On 9/10/20 11:52 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 07:54:41PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> commit 9ab9f2b1acb8bc1a40d5a69737b43d09b7f7a597 >> Author: Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> >> Date: Thu May 16 13:58:18 2019 -0400 >> >> Tab binding: outline-in before depth-increment >> >> Same for BackTab. The outline-in was originally (31398779) >> introduced to the command-sequence at the end. Probably it was >> placed at the end to be conservative (i.e., so that it would only >> change behavior where there was a no-op before). >> >> This fixes #11576. >> --- >> lib/bind/site.bind | 4 ++-- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/lib/bind/site.bind b/lib/bind/site.bind >> index 4c3c609..615c685 100644 >> --- a/lib/bind/site.bind >> +++ b/lib/bind/site.bind >> @@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ Format 5 >> \bind "Up" "up" >> \bind "Down" "down" >> >> -\bind "Tab" "command-alternatives >> completion-accept;cell-forward;tab-insert;depth-increment;outline-in" >> +\bind "Tab" "command-alternatives >> completion-accept;cell-forward;tab-insert;outline-in;depth-increment" >> \bind "C-Tab" "cell-split" >> \bind "~S-ISO_Left_Tab" "cell-backward" >> -\bind "~S-BackTab" "command-alternatives >> cell-backward;tab-delete;depth-decrement;outline-out" >> +\bind "~S-BackTab" "command-alternatives >> cell-backward;tab-delete;outline-out;depth-decrement" > This commit introduced a regression (also in stable). To reproduce: > > 1. open the attached file. > 2. convert the "standard" layout to "frame" (it will be nested). > 3. try to unnest the frame with shift+tab. > > Result: on 2.3.x and master, it becomes a subsubsection. On 2.3.0, it > has the expected (to me) result of unnesting the frame. > > The reason for the 2.3.x behavior is because of the change of order of > the command alternatives in this commit. outline-out succeeds. From what > I understand, outline-out succeeds because in the Frame layout, the > TocLevel is set. > > If we revert this commit, we reintroduce #11576. > > I don't know much about layouts so I'm not sure what the best approach > is.
One possible solution would be a new layout tag: ProhibitNesting, off by default. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
