On Sun, 22 Sep 2024, Corey H via mailop wrote:
Hello gurus,
Besides pobox.com and dnsexit.com, do you know any good smtp gateway for
relaying out my messages? daily sending amount is about 3k ~ 5k (just legit
messages).
the two I mentioned are not bad, but they have small limits on sending
On 22Sep24, Marco Moock apparently wrote:
> Am 22.09.2024 um 09:18:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Delany via mailop:
> > and a lot of false negatives on ipv6, but otherwise it seems
> > pretty solid.
>
> They don't support IPv6 at all, so no spamtrap can be hit via IPv6.
Yes, that uceprotect ignores half t
Am 22.09.2024 um 09:18:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Delany via mailop:
> TLDR; uceprotect looks like it generates a lot of false positives on
> ipv4
If you use level2/3 you will of course have false-positive, as stated
in their documentation.
> and a lot of false negatives on ipv6, but otherwise it seems
On 22Sep24, Bastian Blank via mailop apparently wrote:
> > Ditto, they aggressively list Aussie Broadband's entire AS,
> > https://www.uceprotect.net/en/rblcheck.php?ipr=144.6.86.210
>
> UCEProtect lists this ip in Level 2. So this not about the single IP,
According to https://www.uceprotect
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 1:35 AM Corey H via mailop
wrote:
> Hello gurus,
>
> Besides pobox.com and dnsexit.com, do you know any good smtp gateway for
> relaying out my messages? daily sending amount is about 3k ~ 5k (just
> legit messages).
>
> the two I mentioned are not bad, but they have small
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 22 Sep 2024 09:14:17 +0200 Bastian Blank via mailop
napísal:
> UCEProtect lists this ip in Level 2. So this not about the single IP,
> but the whole net block (it even tells you, it's about 144.6.0.0/16).
> And I found listings in Abusix for adresses within this block by
> simple
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 09:14:17AM +0200, Bastian Blank via mailop wrote:
> > > I might not advocate for UCEProtect as a source of truth for anything.
> > > But that's just my €0.02.
> >
> > Ditto, they aggressively list Aussie Broadband's entire AS,
> > https://www.uceprotect.net/en/rblcheck.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 04:37:54PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 09:25:36AM +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> > > Get a Linux machine in an AS that doesn't host abusers (check the AS
> > > using http://www.uceprotect.net/de/rblcheck.php) and install yo
[No private replies required, list only is fine.]
> It [UCEProtect, ed.] is a really good indicator how many abusive
> IPv4 systems are in an AS.
I am questioning their methods, their data sources, and their evaluations.
It is guaranteed that they don't have visibility into everything (I am
sayi
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 09:25:36AM +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> > Get a Linux machine in an AS that doesn't host abusers (check the AS
> > using http://www.uceprotect.net/de/rblcheck.php) and install your MTA there.
>
> I might not advocate for UCEProtect as a source of truth for an
Am 22.09.2024 um 09:25:36 Uhr schrieb Atro Tossavainen via mailop:
> > Get a Linux machine in an AS that doesn't host abusers (check the AS
> > using http://www.uceprotect.net/de/rblcheck.php) and install your MTA
> > there.
>
> I might not advocate for UCEProtect as a source of truth for anyt
> Get a Linux machine in an AS that doesn't host abusers (check the AS
> using http://www.uceprotect.net/de/rblcheck.php) and install your MTA there.
I might not advocate for UCEProtect as a source of truth for anything.
But that's just my €0.02.
--
Atro Tossavainen, Founder, Partner
Koli-Lõks O
Am Sun, 22 Sep 2024 00:06 schrieb Corey H:
> Besides pobox.com and dnsexit.com, do you know any good smtp gateway
> for relaying out my messages? daily sending amount is about 3k ~ 5k
> (just legit messages).
Why don't you operate your own server?
Get a Linux machine in an AS that doesn't host a
My volume's about the same as Corey's. Maybe a hair lower.
My ISP renumbered my MTA a few months ago so I moved my outbound to
Amazon SES to avoid the pain of lost sender reputation. (I blogged
about that here: https://xnnd.com/ct6y )
It works, but it took a bit of getting used to. They do rewrit
It appears that Corey H via mailop said:
>I expect it should be a pure smtp relay, change nothing in headers. We
>can pay for it.
I have looked and found nothing. For fairly obvious reasons, relays
are picky about what they allow, and while your set of random mail may
be nice, someone else's tha
Hello gurus,
Besides pobox.com and dnsexit.com, do you know any good smtp gateway for
relaying out my messages? daily sending amount is about 3k ~ 5k (just
legit messages).
the two I mentioned are not bad, but they have small limits on sending
amount.
other relays I have tried include smtp
16 matches
Mail list logo
