[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Dear Chase Customer,
For the User Agreement, Section 9, we may immediately issue a warning,
temporarily suspend, indefinitely suspend or terminate your membership
and refuse to provide our services to you if we believe that your actions
may cause financial loss or legal
Original message
>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:24:09 -0400
>From: Craig Shue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: ISAKMPD dies during phase 1
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>Greetings,
>
>I am attempting to have two OpenBSD boxes communicate via IPSec. I have
>configured them to use ISAKMPD to negotia
I've been breaking and rebuilding my RAID so I know what to do later...
I popped out a disk and booted, and the hot spare kicked in. Bioctl
nicely showed the status, etc. After everything was good again I
rebooted. The drive I'd popped was back in and marked unused. Cool. I
used "bioctl -H" to mak
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:46:17PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
> 24912 fsck_ffs GIO fd 4 wrote 32 bytes
>"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"
> 24912 fsck_ffs RET write 16384/0x4000
> 24912 fsck_ffs CALL munmap(0x861e3000,0x4000)
> 24912 fsck_ffs RET mu
Greetings,
I am attempting to have two OpenBSD boxes communicate via IPSec. I have
configured them to use ISAKMPD to negotiate the connection, using PSK.
Unfortunately, isakmpd on one of the boxes dies in phase 1's
negotiation. For both machines, I am using OpenBSD 3.8 on an i386
architecture.
I
Gidday...
Here is a rangi network topology:
__INTERNET__
| | |
| | |
|___SWITCH__|
|
|
Ok, so GW2 is SERVERS default gateway. I need to port forward incoming
port 80 internet traffic to SERVER an ALL gateways, eg, from 3 seperate
network conne
On 9/13/06, Monah Baki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I just received 8 public IP addresses from my ISP. I'm running
> ppp on my OpenBSD 3.9 server (DSL).
> My xl0 has the public IP address (67.100.x.x) provided to me by my ISP, my
> xl1 interface is my 192.168.3.1
> Once I ru
Stuart Henderson wrote:
...
> and, if you use a snapshot,
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade40.htXXml
not yet, please...this file is unlinked for a reason.
Not only is this file untested, it is blatantly incomplete (and
previously, it was blatantly wrong).
If you wish to get a head-start, watch
I plan to configure a device to boot from a CF card, but to reduce writes to
the CF, run /tmp /var and /dev from a memory (mfs) drive.
When preping the device, I copy the contents of the /var directory to another
directory path. When 'swap mfs' in the fstab file mounts the mfs drive, the
conte
> In the passive modes session, i counted 4 pf rules being added, as
> also in the active modes. But reading ftp-proxy(8) i can see the
> following reference:
>
> I.e., two rules for active mode and three for passive mode. I could
> not understand what happened to the others listed in the source
I posted about my mbuf leak problem earlier, but I thought I'd chime in
again.
For those without uptimes, the mbuf usage depends on the uptime of the
system and is pretty meaningless if you just restarted.
Uptime:
1:30AM up 8 days, 5:12, 0 users, load averages: 0.13, 0.11, 0.08
Netstat -m:
125
On Thursday 14 September 2006 16:54, Paul Irofti wrote:
> I use both on a daily basis, but I'll use vim every time I get the
> chance because it's simply faster than vi when it comes to editing.
Well it's certanly been that for me too. Of course, I even still remember some
of the control keys for
On 14/09/06, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Bash should be bashed. Its horrible garbage and should be banned from the
face
> of this earth. We all know that real men use ksh.
>
what you really meant was `real men use csh/tcsh' right ? :-)
Yep, I don't get
I use both on a daily basis, but I'll use vim every time I get the
chance because it's simply faster than vi when it comes to editing.
On 9/13/06, Andrew Dalgleish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:49:29PM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
> I don't get very emotional about either one and try to keep things simple. I'm
> curious to see how many not equally hard core users prefer vi over vim when
> having a choice.
I use vim reluctanctly, but only because nvi lacks utf-8 support which
is a must have for me.
--
Sebastian A. Liem
On 9/14/06, Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
Does anything in OpenBSD use SSE instructions by default ?
I mean kernel, userland, ports.
Particularly I need to know if SSE3 instructions are/may be used and
by what part of the system.
you can use them in userland.
One thing i could not understand, the ftp-proxy.c file has the following lines:
int
server_parse(struct session *s)
{
struct sockaddr *client_sa, *orig_sa, *proxy_sa, *server_sa;
int prepared = 0;
if (s->cmd == CMD_NONE || linelen < 4 || linebuf[0] != '2')
got
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 21:49, Don Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:39:53 +
>
> Deanna Phillips wrote:
> > Michael Schmidt writes:
> > > which experiences or what knowledge are/is available
> > > concerning good and secure forum-software known to run under
> > > OpenBSD? I am interest
When I first got into linux and openbsd, I thought vi sucked. Then by reading
linuxtoday.com I ran into some articles about vi. One was from the creator of
vi and he explained why vi is the way it is (it was written in the days when
you didn't have a monitor, just a telepromptor). Then another a
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:38:35AM -0500, Karle, Chris wrote:
> Is anyone using a Realtek 8139 card with OpenBSD 3.9? I noticed that mbufs
> will slowly leak when using it. I noticed this after switching to 3.9. I
I have 2 rl and 1 sk interface in my AMD64 machine, and this works fine.
Home us
Hello
Does anything in OpenBSD use SSE instructions by default ?
I mean kernel, userland, ports.
Particularly I need to know if SSE3 instructions are/may be used and
by what part of the system.
Anyone ?
--
Regards
Piotr Kapczuk
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:53:04PM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
> Over the years one gets used to some small things that makes life easier but
> is only slowly catching up on OBSD. I'm curious as why this is. Is it that
> real coders don't need some of them, or is it just something like a matter of
On Thursday 14 September 2006 11:49, Matthew Jenove wrote:
> steve szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe I'm different in that I like change.
>
> Who cares?
>
> Why is this thread still being discussed? Install ViM and bash, and
> alias "ifconfig" to "ifconfig -A", and /you/ have /your/ perf
On 9/14/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 03:40:59PM +0200, viq wrote:
> Hmm, I found something that could be interesting... Apparently QEMU
> images support encryption when the image is in qcow format. From the
> man page it seems it's 128 bit AES encryption
I forgot to mention that my rl interface is on a cable modem, which tends to
have a lot of ARP traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Abel Talaversn Estevez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:14 AM
To: Karle, Chris
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: mbuf leak with
I mentioned this in a different post too; I should have included it in my
original message.
My rl interface is on a cable modem, which tend to be very chatty with ARP
traffic. The output of netstat -m ever increases; I ran a cronjob which
captured it. After about 10-12 days the network would die
"Stefan Sczekalla-Waldschmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pinging to somewhere ( how to get there is known by the gateway ) from
> within 192.168.110.x leads sometimes to a "unreachable" from the _alias_
Why do you think this is "trouble"?
> What can cause such a behaviour ?
That's normal beh
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:38:35AM -0500, Karle, Chris wrote:
> If you're using a "rl*" can you take a look at your mbuf usage (netstat -m)?
> Me and another person both see something similar.
OpenBSD 3.9-stable (i386 GENERIC)
% dmesg | grep rl
rl0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "Realtek 8139" rev 0x1
On Thursday 14 September 2006 17:38, you wrote:
> Is anyone using a Realtek 8139 card with OpenBSD 3.9? I noticed that mbufs
> will slowly leak when using it. I noticed this after switching to 3.9. I
> don't know if something happened to the card or not... maybe there is a
> hardware error now t
El Jueves, 14 de Septiembre de 2006 17:38, escribiC3:
> Is anyone using a Realtek 8139 card with OpenBSD 3.9? I noticed that mbufs
> will slowly leak when using it. I noticed this after switching to 3.9. I
> don't know if something happened to the card or not... maybe there is a
> hardware error
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 03:40:59PM +0200, viq wrote:
> Hmm, I found something that could be interesting... Apparently QEMU
> images support encryption when the image is in qcow format. From the
> man page it seems it's 128 bit AES encryption based on password. So,
> install some very basic system o
On Thursday 14 September 2006 17:38, Karle, Chris wrote:
> Is anyone using a Realtek 8139 card with OpenBSD 3.9? I noticed that mbufs
> will slowly leak when using it. I noticed this after switching to 3.9. I
> don't know if something happened to the card or not... maybe there is a
> hardware er
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:29:49AM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
> (Say what you will about Linux being inferior in ways, it managed
> to do what no other Unice did for all that time -- captured a
> mainstream. A lot of development is being done benefitting most if
> not all Open Source platforms beca
On Thursday 14 September 2006 07:16, you wrote:
> > * Defaulting to bash, easier to use - Implemented.
>
> that one shows the research you did, which would usually save me from
> feeling any reason to respond...
True, it was just a silly assumption when I all of a sudden had keyboard
scroll buff
On Thursday 14 September 2006 07:48, Adriaan wrote:
> On 9/14/06, steve szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Out of date vi, harder to navigate and use, poor visual feedback.
>
> Use an .exrc file
>
> set number
> set ruler
> set verbose
> set showmode
> set showmatch
> set shiftwidth=4
Thanks
On Thursday 14 September 2006 00:10, you wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:53:04 -0400, "steve szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> said:
> > * Defaulting to bash, easier to use - Implemented.
>
> OMG, not this again
> If you like bash install it.
It was simply a perception. I have not even checked b
steve szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe I'm different in that I like change.
Who cares?
Why is this thread still being discussed? Install ViM and bash, and
alias "ifconfig" to "ifconfig -A", and /you/ have /your/ perfect
system.
-mj
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 23:38, you wrote:
> steve szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Not showing all I/F's by default in ifconfig, requiring -A.
>
> This is a good thing. Do you really want every command to just list any
> possible information in a huge mess? Personally, I like to jus
Is anyone using a Realtek 8139 card with OpenBSD 3.9? I noticed that mbufs
will slowly leak when using it. I noticed this after switching to 3.9. I
don't know if something happened to the card or not... maybe there is a
hardware error now that is making it behave funky.
If you're using a "rl*
On Thursday 14 September 2006 02:11, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, steve szmidt wrote:
> > Over the years one gets used to some small things that makes life easier
> > but is only slowly catching up on OBSD. I'm curious as why this is. Is it
> > that real coders don't need some of the
On Thursday 14 September 2006 08:18, Terry wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:49:29PM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
>
>
> > I'm
> > curious to see how many not equally hard core users prefer vi over vim
> > when having a choice.
>
> I'm definately not a "hard core user" but I prefer vi over vim in m
On Thursday 14 September 2006 04:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/09/13 23:49, steve szmidt wrote:
> > My reference to coding with vi/vim means usually working on scripts, and
> > config files.
>
> If you use it more, you'll find the differences get pretty
> annoying when you have to switch be
mickey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 04:02:53PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > > Bash should be bashed. Its horrible garbage and should be banned from
> > > the
> > > face
> > > of this earth. We all know that real men use ksh.
> > >
> > what you really meant w
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 03:04:09AM +0200, Robert Urban wrote:
> if you want to be taken seriously,
Who is going to pay any attention to a top poster
> maybe you should change your
> e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who
> receives your e-mails, in this case, sev
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 04:02:53PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
> >Bash should be bashed. Its horrible garbage and should be banned from the
> >face
> >of this earth. We all know that real men use ksh.
> >
> what you really meant was `real men use csh/tcsh' right ? :-)
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Bash should be bashed. Its horrible garbage and should be banned from the face
of this earth. We all know that real men use ksh.
what you really meant was `real men use csh/tcsh' right ? :-)
On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:57 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
One entry every day:
Sep 10 02:16:58 tma0 /bsd: nfs server amd:16867: not responding
As far as I know I don't have NFS running...
amd(8): "amd operates by attaching itself as an NFS server to
each of the specified directories". mount(8) w
I'm working with a university on a cluster using USB 2.0 network bridge
cables, cdce(4), for node interconnects. The current "cables" are Acer
Labs USB 2.0 Data Link based. Throughput tests indicates a bottleneck at
~74Mbps even with only one cable connected.
I'm interested in knowing if anyone
[IMAGE]
Offre riservie exclusivement aux entreprises.
Conformiment ` la Loi Informatique et Libertis parue au Journal Officiel
du 6 janvier 1978, vous disposez d'un droit d'acchs, de rectification, et
d'opposition aux donnies personnelles vous concernant. Pour ne plus
recevoir d'informations de n
> * Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-14 14:11]:
> > Unless you remove and re-add all your packages, the pkg_*
> > tools won't work as smoothly as they should.
>
> this is untrue.
>
> pkg_add -u does a wonderful job, even on ancient installed packages.
>
> I just had such an upgrade,
Hi bofh,
You about Chris:
> Then I profess I do not understand why you get so pissed off when Adam
> pointed out that phpbb is not good, since apparently you don't consider
> it to be good by your own standards.
I think what Chris was getting all worked up about, was the fact that
Adam chose to s
Hmm, I found something that could be interesting... Apparently QEMU
images support encryption when the image is in qcow format. From the
man page it seems it's 128 bit AES encryption based on password. So,
install some very basic system on it, and have it export some folder
with nfs or samba... Ap
* Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-14 14:11]:
> Unless you remove and re-add all your packages, the pkg_*
> tools won't work as smoothly as they should.
this is untrue.
pkg_add -u does a wonderful job, even on ancient installed packages.
I just had such an upgrade, and only ran into
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 15:12 +0400, Igor Zinovik wrote:
> I have old box which runs OpenBSD 3.6 and i want to upgrade it to last
> release.
> So my question is can go directly to OPENBSD_3_9 or i have to go through all
> further versions (3.6->3.7->3.8->3.9)? I'm worry about that further versions
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> bofh wrote:
> > On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I never said it was secure. In fact, I distinctly recall saying
> >> "hell no" to whether or not I considered phpBB secure. What I
> >> *did* say was that it fit my nee
Hi all,
Andreas wrote that:
I tested throughput with netpipe via cross-over cable and my X40 with
an em0 NIC on the other end:
0.000126 0.060570 8 1 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00
0.000126 0.121240 16 2 0.00 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.00
Could anybody possibly explai
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 07:16:24AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
|Unix machine...it's like notepad in windows or edlin in MSDOS, you need to
|know the core system, and if you really need something else, fine, but
|you have to learn what is on the system. Learn vim, you have learned
|what is in Linux,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:49:29PM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
> I'm
> curious to see how many not equally hard core users prefer vi over vim when
> having a choice.
I'm definately not a "hard core user" but I prefer vi over vim in most
cases. I do install vim and use it with mutt for my emails.
Hi Igor,
> I have old box which runs OpenBSD 3.6 and i want to upgrade it to last
> release. So my question is can go directly to OPENBSD_3_9 or i have to
> go through all further versions (3.6->3.7->3.8->3.9)? I'm worry about
> that further versions switched to new compiler (this box has gcc-2.95
On 2006/09/14 15:12, Igor Zinovik wrote:
> I have old box which runs OpenBSD 3.6 and i want to upgrade
> it to last release.
Don't upgrade by anoncvs, use binary upgrades to get you
as close as possible to the version you want and follow the
steps to upgrade /etc and so on from the FAQ;
http://w
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 07:44:44PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:03:59AM +0200, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> > Well, here it goes again:
> >
> > Issue with my onboard
> > mskc0: "Marvell Yukon 88E8053" Marvell Yukon-2
> >
> > With the newest i386 (quite old btw.) snapshot
On 9/14/06, steve szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Out of date vi, harder to navigate and use, poor visual feedback.
Use an .exrc file
set number
set ruler
set verbose
set showmode
set showmatch
set shiftwidth=4
Hello, OpenBSD-misc readers.
I have old box which runs OpenBSD 3.6 and i want to upgrade it to last release.
So my question is can go directly to OPENBSD_3_9 or i have to go through all
further versions (3.6->3.7->3.8->3.9)? I'm worry about that further versions
switched to new compiler (this box
Anybody considering using any application written in PHP should
consider Marc Espie's option about the PHP language (
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=114664070319490&w=2 )
- quote -
I'm not the maintainer of php itself, but still I have an opinion.
I don't like php, fr
steve szmidt wrote:
> Over the years one gets used to some small things that makes life easier but
> is only slowly catching up on OBSD. I'm curious as why this is. Is it that
> real coders don't need some of them, or is it just something like a matter of
> being a lower priority?
over the year
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:03:59AM +0200, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> Well, here it goes again:
>
> Issue with my onboard
> mskc0: "Marvell Yukon 88E8053" Marvell Yukon-2
>
> With the newest i386 (quite old btw.) snapshot, I can use msk0 without
> any troubles UNTIL I start X on the machine.
> As
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:22:03AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/09/14 11:03, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> > With the newest i386 (quite old btw.) snapshot, I can use msk0 without
> > any troubles UNTIL I start X on the machine.
> > As soon as I do that interrupts go to 99% and everything
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:03:59AM +0200, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> Well, here it goes again:
>
> Issue with my onboard
> mskc0: "Marvell Yukon 88E8053" Marvell Yukon-2
>
> With the newest i386 (quite old btw.) snapshot, I can use msk0 without
> any troubles UNTIL I start X on the machine.
> As
* Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-14 11:27]:
> On 2006/09/14 11:03, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> > With the newest i386 (quite old btw.) snapshot, I can use msk0 without
> > any troubles UNTIL I start X on the machine.
> > As soon as I do that interrupts go to 99% and everything starts
On 2006/09/14 11:03, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> With the newest i386 (quite old btw.) snapshot, I can use msk0 without
> any troubles UNTIL I start X on the machine.
> As soon as I do that interrupts go to 99% and everything starts to crawl
> until I reboot. Pretty much same issue I had before with
Hi,
I have a interface on my default gateway defined as follows:
hostname.dc1:
inet 192.168.110.254 255.255.255.0 192.168.110.255
inet alias 172.22.125.243 255.255.255.240 172.22.125.255
192.168.110.254 is default gw-address in my network.
pinging to somewhere ( how to get there is known by the
Well, here it goes again:
Issue with my onboard
mskc0: "Marvell Yukon 88E8053" Marvell Yukon-2
With the newest i386 (quite old btw.) snapshot, I can use msk0 without
any troubles UNTIL I start X on the machine.
As soon as I do that interrupts go to 99% and everything starts to crawl
until I reboo
> > >>One entry every day:
> > >> Sep 10 02:16:58 tma0 /bsd: nfs server amd:16867: not responding
> > >>
> > >>As far as I know I don't have NFS running...
amd(8): "amd operates by attaching itself as an NFS server to
each of the specified directories". mount(8) would probably tell
you something
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:10:27PM -0500, Doug Carter wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:49 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:08:22PM -0500, Doug Carter wrote:
> >>I really doubt that this is a system problem; I just can't figure out
> >>what stupid thing I have done.
> >>
> >>U
On 2006/09/13 23:49, steve szmidt wrote:
> My reference to coding with vi/vim means usually working on scripts, and
> config files.
If you use it more, you'll find the differences get pretty
annoying when you have to switch between them. I particularly
dislike how the combination of `u' and `.' w
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:45:18AM -0400, Monah Baki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I just received 8 public IP addresses from my ISP. I'm running
> ppp on my OpenBSD 3.9 server (DSL).
> My xl0 has the public IP address (67.100.x.x) provided to me by my ISP, my
> xl1 interface is my 192.168.3.1
>
On 2006/09/14 02:12, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> i am playing with ftp-proxy and could not understand the benefits of
> the new one compared to the previous up to 3.8. Could some one enlight
> me?
> One thing i realized is the number of rules the new version creates on
> run time. Whether this feature is
78 matches
Mail list logo
