On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 03:00:54PM +0800, Matthias Diehl wrote:
> It indicates that the outline menu cannot handle multiple documents.
This is indeed currently the case and having "Keep" working
in more robust way would require to rewrite the logic how
ToC currently works.
Pavel
Dear developers,
I do not necessarily want to subscribe to this list.
I simply have the following bug report:
The keep toggle-switch in the outline menu (sometimes) doesn't keep.
You can reproduce it by opening a document where you can expand the outline
from section to subsecti
On 2023-09-23 21:09, Daniel wrote:
On 2023-09-23 18:50, Dan via lyx-users wrote:
Is there a way to delete an outline entry? A right-click on the entry
does
not offer that option and the delete key removes characters in the
chapter/section title, not the chapter/section itself.
I do not see
Le 05/12/2021 à 05:40, sovhist a écrit :
I opended Lyx, hugenote document, scrolled one huge inset up and down, cliced
to other tab and scrolled usual document, after returned to hugenote and
scrolled a bit, if I remember properly.
flame_1 is TextMetrics selected from first hugenote
scrolling an
On 2022-05-19 07:27, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Wed, 18 May 2022 21:18:29 -0400
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:29:24PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:28:11 +0100
schrieb Kornel Benko :
1.) open UserGuide.lyx
2.) open outline, select Table of Contents
Am Wed, 18 May 2022 21:18:29 -0400
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:29:24PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:28:11 +0100
> > schrieb Kornel Benko :
> >
> > > 1.) open UserGuide.lyx
> > > 2.) open outline, sele
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:29:24PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:28:11 +0100
> schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > 1.) open UserGuide.lyx
> > 2.) open outline, select Table of Contents
> > 3.) select A.9.1 (this is only to move the cursor,
> &
Am Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:28:11 +0100
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> 1.) open UserGuide.lyx
> 2.) open outline, select Table of Contents
> 3.) select A.9.1 (this is only to move the cursor,
>but though the view is rebuild 3 times here,
>this is another quirk)
> 4.)
1.) open UserGuide.lyx
2.) open outline, select Table of Contents
3.) select A.9.1 (this is only to move the cursor,
but though the view is rebuild 3 times here,
this is another quirk)
4.) select Graphics in outline
5.) move cursor to the first row in table (Graphic shows buffer
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:41:39PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> For me it is OK as it is now.
>
> -1 to revert.
As Kornel I prefer the way it is now (except there might be some buggy corner
cases
as you write in other mail, but in general I'm not confused by the current
situation
and find nice
On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 14.33.49 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Note that shift-tab for depth does not always have a local scope either,
> since it may change the depth of nested sub elements.
Yes, I know and it was a sloppy language. :-)
A better expression would be a waterfall model and
On 01/02/2022 11:23, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for feedback about
https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12417
Basically, now Tab and the depth icons invoke outline in/out when on a
sectioning layout.
Do you find that this is confusing? The fact is that these two bindings
are expecting?
This is interesting in terms of brokenness of outline-* functions. This
would an argument for exposing them separately (they do have their own
shortcuts) and merging this with depth stuff yet.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman
On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 10.23.41 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for feedback about
> https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12417
>
> Basically, now Tab and the depth icons invoke outline in/out when on a
> sectioning layout.
>
> Do you find
Am Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:23:41 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for feedback about
> https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12417
>
> Basically, now Tab and the depth icons invoke outline in/out when on a
> sectioning layout.
>
> Do you find
Hello,
I am looking for feedback about
https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12417
Basically, now Tab and the depth icons invoke outline in/out when on a
sectioning layout.
Do you find that this is confusing? The fact is that these two bindings
have different behavior on layouts that follow the
Hi Valdemaras,
I move this discussion to lyx-devel since you are there too. We have
used the bandwidth of this list long enough with technical issues.
Le 07/12/2021 à 03:19, sovhist a écrit :
Well, I don't see much difference with and without spellcheck. All
"words" are with misspelling marks
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:19:54AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:51:01PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 01:07:27PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 06:20:37PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > Am Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:51:01PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 01:07:27PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 06:20:37PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:07:06 -0500
> > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 09
On Monday, March 15, 2021, 12:59:32 PM GMT+2, Pavel Sanda
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 05:07:10PM +, V K wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Lyx master crashes when opening outline pane (with Alt+ shortcuts or menus).
> Error message:
Can not reproduce.
Do you need speci
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 01:07:27PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 06:20:37PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:07:06 -0500
> > schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > > Am Freitag, dem
Hello.
Lyx is approaching 2.4 and I want to draw attention of devs to the outline pane
functionality and problem of the huge notes. Maybe some of these issues can be
fixed relatively easy and quickly till the new release.
1. "Keep" tikbox in the outline pane is working inconsisten
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 06:20:37PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:07:06 -0500
> schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, dem 08.01.2021 um 20:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > > It would be nic
Am Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:07:06 -0500
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Freitag, dem 08.01.2021 um 20:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > It would be nice to get someone else's feedback (Jürgen?) before you
> > > work on it. I
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Freitag, dem 08.01.2021 um 20:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > It would be nice to get someone else's feedback (Jürgen?) before you
> > work on it. I see a few possibilities:
> >
> > 1. A tag that does not allow layouts
Am Freitag, dem 08.01.2021 um 20:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> It would be nice to get someone else's feedback (Jürgen?) before you
> work on it. I see a few possibilities:
>
> 1. A tag that does not allow layouts to nest other layouts of the
> same
> type.
>
> 2. A tag that does not all
e:
> >>>>>>> commit 9ab9f2b1acb8bc1a40d5a69737b43d09b7f7a597
> >>>>>>> Author: Scott Kostyshak
> >>>>>>> Date: Thu May 16 13:58:18 2019 -0400
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tab bin
; Author: Scott Kostyshak
>>>>>>> Date: Thu May 16 13:58:18 2019 -0400
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tab binding: outline-in before depth-increment
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Same for BackTab. The outline
gt; On 9/10/20 11:52 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 07:54:41PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>>>> commit 9ab9f2b1acb8bc1a40d5a69737b43d09b7f7a597
> >>>>> Author: Scott Kostyshak
> >>>>> Date:
54:41PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>>>> commit 9ab9f2b1acb8bc1a40d5a69737b43d09b7f7a597
>>>>> Author: Scott Kostyshak
>>>>> Date: Thu May 16 13:58:18 2019 -0400
>>>>>
>>>>> Tab binding: outline-in before depth-incremen
ote:
> > >> commit 9ab9f2b1acb8bc1a40d5a69737b43d09b7f7a597
> > >> Author: Scott Kostyshak
> > >> Date: Thu May 16 13:58:18 2019 -0400
> > >>
> > >> Tab binding: outline-in before depth-increment
> > >>
> > >> Same for Back
t; >> Date: Thu May 16 13:58:18 2019 -0400
> >>
> >> Tab binding: outline-in before depth-increment
> >>
> >> Same for BackTab. The outline-in was originally (31398779)
> >> introduced to the command-sequence at the end. Probably
On 9/10/20 11:52 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 07:54:41PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> commit 9ab9f2b1acb8bc1a40d5a69737b43d09b7f7a597
>> Author: Scott Kostyshak
>> Date: Thu May 16 13:58:18 2019 -0400
>>
>> Tab binding:
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 07:54:41PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> commit 9ab9f2b1acb8bc1a40d5a69737b43d09b7f7a597
> Author: Scott Kostyshak
> Date: Thu May 16 13:58:18 2019 -0400
>
> Tab binding: outline-in before depth-increment
>
> Same for BackTa
> OK I'll take a look at the buttons. They do call the LFUNs but I think
>> they do something before/after.
> The cursor move happens because of the commented out call to goTo() in
> the following TocWidget::outline() chunk:
>
> diff --git a/src/frontends/qt/TocWidget
s but I think
> they do something before/after.
The cursor move happens because of the commented out call to goTo() in
the following TocWidget::outline() chunk:
diff --git a/src/frontends/qt/TocWidget.cpp b/src/frontends/qt/TocWidget.cpp
index 4c69aa3ba5..d0de03fadc 100644
--- a/src/fro
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:16:10PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/03/2020 à 21:03, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > I'm glad I'm not the only one that originally interpretted JMarc's
> > comment like that. I made a patch thinking he was hinting that I should
> > combine the code to reduce
Le 11/03/2020 à 21:03, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I'm glad I'm not the only one that originally interpretted JMarc's
comment like that. I made a patch thinking he was hinting that I should
combine the code to reduce duplication. See attached. Now I realize
that's not what he was trying to say, and
d1e5e60b221
>>>> Author: Scott Kostyshak
>>>> Date: Wed Mar 11 14:18:33 2020 -0400
>>>>
>>>> outline-up/down: preserve cursor's position
>>>> There is no need to change the cursor's position to the
>>>> be
gt; Date: Wed Mar 11 14:18:33 2020 -0400
> >>
> >> outline-up/down: preserve cursor's position
> >> There is no need to change the cursor's position to the
> >> beginning of
> >> the line.
> >> This change
On 3/11/20 3:12 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/03/2020 à 19:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> commit adb7283b69f5dddfabb8d807a432cd1e5e60b221
>> Author: Scott Kostyshak
>> Date: Wed Mar 11 14:18:33 2020 -0400
>>
>> outline-up/down: preserve cursor
Le 11/03/2020 à 19:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
commit adb7283b69f5dddfabb8d807a432cd1e5e60b221
Author: Scott Kostyshak
Date: Wed Mar 11 14:18:33 2020 -0400
outline-up/down: preserve cursor's position
There is no need to change the cursor's position to the be
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 10/03/2020 à 15:31, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > Perhaps the following be more reasonable and safer?
> >
> >setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos());
> >
> > The above seems safe since I'm just changing "0" to "cur.pos()"
Le 10/03/2020 à 15:31, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Perhaps the following be more reasonable and safer?
setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos());
The above seems safe since I'm just changing "0" to "cur.pos()", and I
don't see how the length of the paragraph can change after this
operation.
This
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 04:56:35PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:31:10AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > your questions. I tried to test regarding Pavel's concern, but I don't
> > know a situation when the depth changes;
>
> Actually you are likely right. The destructio
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:31:10AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> your questions. I tried to test regarding Pavel's concern, but I don't
> know a situation when the depth changes;
Actually you are likely right. The destruction of depth structure comes
with moving paragraphs lfuns, not outlines-u
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:55:06AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 01:24:31AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > On 3/9/20 9:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > Is there a reason to do the following for outline-up and outline-down?
> > >
> >
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 01:24:31AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 3/9/20 9:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Is there a reason to do the following for outline-up and outline-down?
> >
> > setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), 0);
> >
> > It does not seem to be
On 3/9/20 9:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Is there a reason to do the following for outline-up and outline-down?
>
> setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), 0);
>
> It does not seem to be necessary in my testing, but I'm wondering if
> there's a case I'm missing. Or p
Is there a reason to do the following for outline-up and outline-down?
setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), 0);
It does not seem to be necessary in my testing, but I'm wondering if
there's a case I'm missing. Or perhaps it is not necessary but is
desired behavior for some reason?
It ha
Le 11/05/2019 à 23:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 11/05/2019 à 22:37, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
This might be https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11423. If so, it might
be good to add your minimal example and explanation there (or a link
to the list).
Daniel
Thanks, I've added a comment a
Le 11/05/2019 à 22:37, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
This might be https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11423. If so, it might
be good to add your minimal example and explanation there (or a link
to the list).
Daniel
Thanks, I've added a comment and the screenshot to the ticket.
This should be fixed
On 12/05/2019 4:09 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 2019-05-09 03:02, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I switched the Outline pane to Equations recently and noted that
there was a string of zeros as entries. A little experimenting showed
that these entries corresponded to inline math symbols and
expressions I had
On 2019-05-09 03:02, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I switched the Outline pane to Equations recently and noted that there
was a string of zeros as entries. A little experimenting showed that
these entries corresponded to inline math symbols and expressions I had
added in the current session. On
I switched the Outline pane to Equations recently and noted that there
was a string of zeros as entries. A little experimenting showed that
these entries corresponded to inline math symbols and expressions I had
added in the current session. On closing the document and opening it
again, the
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 05:22:46PM +, john kennan wrote:
> When two files are open in tabs, with Tables selected in the outline pane
> in the first file, the selection doesn't hold after switching to the other
> file and back if the other file has no tables -- the selection reve
On 01/05/2018 08:31 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> Works fine here (master with qt5).
> Joel Kulesza wrote:
>> I cannot reproduce.
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Neither can I.
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>> For me, even the "4. after undocking outliner no more responds to mouse
>> input"
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> > Le 05/01/2018 ? 14:31, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >
> >> Anyone of you running with Qt 5.7.1? P
> >
> > I am, but I can't reproduce, neither with master (27 noc 2017 build) nor
> > with 2.3.x (last wednesday build).
>
> Thanks. I just reproduced t
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 05/01/2018 ? 14:31, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>
>> Anyone of you running with Qt 5.7.1? P
>
> I am, but I can't reproduce, neither with master (27 noc 2017 build) nor
> with 2.3.x (last wednesday build).
Thanks. I just reproduced the same problem on example from qt do
Le 05/01/2018 à 14:31, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Anyone of you running with Qt 5.7.1? P
I am, but I can't reproduce, neither with master (27 noc 2017 build) nor with
2.3.x (last wednesday build).
--
Jean-Pierre
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:31 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > I cannot reproduce.
>
> Anyone of you running with Qt 5.7.1? P
>
5.10.0
Richard Heck wrote:
> Works fine here (master with qt5).
Joel Kulesza wrote:
> I cannot reproduce.
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Neither can I.
Kornel Benko wrote:
> For me, even the "4. after undocking outliner no more responds to mouse input"
> does not apply.
Anyone of you running with Qt 5.7.1?
Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2018 um 19:17:43, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:36:08PM +, Joel Kulesza wrote:
>
> > I cannot reproduce.
>
> Neither can I.
>
> Scott
For me, even the "4. after undocking outliner no more responds to mouse input"
does not apply.
Kor
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:36:08PM +, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> I cannot reproduce.
Neither can I.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:03 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 01/04/2018 01:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > I see this with qt5, both master & 2.3:
> > >
> > > 1. launch lyx (which does not have outline shown from previous session)
&
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/04/2018 01:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > I see this with qt5, both master & 2.3:
> >
> > 1. launch lyx (which does not have outline shown from previous session)
> > 2. new file & open outliner
> > 3. undock outliner while movi
On 01/04/2018 01:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I see this with qt5, both master & 2.3:
>
> 1. launch lyx (which does not have outline shown from previous session)
> 2. new file & open outliner
> 3. undock outliner while moving it out of lyx main window
> 4. after undocking
I see this with qt5, both master & 2.3:
1. launch lyx (which does not have outline shown from previous session)
2. new file & open outliner
3. undock outliner while moving it out of lyx main window
4. after undocking outliner no more responds to mouse input
5. close lyx
6. start lyx
7. re
When two files are open in tabs, with Tables selected in the outline pane
in the first file, the selection doesn't hold after switching to the other
file and back if the other file has no tables -- the selection reverts to
Table of Contents. This seems undesirable (OSX, 2.3rc1).
John
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:15:52AM -0400, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
>
> > This bug is fixed in rc1 AFAIK.
> >
> > From what I can tell, that is indeed the case.
OK thanks for the update.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
This bug is fixed in rc1 AFAIK.
JMarc
Le 26 avril 2016 13:57:59 GMT+02:00, Joel Kulesza a écrit :
>Yes, please see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10031.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> This bug is fixed in rc1 AFAIK.
>
> From what I can tell, that is indeed the case.
Yes, please see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10031.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:23:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 18/03/2016 14:32, Joel Kulesza a écrit :
> > > LyX Developers,
> > >
> > > I'm using LyX 2.2b2 on a Retina
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:23:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 18/03/2016 14:32, Joel Kulesza a écrit :
> > LyX Developers,
> >
> > I'm using LyX 2.2b2 on a Retina display. When gridlines are removed from
> > tables the cell outlines are quite faint (see attached) and can be
> > diffic
LyX Developers,
I'm using LyX 2.2b2 on a Retina display. When gridlines are removed from
tables the cell outlines are quite faint (see attached) and can be
difficult to see/differentiate from the background. I'm running my display
at a typical brightness that everything else is comfortable at. H
Le 18/03/2016 14:32, Joel Kulesza a écrit :
LyX Developers,
I'm using LyX 2.2b2 on a Retina display. When gridlines are removed from
tables the cell outlines are quite faint (see attached) and can be
difficult to see/differentiate from the background. I'm running my
display at a typical brightn
Le 04/12/15 18:33, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Note that for selecting symbols, we should check in
what unicode version they were introduced.
The failing symbols were version 6 (negative cross) and 3 (reversed
pilcrow). The new symbols are all at most unicode 1.1. I am not sure
that we can make a
Le 04/12/2015 13:19, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 04/12/2015 13:46, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Please use the same cross that is used for the branch inset. It looks
like a good idea to have the same symbol in both places.
Good idea. I did not realise (although I knew...) that ✖ was already
Le 04/12/2015 13:46, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Please use the same cross that is used for the branch inset. It looks
like a good idea to have the same symbol in both places.
Good idea. I did not realise (although I knew...) that ✖ was already
used for branches. Here's a patch (more details in t
Le 02/12/2015 22:19, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 02/12/2015 20:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 02/12/2015 19:44, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I just tested alpha 2.2 on Windows 10. I can reproduce the white square
issue even there. In fact it is worse than that: other symbols such as ✍
also
Le 02/12/2015 22:19, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Again, let's hope that qt 5.6 will do miracles. If there is a prerelease
packaged, it would be a good idea to try it now on Windows. It seems
overly optimistic to think that we'll just try it out at release time.
Now that we know that there was
Le 02/12/2015 20:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 02/12/2015 19:44, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I just tested alpha 2.2 on Windows 10. I can reproduce the white square
issue even there. In fact it is worse than that: other symbols such as ✍
also display as a square (also ✀ I assume), and even
Le 02/12/2015 19:45, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
Instead of the pilcrow I get a thick vertical line
(like a sans serif I in bold).
Mystery solved. Instead of ¶, the source used the character ⁋, which
obviously is less common.
Thank you for your tests.
On 3/12/2015 8:45 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 3/12/2015 8:00 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 02/12/2015 18:22, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
On 3/12/2015 5:37 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote:
* Have you ever noticed other symbols displaying incorrectly? For
instance, does the outliner correctl
Le 02/12/2015 19:44, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I just tested alpha 2.2 on Windows 10. I can reproduce the white square
issue even there. In fact it is worse than that: other symbols such as ✍
also display as a square (also ✀ I assume), and even the ¶ symbol, used
in the outliner for tracked chang
On 3/12/2015 8:00 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 02/12/2015 18:22, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
On 3/12/2015 5:37 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote:
* Have you ever noticed other symbols displaying incorrectly? For
instance, does the outliner correctly displays the symbols ✀ and ✍ for
tracked change
Le 02/12/2015 18:22, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
On 3/12/2015 5:37 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 01/12/2015 21:57, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
When a branch is inactivated in alpha2 (on Windows), the Outline
display shows duplicated expand/contract boxes, as in the attached
png. Activate the
Le 02/12/2015 17:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 02/12/2015 17:37, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
First, this is indeed the symbol ❎ not displaying correctly but
this has nothing to do with a missing font package in your latex
distribution.
This symbol does not display correctly on my oldish
On 3/12/2015 5:37 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 01/12/2015 21:57, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
When a branch is inactivated in alpha2 (on Windows), the Outline
display shows duplicated expand/contract boxes, as in the attached
png. Activate the branch and the duplication vanishes. I read in the
Le 02/12/2015 17:37, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
First, this is indeed the symbol ❎ not displaying correctly but this has
nothing to do with a missing font package in your latex distribution.
This symbol does not display correctly on my oldish Ubuntu 12.04 install.
JMarc
Le 01/12/2015 21:57, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
When a branch is inactivated in alpha2 (on Windows), the Outline
display shows duplicated expand/contract boxes, as in the attached
png. Activate the branch and the duplication vanishes. I read in the
New features in 2.2 that " entries tha
When a branch is inactivated in alpha2 (on Windows), the Outline display
shows duplicated expand/contract boxes, as in the attached png. Activate
the branch and the duplication vanishes. I read in the New features in
2.2 that " entries that are disabled (i.e. either in a note or in an
ina
On 3/01/2015 10:34 a.m., Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
aparsloe wrote:
The buttons at the bottom of the Outline pane which increase or decrease
the depth of the heading containing the cursor don't work as they should on
my system for chapters and parts. If the cursor is in a ch
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> aparsloe wrote:
> > The buttons at the bottom of the Outline pane which increase or decrease
> > the depth of the heading containing the cursor don't work as they should on
> > my system for chapters and parts. If the cursor is in a chapter
aparsloe wrote:
> The buttons at the bottom of the Outline pane which increase or decrease
> the depth of the heading containing the cursor don't work as they should on
> my system for chapters and parts. If the cursor is in a chapter heading,
> clicking the decrease-depth b
The buttons at the bottom of the Outline pane which increase or decrease
the depth of the heading containing the cursor don't work as they should
on my system for chapters and parts. If the cursor is in a chapter
heading, clicking the decrease-depth button to make the chapter a part
h
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 7-8-2013 9:01, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>>
>> Vincent,
>>
>> Should this go to master?
>>
>> Scott
>
> Yes, that's ok.
It's in at 0f5589e2.
Scott
Op 7-8-2013 9:01, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/11/2013 12:21 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Any thoughts?
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2013 12:21 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> Any thoughts?
Looks reas
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 06/11/2013 12:21 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>>
>>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Looks reasonable.
>>
>>
>> I don't see any reason this can't go into 2.1. It
1 - 100 of 448 matches
Mail list logo
