On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:07:02PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Does it mean 'delay 2.2 alpha'? > > I don't think so. 2.1 has language nesting bugs as well, and the more simple > cases do work. But we should probably mention that there are known language > nesting bugs in the release notes. It is alpha after all (and I still hope > to get some safe improvement for the beta).
I agree with Georg. I think these issues should not block alpha. It might be reasonable to have a policy of "no failing tests" for beta in the future. This doesn't mean that we fix all bugs. It just means that every test failure was looked at. Maybe we looked at a test and decided it is OK for it to fail so we invert it and thus it no longer fails. Scott
