Dear all, There seems to be more interest in running the export tests. This is great and will encourage me to improve the (shamefully lacking) documentation for these tests.
First, I am focusing on the test results after reverting (locally) two commits, as follows: git revert --no-edit 664ef2c4 1523fc60 If you do not revert these two commits, many tests will fail and it will be hard to figure out when there are regressions. To run all the tests successfully, you need to have a lot of dependencies (even if you have a full TeX Live installation). Thus, you might just want to limit your running of the tests to our manuals, and exclude the templates and examples. To do that, you can do something like: ctest -R "doc/" If you are interested in whether a certain patch breaks anything, feel free to let me or Kornel know and we will do our best to run the tests before and after your change and see if any test suggests a regression. The following tests are currently expected to fail because of issues with nested language handling and polyglossia. Georg, if you still have interest and time for fixing this type of issue, take a look at these: export/doc/nb/Intro_pdf5_systemF export/doc/sk/Intro_pdf5_systemF export/doc/es/Customization_pdf5_systemF export/doc/de/Customization_pdf5_systemF export/doc/fr/Customization_pdf5_systemF I'm not sure but these might also suffer from a similar problem: export/examples/seminar_pdf5_systemF export/examples/fr/seminar_pdf5_systemF These tests fails because of language switching done with polyglossia, but I'm not sure what the root problem is: export/doc/fr/UserGuide_pdf5_systemF export/examples/fr/Foils_pdf5_systemF # kluwer gives the following error with polyglossia: # LaTeX Error: Command \ifdef already defined. export/templates/kluwer_pdf5_systemF Please let me (or Kornel) know if you have any questions. Scott
