On 12 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Plus, it excludes one set of default bindings (e.g. Emacs) in favor of
> | another (e.g. CUA). We need to document *all* bindings, and the place
> | for that is in the Reference Manual.
>
> I must admit that
> "John" == John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:33:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John> wrote:
>> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Angus Leeming wrote: | | > Gentlemen, | > | >
>> I've written the inset proposed by Jean-Ma
John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:39:05PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
| > On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:27:05PM +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
| > > Why don't you write a perl script to parse users' lyxrc, preference, ui and
| > > bind files, and to update UserGuide.lyx
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 12:22:12PM -0800, Mike Ressler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on updating the keyboard shortcuts in the docs (starting with
> the User Guide).
Given that I'm former editor-in-chief of the LyX Documentation Effort
and remain its floating spiritual guide, I think it's time I
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:39:05PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:27:05PM +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
> > Why don't you write a perl script to parse users' lyxrc, preference, ui and
> > bind files, and to update UserGuide.lyx?
>
> But then, each user would need a local co
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:33:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> |
> | > Gentlemen,
> | >
> | > I've written the inset proposed by Jean-Marc. Currently, it's a little
> | > cumbersome to use:
[snip
On 4 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> |
> | > Gentlemen,
> | >
> | > I've written the inset proposed by Jean-Marc. Currently, it's a little
> | > cumbersome to use:
> | >
> | > Eg, type in the minib
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
| Lars> Yes, that's what I had in mind originally. And lyxfuncs allowed
| Lars> for | this inset should be marked explic
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> Yes, that's what I had in mind originally. And lyxfuncs allowed
Lars> for | this inset should be marked explicitely in LyXAction.
Lars> Hmmm... rather mark all functions
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Yes, that's what I had in mind originally. And lyxfuncs allowed for
| this inset should be marked explicitely in LyXAction.
Hmmm... rather mark all functions that outputs something...
| So, would you be ready to accept that in 1.1.6?
I would h
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gentlemen, | | I've
Lars> written the inset proposed by Jean-Marc. Currently, it's a
Lars> little | cumbersome to use: | | Eg, type in the minibuffer: | |
Lars> shortcut-insert line-e
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Ummm...
|
| Aren't you wanting three different insets for your three different types of
| info. My quick (and fully working) hack does exactly what your
|
| describe-function-binding line-end -> "C-e"
|
| would do. I guess that you could use the on
Ummm...
Aren't you wanting three different insets for your three different types of
info. My quick (and fully working) hack does exactly what your
describe-function-binding line-end -> "C-e"
would do. I guess that you could use the one inset, but don't see why.
Angus
On Monday 04 December
Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| With regards the UserGuide, however, we must bear in mind that having a
| list of keybindings indexed by the key combinations is not useful.
Why is this so?
| I will admit here that all of the above reflects the personal opinions of
| a cua.bind user
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| > Gentlemen,
| >
| > I've written the inset proposed by Jean-Marc. Currently, it's a little
| > cumbersome to use:
| >
| > Eg, type in the minibuffer:
| >
| > shortcut-insert line-end
| >
| > And a little
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gentlemen,
|
| I've written the inset proposed by Jean-Marc. Currently, it's a little
| cumbersome to use:
|
| Eg, type in the minibuffer:
|
| shortcut-insert line-end
But this is not what we really want... we want an inset that shows the
output o
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> I've written the inset proposed by Jean-Marc. Currently, it's a little
> cumbersome to use:
>
> Eg, type in the minibuffer:
>
> shortcut-insert line-end
>
> And a little button appears in the text containing the immortal [C-e].
>
>
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:49:42AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I will modify the docs so that only the menu bindings (minibuffer
> > commands) are listed in the text. Appropriate verbiage will be added to
> > the UG and perhaps the Introducti
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:49:42AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I will modify the docs so that only the menu bindings (minibuffer
> > commands) are listed in the text. Appropriate verbiage will be added to
[ ...]
> >
> > Fair enough?
>
> No!
>
> I
Gentlemen,
I've written the inset proposed by Jean-Marc. Currently, it's a little
cumbersome to use:
Eg, type in the minibuffer:
shortcut-insert line-end
And a little button appears in the text containing the immortal [C-e].
It isn't quite there yet (no Read(), Write(), Latex() functions, s
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:27:05PM +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
> Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Otherwise, you'd have to write it so that it automatically displayed what
> > the person's personal bindings were at that time, or something.
>
> Why don't you write a perl script to pa
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:49:42AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I will modify the docs so that only the menu bindings (minibuffer
> commands) are listed in the text. Appropriate verbiage will be added to
> the UG and perhaps the Introduction to explain the situation. Then I will
> update t
Hello all,
I seem to have generated some discussion - good.
On 1 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Allan Rae wrote:
> | > On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Mike Ressler wrote:
> | > > Given that CUA is the default, and assuming that an overwhelming majori
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> Then we could have an inset which contains the value of a
Lars> lyxfunc | (which would work only with lyxfuncs marked as
Lars> "embedable"). Then the | documentation woul
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Then we could have an inset which contains the value of a lyxfunc
| (which would work only with lyxfuncs marked as "embedable"). Then the
| documentation would always contain up to date shortcuts whatever the
| user did.
I am not sure this is re
> "Miyata" == Miyata Shigeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Miyata> Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Otherwise, you'd have to write it so that it automatically
>> displayed what the person's personal bindings were at that time, or
>> something.
Miyata> Why don't you write a perl script
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Allan Rae wrote:
| >
| > On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Mike Ressler wrote:
| >
| > > Given that CUA is the default, and assuming that an overwhelming majority
| > > use that, the question is how to I document such things without being
| > > ridiculous? Do I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Agreed - this is why I thought I'd ask. If no one feels strongly about the
| emacs bindings (other than me), then it's appropriate to leave them
| out.
Hey!
Lgb
Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otherwise, you'd have to write it so that it automatically displayed what
> the person's personal bindings were at that time, or something.
Why don't you write a perl script to parse users' lyxrc, preference, ui and
bind files, and to update UserGuide.lyx
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:03:28PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> How about chapters or separate docs
> Keyboard shortcuts CUA
> Keyboard shortcuts Emacs
> Personally I just look at the bind file.
> Having the shortcuts scattered through the docs is of absolutely no use.
> Many are now in the pull
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > Given that CUA is the default, and assuming that an overwhelming majority
> > use that, the question is how to I document such things without being
> > ridiculous? Do I just document CUA and tell Emacs users to go figure it
> >
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Mike Ressler wrote:
> Given that CUA is the default, and assuming that an overwhelming majority
> use that, the question is how to I document such things without being
> ridiculous? Do I just document CUA and tell Emacs users to go figure it
> out themselves? (e.g. "to cut hi
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> I think the docs have to be written assuming you've got the default binding.
> Otherwise, you'd have to write it so that it automatically displayed what
> the person's personal bindings were at that time, or something.
That would actually be really cool!
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 12:22:12PM -0800, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> Given that CUA is the default, and assuming that an overwhelming majority
> use that, the question is how to I document such things without being
> ridiculous? Do I just document CUA and tell Emacs users to go figure it
> out thems
34 matches
Mail list logo
