On 8/15/10 10:23 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
Dear LyX Developers,
While working on another issue, I was taking a look at BibLaTeX over the weekend. It
looks like a very nice package for the creation of bibliographies. On the Wiki it says
that LyX does not support not support BibLaTeX natively, "yet
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
> Dear LyX Developers,
>
> I was wondering if there are plans to add it in the near future, or if
> someone is working on it. If not, it might be something that I'm interested
> in doing. It looks like any modifications would be minimal. Add an
Rob Oakes wrote:
> I wanted to just post an update on the LyX packages. I spoke with two
> people who manage the Universe archive (Ubuntu archive names are very
> confusing), and I have filed a sync request with the most recent Debian
> package. I am currently working on a Feature Freeze Exceptio
I wanted to just post an update on the LyX packages. I spoke with two people
who manage the Universe archive (Ubuntu archive names are very confusing), and
I have filed a sync request with the most recent Debian package. I am
currently working on a Feature Freeze Exception, which would allow f
Dear LyX Developers,
While working on another issue, I was taking a look at BibLaTeX over the
weekend. It looks like a very nice package for the creation of bibliographies.
On the Wiki it says that LyX does not support not support BibLaTeX natively,
"yet."
I was wondering if there are plans
On Sunday 09 November 2008 17:44:18 Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Beside that I've to thank you for your great cooperation. It's always a
> pleasure to work with you guys as upstream devs. Thanks.
You are welcome. :-)
> Sven
--
José Abílio
or the weekend so it can take from a day
> to a week until we get something final in the Debian archive. (Remember I'm
> not a DD yet so I can't upload to the Debian archive myself.)
Ok kudos to Per, he came back yesterday evening and did an upload. So the
Debian packages will b
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 08:30:14PM +, José Matos wrote:
Hi guys,
> This way we would have binary packages for the users to try when they
> read
> the announce. Larger projects follow this scheme and I would like to give it
> a
> try this time.
>
> I intend to release the anno
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
we've had some arguments about the fact that we turned assertions on
in the LyX Debian package. ATM we're rethinking our position and I
would like to get some input from you on the topic.
The main argument for turning assertions on is that in cases of an
assertion getting
Hi,
we've had some arguments about the fact that we turned assertions on
in the LyX Debian package. ATM we're rethinking our position and I
would like to get some input from you on the topic.
The main argument for turning assertions on is that in cases of an
assertion getting cought the chance for
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 04:04:09PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
>
> > >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Paul> Updated *unofficial* Debian packages com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
> >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Paul> Updated *unofficial* Debian packages compiled with
> Paul> libforms_1.0-RC4.1 are available here:
>
> Do you want them
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 07:25:52PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> Secondly, probably less important, make distclean doesn't quite get
> you back to 'square one'. In my rules file I've added:
>
> EXTRA_CLEAN=development/lyx.spec sigc++/slot.h sigc++/object_slot.h \
I think I've gotten myself confu
Just quickly, because I'm on my way out, some observations:
The building of the 'listerrors' binary is dependent on already having
installed and reconfigured a lyx binary, it seems. It tries to use
the lyx binary in the source tree (../src/lyx) but that binary doesn't
know about the fact that n
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>
> I just noted, that the configuration files seem to be incompatible:
See:
http://www.lyx.org/news/20010117.php3
for tips for upgraders.
Allan. (ARRae)
I just noted, that the configuration files seem to be incompatible:
rainer@rai16:~/Managed/Publikationen/VTS01$ lyx vts01.lyx
LyX: Unknown tag `\latex_command' [around line 6 of file ~/.lyx/lyxrc.defaults]
LyX: Unknown tag `\relyx_command' [around line 7 of file ~/.lyx/lyxrc.defaults]
LyX: Unkno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rainer Dorsch) writes:
> $apt-get source lyx
> [...]
> Failed to fetch ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/Sources
> Unable to fetch file, server said '/pub/debian/unofficial/Sources.gz: No
> such file or directory.
>
Ooops, sorry! This has been corrected and sho
asure to announce that LyX 1.1.6fix1 has been released
> > today. This is a maintenance release which fixes some important bugs
> > in 1.1.6, and updates a few things, in particular in the
> >
> I've made some unofficial Debian packages of it based on the packaging
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
> It is my pleasure to announce that LyX 1.1.6fix1 has been released
> today. This is a maintenance release which fixes some important bugs
> in 1.1.6, and updates a few things, in particular in the
>
I've made some unofficial D
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 04:25:23PM -0500, mrd wrote:
> Is there anyone currently maintaining debian packages for LyX? The latest
> version in the debian archives seems to be 1.1.4.
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:33:20AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Other question: Is a de
Is there anyone currently maintaining debian packages for LyX? The latest
version in the debian archives seems to be 1.1.4.
21 matches
Mail list logo
