On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:40:06PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These > > tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents > > that users have that compile with LyX 2.1.x suddenly fail to compile > > with LyX 2.2.0 because of edd37de8. In this sense, there is a > > regression. > > Sorry, then I mixed this up.
Well it is a confusing situation with the tests. I might make a new ticket that makes it clear what the current state of this "regression" is and target it for 2.2.0. > This should of course be fixed for the release > IMO. I'll try to find out what is still missing. OK. Do you agree that this is not a blocker for alpha? Scott
