If you like losing data ext3 and reiserfs work just fine. I manage to lose Linux installations pretty often by doing crazy things like rebooting.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:41:05PM +0100, RedShift wrote: > Claudio Jeker wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote: > >>On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:36:00PM -0500, R. Fumione wrote: > >>>Hello, > >>> > >>>I am using OpenBSD on server since few years now, and I am very happy > >>>with it's easy maintenance and it's stability. I want to try on > >>>desktop, and I am having trouble. > >>> > >>>Everything is much slower than existing Linux system. For example, > >>>Firefox takes 3-5 seconds to start on Linux but ~10 seconds on > >>>OpenBSD on same machine! > >>I have the same problem. The FFS doesn't seem to be as fast as ext2. > >> > > > >On the other hand I never lost data on ffs while a crashing linux box > >likes to eat up file systems. If you like to get ext2 speed just mount > >your filesystems async and hope for the best (that's what linux is doing). > > > > That's what transactional filesystems like ext3 and reiserfs are for. I > can highly recommend reiserfs. > > Glenn