Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:46:00, schrieb Georg Baum > <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> >> >> We have a chicken and egg problem here. I started to work on the language >> nesting stuff, and fixing this without introducing regressions is >> impossible without creating specific test cases first. So, for this >> particular area of the code, the tests are already unusable, and we >> cannot get it into a good state again without usable tests... > > It is not only you. If our tests were usable at that time, then it would > have been easy to check and set the appropriate tests in reverted drawer.
Definitely. >> In principle I am with Kornel here, but in the current situation I think >> the only option we have is to set up more specific tests, fix the code >> one bug at a time, and then begin to look at the automatic export tests >> again. In the mean time, I don't care too much whether the failing tests >> are inverted or not. > > > Does it mean 'delay 2.2 alpha'? I don't think so. 2.1 has language nesting bugs as well, and the more simple cases do work. But we should probably mention that there are known language nesting bugs in the release notes. It is alpha after all (and I still hope to get some safe improvement for the beta). Georg
