On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Andrew U. Frank
wrote:
> dear scott
> i tried to find my comment on the list to respond to but i could not find
> it. (my original post was via email, but can i add to a discussion by
> email?)
When you reply, instead of replying to me, reply to the address
lyx-dev
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Andrew U. Frank
wrote:
> this seems not to be a deb package... i tried to put it in synaptic, but it
> did report problems. is it deb archive?
Hi Andrew,
Please respond to the list.
Try running the following commands:
1. sudo apt-add-repository ppa:lyx-devel/dail
Am 04.11.2012 um 09:23 schrieb Andrew U. Frank :
> i fear i encounter the problem reported in bug 8238:
> how do i get the patch version?
> i have downloaded from lyx dev the version 2.0.4.1
The official version 2.0.5 is coming soon. This bug is fixed then.
You can get the source tarball here: ht
Do you use Ubuntu? If so, Liviu Andronic and Rob Oakes have set up a PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily
Respond (to the list) if you need instructions on how to set that up
(it's easy).
If you don't use Ubuntu, see the instructions in the source tar ball
for how to compile.
Scot
Pascal Fischer googlemail.com> writes:
>
> In addition to today's spellchecker there should be the possibility to
> activate spell-checking as you type. (With those red wavy lines under
This is available as Tools -> Preferences -> Language Settings -> Spellchecker
-> Spellcheck continuously.
I
Am 17.04.2011 um 22:16 schrieb Jim Oldfield:
>> From: Joost Verburg
>>
>> "Julien Rioux" wrote in message
>> news:iod00u$hei$1...@dough.gmane.org...
>>> You would need to make aspell visible to the configure script by putting
>>> the
>>
>> path to aspell.exe in your PATH environment vari
Am 17.04.2011 um 03:12 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> "Julien Rioux" wrote in message
> news:iod00u$hei$1...@dough.gmane.org...
>> You would need to make aspell visible to the configure script by putting the
>> path to aspell.exe in your PATH environment variable or alternatively in the
>> PATH in L
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> PS I noticed that the same phrase "Replace word with current choice" is in
> the tooltips for "Find next", "Replace" and "Replace all". This is the
> correct phrase only for the second one.
this is now fixed. pavel
Stephan Witt a écrit :
Am 08.04.2011 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Hello,
Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore all':
We reached the end of the document, would you li
Am 08.04.2011 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
> Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
>> On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore
>>> all':
>>>
>>>
>>> We reached the end of the document, would
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Hello,
Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit
'Ignore all':
We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from
the beginning?
If I say yes, it restars at the beginn
Am 04.04.2011 um 13:02 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 04.04.2011 um 11:39 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
>
>> On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore
>>> all':
>>>
>>>
>>> We reached the end of the
Am 04.04.2011 um 11:39 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore
>> all':
>>
>>
>> We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from the
>> beginni
On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Hello,
Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit
'Ignore all':
We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from
the beginning?
If I say yes, it restars at the beginning, which is not what I want
> % rpm -q -v -f /usr/include/aspell.h
> aspell-devel-0.60.6-28.2.i586
> %
>
> Don't ask me how to install it with Ubuntu.
>
Yep.. thanks Stephan. I missed that
In Ubuntu, I can find it in Synaptic Package Manager libaspell-dev,
also libaiksaurus-1.x-dev for thesaurus.
Now, It is ok.
The spelling
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Would this patch be appropriately?
looks fine
> Index: INSTALL
> ===
> --- INSTALL (Revision 36271)
> +++ INSTALL (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -69,6 +69,13 @@
> If, however, your version of Qt does not use fontconf
Am 12.11.2010 um 07:43 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 12.11.2010 um 00:33 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
>
>> На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
>>> I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
>>> using the following commands:
>>>
>>> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
>>> make
>>> sudo make instal
Am 12.11.2010 um 00:33 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
> На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
>> I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
>> using the following commands:
>>
>> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
>> make
>> sudo make install
>>
>> everything ok no errors, but when I run lyx-2.0.
Am 11.11.2010 um 11:13 schrieb Waluyo Adi Siswanto:
>>
>> checking aspell.h usability... yes
>> checking aspell.h presence... yes
>> checking for aspell.h... yes
>> checking for new_aspell_config in -laspell... yes
>> checking whether to use aspell... yes
>> checking for name of aspell framework.
Am 11.11.2010 um 10:18 schrieb Waluyo Adi Siswanto:
> I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
> using the following commands:
>
> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
> make
> sudo make install
>
> everything ok no errors,
When ./configure is run the available spellchecker header and libraries a
And I would integrate it more into the LyX application.
One of my goals is to make the installer for Mac obsolete.
It'd be great to have a platform-independent dictionary/thesaurus
installation wizard.
Are you still planning to use Aspell for the LyX 2.0 Mac installers? On
Windows I'm trying
Am 20.04.2010 um 12:57 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 20 avr. 10 à 12:55, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Then I propose to use some hard coded path below $sysdir for the shipped
>>> directories and the user may specify another path for the extra
>>> dictionaries in pre
Le 20 avr. 10 à 12:55, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Stephan Witt wrote:
Then I propose to use some hard coded path below $sysdir for the
shipped
directories and the user may specify another path for the extra
dictionaries in preferences.
Note that we only have one path at disposal currently.
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Then I propose to use some hard coded path below $sysdir for the shipped
> directories and the user may specify another path for the extra
> dictionaries in preferences.
Note that we only have one path at disposal currently. So you need to use one
for both aims.
Jürgen
Am 20.04.2010 um 12:28 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Also sprach Stephan Witt:
>> So the question is: is it legal to ship those dictionaries with LyX?
>> Can some kind soul with the knowledge about such things tell?
>
> Depends on the licensing of the specific dictionaries, which are third-party-
J?rgen Spitzm?ller wrote:
> My proposal would be to have those dictionaries on a server and let the
> installers download them, if required. This is what the Windows installers do
this would also considerably reduce the size of the installers...
pavel
Stephan Witt wrote:
> So the question is: is it legal to ship those dictionaries with LyX?
> Can some kind soul with the knowledge about such things tell?
what is their license?
pavel
Also sprach Stephan Witt:
> So the question is: is it legal to ship those dictionaries with LyX?
> Can some kind soul with the knowledge about such things tell?
Depends on the licensing of the specific dictionaries, which are third-party-
contributions to Ooo. Most have "Opensource" license accord
Am 20.04.2010 um 12:02 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I've to correct me. When I open the thesaurus dialog it looks like the
>> language is selected and the dictionary found. But the message in the
>> lower part indicates that there is no thesaurus available. So I thought it
Stephan Witt wrote:
> I've to correct me. When I open the thesaurus dialog it looks like the
> language is selected and the dictionary found. But the message in the
> lower part indicates that there is no thesaurus available. So I thought it
> does not work... mostly because last time I tried in fa
Am 20.04.2010 um 11:47 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Sorry I was fooled by the dialog contents.
>> If I try to lookup something it works now.
>
> Excellent.
Good. Hopefully I'm fast enough this time :)
Stephan
Am 20.04.2010 um 11:46 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Output of -dbg files:
>>
>> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/Thesaurus.cpp(81): thesaurus path:
>> /Users/stephan/Documents/Dictionaries
>> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/support/FileName.cpp(417): filtering
>>
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Sorry I was fooled by the dialog contents.
> If I try to lookup something it works now.
Excellent.
Jürgen
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Output of -dbg files:
>
> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/Thesaurus.cpp(81): thesaurus path:
> /Users/stephan/Documents/Dictionaries
> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/support/FileName.cpp(417): filtering
> on extension *.idx is requested.
> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/ly
Stephan Witt wrote:
> * What am I missing with my thesaurus? Any ideas?
I just fixed a thesaurus problem in trunk. Does an svn up help? If not, "-dbg
files" should provide more information.
Jürgen
Am 20.04.2010 um 00:18 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 19 avr. 10 à 17:34, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> I can live with it. The code would be less cluttered.
>> But if I read the developer docs of mac correct there is a standard.
>> It is called "The anatomy of a bundle".
>
> Indeed. But if we pu
Le 19 avr. 10 à 17:34, Stephan Witt a écrit :
I can live with it. The code would be less cluttered.
But if I read the developer docs of mac correct there is a standard.
It is called "The anatomy of a bundle".
Indeed. But if we put everything in LyX' resources I think we are
still in the
spiri
Am 19.04.2010 um 16:47 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 19/04/2010 16:18, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> The reasoning was as follows:
>> * macports splits data and dict (maybe data is machine dependend and
>> dictionaries are not?)
>> So it becomes .../data and .../dict
>> * Qt4 (as Apple framewo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Hunspell can be seen as some kind of successor to aspell. At least it is
> supposed to be better (am I right?)
>
Yes. Hunspell can deal with coumpound words (two words joined in one) which
are very common in German and suffix and affix which are used in Hungarian
Stephan Witt writes:
> Note, the current implementation is guarded by _APPLE_ #ifdef.
> After some discussion it could be more general...
>
> Therefore currently it is Apple-like:
> 1) aspell user dir: /Users/stephan/Library/Application
> Support/LyX-2.0.0svn/Aspell.framework/Resources/dict
> 2)
Am 19.04.2010 um 14:39 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Stephan Witt writes:
>> Currently the build on Mac is able to include aspell with a subset of
>> dictionaries.
>> I've prepared a patch to allow for searching dictionaries at different
>> locations.
>> I'll attach it below. Now LyX/Mac is
Stephan Witt writes:
> Currently the build on Mac is able to include aspell with a subset of
> dictionaries.
> I've prepared a patch to allow for searching dictionaries at different
> locations.
> I'll attach it below. Now LyX/Mac is looking at runtime
> 1) in LYX_USERDIR,
Where exactly?
> 2)
Am 18.04.2010 um 23:02 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> +lyx::support::FileName base(basepath);
>> +lyx::support::FileName data(base.absFilename() + datapath);
>> +lyx::support::FileName dict(base.absFilename() + dictpath);
>
> strip lyx::support:: part?
This works if I
Stephan Witt wrote:
> + lyx::support::FileName base(basepath);
> + lyx::support::FileName data(base.absFilename() + datapath);
> + lyx::support::FileName dict(base.absFilename() + dictpath);
strip lyx::support:: part?
> Apropos, the spellchecker wiki should be updated soon :)
> I'll t
Am 18.04.2010 um 00:08 schrieb BH:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 17.04.2010 um 21:02 schrieb BH:
>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Hi,
thinking about the way to go with spell checkers and thesaurus...
Currently
Am 18.04.2010 um 00:08 schrieb BH:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 17.04.2010 um 21:02 schrieb BH:
>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Hi,
thinking about the way to go with spell checkers and thesaurus...
Currently
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 17.04.2010 um 21:02 schrieb BH:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thinking about the way to go with spell checkers and thesaurus...
>>>
>>> Currently the build on Mac is able to include aspell with a
Am 17.04.2010 um 21:02 schrieb BH:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thinking about the way to go with spell checkers and thesaurus...
>>
>> Currently the build on Mac is able to include aspell with a subset of
>> dictionaries.
>
> I've just downloaded your a
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thinking about the way to go with spell checkers and thesaurus...
>
> Currently the build on Mac is able to include aspell with a subset of
> dictionaries.
I've just downloaded your alpha2 build, and it seems to run fine for
me, at l
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, rgheck wrote:
This is a bug.
Oh. Not a new feature of 1.6.2? :-)
The language has been set to "latex", which I think needs to be done for
some reason, and of course the spellchecker isn't going to find that.
Cross-posting to devel
Thank you.
FWIW, I killed
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> The name is "Bahasa Indonesia" what means "Indonesian language", the same
> is for "Bahasa Malaysia".
You're right, thanks.
Jürgen
> Would be the attached.
> OK to apply?
Not completely, because:
-bahasa bahasa "Bahasa Indonesia"false iso8859-15 id_ID ""
-bahasam bahasam"Bahasa Malaysia" false iso8859-15 ms_MY ""
+bahasa bahasa "Bahasa (Indonesia)" false iso8859-15 id_ID ""
+bahasam
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 09:25:18 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Maybe we should use this convention [i.e. "Language (variety)"] in
> > > general.
> > > Even though it doesn't solve any political issues, it's at least
> > > easier to
> > > find.
> >
> > Definite
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Maybe we should use this convention [i.e. "Language (variety)"] in
> > general.
> > Even though it doesn't solve any political issues, it's at least
> > easier to
> > find.
>
> Definitely.
Would be the attached.
OK to apply?
Jürgen
Index: lib/languages
===
> Just guessing --- it probably has to do with how (in which encoding) the
words are passed to the
> spelling engine...
>
> But it's probably smarter to look in the code than to guess... ;)
I had a look in the Ispell.cpp was didn't understand it. Now I found an
explanation here:
http://www.rpi.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What exactly does the spellchecker option "Use input encoding" in LyX's
preferences dialog?
regards Uwe
Just guessing --- it probably has to do with how (in which encoding) the
words are passed to the spelling engine...
But it's probably smarter to look in the code than t
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:29:18 +0100
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't reproduce this problem at all
Strange - I get it every time I try, so I guess it might be something with my
environment...
I'll check it up, and eventually come back to it if I manage to understand why it
h
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 06:16:21PM +0200, Rune Hansen wrote:
> I have found a bug in the lyx spellchecker that makes lyx crach
>
> To reproduce the crash:
>
> 1. Open several documents in lyx (with some spelling errors in it...)
>
> 2. Start spellchecker in one of the documents - when dialogb
Angus Leeming wrote:
> More wheel turning, although this one also cleans up the structure of
> the class so that it behaves in similar manner to all the other
> dialogs. There is still far too much of the core in here though...
>
> Patch attached and committed.
... and it even solves the problem
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 05:40:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I'd suggest doing nothing to this code for a while.
Too late ...
> Attached is a NEW Dialog class that should make life a LOT easier.
Actually most of my problems were unrelated to the framework ...
can we leave this for a short
John Levon wrote:
>
> OK, so we're not calling speller_->close() when the window is closed or
> Close is pressed - bad, we didn't write out the accepted word list.
>
> dialogs call controller().stop() but this doesn't actually do anything
> interesting. Angus, how can we make it so that it will
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:26:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Ok. I just noticed that I had to switch this on (and it took me
> Andre> a while) so I wondered whether changing the default might save
> Andre> others some time.
>
> To be fair, I may be completely wrong here. Real men
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I seem to remember that it depends a lot of how the dictionary has
>> been encoded for a particulat language. But I am not sure where I
>> read that.
Andre> Ok. I just noticed that I had to switch this on (and it took me
Andre> a whil
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:08:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Would it be sensible to switch on the 'Use input encoding'
> Andre> toggle by default?
>
> I seem to remember that it depends a lot of how the dictionary has
> been encoded for a particulat language. But I am not sure w
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Would it be sensible to switch on the 'Use input encoding'
Andre> toggle by default?
I seem to remember that it depends a lot of how the dictionary has
been encoded for a particulat language. But I am not sure where I read
that.
J
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I do not find the mistake though.
Of course not. I should have rebuilt after cvs up.
Sorry,
Jürgen
John Levon wrote:
> should be fixed now
Strange, it does not work correctly here.
If there are any suggestions in the browser, the first item is inserted into
the replacement combo; if no suggestion exist, the replacement from the last
word ist kept.
I do not find the mistake though.
Jürgen.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 07:18:23PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Bug: The misspelled word is not copied into the replacement field.
should be fixed now
john
--
"Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away on
a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy has nev
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:39:35PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It's getting a little tedious hitting the "ignore" button every time "rms"
> comes up...
Anyone else see the (unintentional) humour here?
;-P
Jules
On Monday 11 November 2002 5:25 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Didn't there used to be an "ignore always" button on the dialog? It's
> > getting a little tedious hitting the "ignore" button every time "rms"
> > comes up...
> >
> > Angus
>
> I use `Accept word in this session'
> "Wolfgang" == Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wolfgang> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 11:06:07AM -0500, Wolfgang Engelmann
Wolfgang> wrote:
>> Using the spellchecker under Lyx it crashed by finding the word
>> `entrain´ where entrain´ was highlighted. I reacted to it by saying
>> i
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 12:25 am, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday 15 January 2002 2:17 pm, John Levon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:12:26PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > >
> > > > Now the question is this: should I change this to just single click?
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2002 2:17 pm, John Levon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:12:26PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> > > Now the question is this: should I change this to just single click?
> > > The reason why? consistency with other dialogs
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:20:08PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > if you do I guess we need to change thesaurus behaviour too ?
>
> Well, that was the reason for the question. I think single-click here is
> sufficient but others may complain vociferously. Personally, I don't see the
> point o
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 2:17 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:12:26PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Now the question is this: should I change this to just single click?
> > The reason why? consistency with other dialogs will do.
>
> if you do I guess we need to change t
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:12:26PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Now the question is this: should I change this to just single click?
> The reason why? consistency with other dialogs will do.
if you do I guess we need to change thesaurus behaviour too ?
john
--
"Now why did you have to go an
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> if fl_get_browser_line can return null, then it must be
>
> char const * tmp = fl_get_browser_line(...);
> string blah = (tmp ? tmp : "");
I think you meant
string blah = tmp ? tmp : string();
Never use "" as a substitute for string().
It's not
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:13:39AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> string const getStringFromBrowser(FL_OBJECT * ob, int line)
good, thanks for dealing with my laziness again.
regards
john
--
"I went to set up a Yahoo ID for my dog. (Don't ask, but the DOG'S email was
cluttering my inbox)."
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 12:10 am, you wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:55:42PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I double-clicked on a choice, to replace bMy with My or some such.
> >
> > I believe the crash was immediate (the change certainly didn't make it
> > into the emergency fil
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:55:42PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I double-clicked on a choice, to replace bMy with My or some such.
>
> I believe the crash was immediate (the change certainly didn't make it
> into the emergency file, but the prior change did.)
well I don't really see how i
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:34:33PM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> Don't think I've seen *this* one before.
>
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
there is a gaping hole here where you forget to tell us what you actually
did ..
> 0x820854c in FormSpellchecker::input (t
On 24-Oct-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> This PM CVS
> checking a 50p doc with figures and tables and lots of Accept this word
> or Ignores,
> Completion bar is very erratic and there are long delays. Finally it
> just died.
This is a pspell problem. I tried to contact Kevin a few times but he
nev
> I'll have a look at this, as most probably I broke it ;)
apparently selectNextWord fails to select the word. Word count (or paragraph
count don't really know how it works) has been broken as well...
Thanks!
gr.ed.
On 07-Aug-2001 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> patch attached.
Applied!
>> You are better off than I. Replace word just adds the new word after the
>> old one here. --with-pspell latest.
>
> I think someone has been tinkering with selectNextWord in text.C which has
> broken things for the spellchecker
On Monday 06 August 2001 07:19 pm, you wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> > sorry if this one has been seen, but "insert in personal dictionary"
> > doesn't then move on to the next unknown word. I have to do ignore word
> > or something to get it to move on ...
patch attached.
> You are better off th
> Replace this word is not doing anything for me.
> Using aspell, but not --with-pspell.
Could you be a bit more specific; it works for me. (Others having this
problem?)
gr.ed.
On 12-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Well the frontend doesn't have to implement the progression bar I did
>| the same in my KMameRun (KDE1-M.A.M.E frontend) and you just have to
>| update the progression bar between one word and the other, wouldn't we?
>|
>| Without the need of a signa
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > You could be... and we have a prograssion bar in the dialog... this
> > should also be done with a signal (because then the frontend wont have
> > to implement the progression bar at all)
>
> Well the frontend doesn't have to implement the progression
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Well whatever IMO the easiest (and fastes) solution for now is just use
| #ifdef statements. If you want to use dl and load dynamic libaries
| and configure this all now so that Edwin can work with it, why not. When
| you are at it you could also dynami
On 12-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Well Edwin this probably won't work anyway. We have to use PREPROCESSOR
>| #ifdef/#else/#endif stuff to handle this. Why? Because if you don't want
>| pspell you shouldn't have it in the code otherwise it won't work. You
>| hopefully understand what I
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 12-Jun-2001 Edwin Leuven wrote:
|
| > While we are at it. I am having some scarce free moments again in which I am
| > looking at the spellcheck code.
|
| Good!
|
| > What I was thinking was to have something like the following (watch out, a
| >
On 12-Jun-2001 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> While we are at it. I am having some scarce free moments again in which I am
> looking at the spellcheck code.
Good!
> What I was thinking was to have something like the following (watch out, a
> flow of consciousness of a c++ beginner follows!):
[snip cl
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:36:40AM +0200, Andrej Vodopivec (158-2353/041-928-765)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> lyx-1.1.6fix1
>
> An example is attached
Thanks for your report.
This is a known problem and we hope to fix it soon.
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> It does beg the question: Do we need/want document scope
Allan> options? (Which such a direct link implies)
I do not think it will be necessary for the spellchecker. At most, we
will need options for each language.
JMarc
On 12 Dec 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> - the button 'Spellchecker Options' in the spellchecker popupopens
> >> the old spellchecker options popups. I guess the button should be
> >> removed, and the form should go away too.
>
>
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - the button 'Spellchecker Options' in the spellchecker popupopens
>> the old spellchecker options popups. I guess the button should be
>> removed, and the form should go away too.
John> Even better, it should bring up the prefs dialog wi
On 11 Dec 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> These are for Angus.
>
> - the button 'Spellchecker Options' in the spellchecker popupopens the
> old spellchecker options popups. I guess the button should be
> removed, and the form should go away too.
Even better, it should bring up the pr
97 matches
Mail list logo
