On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Mike Piety wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:15:24 +0100
> Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Some reasons why NOT to build from source:
> > [...]
> > Compiling your own system as a way of upgrading it is not supported."
> > http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
> >
>
On Friday 16 March 2007 21:25, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > If you have ever wondered why the OpenBSD multi-processor kernel is
> > named "GENERIC.MP" rather than "GENERIC.SMP," it's because you've
> > missed out on some of Theo's ideas and plans to do asymmetric
> > mutli-processing processing rather
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:41:23AM +, Brad Brad wrote:
> When I connect a second drive to a sil3114 controller that drive is
> assigned wd0 and my real boot drive becomes wd1. How can I force the drive
> I choose to be wd0? Its a soekris 4801.
>
> I assume its not a BIOs issue because it do
When I connect a second drive to a sil3114 controller that drive is assigned
wd0 and my real boot drive becomes wd1. How can I force the drive I choose
to be wd0? Its a soekris 4801.
I assume its not a BIOs issue because it does start booting, and it should
get nowhere if that was wrong.
It
thanks for the ideas
On 3/17/07, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:17:10PM +0800, Jay Jesus Amorin wrote:
> hi gurus,
>
> how will i configure sshd to allow only one username at a time.
>
> example:
>
> on pc1 ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> on pc2 ssh [EMA
> If you have ever wondered why the OpenBSD multi-processor kernel is
> named "GENERIC.MP" rather than "GENERIC.SMP," it's because you've
> missed out on some of Theo's ideas and plans to do asymmetric
> mutli-processing processing rather than the usual symmetric
> multi-processing (SMP).
Let'
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:51:15AM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Miod Vallat wrote:
>
> >> 2) Do I have to modify another file?
> >
> >No.
>
> Very much noted. I have been wondering about this too.
it's the 'i want to create my own style ramdisk kernels
with their own unique "in-the-ramdriv
On Friday 16 March 2007 20:07, Darren Spruell wrote:
> On 3/16/07, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 16 March 2007 13:51, Nick Holland wrote:
> > > Read the rest of that page... you are confusing upGRADING and
> > > upDATING.
> >
> > Unfortunately, confusing the two terms, upGR
> On Friday 16 March 2007 12:56, Bob Beck wrote:
> > If you have nothing better to do that look at "campaigns"
> > at least find a campaign where it appears the people doing it
> > understand this issues.
>
> Can you actually name a technical campaign besides openbsd that actually
> unders
If you have ever wondered why the OpenBSD multi-processor kernel is
named "GENERIC.MP" rather than "GENERIC.SMP," it's because you've
missed out on some of Theo's ideas and plans to do asymmetric
mutli-processing processing rather than the usual symmetric
multi-processing (SMP). If you do not u
On Friday 16 March 2007 12:56, Bob Beck wrote:
> If you have nothing better to do that look at "campaigns"
> at least find a campaign where it appears the people doing it
> understand this issues.
Can you actually name a technical campaign besides openbsd that actually
understands both the
On 3/16/07, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2007 13:51, Nick Holland wrote:
> Read the rest of that page... you are confusing upGRADING and
> upDATING.
Unfortunately, confusing the two terms, upGRADING and upDATING, is very
easy to do mainly because of our usage of th
Just wondering... if I should order it from the international store:
https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order?CD41=1&CD41%2b=Add
I don't live in US Canada nor Europe... but I am worried if I ordered
"From North America to anywhere worldwide", would the CD have the lack
of built-in cryptography due
On Friday 16 March 2007 13:51, Nick Holland wrote:
> Read the rest of that page... you are confusing upGRADING and
> upDATING.
Unfortunately, confusing the two terms, upGRADING and upDATING, is very
easy to do mainly because of our usage of the terms is not particularly
clear.
For each numbered
Is it really that hard to cc to security-anoounce? Jeez...
2007/3/17, Ray Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mar 16, 2007, at 5:43 PM, fonkprop wrote:
> Yet again, we see that although Theo is willing to beg, wheedle and
> threaten
> his user community into sending him money when he needs it, he
On 16-Mar-07, at 9:57 PM, Ray Percival wrote:
On Mar 16, 2007, at 5:43 PM, fonkprop wrote:
Yet again, we see that although Theo is willing to beg, wheedle
and threaten
his user community into sending him money when he needs it, he
holds them in
too much contempt to respond to simple, uncont
On Mar 16, 2007, at 5:43 PM, fonkprop wrote:
Yet again, we see that although Theo is willing to beg, wheedle and
threaten
his user community into sending him money when he needs it, he
holds them in
too much contempt to respond to simple, uncontroversial and valid
criticism.
No. This is pur
Anyone else having issues with pf?
I don't think my rdr pass rule is keeping state as my reply packets
get dropped. As seen by tcpdump. And I can't get any output from
pfctl -x loud to see what's going on.
#pf.conf
ext_if="fxp0"
int_if="fxp1"
set skip on lo
set loginterface fxp0
nat o
Yet again, we see that although Theo is willing to beg, wheedle and threaten
his user community into sending him money when he needs it, he holds them in
too much contempt to respond to simple, uncontroversial and valid criticism.
On 3/16/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let's se
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 23:41, Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
...
> Um, no. If you apply the errata to -release you have -release + errata.
> There are things in stable that are not in the errata, albeit not much.
> Tracking -stable requires using cvs which, frankly is much easier than
> patching -
2007/3/16, Mike Piety <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
uh, why don't you just load your release bsd.rd at the boot prompt, and
do an upgrade to 4.0, using the ftp method? This would install 4.0-
stable, and would be a lot faster.
No. There are no new kernels (i.e. stable) available from the servers.
Best
On 3/16/07, Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/16/07, JT Croteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to add a sound card to my OpenBSD desktop box for basic audio
> playback from .mp3's and cd's and to do some basic recording. What
> would be a good PCI based card to go with?
ess(4)'s
On 3/16/07, Tobias Weisserth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 21:04, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
...
> Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The
> explanation in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -current, but
> also the -stable is a moving t
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:31:33PM -0800, smith wrote:
> OpenBSD developers add code and fix bugs using a program called CVS. CVS has
> the ability to create branches like a tree. The main tree trunk is -current.
> After a certain amount of time, usually a couple of months before the release
>
On 16-Mar-07, at 4:52 PM, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 21:04, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
...
Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The
explanation in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -
current, but
also the -stable is a moving target,
On Friday 16 March 2007 16:15:24 Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> "Some reasons why NOT to build from source:
> [...]
> Compiling your own system as a way of upgrading it is not supported."
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
>
> I want to upgrade my 4.0-release system to get rid of the ipv6 remote
> vulnerab
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html
The name of the browser that is at http://links.twibright.com is not
Links+, but Links (or Twibright Links). It's not a different browser than the
textmode Links. If you run recent Links without -g, you get the textmode links.
There is an older version of Links whi
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:45:40PM +, Alex Berdan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to make CARP to monitor an interface and if that
> interface is down to switch to slave from master? (I know this is
> possible with HSRP)
>
see ifstated(8)
> Thanks
>
> --
>
> Alex
Karel Kulhavy wrote on Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:04:50PM +0100:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrote:
>> ok, I'll try to be clear :
[...]
>> so, in term of patching,
>> release + errata = stable and
>> release < stable < current
>
> Thanks, this is a much better expl
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:51:35PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
[...]
> > It's actually really easy. Follow the first 2 steps in "man release".
>
> Unfortunately these instructions fail with not being clear if I should use
> OPENBSD_4_0_BASE or OPENBSD_4_0 in step 1. It doesn't say if I should pic
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 21:26, JT Croteau wrote:
> This may seem like a simple question but it has been a long time since
> I've done any multimedia work on a *nix platform and never on OpenBSD.
> I need to add a sound card to my OpenBSD desktop box for basic audio
> playback from .mp3's an
Just as a note, when I first read the section 5.2 of the FAQ I was
also a bit confused. The line "Compiling your own system as a way of
upgrading it is not supported." made think that maybe following the
-stable branch wasn't supported. But after doing more research I
figured that following -stabl
On 2007/03/16 21:15, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> "Some reasons why NOT to build from source:
> [...]
> Compiling your own system as a way of upgrading it is not supported."
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
system != kernel. Some OS advise people to 'make world' as a way to
upgrade to a new release, t
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:15:24 +0100
Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Some reasons why NOT to build from source:
> [...]
> Compiling your own system as a way of upgrading it is not supported."
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
>
> I want to upgrade my 4.0-release system to get rid of th
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The explanation
in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -current, but also the
-stable is a moving target, though a slowly moving one.
Now I have 4.0-release and want
On 3/16/07, Tobias Weisserth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Check there first:
http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware
Yeah, I am aware of the supported chipsets.. I was looking for a
recommendation based on what is supported as I am sure some drivers
are better than others.
Thanks
--
JT Crote
On 3/16/07, JT Croteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to add a sound card to my OpenBSD desktop box for basic audio
playback from .mp3's and cd's and to do some basic recording. What
would be a good PCI based card to go with?
ess(4)'s have always treated me well.
Dear gentleman,
when i execute some command on my server box, i got a complain about
not enough buffer available. For instance.
$ rusers
rusers: can't send broadcast packet: No buffer space available
$
I don't how to perform tunning on mbufs. Rather than simply reasing
its limits i wonder which
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:17:10PM +0800, Jay Jesus Amorin wrote:
> hi gurus,
>
> how will i configure sshd to allow only one username at a time.
>
> example:
>
> on pc1 ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> on pc2 ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> now what i like to happen is ssh on pc2 should be drop bec
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:04:50 +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote
> Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The explanation
> in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -current, but also
> the -stable is a moving target, though a slowly moving one.
>
> Now I have 4.0-release a
why do you bother asking questions if you are not willing to accept answers?
you either need:
pass out on bge0 from
block out on bge0 from to { , }
or:
block quick out on bge0 from to { , }
pass out on bge0 from
alternatively you could have a combined table containing both
outside and
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:20:00AM +, John Gould wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:54:16AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> >>On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:46:26PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>> The OpenBSD team has released a "security fix"
> >>I
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
"Some reasons why NOT to build from source:
[...]
Compiling your own system as a way of upgrading it is not supported."
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
I want to upgrade my 4.0-release system to get rid of the ipv6 remote
vulnerability. I understood it's possible only by re
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 21:04, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
...
> Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The
> explanation in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -current, but
> also the -stable is a moving target, though a slowly moving one.
>
> Now I have 4.0-rele
Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Some reasons why NOT to build from source:
> [...]
> Compiling your own system as a way of upgrading it is not supported."
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
>
> I want to upgrade my 4.0-release system to get rid of the ipv6 remote
> vulnerability. I u
* STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 22:17]:
> On Friday 16 March 2007 16:08:55 Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> > "One should also understand that the update process is supported in only
> > one direction: from older to newer, and from -stable to -current."
> > http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
> >
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
"Some reasons why NOT to build from source:
[...]
Compiling your own system as a way of upgrading it is not supported."
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
I want to upgrade my 4.0-release system to get rid of the ipv6 remote
vulnerability. I understood it's possible only by re
On 03/16/2007 02:51:35 PM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:26:39PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> It's actually really easy. Follow the first 2 steps in "man
release".
Unfortunately these instructions fail with not being clear if I should
use
OPENBSD_4_0_BASE or OPENBSD_4_0 in
Thanks very much for taking the time to respond.
On 03/16/2007 02:33:28 PM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
I'm not saying that you're unappreciative, just that it seemed that
way.
That is why when I write suggestions, I usually find something to
thank the
person for too, just so they don't feel unde
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> "Some reasons why NOT to build from source:
> [...]
> Compiling your own system as a way of upgrading it is not supported."
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
>
> I want to upgrade my 4.0-release system to get rid of the ipv6 remote
> vulnerability. I u
On Friday 16 March 2007 16:08:55 Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> "One should also understand that the update process is supported in only
> one direction: from older to newer, and from -stable to -current."
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
>
> Is it possible to upgrade from 4.0-current to 4.1-stable?
>
>
This may seem like a simple question but it has been a long time since
I've done any multimedia work on a *nix platform and never on OpenBSD.
I need to add a sound card to my OpenBSD desktop box for basic audio
playback from .mp3's and cd's and to do some basic recording. What
would be a good PCI
* Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 21:32]:
> "One should also understand that the update process is supported in only one
> direction: from older to newer, and from -stable to -current."
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
>
> Is it possible to upgrade from 4.0-current to 4.1-stable?
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 16:30 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >1) is my syntax wrong? YES
> >2) OK, what is wrong with it? Pointed out and understood.
>
> Evidently, *not* understood.
Evidently, you can read my mind and know what I do and do not
understand. That's fricken' amazing!
>
> >3) Good
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:59 -0700, Marco S Hyman wrote:
> > now. given that I have a default block all rule, is it possible to allow
> > out ALL traffic EXCEPT those packets bound for the addresses listed in
> > the and tables without the need for more block rules?
>
> No, you need additional
"Some reasons why NOT to build from source:
[...]
Compiling your own system as a way of upgrading it is not supported."
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
I want to upgrade my 4.0-release system to get rid of the ipv6 remote
vulnerability. I understood it's possible only by recompiling because the f
On 16-Mar-07, at 3:51 PM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:26:39PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
It's actually really easy. Follow the first 2 steps in "man
release".
Unfortunately these instructions fail with not being clear if I
should use
OPENBSD_4_0_BASE or OPENBSD_4_0 i
"One should also understand that the update process is supported in only one
direction: from older to newer, and from -stable to -current."
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
Is it possible to upgrade from 4.0-current to 4.1-stable?
CL<
Alex Berdan wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to make CARP to monitor an interface and if that
interface is down to switch to slave from master? (I know this is
possible with HSRP)
ifstated(8)
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrote:
>
> ok, I'll try to be clear :
> there is a -current branch (HEAD in CVS technobabble).
> nearly every six month, -current give birth to a release (CDs).
> a release shall move as little as possible. but sometimes, (like now)
> there
* Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 12:20]:
> Is it true that Puffy is not here because of Theo's concerns about
> his copyrighted Puffy logo?
> http://misc.allbsd.de/Kampagnen/NoBlob/NoBlob-en-Poster.jpg
Hunh? a "No Blob" poster with FreeBSD on it? that's a
fucking joke. they'
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:26:39PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 03/16/2007 03:54:16 AM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:46:26PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> This means everyone should have our latest patches installed.
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >> *Solution/Vendor Information/
Hi,
Is it possible to make CARP to monitor an interface and if that
interface is down to switch to slave from master? (I know this is
possible with HSRP)
Thanks
--
Alex
On 3/16/07, Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/16/2007 02:51:48 AM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
>
> > Yeah. Expectations aside, being condescending is never warranted.
>
> We've all spent more time on this than it's worth, but I would
> appreciate it if you'd point out any condescension
** Reply to message from Ryan Corder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:01:38 -0500
>very simply, this thread could have ended a day or two ago if the
>following process would have taken place:
>
>1) is my syntax wrong? YES
>2) OK, what is wrong with it? Pointed out and understood.
Ev
It'd be great if Theo could make a clear statement on Puffy, the same
as Marshall Kirk McKusick has for the daemon. I had cause to use a
variant of Marshall's beastie for a project which was marginally
within his published guidelines, and had no problem getting
permission.
On 3/16/07, Karel Ku
On 3/16/07, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wait for 4.2. Sorry, it's not implemented yet. pkg_add doesn't really
know how to compare versions. And in case you're wondering, it's harder
than it seems...
Thankyou so much marc for the reply :-)
In the mean time what would be the best way t
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 19:29 +0100, Almir Karic wrote:
> the {} thingy is strictly text expansion, which means your rules expand to:
>
> pass out on bge0 from to any
> pass out on bge0 from to !
> pass out on bge0 from to any
> pass out on bge0 from to !
>
> if you use ''pfctl -sr'' you will see
Yeah that's what I was thinking... you not only eliminate a single point
of failure, but you also split your pps throughput requirements in half.
Danno
Danno.appliedi.net/drupal/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Martin Toft
Sent: Saturday,
On 3/16/07, Ryan Corder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:09 +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Ryan Corder wrote:
>
> > alternatively, I did this and it seemed to work
> >
> > pass out on bge0 from to { any, ! }
> > pass out on bge0 from to { any, ! }
>
> The above is an overkill
> Is it true that Puffy is not here because of Theo's concerns about
> his copyrighted Puffy logo?
> http://misc.allbsd.de/Kampagnen/NoBlob/NoBlob-en-Poster.jpg
No. That is false. Whoever told you that lied to you.
> I also couldn't use Puffy logo on Ronja because then I wouldn't be able to
>
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it true that Puffy is not here because of Theo's concerns about
his copyrighted Puffy logo?
http://misc.allbsd.de/Kampagnen/NoBlob/NoBlob-en-Poster.jpg
I also couldn't use Puffy logo on Ronja because then I wouldn't be able to talk
about Op
On 3/16/07, Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip blah blah blah...]
After all the kvetching and sensationalism that's characterized both
this thread and the release of this errata, there's a few things I
wanted to point out. Theo's already put out the timeline and
circumstances around
On Mar 16, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> I think Theo should stop being paranoid about his Puffy.
You don't understand! Theo's just trying to protect us. Handling the
deadly
pufferfish is very dangerous, and best left to experts!
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute P
Is it true that Puffy is not here because of Theo's concerns about
his copyrighted Puffy logo?
http://misc.allbsd.de/Kampagnen/NoBlob/NoBlob-en-Poster.jpg
I also couldn't use Puffy logo on Ronja because then I wouldn't be able to talk
about OpenBSD negatively if it came out there is some serious p
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:50:45PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried today to update my packages with the
>
> $sudo pkg_add -ui
>
> command.
>
> I found that it selected lower versions of the packages automatically :-(
> as senn in the sample below.
>
>
> Candidates for updating vim
On 3/16/07, Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 08:15:18]:
> I don't see how your excuses apply here.
>
I can't help this =) : I noticed your quote about metaphysics. Well
it's metaphysically ridiculous to even expect excuses from people
who
Miod Vallat wrote:
PS Besides the aac stuff I noticed "marc-20070203". What is "marc"?
MARC is a top secret project only US government agencies and their
contractors know about.
The name stands for :
Moderately
Advanced
Rumours
Creator
and is being used as part of an evil conspiracy
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Miod Vallat wrote:
PS Besides the aac stuff I noticed "marc-20070203". What is "marc"?
MARC is a top secret project only US government agencies and their
contractors know about.
The name stands for :
Moderately
Advanced
Rumours
Creator
and is being used as part of an e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/16/2007 02:40:38 PM:
[...]
> > > I'm working on a patch. The hold up is digging through restore to
make
> > > sure I do this correctly. No point in frogging up dumpinomap,
> > > dumpdirmap, and usedinomap if restore doesn't do what you expect.
> >
> > Why should t
* Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 12:09:28]:
>
> In other operating system the concept of upgrading is straightforward -
> Windows
> ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you type a magic sequence of magic
> commands and your system is up to date. But in OpenBSD it seems that
* tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 08:15:18]:
> I don't see how your excuses apply here.
>
I can't help this =) : I noticed your quote about metaphysics. Well
it's metaphysically ridiculous to even expect excuses from people
who owe you nothing.
> If Theo made a mistake by not sen
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:09 +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Ryan Corder wrote:
>
> > alternatively, I did this and it seemed to work
> >
> > pass out on bge0 from to { any, ! }
> > pass out on bge0 from to { any, ! }
>
> The above is an overkill equivalent to
>
> pass out on bge0 from to any
>
PS Besides the aac stuff I noticed "marc-20070203". What is "marc"?
MARC is a top secret project only US government agencies and their
contractors know about.
The name stands for :
Moderately
Advanced
Rumours
Creator
and is being used as part of an evil conspiracy to reduce the signa
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:52:44AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:26:23AM +, Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Reading the security advisory for the ipv6 buffer issue, the
> > workaround is to block inet6 traffi
Hi,
Could someone who submit dmesg with GA-M61PM-S2 motherboard be so kind
and send it to me off the list with `sysctl hw' output. Thanks in advance.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:30:33PM -0600, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: src
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2
On 3/15/07, x x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I on
> Ok, I'm using 4.0 from the FTP install for the sets, I still have find
> how to get the ports installed, and wanted to see if, and how, to get K
> 3.5.6 installed, or should I just use what's ever in the ftp directory
> for 4.0.
So you d
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
I am not following anything
That's obvious.
- just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD.
What should
I follow, then?
In other operating system the concept of upgrading is
straightforward - Windows
ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you t
On Mar 16, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
You're welcome to use my unsupported -stable kernel that I make
available for aac users. Please read the aac.README for more
details.
http://colo2.dixongroup.net/releases/unsupported/4.0-
stable-20
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
> A nice newbie site explaining this with examples is www.openbsd101.com, if
you
> don't understand the OpenBSD FAQ.
Thanks for posting that one. It hadn't turned up in any of my searches
and if it was in any documents I already looked at, I must have
> In other operating system the concept of upgrading is straightforward -
> Windows
> ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you type a magic sequence of
> magic
> commands and your system is up to date.
In OpenBSD, you type a logical sequence of logical commands and your system
is up to date
2007/3/16, Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 03/16/2007 02:51:48 AM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
Expectations aside, being condescending is never warranted.
> Both
> Karl and Martin did just that.
I did not intend to be condesending and apologise if it
was taken that way.
Same here. It was a sta
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
You're welcome to use my unsupported -stable kernel that I make available for
aac users. Please read the aac.README for more details.
http://colo2.dixongroup.net/releases/unsupported/4.0-stable-20070314/i386/
P.S. As Joachim mentions, you have to trus
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070316 03:58]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15/03/2007 19:26:48:
>
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > Trying to dump a filesystem with nodump flags on some folders results
> in
> > > these folders been dumped anyway, even on higher leve
On 03/16/2007 02:51:48 AM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
Expectations aside, being condescending is never warranted.
Both
Karl and Martin did just that.
I did not intend to be condesending and apologise if it
was taken that way.
Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay fo
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 12:09, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> I am not following anything - just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD. What
> should I follow, then?
That's your choice.
If you just want a stable and reliable OpenBSD then install -release (that's
what you did). If you want to keep it pa
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:09:28PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
| I am not following anything - just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD. What
should
| I follow, then?
|
| In other operating system the concept of upgrading is straightforward -
Windows
| ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you type
* Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 12:24]:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:23:59 +0100
> Frank Tegtmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The article claims that the OpenBSD developers tried to deny that the
> > ICMPv6 bug is a remotely exploitable security hole.
>
> Aha. Slow newsday in German
Hello,
I've recently got a ral-based card and I have a problem in IBSS mode.
It seems that ral fails to send any kind of packets larger than
200 bytes (192 bytes + 8 bytes icmp header).
I want to use my ral-based card to connect to the "freifunk" network in
Berlin, Germany. ("Freifunk" can be rou
You need to read the FAQ :
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade40.html
Read the ENTIRE FAQ, because it's there for a GOOD reason.
Marius
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrot
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
