Re: [mailop] This is ridiculous

2024-12-28 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 27.12.2024 o godz. 15:49:40 Peter Corlett via mailop pisze: > I have doubts that jumping through the hoops to sign up for Postmaster Tools > would even be a productive use of one's time. I had access to a site's > Webmaster Tools a while back and it told me nothing that somebody with > reasona

Re: [mailop] This is ridiculous

2024-12-28 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 27.12.2024 o godz. 07:47:35 Michael Denney via mailop pisze: > Do you have Google Postmaster Tools > configured for the domain as advised in the complete error > message?It links here: https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] This is ridiculous

2024-12-28 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 27.12.2024 o godz. 13:47:38 Kasper Peeters via mailop pisze: > > If your domain only sends occasional emails to gmail, postmaster tools are > completely useless, as they do not show any information if the volume is > below a certain threshold. This is true as well for similar tools of > other

Re: [mailop] [Admin] Re: This is ridiculous

2024-12-28 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 28.12.2024 o godz. 04:17:51 Ralph Seichter via mailop pisze: > * Michael Denney via mailop: > > > I'm simply replying via my normal mail client. I didn't realize that > > having HTML in my message would cause anyone problems. AFAIK everyone > > these days has an HTML-Capable mail client, but

Re: [mailop] This is ridiculous

2024-12-28 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 27.12.2024 o godz. 10:28:06 John Levine via mailop pisze: > eu.org hands out free subdomains. As its home page notes, it has nothing > to do with the EU. > > As I may have noted once or twice, often free services are worth what you > pay for them. And you are still taking only monetary aspe

Re: [mailop] This is ridiculous

2024-12-28 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 27.12.2024 o godz. 08:42:50 Michael Denney via mailop pisze: > I think that it's doubtful that Google performing anti-spam filtration > based upon statistics Yes, they do. Someone from Google even confirmed it on this list some time ago. Also, based on my previous experiences with sending to

Re: [mailop] Minimum Viable IP Reputation Check for a new IP?

2024-12-28 Thread Florian Effenberger via mailop
Hello, Simplelists - Andy Beverley via mailop wrote on 28.12.24 at 09:56: You could also use a professional service if paying a nominal charge is an option. I can recommend isipp.com - their fees for such a check are very reasonable. I blogged a while ago about all the services I use - but ke

Re: [mailop] Minimum Viable IP Reputation Check for a new IP?

2024-12-28 Thread Simplelists - Andy Beverley via mailop
On 28/12/2024 01:17, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via mailop wrote: Subject says it all, really: what's the minimum you have to do these days to get a new IP (that's not otherwise policied, SMTP portblocked and has working FCRDNS, obviously) past most filters out of the gate, at least past SMTP rejecti

Re: [mailop] Minimum Viable IP Reputation Check for a new IP?

2024-12-28 Thread Michael Peddemors via mailop
Better to check http://mxtoolbox.com and http://hetrixtools.com And 'wellknown' VPS providers can be bad too.. check their overall reputation as well as your own IP address. On 2024-12-27 17:17, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via mailop wrote: Hi guys, Subject says it all, really: what's the minimum y

Re: [mailop] Proposal: automated monthly posting wrt. useful resources

2024-12-28 Thread postfix--- via mailop
On 2024-12-28 06:14, Carsten Schiefner via mailop wrote: So, not a single reaction to the below whatsoever at all should nonetheless also be considered a clear response: I rest my case. sorry, Carsten, for not reading regularly and missing your proposal. I personally would find your initiativ

Re: [mailop] Proposal: automated monthly posting wrt. useful resources

2024-12-28 Thread Al Iverson via mailop
Oh, I meant to reply. Not a bad idea, but also there's a lot of info needed to troubleshoot email delivery issues and I fear the list would grow very long very quickly. Not quite the same thing, but my blog already has 500k+ words on the topic. Or maybe a more directory-oriented website, like https

Re: [mailop] Proposal: automated monthly posting wrt. useful resources

2024-12-28 Thread Carsten Schiefner via mailop
So, not a single reaction to the below whatsoever at all should nonetheless also be considered a clear response: I rest my case. Best, -C. On 18.12.2024 13:22, Carsten Schiefner via mailop wrote: Folks, Oliver's posting below got me thinking about a regular, probably monthly summary

Re: [mailop] This is ridiculous

2024-12-28 Thread Benny Pedersen via mailop
Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop skrev den 2024-12-28 10:42: Dnia 27.12.2024 o godz. 07:47:35 Michael Denney via mailop pisze: Do you have Google Postmaster Tools configured for the domain as advised in the complete error message?It links here:  Of course I do. As usual in such cases (at least for me

Re: [mailop] This is ridiculous

2024-12-28 Thread Alain D D Williams via mailop
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 01:09:58PM +0100, Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote: > it would be nice that mlm did convert html to plain text, or simply reject > html posters The other thing about reading the text/plain attachment of email is no vulnerability exposure due to the HTML downloading some fil

[mailop] [ADMIN] Stop it, please.

2024-12-28 Thread Graeme Fowler via mailop
Hi all Bear in mind here that I’m still being treated with chemotherapy and this makes me exceedingly grumpy - more so than usual - so this entire discussion has started to wear me down. Some guidance to think about before deciding to mention anything else - and yes, this will feel like I’m sin