Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Yes, that's what I had in mind originally. And lyxfuncs allowed for | this inset should be marked explicitely in LyXAction. Hmmm... rather mark all functions that outputs something... | So, would you be ready to accept that in 1.1.6? I would hope to avoid that. | 1.1.6fix1? That would be your call. | Another question: do you think we should have a 1.1.5fix3? Your call. But I don't see any great demand. Lgb
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Angus Leeming
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Allan Rae
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Allan Rae
- Re: Key-binding documentati... John Weiss
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Angus Leeming
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma John Weiss
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... mike . ressler
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Allan Rae
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Garst R. Reese
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Amir Karger
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma - ... mike . ressler