On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > bofh wrote: > > On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I never said it was secure. In fact, I distinctly recall saying > >> "hell no" to whether or not I considered phpBB secure. What I > >> *did* say was that it fit my needs, as I laid them out. > > > > Which is "good" to you, but probably isn't "good" to people who are > > specifically interested in OpenBSD for it's security stance. > > Have you considered the possibility that I choose OpenBSD specifically > for its security stance? phpBB runs on any *NIX or Windows, you know.
As I said, I don't trust it to be secure. Then I profess I do not understand why you get so pissed off when Adam pointed out that phpbb is not good, since apparently you don't consider it to be good by your own standards. There are lots of things in my life that I don't consider good, but I don't fly off the handle when others point it out to me. Nor do I demand that they provide me with alternatives.
