize, p[0] evals to 1 and p[1] evals to 2 as it shoul
On 3/19/07, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No!
p sizeof is 4 bytes, p is the frst byt of &x, and p + 1 is the 4th
byte. Casting is only on attribution of &x to p.
Realize, p[0] evals to 1 and p[1] evals to 2 as it should be. Only
problem relates to p[0] * p[1]. I believe it should (1 *
Whenever a printf "fixes everything", it's usually because that forces
gcc to put the values on the stack. Without the printf, they're
probably in registers and p points to who knows what.
If you grok assembly, try objdump on the executable to see what's
going on. If you want to multiply the tw
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:26:12 -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>Yes but since these are production machines in a lab that requires
>clearance I can't share. We keep backups around for all these machines
>since every now and then we lose one for no good reason. In contrast
>the windows and openbsd m
No!
p sizeof is 4 bytes, p is the frst byt of &x, and p + 1 is the 4th
byte. Casting is only on attribution of &x to p.
Realize, p[0] evals to 1 and p[1] evals to 2 as it should be. Only
problem relates to p[0] * p[1]. I believe it should (1 * 2), i.e., 2.
Not a random value.
On 3/19/07, Nick !
Le Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:12:24PM -0300, Gustavo Rios ecrivait :
I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
variable value change every time i run it.
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
unsigned long long x, c;
unsigned*p;
p = (voi
On 3/19/07, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/19/07, Nick ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/19/07, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
> > variable value change every time i run it. What would it be my mistak
So, why when i printf p[1], it correctly prints 2?
On 3/19/07, Nick ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/19/07, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
> variable value change every time i run it. What would it be my mistake
> on
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Here is the output:
>
> $ ifconfig -a
> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33224
>groups: lo
>inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
>inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
>inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
> sis0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
>lla
Hello guys.
I'm migrating to 4.0 now and I have problem with panic on couple of my servers
on 4.0.
Servers crashes irregulary with page fault (6) -
(/src/sys says that's an arthmetic fault).
All servers crashes with the same EIP d02ce554, so I think it cannot be RAM.
Machines have Pentium D with
Nevermind, I figured it out. I set up an alias on my internal
interface and then set up my pptp.conf and ppp.conf to assign IP's on
this new range.
Now everything works as I expect.
Thanks for the suggestions.
--Bryan
On 3/19/07, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/9/07, Joachim Sch
Wikipedia's wrong?!?!?!?!?!?!
What about the term 'truthiness'? Don't tell me Wikipedia's wrong about
that, too?
;)
danno
ps-
2006-03-01
The Colbert Report, episode 58
Arianna Huffington challenges host Stephen Colbert on his claim that he
had coined the word "truthiness". She cited Wikipedi
On 3/19/07, Carlos Valiente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On my -CURRENT amd64 system, Python 2.5 (installed from packge file
python-2.5p3.tgz on 14 Mar 2007) is segfaulting within an installed
module (the PostgreSQL Python driver from
http://www.initd.org/tracker/psycopg/wiki/PsycopgTwo). The crash
use route tables, set the getaway 10.30.9.253 for the subnet on which
your other office is, and use your ISP's getaway as default getaway.
you can manipulate route tables with route(8).
On 3/19/07, Ricardo Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello ppl from misc,
I have an issue, I have a little
On 3/19/07, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
variable value change every time i run it. What would it be my mistake
on the source? Did i forget some thing?
#include
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
unsigned long
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:26:18 -0500
Matthew Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
> > people with a total lack of so called 'soft skills' won't see them,
> > tho, but that is neither Theo's problem nor anyone else's.
>
> Give me a break. If anyone posted here saying that the
On Monday, March 19, "Chris 'Xenon' Hanson" wrote:
>
>Optimally, you could switch between allocators as a compile-time
> define. U se a tougher allocator for debugging and stress testing. Use
> a lighter, faster one in situ ations where you are confident that the
> code is solid and needs spee
Christoph Leser wrote:
hello,
I would love to set up a openBSD/soekris based dsl router for accessing the
internet from home (my provider is t-com from germany).
Can anyone here tell me whether there are internal dsl modem cards available
which are supported by openBSD?
although it is not ide
On 3/19/07 4:48 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
You are so uninformed that it isn't even funny to pick on you.
Karel clocks on the wrong edge and is by far the worst educated
asocial asshole I have met on this list.
+++chefren
On 2007/02/23 12:52, Falk Brockerhoff wrote:
> Claudio Jeker schrieb:
> > Hmm. For some reasons the carp route is not cleared correctly.
> > I'll have a look at it.
> >
> Do you have any news on this topic? I like to run OpenOSPFd on my
> routers, but since the bugfix there isn't any redundancy.
Here is the output:
$ ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33224
groups: lo
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
sis0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:00:24:c7:31:20
media: Ethernet 100baseTX (100ba
Yes but since these are production machines in a lab that requires
clearance I can't share. We keep backups around for all these machines
since every now and then we lose one for no good reason. In contrast
the windows and openbsd machines we have deployed do not share this
behavior.
You are th
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:59:51 -0400, Dan Farrell wrote:
>I thought it was free as in beer, but because of the blobs, not
>necessarily free as in you can do whatever you want with it...
>
>Because what can you do with a blob? Are you allowed to use a blob
>anywhere you want, in any situation? Are yo
I am writing a very simple program but the output change for the c
variable value change every time i run it. What would it be my mistake
on the source? Did i forget some thing?
#include
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
unsigned long long x, c;
unsigned*p;
> Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
> setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
you want a resolver for your local IPv4 subnets?
just add named_flags="" to /etc/rc.conf.local and restart
On 3/9/07, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:31:38PM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> I'm running poptop on my home firewall, but I can't see any of the
> machines on that network (though I can see indivudal machine on
> friends network that are connected via isak
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Dave Anderson wrote:
> You've left out the extremely important fact that many vendors
> interpret acceptance of blobs by any "free" OS as validating their
> position of not releasing adequate documentation -- so accepting blobs
> (even when "there's no other choice") actively h
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:23:43AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> But if you write a program and the user finds it full of bugs, are they
> going to care that you can say that it's GCC's fault? The burden falls
> on the developers to make c
On 3/19/07, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So isn't it rather hypocritical to claim GPL license is bad and BSD
license is good and ship operating system with GPLed code?
How do you feel about having pro-GPL operating system? Why do you lie to
your users by having 'BSD' in operatin
Hello ppl from misc,
I have an issue, I have a little lan with a oBSD box that connect to my
ISP and bring the Internet to this lan, but I have another router inside
that lan that connects me to my another office, and I have a win2000 machine
that is the DNS for this router, so, if I want to co
Timo Schoeler wrote:
> people with a total lack of so called 'soft skills' won't see them,
> tho, but that is neither Theo's problem nor anyone else's.
Give me a break. If anyone posted here saying that they would post some
private correspondence with Theo unless he took some action, misc@ would
** Reply to message from Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon,
19 Mar 2007 09:40:52 -0600
>* Sid Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 03:25]:
>
>> > Regardless, if NOOP is in the SMTP standard, and spamd does not handle
>> > it correctly, that is a bug that needs to be fixed.
>
> Bullshit.
hello,
I would love to set up a openBSD/soekris based dsl router for accessing the
internet from home (my provider is t-com from germany).
Can anyone here tell me whether there are internal dsl modem cards available
which are supported by openBSD?
It would be sad if I had to install an external
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
What about Charlie Root testing something remotely through cron and then
Ok, I'll bite. This is not hard. Here's something I did real quick.
Use at your own risk. Replace XXX with your closest ftp mirror from
http://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html. Read
On 3/19/07, mail-lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, I've asked this before and didn't get a response.. am I asking
this incorrectly - or in the wrong place?
This is the right place, you just haven't done your research so no one
bothered to answer. You might want to look into
[EMAIL PROTECT
Ok,
Here is my output of netstat:
$ netstat -m
331 mbufs in use:
326 mbufs allocated to data
2 mbufs allocated to packet headers
3 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses
72/152/6144 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
420 Kbytes allocated to network (53% in use)
0
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Nick ! wrote:
>
> > On 3/19/07, hiren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > hi all,
> > >
> > > i found it interesting that cat.c compiles after removing these
> > > includes:
> > >
> > > #include
> > > #include
>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 04:19:11PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> We can analogically use this argument for ocassional errors in memory, too. If
"We" can, but "we" won't.
Yes, the GCC bugs should be fixed. Yes, it's important to communicate
with the GCC people that -O2 breaks things sometimes.
Th
Tobias Weingartner wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Wilson wrote:
I dunno. Am I being overly paranoid, or should I stick with nice
dependable old-fashioned malloc?
I usually take dependable and slightly slower over faster and nastier
any day. Especially if it's fast enough.
Are you looking to make the DNS server a caching-only DNS server or are
you going to have be authoritative for a domain (or set of domains?) (If
you don't know the answer to this question then any 'examples' are going
to be lost on the ignorant... no offense, you should understand this
before delvi
On 2007/03/19 11:14, Steve Glaus wrote:
> I'm trying to get a mini pci card working on OpenBSD 4.0. I ripped this
> card out of a dlink router that we weren't using. From what I understand
> it's supposed to use the acx driver.
Knowing that minipci can be fiddly, I would double-check it's
inserted
Yeah but what die is he rolling? I'm tired of rolling a six-sided die
against blobs and hobgoblins when all the level 23 developer-clerics are
using a 20-sided die... simply not fair!!!
danno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Marco Peereboo
Ce message est au format HTML. Si vous ne parvenez pas ` le lire, cliquez
ici.
[IMAGE]
GESTION D'ENTREPRISE
MARKETING ET COMMUNICATION
NOUVELLES TECHNOLOGIES
GESTION DU PERSONNEL
LOGISTIQUE ET EQUIPEMENT
VEHICULES ET UTILITAIRES
BOUTIQUE EN LIGNE
[IMAGE]
Chers internautes, chers clients,
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 16:00:49 +0100:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:26:56AM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
> > On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Aggre
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 15:27:29 +0100:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:35:14AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 03:21]:
> > > Free as in FreeBSD
> >
> > ahh, I finally get it.
> >
> > dry like water
> > hot l
Might be a dumb question, but what's the equivalent of
neighbor remove-private-as
in OpenBGPD
I've just noticed we're advertising prefixes 65xxx to our upstream
providers when we should be stripping them from our advertisements.
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 00
In epistula a Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 15:59:06 +0100:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:15:16AM -0400, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >> Everything is much slower than existing Linux system. For
> > >> example, Firefox takes 3-5 seconds to start on Lin
>> > It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether
>> > the
>> > result of optimization is correct. Therefore it's not the optimizations
>> > that
>> > are source of bugs, but bugs in GCC.
>>
>> But if you write a program and the user finds it full of bugs, are they
>>
Marco Peereboom wrote:
If you like losing data ext3 and reiserfs work just fine. I manage to
lose Linux installations pretty often by doing crazy things like
rebooting.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:41:05PM +0100, RedShift wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100, Kar
"JOHN LUCKEY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
> The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
Assuming that you don't need dynamic updates, Dan Bernstein has EXACT
guidelines for his djbdns:
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html
Look for "H
Hi Pawel,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek schrieb am Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:02:47PM +0100:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:38:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> So isn't it rather hypocritical to have a anti-Blob campaign, backed
>> by projects which embrace the Blob?
> So isn't it rather hypocritical to cla
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:33:42AM -0700, JOHN LUCKEY wrote:
> Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
> setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
> The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
Sure, I have that exact setup running. I've pasted a sligh
In epistula a Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 15:02:47 +0100:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:38:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > So isn't it rather hypocritical to have a anti-Blob campaign, backed
> > by projects which embrace the Blob?
>
> So isn't it rath
Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:23:43AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> > > It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether
> > > the
> > > result of optimization is
Sorry, I've asked this before and didn't get a response.. am I asking
this incorrectly - or in the wrong place?
Hello all,
I'm trying to get a mini pci card working on OpenBSD 4.0. I ripped this
card out of a dlink router that we weren't using. From what I understand
it's supposed to use the acx
>Jason George wrote:
>
>> This was sabre-rattling. Daniel made a pre-emptive tactical strike.
>> There's a big difference.
>
>No, there's not a difference. Theo said he was willing to take the
>emails public; this Daniel guy took him at his word, and made them
>public. The only foul I see is The
In epistula a Matthew Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> die horaque Mon, 19
Mar 2007 10:54:24 -0500:
> Jason George wrote:
>
> > This was sabre-rattling. Daniel made a pre-emptive tactical strike.
> > There's a big difference.
>
> No, there's not a difference. Theo said he was willing to take the
> e
Sorry, I've asked this before and didn't get a response.. am I asking
this incorrectly - or in the wrong place?
Hello all,
I'm trying to get a mini pci card working on OpenBSD 4.0. I ripped this
card out of a dlink router that we weren't using. From what I understand
it's supposed to use the ac
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FreeBSD is released under BSD licence and therefore is free software, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software
where is the source to the "free software" nvidia driver?
In epistula a Manuel Ravasio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> die horaque Mon,
19 Mar 2007 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT):
> Really?
> I have a completely different experience: I never managed to
> completely loose a filesystem, except by on OpenBSD...
>
> I've been using slackware linux on reiserfs and xfs for many ye
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:38:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
So isn't it rather hypocritical to have a anti-Blob campaign, backed
by projects which embrace the Blob?
So isn't it rather hypocritical to claim GPL license is bad and BSD
license is good and shi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Wilson wrote:
>
> I dunno. Am I being overly paranoid, or should I stick with nice
> dependable old-fashioned malloc?
I usually take dependable and slightly slower over faster and nastier
any day. Especially if it's fast enough.
--
[100~Plax]sb16i0A2
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:26:56AM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
> On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> >>
> >> Aggressive compiler optimizations are not generally a
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:23:43AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> > It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether the
> > result of optimization is correct. Therefore it's not the optimizations that
> > are
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:42:26PM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> JOHN LUCKEY wrote:
> >Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
> >setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
> >The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
> >
> >
> It isn't different
If you like losing data ext3 and reiserfs work just fine. I manage to
lose Linux installations pretty often by doing crazy things like
rebooting.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:41:05PM +0100, RedShift wrote:
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> >>
On 3/19/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have also a feeling that deleting huge files or large directories with
loads of tiny files in subdirectories is slower.
A "feeling"?? Entirely subjective readings like this mean nothing and
are at best noise and at worst FUD. Come on, be sc
On 3/19/07, JOHN LUCKEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
TIA
John
an unofficial source, but it was very usefull to me..
http:/
** Reply to message from Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 19
Mar 2007 15:04:46 +0100
>On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:06:31AM +0100, SW wrote:
>
>I have a feeling that the campaign means "We don't want vendors to require
>us to use a blob but we'll ocassionally use them when we have to other w
Hi,
FreeBSD sysctl supports hw.snd.pcm0.vchans and hw.snd.maxautovchans.
With this variables user may hear sound from many apps at one time.
How I can do this in OpenBSD.
My friend says that this possible only when current app link with
lossaudio(3). Maybe there is another way?
Sorry for my Eng
Hey Michael,
> I use OpenBSD from 3.6, when every release is pre-ordered, i can't find a
> easy way to
> own a set.
>
> I live in China, Is it possible to have a OpenBSD store in Asia?
> China? Japan? Korean? or other coutries?
Did you contact http://www.genesis.com.hk/ in Hong Kong?
Or should
JOHN LUCKEY wrote:
Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
bind is part of the base system @ OpenBSD (default install).
These manuals should help.
man named
man
On 03/19/07 at 7:33, JOHN LUCKEY wrote:
>Anyone have or know of a good beginner's tutorial on how to
>setup/configure a openBSD box to do DNS on a local network?
>The more concrete/cookbook the examples, the better.
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/dns/index.html
You are so uninformed that it isn't even funny to pick on you.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:04:46PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:06:31AM +0100, SW wrote:
>
> I have a feeling that the campaign means "We don't want vendors to require
> us to use a blob but we'll ocassion
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
