Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2015 um 16:56:32, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-05, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2015 um 12:43:12, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
>
...
> > No, the tests do not have any special naming. As they are a subset of
> > revertedTests their name star
On 2015-11-05, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2015 um 12:43:12, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
...
>> > (from here on it matches revertedTests)
>> iv. Prepend INVERTED... to testname. Revert test verification.
>> > Now calling ctest with '-L export' selects tests with label 'expor
Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2015 um 12:43:12, schrieb Guenter Milde
> Dear Kornel,
>
> thank you for the explanation. I come a bit nearer to a generic
> understanding now.
>
> On 2015-11-05, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2015 um 07:34:47, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
>
> > .
Dear Kornel,
thank you for the explanation. I come a bit nearer to a generic
understanding now.
On 2015-11-05, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2015 um 07:34:47, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> ...
>> > It is suspended _only_ if you select testcases with the '-L' parameter.
>> OK. M
Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2015 um 07:34:47, schrieb Guenter Milde
...
> > It is suspended _only_ if you select testcases with the '-L' parameter.
>
> OK. My idea was that suspended testcases are skipped by default.
Let me sketch our use of '-L' parameter.
This should answer also your remark in
On 2015-11-04, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 19:27:06, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
>> On 2015-11-04, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 15:36:45, schrieb Guenter Milde
>> >
>> ...
>> >> Not only, with "suspending" I also mean "The outcome is of no v
Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 19:27:06, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-04, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 15:36:45, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
>
> ...
>
> >> Not only, with "suspending" I also mean "The outcome is of no value for
> >> finding new bugs or regres
On 2015-11-04, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 15:36:45, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
...
>> Not only, with "suspending" I also mean "The outcome is of no value for
>> finding new bugs or regressions until someone solves the known bug ...".
> OK.
>> However, we usually know
Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 15:36:45, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-04, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --]
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 14:36:19, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> >
> >> > In my view, suspension is orthogonal to reversion:
>
On 2015-11-04, Kornel Benko wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --]
> Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 14:36:19, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
>
>> > In my view, suspension is orthogonal to reversion:
>> >
>> > - normal: we want the test to pass
>> > revert: we want the test to f
Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 14:36:19, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > In my view, suspension is orthogonal to reversion:
> >
> > - normal: we want the test to pass
> > revert: we want the test to fail
>
> You mean: revert is that "it is known to fail", but we haven't fixed it yet.
Y
> In my view, suspension is orthogonal to reversion:
>
> - normal: we want the test to pass
> revert: we want the test to fail
You mean: revert is that "it is known to fail", but we haven't fixed it yet.
>
> - normal: run the test
> suspend: skip the test temporarily
> ignore: skip the
On 2015-11-04, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 09:30:03, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
>> On 2015-11-02, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > Am 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
>> >> On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> >> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100,
Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015 um 09:30:03, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-02, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >> On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> >> Am 1. November
Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 08:39:59, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Good point. On the other hand, if we make regex changes then it is
> > harder to revert them. Problems have come up before of us
> > misconstructing the regexes.
>
> If possible, make se
On 2015-11-02, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
>> On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> >> Am 1. November 2015 um 21:27:11, schrieb Guenter Milde
>> >> > Could we introduce a new sta
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:36:02PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 21:31:12, schrieb Kornel Benko
> > Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 11:21:09, schrieb Kornel Benko
> >
> > > Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
> > >
> > > > Dear Scott and
Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 21:31:12, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 11:21:09, schrieb Kornel Benko
> > Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
> > > Dear Scott and Kornel,
> > >
> > > On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov
Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 11:21:09, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> > Dear Scott and Kornel,
> >
> > On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > >> Am Sonntag, 1. Nove
Am Montag, 2. November 2015 um 08:36:05, schrieb Guenter Milde
> Dear Scott and Kornel,
>
> On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:27:11, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >>
>
> >> > Could we intro
On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Good point. On the other hand, if we make regex changes then it is
> harder to revert them. Problems have come up before of us
> misconstructing the regexes.
If possible, make separate regexp patterns for separate "fail reasons".
Then, we just have to delet
Dear Scott and Kornel,
On 2015-11-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:27:11, schrieb Guenter Milde
>>
>> > Could we introduce a new status "suspended" - meaning just skip the
>> > test until a known bug
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:31:32PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-11-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:41PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >> >
>
> >>
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:39:24PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> I have to be convinced.
Fair. I think that whenever tests fail the burden is on those who wish
to invert or temporarily ignore the tests. I am not proud to be on the
dark side of wanting to invert the tests, but I think that is where
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:05:06PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> My argument is not that they do not belong into the set of reverted, but I'd
> like them
> to be checked first.
> They will be included with the appropriate comment.
+1
Scott
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:48:28PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-11-01, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Most of these tests were working some time ago.
>
> Many of them "by chance": not failing but with incorrect output (Missing
> characters, wrong characters) or "fragile" (working, but would fa
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:27:11, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> > Could we introduce a new status "suspended" - meaning just skip the test
> > until a known bug is solved as we know the result is insignificant until
> > then?
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:07:02PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Does it mean 'delay 2.2 alpha'?
>
> I don't think so. 2.1 has language nesting bugs as well, and the more simple
> cases do work. But we should probably mention that there are known language
> nesting bugs i
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:14:53PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 19:37:41, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> > On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Solving all issues that arise from this combination is diverting attention
> > and ressources from more important tasks.
>
On 2015-11-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:41PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>> >
>> > Besides we have ATM about 200 failing export test cases.
>> Too many to b
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:48:28, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-01, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 19:37:41, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
> >> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> > Besides we have ATM about 200 failing export test cases.
>
> .
On 2015-11-01, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 19:37:41, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
>> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
...
>> > Besides we have ATM about 200 failing export test cases.
...
>> How many of these are for the obscure combination of Xetex and Tex fonts?
>> Wh
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:27:11, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-01, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> >> Optimist (I mean 'usable state').
> >> I am strongly against such policy. First one has to check if the reason is
> >> really babel/polyglossia conflict.
> >> There a
On 2015-11-01, Georg Baum wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Optimist (I mean 'usable state').
>> I am strongly against such policy. First one has to check if the reason is
>> really babel/polyglossia conflict.
>> There are already too many tests inverted, no one cares anymore.
> We have a chicken a
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:46:00, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>>
>> We have a chicken and egg problem here. I started to work on the language
>> nesting stuff, and fixing this without introducing regressions is
>> impossible without creating specific test cases first. So,
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:46:00, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Optimist (I mean 'usable state').
> > I am strongly against such policy. First one has to check if the reason is
> > really babel/polyglossia conflict.
> > There are already too many tests inverted, no one c
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Optimist (I mean 'usable state').
> I am strongly against such policy. First one has to check if the reason is
> really babel/polyglossia conflict.
> There are already too many tests inverted, no one cares anymore.
We have a chicken and egg problem here. I started to work on
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 15:00:25, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:41PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> > >
> > > Besides we have ATM about 200 failing exp
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 19:37:41, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:11:52PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> > On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> >
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:41PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > Besides we have ATM about 200 failing export test cases.
>
> Too many to be helpfull.
I don't understand this logic.
On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:11:52PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> > On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> >
>> > ..
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:14:39PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 28 Oktober 2015, 11:31:38 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > It may be that we need a new keyword for lib/languages, to tag
> > > languages where Babel is superior to Polyglossia also with non-TeX fonts.
> > >
> > > Then
Am Mittwoch 28 Oktober 2015, 11:31:38 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > It may be that we need a new keyword for lib/languages, to tag
> > languages where Babel is superior to Polyglossia also with non-TeX fonts.
> >
> > Then, the "automatic" setting (which is also the default "default") could
> > take
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:11:52PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > >> However, if the exit status of
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:11:52PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> However, if the exit status of an export test changes (from fail to
> >> pass or vice versa), we should check wh
On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
...
>> However, if the exit status of an export test changes (from fail to
>> pass or vice versa), we should check whether this is due to a new bug,
>> a fix or just exposing previously hidden p
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:36:57PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Unit tests are almost always worth the effort. When I implement one, it does
> almost always find a bug right away. See also the check_lstrings failure
> Vincent reported and http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9799. Having these bugs
> fo
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
>> I think we have to distinguish several test methods:
>>
>> a) automatic export tests with lots of "real life" documents (manuals,
>>templates, examples)
>>
>> b) functional tests: import/export of a
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:46:58AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> Yes, I understood this. But for the first try I didn't want to run it in
> parallel.
> I've observed that e.g. kpsewhich is used heavily while testing and one call
> took ~10ms.
> Perhaps there is some tuning possible?
My guess i
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:24:23AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These
> > tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents
> > that users have that compile with LyX 2
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> Could this prevent some of the regressions? (We need to look carefully, not
>
On 2015-10-27, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> A proper fix would be to use lib/unicodesymbols for the content of the
>> hypersetup.
> It has been discussed in the past to use lib/unicodesymbols replacements for
> the preamble, but there was some important reason not to do it (which
Guenter Milde wrote:
> A proper fix would be to use lib/unicodesymbols for the content of the
> hypersetup.
It has been discussed in the past to use lib/unicodesymbols replacements for
the preamble, but there was some important reason not to do it (which I
forgot unfortunately). Searching the l
On 2015-10-27, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 27.10.2015 um 13:42 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 13:29:35, schrieb Stephan Witt
>>
>>> One interesting example of a failure is as follows:
>>> ==
>>> 350/4621 Testing: export/doc/Math_pdf4_texF
>> It is simply not compil
Am 27.10.2015 um 13:42 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 13:29:35, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
>> One interesting example of a failure is as follows:
>>
>> ==
>> 350/4621 Testing: export/doc/Math_pdf4_texF
>
> It is simply not compilable with xelatex. At least here.
Be
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 13:29:35, schrieb Stephan Witt
> One interesting example of a failure is as follows:
>
> ==
> 350/4621 Testing: export/doc/Math_pdf4_texF
It is simply not compilable with xelatex. At least here.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Am 27.10.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 10:46:58, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
>> Am 27.10.2015 um 10:13 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 00:48:44, schrieb Stephan Witt
>>>
Am 26.10.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Kornel Benko :
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 10:46:58, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 27.10.2015 um 10:13 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 00:48:44, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >
> >> Am 26.10.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> >>
> >>> Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 11:43:07, schr
Am 27.10.2015 um 10:13 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 00:48:44, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
>> Am 26.10.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>>
>>> Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 11:43:07, schrieb Stephan Witt
>>>
Am 26.10.2015 um 09:46 schrieb Kornel Benko :
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 00:48:44, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 26.10.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 11:43:07, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >
> >> Am 26.10.2015 um 09:46 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> >>
> >>> They are started, because otherwise you would n
Am 26.10.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 11:43:07, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
>> Am 26.10.2015 um 09:46 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>>
>>> They are started, because otherwise you would not see 'out of 199'.
>>> What was your exact test command?
>>
>> This is the co
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> OK. Do you agree that this is not a blocker for alpha?
Yes.
Georg
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:40:06PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These
> > tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents
> > that users have that compile with LyX 2.1.x suddenly fail
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These
> tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents
> that users have that compile with LyX 2.1.x suddenly fail to compile
> with LyX 2.2.0 because of edd37de8. In this sense, there
On 2015-10-26, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
...
>> Could this prevent some of the regressions? (We need to look carefully, not
>> only if the relevant documents compile without error, but also if the
>> ex
Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 11:43:07, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 26.10.2015 um 09:46 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 09:13:44, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >
> > ...
> >>> These tests fails because of language switching done with polyglossia,
> >>> but I'm not sure what
Am 26.10.2015 um 09:46 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 09:13:44, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
> ...
>>> These tests fails because of language switching done with polyglossia, but
>>> I'm not sure what the root problem is:
>>> export/doc/fr/UserGuide_pdf5_systemF
>>> export/exa
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These
>> tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents
>> that users have that compile with LyX 2.1.x sudden
On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These
> tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents
> that users have that compile with LyX 2.1.x suddenly fail to compile
> with LyX 2.2.0 because of edd37de8. In th
Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 09:13:44, schrieb Stephan Witt
...
> > These tests fails because of language switching done with polyglossia, but
> > I'm not sure what the root problem is:
> > export/doc/fr/UserGuide_pdf5_systemF
> > export/examples/fr/Foils_pdf5_systemF
> > # kluwer gives the fol
Am 25.10.2015 um 05:29 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> Dear all,
>
> There seems to be more interest in running the export tests. This is great and
> will encourage me to improve the (shamefully lacking) documentation for these
> tests.
>
> First, I am focusing on the test results after reverting (l
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:10:56AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > The following tests are currently expected to fail because of issues with
> > nested language handling and polyglossia. Georg, if you still have
> > interest and time for fixing this type of issue, take a lo
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The following tests are currently expected to fail because of issues with
> nested language handling and polyglossia. Georg, if you still have
> interest and time for fixing this type of issue, take a look at these:
>
> export/doc/nb/Intro_pdf5_systemF
> export/doc/sk/Int
Dear all,
There seems to be more interest in running the export tests. This is great and
will encourage me to improve the (shamefully lacking) documentation for these
tests.
First, I am focusing on the test results after reverting (locally) two commits,
as follows:
git revert --no-edit 664ef2c
74 matches
Mail list logo
